Abstract The introduction of the fixed jacket Load and Resistance Factor Design code (API RP 2A-LRFD), and the Jack-up Site Assessment Recommended Practice (SNAME T&R Bulletin 5-5A), raises debates regarding differences in the reliability levels associated with the use of the two documents. In an effort to investigate whether substantial differences exist, and to understand the underlying causes of the differences, a major study has been initiated by the UK Health and Safety Executive to compare the reliabilities of these two structures when operating in similar weather conditions and in similar water depths, to the extreme weather hazard. To ensure the comparison is appropriate, both units will be assumed to be operating close to the limits of their relevant code. Both will be subject to the same analysis packages in respect to wave-current force determination, structural analysis, pushover analysis, and reliability analysis. Initially, foundation failure will be suppressed in order that structural reliabilities under extreme weather conditions can be directly compared. Foundation failure will then be introduced to quantify the effect this has on the structural safety levels. Reliabilities will be determined at both component and system level using the response surface reliability methodology. Component strength modelling will exploit the formulations currently being harmonised for the new ISO offshore code, whilst global strength will be evaluated using CAP/Seastar for both installation types, thus reducing the potential for modelling based differences occurring during the system analysis of the study.
Read full abstract