Using a continuous-list procedure, the frequency of presentation, the spacing of repetitions, and the position of occurrence of an item were manipulated as within-list variables. Separate groups of subjects made comparative judgments of either frequency or recency. The results showed the judgments of frequency to be independent of recency, whereas the judgments of recency were markedly influenced by frequency, the latter effect increasing when the repetitions of the items were spaced (i.e., distributed rather than massed). A response strategy is proposed to account for the observed effects of frequency on the judgments of recency. In a previous study, subjects were presented sets of A-B A-C pairs - that is, pairs with common stimulus words and different response words (Galbraith, 1975). One pair of a set was arbitrarily classified as correct, the other as incorrect. The presentation of the pairs within a set was such that the incorrect pair occurred with either lesser, equal, or greater frequency than the correct pair of the set. Subjects were instructed that they would be asked to judge the relative frequency of the pairs of a set, or the correctness of the pairs, or both. The performance of the subjects on these two attributes, relative frequency and associative correctness, proved strikingly divergent. The judgments of frequency showed pronounced effects of relative frequency, while the judgments of associative correctness appeared nearly devoid of any influence of relative frequency. It was inferred from these results that the subjects' performance reflected an independence of utilization of the attributes of frequency and correctness. The present experiment attempted to extend the generality of this 'independence' by investigating performance with the attributes of frequency and recency. Some previous work with the judgment of frequency has shown it to be independent of recency (Hintzman, 1969). Also, prior research on the judgment of recency has given some support to its inde
Read full abstract