Key Endpoints Research Articles

The Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Antibiotics for the Treatment of Bronchiectasis in Adults: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundInhaled antibiotics are conditionally recommended by international bronchiectasis guidelines for the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis but results of individual studies are inconsistent. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of inhaled antibiotics in bronchiectasis. Subsequent publications have further supplemented the existing body of evidence in this area. Research questionTo what extent do inhaled antibiotics demonstrate both efficacy and safety as a treatment option for adults with bronchiectasis? Study design And methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of inhaled antibiotics in adult patients with bronchiectasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for eligible studies. Studies were included if they enrolled adults with bronchiectasis diagnosed by CT and trials had a treatment duration of at least 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was exacerbation frequency, with additional key efficacy endpoints including severe exacerbations, bacterial load, symptoms, quality of life and FEV1. Data were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis. Results20 studies involving 3468 patients were included. Inhaled antibiotics were associated with reduced number of subjects with exacerbations (risk ratio 0.85 95%CI 0.75-0.96), a slight reduction in exacerbation frequency (rate ratio 0.78 95%CI 0.68-0.91), a probable reduction in the frequency of severe exacerbations (rate ratio 0.48 95%CI 0.31-0.74) and a likely slight increase in time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio 0.80 95%CI 0.68-0.94). Inhaled antibiotics likely lead to a slight increase in the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Score (2.51, 95%CI 0.44 to 4.31) and may reduce scores on the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (-3.13, 95%CI -5.93 to -0.32). Bacterial load was consistently reduced but FEV1 was not changed with treatment. Evidence suggests little to no difference in adverse effects between groups (odds ratio 0.99 95%CI 0.75-1.30). Antibiotic resistant organisms were likely increased by treatment. InterpretationInhaled antibiotics result in a slight reduction in exacerbations, a probable reduction in severe exacerbations and a likely slight improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adults with bronchiectasis. Trial registrySystematic review registration number PROSPERO CRD42023384694

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses for efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

Upadacitinib is an orally administered, selective, Janus kinase inhibitor that is approved for several auto-immune conditions, such as axial spondyloarthritis, an inflammatory rheumatic disease that includes ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). The approvals of upadacitinib for the treatment of AS and nr-axSpA were based on the safety and efficacy data for upadacitinib 15 mg once-daily compared to placebo from the SELECT-AXIS 1 and SELECT-AXIS 2 studies. Population pharmacokinetic analyses based on data from 244 patients with axSpA showed that the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib were comparable in subjects with AS and nr-axSpA. Exposure-response relationships were characterized for key efficacy and safety end points using data from 482 patients with axSpA. The exposure-response analyses for efficacy based on Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)20 and ASAS40 responses at week 14, showed a clear differentiation from placebo with no evidence of increased responses with increasing upadacitinib plasma exposures. There were no clear exposure-response trends observed for safety end points that included serious infections, herpes zoster, pneumonia, lymphopenia (grade ≥3), neutropenia (grade ≥3), or a greater than 2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin from baseline through week 14. The exposure-response analyses for efficacy and safety presented here supported the favorable benefit-risk profile with the use of upadacitinib 15 mg once-daily for the treatment of axSpA.

The Effect of Nabiximols on Driving Ability in Adults with Chronic Tic Disorders: Results of a Substudy Analysis of the Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled CANNA-TICS Trial.

Background: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase IIIb CANNA-TICS (CANNAbinoids in the treatment of TICS) trial showed clear trends for improvement of tics, depression, and quality of life with nabiximols versus placebo in adult patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome and other chronic tic disorders. Although in general nabiximols was well tolerated, it is unclear whether treatment using this cannabis extract influences driving skills in patients with chronic tic disorders. Methods: Here we report results of the "Fitness to Drive" substudy of the CANNA-TICS trial. The key endpoint was fitness to drive as a binary criterion with a computerized assessment at baseline and after 9 weeks of stable treatment (week 13) with nabiximols or placebo. A patient was considered unfit to drive according to the German Federal Highway Research Institute guidelines. Results: In the substudy, a total of 64 patients (76.6% men, mean±standard deviation of age: 36.8±13.9) were recruited at two study sites. The number of patients who were fit to drive increased from 24 (55.8%) at baseline to 28 (71.8%) at week 13 among 43 patients treated with nabiximols, and decreased from 14 (66.7%) to 10 (52.6%) among 21 patients who received placebo. The risk difference (nabiximols - placebo) was 0.17 (95% confidence interval=-0.08 to 0.43) in favor of nabiximols. Specifically, only 2 of 24 (8.3%) patients in the nabiximols, but 4 of 14 (28.6%) patients in the placebo group changed for the worse from fit (at baseline) to unfit (at week 13) to drive, whereas 8 of 19 (42.1%) patients in the nabiximols, and only 2 of 7 (28.6%) patients in the placebo group improved from unfit to fit. Conclusion: Treatment with nabiximols does not impair skills relevant to driving in those patients with tic disorders who were fit to drive at baseline and even improved fitness to drive in a subset of patients who were unfit to drive before start of treatment. EudraCT number: 2016-000564-42.

First-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): 64-month (mo) follow-up from CheckMate 142.

97 Background: NIVO + IPI demonstrated robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as a 1L therapy in pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC in the phase 2 CheckMate 142 study (NCT02060188), leading to the inclusion of NIVO + IPI in the NCCN guidelines as an initial therapy option for these pts. At 52-mo median follow-up, 1L NIVO + IPI continued to demonstrate durable clinical benefit, and no new safety signals were identified. Here we report longer follow-up results. Methods: Pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment (INV) per RECIST v1.1. Other key endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), all by INV; overall survival (OS); and safety. Results: In total, 45 pts received 1L NIVO + IPI. With median follow-up of 64.2 mo (range, 59.4–68.9 mo), ORR by INV was 71% (95% CI, 56–84%). The proportion of pts with a best overall response of complete response (CR) was 20%, partial response (PR) was 51%, stable disease (SD) was 13%, and progressive disease was 16%. Median DOR (mDOR) was not reached, and the 60-mo DOR rate was 72%. Median PFS (mPFS) by INV and median OS (mOS) were not reached, with 60-mo PFS and OS rates of 55% and 67%, respectively (Table). Among pts alive at the data cutoff (n = 31), 30 remained treatment-free after initial study treatment without receiving any subsequent systemic therapy, with a median treatment-free interval of 34.7 mo (range, 1.6–61.4 mo). Exploratory analysis by tumor mutational burden status will be presented. Safety data are shown in the Table. Conclusions: At 64-mo follow-up, NIVO + IPI continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful survival and durable responses, with mPFS, mOS, and mDOR still not reached, suggesting the potential for long-term clinical benefit. Safety remained consistent with previous data. These findings further support current recommendations for NIVO + IPI as a 1L treatment for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188 . [Table: see text]

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Daily Sitagliptin as Metformin Add-on in a Korean Population with Type 2 Diabetes.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are well-established type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatments. As variations among populations and culture might influence treatment effects, this post hoc analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide in a Korean population. Korean adults with T2D inadequately controlled on metformin included in a 30-week, phase 3a, international, multicentre trial (NCT03061214) compared OW subcutaneous semaglutide (0.5 mg and 1.0 mg) with once-daily sitagliptin (100 mg). Key endpoints included change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight; additional endpoints assessed proportions of participants reaching targets of HbA1c < 7.0% and ≤ 6.5%, ≥ 5% weight loss, and a composite endpoint of HbA1c < 7.0% without severe/blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia and no weight gain. Korean participants (n = 110) showed a greater reduction in HbA1c and body weight with semaglutide 0.5 mg (-1.6%, -2.7 kg) and 1.0 mg (-1.8%, -4.8 kg) versus sitagliptin (-0.9%, 0.5 kg). HbA1c targets of < 7.0% and ≤ 6.5% were achieved by more participants treated with semaglutide 0.5 mg (80.0% and 60.0%, respectively) and 1.0 mg (87.5% and 67.5%, respectively) versus sitagliptin (54.3% and 25.7%, respectively); ≥ 5% weight loss was observed in 42.9% and 65.0% of participants treated with semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg versus 0.0% with sitagliptin. The composite endpoint was achieved by 71.4%, 77.5%, and 31.4% of the population in the semaglutide 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, and sitagliptin group, respectively. No new safety concerns were observed. This analysis confirms efficacy and safety of OW semaglutide (0.5 and 1.0 mg) in a Korean population with T2D. NCT03061214.

Index of Microcirculatory Resistance to predict microvascular obstruction in STEMI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Microvascular obstruction (MVO) is an independent predictor of adverse cardiac events after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) may be a useful marker of MVO, which could simplify the care pathway without the need for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR). We assessed whether the IMR can predict MVO in STEMI patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, including articles where invasive IMR was performed post primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to MVO assessment with cardiac MRI. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception until January 2023. Baseline characteristics, coronary physiology and cardiac MRI data were extracted by two independent reviewers. The random-effects model was used to pool the data. Among 15 articles identified, nine articles (n = 728, mean age 61, 81% male) contained IMR data stratified by MVO. Patients with MVO had a mean IMR of 41.2 [95%CI 32.4-50.4], compared to 25.3 [18.3-32.2] for those without. The difference in IMR between those with and without MVO was 15.1 [9.7-20.6]. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated a linear relationship between IMR and TIMI grade (β = 0.69 [0.13-1.26]), as well as infarct size (β = 1.18 [0.24-2.11]) or ejection fraction at 6 months (β = -0.18 [-0.35 to -0.01]). In STEMI, patients with MVO had 15-unit higher IMR than those without. IMR also predicts key prognostic endpoints such as infarct size, MVO, and long-term systolic function.

A Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab versus Placebo for Previously Treated Patients from Asia with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Health-Related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-394

Introduction: KEYNOTE-394 showed pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate with manageable safety versus placebo for patients from Asia with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We present results on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: HRQoL was evaluated using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires. Key HRQoL endpoints were least squares mean (LSM) score changes from baseline to week 12 and time to deterioration (TTD) for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL. p values were one-sided and nominal without adjustment for multiplicity. Results: The HRQoL population included patients randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n = 298) and placebo (n = 152). From baseline to week 12, a greater decline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was observed with placebo (LSM, −8.4; 95% CI: −11.7 to −5.1) versus pembrolizumab (−4.0; 95% CI: −6.4 to −1.6; difference vs. placebo: 4.4; 95% CI: 0.5–8.4; nominal p = 0.0142). Similarly, a greater decline in the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale score was observed with placebo (−6.9; 95% CI: −9.4 to −4.5) versus pembrolizumab (−2.7; 95% CI: −4.5 to −1.0; difference vs. placebo: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.2–7.2; nominal p = 0.0030). TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.58–1.25; nominal p = 0.1993). Conclusion: Patients receiving placebo showed a greater decline in HRQoL than those receiving pembrolizumab. Combined with efficacy and safety data from KEYNOTE-394 and the global KEYNOTE-240 and KEYNOTE-224 trials, our data support the clinically meaningful benefit and manageable tolerability of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

3D human stem-cell-derived neuronal spheroids for in vitro neurotoxicity testing of methylglyoxal, highly reactive glycolysis byproduct and potent glycating agent

Human-derived three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models are advanced human cell-based model for their complexity, relevance and application in toxicity testing. Intracellular accumulation of methylglyoxal (MGO), the most potent glycating agent in humans, mainly generated as a by-product of glycolysis, is associated with age-related diseases including neurodegenerative disorders.In our study, 3D human stem-cell-derived neuronal spheroids were set up and applied to evaluate cytotoxic effects after short-term (5 to 48 h) treatments with different MGO concentrations, including low levels, taking into consideration several biochemical endpoints.In MGO-treated neurospheroids, reduced cell growth proliferation and decreased cell viability occurred early from 5-10 μM, and their compactness diminished starting from 100 μM, apparently without affecting spheroid size. MGO markedly caused loss of the neuronal markers MAP-2 and NSE from 10-50 μM, decreased the detoxifying Glo1 enzyme from 50 μM, and activated NF-kB by nuclear translocation.The cytochemical evaluation of the 3D sections showed the presence of necrotic cells with loss of nuclei. Apoptotic cells were observed from 50 μM MGO after 48 h, and from 100 μM after 24 h. MGO (50–10 µM) also induced modifications of the cell–cell and cell-ECM interactions. These effects worsened at the higher concentrations (300–500 µM).In 3D neuronal spheroids, MGO tested concentrations comparable to human samples levels measured in MGO-associated diseases, altered neuronal key signalling endpoints relevant for the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and aging. The findings also demonstrated that the use of 3D neuronal spheroids of human origin can be useful in a strategy in vitro for testing MGO and other dicarbonyls evaluation.

Real-world outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation for dystonia treatment: Protocol for a prospective, multicenter, international registry.

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established therapeutic approach for the treatment of dystonia. However, to date, no large-scale or comprehensive DBS dystonia patient registry has been yet undertaken. Here, we describe the protocol for a world-wide registry of clinical outcomes in dystonia patients implanted with DBS. This protocol describes a multicenter, international clinical outcomes registry consisting of up to 200 prospectively enrolled participants at up to 40 different sites to be implanted with a constant-current, multiple independent current controlled (MICC) DBS device (Vercise DBS Systems, Boston Scientific) for treatment of dystonia. Key inclusion criteria for registry candidates include the following: understanding of study requirements and treatment procedures, a signed written informed consent form prior to participation, and meeting all criteria established in the locally applicable Instructions for Use (IFU) for the implanted DBS system. Key clinical endpoints include (but are not limited to) the evaluation of disease state (Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale [BFMDRS], Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), quality of life (Short Form Health Survey-36, Short Form Health Survey-10), and treatment satisfaction (Clinical Global Impression of Change [CGI-Clinician; CGI-Subject; CGI-Caregiver]) at 6-months, 12-months, 2-years, and 3-years post-lead placement. Adverse events are documented and reported using structured questionnaires. Treatment of patients with dystonia using DBS has progressed considering recent technological advances. This international dystonia outcomes registry aims to collect and evaluate real-world clinical data derived from patients who have been implanted with a constant-current, MICC-equipped DBS system (with available directional capabilities), per standard of care.

Marginal versus conditional rate estimation for count and recurrent event data with an estimand framework

Count and recurrent event endpoints are common key efficacy endpoints in clinical research. For example, in clinical research of pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, the reduction of the occurrence of a recurrent event, pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) caused by acute respiratory symptoms, is often used to measure the treatment effect. The occurrence of PEx is often analyzed with nonlinear models, such as Poisson regression or Negative Binomial regression. It is observed that model-estimated within-group PEx rates are often lower than the descriptive statistics of within-group PEx rates. Motivated by this observation, we explore their relationship mathematically and demonstrate that it is due to the difference between conditional PEx rates and population-level PEx rates (marginal rates). Our findings corroborate the recent FDA guidance (2023) [1], which discusses considerations for covariate adjustment in nonlinear models, and that conditional or subgroup treatment effects with covariate adjustment may differ from marginal treatment effects. In this article, we demonstrate how covariate adjustment impacts the estimation of event rates and rate ratios with both closed form and simulation studies. Additionally, following the ICH E9 addendum on the estimand framework [2], we discuss the estimand framework for count and recurrent event data.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Alone vs Preceded by Bevacizumab, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Untreated Brain Metastases From Breast Cancer

The incidence of brain metastasis is increasing in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Treatments to extend the control of brain metastasis are urgently required. To investigate whether the addition of an induction treatment of bevacizumab, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEEP) improves brain-specific progression-free survival (PFS) after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). This open-label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial assessed patients with brain metastases from breast cancer (BMBC) in Taiwan from September 9, 2014, to December 24, 2018, with survival follow-up until December 31, 2021. Key inclusion criteria included metastatic brain tumors not suitable for focal treatment, WBRT naivety, age 20 to 75 years, and at least 1 measurable brain metastatic lesion. The primary end point was brain-specific PFS, with an expected hazard ratio of 0.60, a 2-sided α ≤ .20, and power of 0.8. Eligible patients were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:1 to the experimental arm, which involved 3 cycles of BEEP followed by WBRT, or the control arm, which involved WBRT alone. The primary end point was the determination of brain-specific PFS by local investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, the initiation of other brain-directed treatment after WBRT, or death. Other key end points included brain-specific objective response rate after 8 weeks of BEEP treatment or WBRT and 8-month brain-specific PFS rate, PFS, and overall survival. A total of 118 patients with BMBC were randomized, with the intention-to-treat cohort comprising 112 patients. The median age was 56 years (range, 34-71 years), and 61 patients (54.5%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive disease. The median (range) brain-specific PFS was 8.1 (0.3-29.5) vs 6.5 (0.9-25.5) months in the experimental and control arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.44-1.13; P = .15; significant at predefined α ≤ .20). The brain-specific objective response rate at 2 months was not significantly different (BEEP treatment vs WBRT, 41.9% vs 52.6%), but the 8-month brain-specific PFS rate was significantly higher in the experimental group (48.7% vs 26.3%; P = .03). Adverse events were generally manageable with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment. The findings show that induction BEEP before WBRT may improve the control of BMBC compared with using upfront WBRT, which could address an unmet need for an effective systemic treatment for intractable brain and extracranial metastases from metastatic breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02185352.

Association between baseline intact parathyroid hormone levels, COVID-19 severity, and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing hemodialysis: A multicenter retrospective study

The COVID-19 pandemic poses unique challenges for vulnerable populations, including patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). This study explores the relationship between baseline intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels and COVID-19 severity, post-acute hospitalization, and mortality rates in HD patients.&#x0D; Methods. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted across multiple centers, encompassing 142 patients undergoing HD treatment in three regions of Ukraine. The study spanned from March 2020 to May 2022. Baseline iPTH levels, demographic characteristics, and relevant clinical indicators were systematically recorded. Key endpoints included the severity of COVID-19, post-acute hospitalization, and mortality rates.&#x0D; Results. Of the initially eligible 165 patients, 23 were excluded, resulting in a final cohort of 142 patients. During the acute phase of COVID-19, distinct patterns emerged in terms of hospitalization rates, oxygen support requirements, and mortality. Lower iPTH levels were significantly associated with severe COVID-19-associated pneumonia (p &lt; 0.0001). A 20-month follow-up revealed a significant association between serum iPTH concentration &lt;174 pg/mL and increased rates of post-acute COVID-19 hospitalization [HR 6.3 (95% CI 2.9; 13.7)] and all-cause mortality [HR 34.3 (95% CI 6.9; 74.5)].&#x0D; Conclusion. This multicenter retrospective study suggests potential links between baseline iPTH levels and COVID-19 outcomes in patients undergoing HD. Serum iPTH concentration ≤174 pg/mL was significantly associated with increased post-acute hospitalization and mortality rate in our patient cohort. The findings emphasize the need for further research to elucidate underlying mechanisms and establish the prognostic value of iPTH in this specific patient population.

Induction of double-strand breaks with the non-steroidal androgen receptor ligand flutamide in patients on androgen suppression: a study protocol for a randomized, double-blind prospective trial

BackgroundProstate cancer remains the most prevalent malignancy and the second-leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the USA. Radiation therapy, typically with androgen suppression, remains a mainstay in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk, potentially lethal prostate cancers. However, local recurrence and treatment failure remain common. Basic and translational research has determined the potential for using androgen receptor (AR) ligands (e.g., dihydrotestosterone and flutamide) in the context of androgen-deprived prostate cancer to induce AR- and TOP2B-mediated DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and thereby synergistically enhance the effect of radiation therapy (RT). The primary aim of this study is to carry out pharmacodynamic translation of these findings to humans.MethodsPatients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-confirmed localized prostatic adenocarcinoma will be recruited. Flutamide, an oral non-steroidal androgen receptor ligand, will be administered orally 6–12 h prior to prostate biopsy (performed under anesthesia prior to brachytherapy seed implantation). Key study parameters will include the assessment of DNA double-strand breaks by γH2A.x foci and AR localization to the nucleus. The initial 6 patients will be treated in a single-arm run-in phase to assess futility by establishing whether at least 2 subjects from this group develop γH2A.x foci in prostate cancer cells. If this criterion is met, the study will advance to a two-arm, randomized controlled phase in which 24 participants will be randomized 2:1 to either flutamide intervention or placebo standard-of-care (with all patients receiving definitive brachytherapy). The key pharmacodynamic endpoint will be to assess whether the extent of γH2A.x foci (proportion of cancer cells positive and number of foci per cancer cell) is greater in patients receiving flutamide versus placebo. Secondary outcomes of this study include an optional, exploratory analysis that will (a) describe cancer-specific methylation patterns of cell-free DNA in plasma and urine and (b) assess the utility of serum and urine samples as a DNA-based biomarker for tracking therapeutic response.DiscussionThis study will confirm in humans the pharmacodynamic effect of AR ligands to induce transient double-strand breaks when administered in the context of androgen deprivation as a novel therapy for prostate cancer. The findings of this study will permit the development of a larger trial evaluating flutamide pulsed-dose sequencing in association with fractionated external beam RT (+/− brachytherapy). The study is ongoing, and preliminary data collection and recruitment are underway; analysis has yet to be performed.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03507608. Prospectively registered on 25 April 2018.

Trainees as primary operators do not significantly impact perioperative complication rates in breast surgery

BackgroundThere is a trend for specialist care in breast surgery resulting in fewer primary operative cases for general surgery trainees; and subsequently that trainees performing advanced oncoplastic techniques in breast surgery may negatively impact patient morbidity. We have reviewed the complication rates between Australian general surgery trainees and Breast Consultants. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed over a 5-year period (January 2016–December 2021). The key endpoints measured were relative complication rates for consultants compared to trainees, subdivided by surgery type. Surgeries were categorised as either benign, primary breast cancer surgery or re-excision. ResultsA total of 2646 operative cases were performed with the primary operator rate for consultants 58.35 % (n = 1544) and for trainees 41.65 %% (n = 1102). The overall complication rate was 2.83 % (n = 75); the overall rate for the consultants was 2.65 % and 3.08 % for the trainees. The complication rates were not statistically significant (p = 0.59) between the two groups. The mastectomy only complication rate was higher in the consultant group with a result of 7.3 % compared to 2.8 % for the trainees however was not statistically significant (p = 0.18). The most common complication was haematoma formation for both groups. ConclusionsThis study has demonstrated that trainees can safely perform advanced oncoplastic techniques without statistically elevated morbidity. In an era where breast surgery caseloads are increasing, but the exposure to breast surgery during training are decreasing, it is necessary to implement a practice where trainees can perform breast operations under supervision at a specialized unit.

Determining treatment tolerance and fitness for intensive chemotherapy in older adults with AML: a call to action

AbstractDetermining fitness for intensive chemotherapy in an older adult with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an unanswered age-old question. Geriatric assessment captures any variation in multidimensional health, which can influence treatment tolerance. A prospective study is necessary to validate fitness criteria, determine whether geriatric assessment–based fitness performs superiorly to other criteria, and what components of geriatric assessment are associated with treatment tolerance. A validation study should enroll diverse patients from both academic and community centers and patients receiving intensive and lower-intensity chemotherapy. Geriatric assessment should include at minimum measures of comorbidity burden, cognition, physical function, and emotional health, which in previous smaller studies have shown to be associated with mortality in AML. These assessments should be completed before or within a few days of initiation of chemotherapy to reduce the influence of chemotherapy on the assessment results. Treatment tolerance has been measured by rates of toxicities in patients with solid malignancies; however, during the initial treatment of AML, rates of toxicities are very high regardless of treatment intensity. Early mortality, frequently used in previous studies, can provide a highly consequential and easily identifiable measure of treatment tolerance. The key end point to assess treatment tolerance, thus, should include early mortality. Other end points may include decline in function and quality of life and treatment modifications or cessation due to toxicities. Validating fitness criteria can guide treatment selection and supportive care interventions and are crucial to guide fitness-based trial eligibility, inform the interpretation of trial results, and facilitate drug labeling.

Safety andeffectiveness ofdenosumab inJapanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 2-year post-marketing surveillance study.

To investigate the 2 year safety and effectiveness of denosumab 60 mg in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice in Japan. This 2 year, prospective, observational cohort study included patients who initiated treatment with denosumab 60 mg for the progression of bone erosion associated with RA. Key endpoints were adverse drug reactions (ADRs), progression of bone erosion, and 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the risk factors for ADRs and the progression of bone erosion. In the safety analysis set (n = 1239), the incidence of ADRs was 3.0%; the most common ADRs were hypocalcaemia (1.2%) and osteonecrosis of jaw-related events (0.6%). A history of any drug allergy was a statistically significant risk factor associated with the occurrence of ADRs. In the effectiveness analysis set (n = 815), the incidence of progression of bone erosion was 8.7%. Steinbrocker stage and initial steroid dose were statistically significant risk factors associated with the progression of bone erosion. Denosumab demonstrated safety and effectiveness over a 2 year period in RA patients without any new safety concerns.

Arterial stiffness mediates the association between age and processing speed at low levels of microvascular function in humans across the adult lifespan.

The function of micro- and macrovessels within the peripheral vasculature has been identified as a target for the investigation of potential cardiovascular-based promoters of cognitive decline. However, little remains known regarding the interaction of the micro- and macrovasculature as it relates to cognitive function, especially in cognitively healthy individuals. Therefore, our purpose was to unravel peripheral factors that contribute to the association between age and processing speed. Ninety-nine individuals (51 men, 48 women) across the adult life span (19-81 yr) were used for analysis. Arterial stiffness was quantified as carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (cfPWV) and near-infrared spectroscopy assessed maximal tissue oxygenation (Sto2max) following a period of ischemia. Processing speed was evaluated with Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B. Measures of central (cPP) and peripheral pulse pressure (pPP) were also collected. Moderated mediation analyses were conducted to determine contributions to the age and processing speed relation, and first-order partial correlations were used to assess associations while controlling for the linear effects of age. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. At low levels of Sto2max, there was a significant positive (b = 1.92; P = 0.005) effect of cfPWV on time to completion on TMT part A. In addition, cPP (P = 0.028) and pPP (P = 0.027) remained significantly related to part A when controlling for age. These results suggested that the peripheral microvasculature may be a valuable target for delaying cognitive decline, especially in currently cognitively healthy individuals. Furthermore, we reinforced current evidence that pulse pressure is a key endpoint for trials aimed at preventing or delaying the onset of cognitive decline.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Arterial stiffness partially mediates the association between age and processing speed in the presence of low microvascular function, as demarcated by maximum tissue oxygenation following ischemia. Central and peripheral pulse pressure remained associated with processing speed even after controlling for age. Our findings were derived from a sample that was determined to be cognitively healthy, which highlights the potential for these outcomes to be considered during trials aimed at the prevention of cognitive decline.

CNS Irradiation in Adult De Novo B-Precursor ALL / Lbl: Results of the Randomized GMALL T rial 08/2013 Indicate Potential Antileukemic Efficacy

In the past decade outcome of adult ALL was improved significantly using pediatric-based chemotherapy. The GMALL Trial 08/2013 (NCT02881086) for patients (pts) aged 18-55 years (yrs) with newly diagnosed ALL/LBL is a pediatric based regimen with MRD based treatment stratification and risk adapted stem cell transplantation (SCT) (Gökbuget et al, ASH 2021). CNS prophylaxis consisted of three doses i.th. MTX during induction II, 11 doses of triple i.th. for standard risk (SR) in consolidation (C)/maintenance and 1 dose before SCT in high risk (HR); 7 vs 1 cycle of HDMTX (1.5 g/m 2 as 24h infusion) were scheduled in SR and HR resp. Prophylactic fractionated CNS irradiation (RAD) with 24 Gy during induction II (IP2) was part of all previous GMALL trials. The trial incorporated a randomization for Ph/BCR::ABL1 negative (Ph-) B-precursor ALL/LBL without initial CNS involvement and treated until C1 in order to compare standard IP2 with i.th. MTX with vs without CNS RAD. The key endpoint was the time from start of induction to start of C1 in CR pts, reasoning that less toxicities and treatment delays would occur without CNS RAD. Further endpoints were remission duration (RD), event-free survival (EFS) and cognitive disturbances (DemTect Test). The statistical assumption was that it is possible to detect a shortening of time to C1 from 74 to 69 days with a power of more than 90% with 215 pts per arm with a two-sided α-niveau of 5%. Between 8/2016-8/2022 1023 pts from 78 centers were included. 512 pts had Ph- B-precursor ALL/LBL (497/15). 31 pts had initial CNS involvement (N=20) or were not randomized due to other reasons (N=11). 241 pts were randomized in arm A (RAD) and 241 in arm B (NoRAD). The median age was 33.5 (18-55) yrs; c/pre B-ALL versus pro B-ALL was present in 83% vs 17%. 191 were HR vs 291 SR. No significant differences were observed between both arms. 477 pts were randomized (ITT population) and 422 were eligible (analysis population) since they achieved CR and were treated until C1. Reasons for non-eligibility were protocol violation (N=5), early death (ED) (N=15), withdrawal (N=12), no CR before C1 (N=18) and late withdrawals in CR before C1 (N=10). 207 pts in the RAD-arm (86%) vs 215 pts in the NoRAD-arm (89%) were eligible. In the analysis population treatment per randomization was 97% in NoRAD and 95% in RAD arm. CR rates before C1 (95% RAD vs 96% NoRAD), ED rates (5% vs 4%), rates of grade III/IV leukopenia in IP2 (14% vs 16%) and infections (29% vs 29%) were similar. The median time to C1 was similar too (75 vs 76 days; p=0.34). Relapse rates (RR) were lower in RAD (13%) vs NoRAD (18%) (p=0.14). Whereas CNS relapses were infrequent in both arms (N=1 vs N=3 i.e. 1% vs 1%; p=0.62), the rate of BM±other relapses (11% vs 15%; p=0.15) was lower in the RAD arm. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse at 3 yrs was 1% vs 1% and of all relapses 14% vs 20% (p=0.13). The EFS at 3 yrs was higher for the RAD (79% [95%-CI: 72% - 85%]) vs NoRAD (72% [95%-CI: 65% - 78%])(p=0.10) in the analysis population and 74% vs 67% (p=0.13) in the ITT population. In the ITT population the impact was statistically significant (p=0.05) in SR pts whereas no difference was detected in HR (i.e. pts with indication for SCT) (figure 1); differences did not reach significance in the analysis population. We further analyzed the impact of randomization arm on cognitive function (analysis population). After C1 results were available in 264 pts. In the RAD vs NoRAD arm 2% vs 2% resp. had low scores (0-8) and 10% vs 8% intermediate scores (9-12) indicating a relevant or limited cognitive disturbance. At the end of therapy (week 130), results are available in 53 pts treated in SR arm. 0% vs 4% had low and 4% vs 4% intermediate scores. Thus, relevant cognitive limitations were present in both arms. The primary endpoint (time to C1) was not met. Pts with RAD did have a trend towards better EFS and RD. The CNS RR was overall low but CNS RAD might have an impact on the systemic relapse rate in SR pts. We recorded no significant negative impact of CNS RAD on DemTect results, but this requires further observation. Results must be interpreted in the context of adult pts with potentially lower risks for cognitive disturbances compared to children and - on the other hand - a relatively low dose of systemic HDMTX. Overall, no clear negative effects of CNS RAD were detected whereas a trend towards positive impact on EFS was observed. GMALL 08/2013 is an independent academic trial funded by the Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Population Pharmacokinetics (PopPK) and Exposure-Response (E-R) Analyses for Belantamab Mafodotin Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Enrolled in DREAMM-2 and DREAMM-3

Background: Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) with a humanized afucosylated anti-BCMA monoclonal antibody (mAb) conjugated to a cytotoxic payload (microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F [MMAF]) by a protease-resistant maleimidocaproyl (mc) linker. This ADC binds to BCMA and induces cell death by direct cell killing and immune-mediated mechanisms. The DREAMM-2 trial (NCT03525678) showed rapid, deep, and durable responses to single-agent belamaf in patients with RRMM. The Phase 3 DREAMM-3 trial (NCT04162210) evaluated single-agent belamaf vs. pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with RRMM at second relapse or later (Weisel et al., J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 [suppl 16; abstr 8007]); DREAMM-3 did not meet its primary endpoint on superiority for progression free survival (PFS). The present analysis evaluated the PopPK of the ADC and cytotoxin cysteine-mcMMAF (cys-mcMMAF) as well as the E-R relationships for key efficacy and safety endpoints to contribute to further understanding of belamaf. Methods: Patients with RRMM were administered intravenous (IV) doses of belamaf 2.5 or 3.4 mg/kg Q3W in DREAMM-2 (n=218) and 2.5 mg/kg Q3W in DREAMM-3 (n=217). Previously built PopPK models of ADC and cys-mcMMAF were updated and used to predict individual Cycle 1 exposure measures for the E-R analyses performed on the DREAMM-3 belamaf arm only. Exposure-efficacy analyses evaluated the probability of response (PoR), PFS, and time to response (TTR). Exposure-safety analyses evaluated the probability of occurrence of adverse events of special interest such as changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), grade ≥2 or ≥3 corneal events, grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia and infusion-related reactions (IRR). Logistic regression models were used to assess event probabilities, while Cox proportional-hazard models were used to assess time to event endpoints. Stepwise covariate analyses were performed. Results: The PopPK data were described well by two-compartment models with linear elimination. The ADC model included time-varying clearance and the cys-mcMMAF model included decreasing MMAF:mAb ratio after each dose. ADC clearance was reduced on average by 30% over the first 5 months on treatment. The PopPK of ADC and cys-mcMMAF were both influenced by disease-related factors (baseline concentrations of soluble BCMA [sBCMA], immunoglobulin G, and albumin), as well as body weight and to a lower extent body mass index. Mild to severe renal impairment, mild hepatic impairment, age, race (Black or Asian), or prior therapies were not found to impact the PopPK of belamaf. Cycle 1 ADC average concentrations (C avg) were inversely correlated with disease burden factors and highly correlated (r=0.97) with ADC trough concentration (C tau). In DREAMM-3, PoR and PFS were higher and longer with higher ADC exposure when evaluated independently of other covariates. In the final model, PoR and PFS were respectively lower and shorter with higher baseline sBCMA or prior anti-CD38 mAb treatment; PoR was also related to presence of extra medullary disease. TTR was not related to ADC exposure or other factors. Safety endpoints were associated with exposure. Higher ADC C avg was associated with higher probability of developing grade ≥2 or ≥3 corneal events and inversely associated with time to their onset. ADC C avg was similarly associated with changes in BCVA but with a lower intercept for BCVA-related endpoints. Baseline sBCMA was inversely associated with probability of grade ≥2 corneal events. Lower baseline platelet count (but not ADC exposure) was associated with increased probability of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. ADC C avg was inversely associated with probability of IRR. In addition, the observed incidence of post-treatment anti-belamaf antibodies was low (&amp;lt;1%) with no observed impact on PK, efficacy, or safety. Conclusion: PopPK and E-R analyses for DREAMM-3 demonstrated the impact of disease factors and patient characteristics on PK, efficacy, and safety endpoints following single-agent belamaf, consistent with prior results for later-line populations.

Experience with Accelerometer Physical Activity Tracking in Adults and Adolescents with Hemophilia A: Tool Validation Using Results from the XTEND-1 Efanesoctocog Alfa Phase 3 Trial

Introduction Wearable physical activity trackers have become increasingly common within clinical studies, patient monitoring, and health assessments. Physical activity is a key endpoint of interest when evaluating treatments for hemophilia. The objective of this analysis was to describe the psychometric properties of five outcome measures of physical activity from the accelerometer activity monitor used in the XTEND-1 study. Methods XTEND-1 (NCT04161495) was a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter study of the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of efanesoctocog alfa in previously treated adults and adolescents aged ≥12 years with severe hemophilia A. Patients receiving prior standard-of-care prophylaxis factor VIII (FVIII) received once-weekly (qw) prophylactic efanesoctocog alfa for 52 weeks (Arm A); patients on prior on-demand FVIII treatment received efanesoctocog alfa on-demand for 26 weeks, then prophylactic efanesoctocog alfa qw for 26 weeks (Arm B). Patients wore a triaxial medical grade accelerometer activity monitor device for continuous monitoring during pre-specified intervals 8 consecutive days after (or before) scheduled visits (to collect data for a full 7-day week + 1 additional day): after the screening, baseline, Week 4, 13, 26, 39 visits, and before the Week 52 visit. Compliance was assessed based on number of monitoring intervals and number of days wearing the device, and number of minutes spent wearing the device within those days. Five outcomes were assessed: light physical activity (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous activity, sedentary behavior (minutes/day spent in these individual outcomes out of total number minutes wearing device while awake), steps (number of steps taken per day), and metabolic equivalent of a task (MET; total estimated metabolic rate per day). Psychometric analyses of these outcomes using data from Arm A were conducted to evaluate test-retest reliability (TRTR), concurrent validity, known-groups validity, ability to detect change, and meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) of physical activity measurements ( Table 1). An analysis to detect potential influential outlier patients for each outcome that could potentially bias results, was conducted. Results In total, 132 out of 133 patients in Arm A and 26 out of 26 patients in Arm B, distributed in 19 countries, had accelerometer data. Compliance was defined post-hoc as ≥12 consecutive wear hours/day and results are presented for days achieving this threshold; no meaningful differences in results were found when incorporating number of monitoring intervals or number of days within the interval in the compliance definition. Most patients maintained or improved physical activity as measured by the activity monitors, with an overall increase in mean (SD) minutes during each monitoring period for LPA (baseline: 636 [234]; Week 52: 653 [237]), though there were variable changes throughout the study period. Measurements of LPA demonstrated acceptable TRTR, concurrent validity with three validation criteria, and ability to detect change with all or most of the anchor variables, while demonstrating good separation for improvement and deterioration thresholds to provide for MWPC ( Table 1). Two patients were identified as influential outliers for LPA. For moderate-to-vigorous activity, the concurrent validity showed that two validators met the criteria, and for steps, four validators met the criteria. Sedentary behavior and MET did not meet criterion with any of the validators ( Table 1). Out of the outcomes assessed, LPA showed the best psychometric properties within the study. Conclusion These analyses show how physical activity tracking through wearables was used to assess outcomes in patients with severe hemophilia A, who switched to a FVIII replacement therapy that provided normal to near-normal FVIII activity for most of the weekly dosing interval, resulting in reduced pain and improved physical functioning as assessed by patient-reported outcome measures. Analyses of these results revealed limitations in the psychometric properties of the assessed outcomes. To further understand the personal motivation and barriers for improving physical activity, addition of goal-setting could be considered in future clinical studies.