ISCHEMIA Trial Research Articles

Abstract 4124065: Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: A Report from the ISCHEMIA Trials Biorepository

Introduction: CHIP is associated with CAD and mortality. The prognostic relevance of CHIP for high-risk patients with confirmed CAD is unknown. Hypothesis: CHIP variants are associated with cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in high-risk patients with known CAD in the ISCHEMIA Trials Biorepository. Methods: 895 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD (hereafter, ISCHEMIA Trials) participants with moderate-severe ischemia and next-generation sequencing performed for CHIP variant allele fractions of ≥2% (CHIP) and ≥10% (large CHIP) were included. Unadjusted and multivariable adjusted (age, sex, diabetes, eGFR not on HD, HD, and LVEF) associations of CHIP and large CHIP with a) ISCHEMIA Trials initial phase primary endpoint (CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest, RCA) and b) ISCHEMIA Trials combined initial and extended follow-up phase (hereafter, Cumulative) endpoint of all-cause death . Results: Median (IQR) age of sequenced participants was 67 (56 – 79) years, 19% were female, 83% white, and 6% Hispanic. Hypertension (84%), diabetes (45%) and obesity (47%) were common, 26% had an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m 2 . The prevalence of CHIP and large CHIP was 23% and 7%, and both increased with age ( Figure 1a ). CHIP mutations in DNMT3A were detected in 106 (12%), TET2 CHIP in 44 (5%), and ASXL1 CHIP in 21 (2%) participants ( Figure 1b ). DNMT3A, TET2, and CREBBP mutations collectively comprised 199 (52%) of overall CHIP mutations, including individuals with multiple mutations in the same gene (N overall = 385); 67 participants (7%) had mutations in >1 gene. Over 3.1 years of RCT follow-up there were 135 (20%), 32 (16%) and 15 (18%) primary endpoints for no CHIP, CHIP and large CHIP, respectively. Over 6.8 years of EXTEND follow-up, there were 126 (18%), 47 (23%) and 24 (29%) deaths in the no CHIP, CHIP and large CHIP groups, respectively. After multivariable adjustment there was no association between CHIP or large CHIP and CV events or mortality ( Figure 1c ). Conclusion: Neither CHIP nor large CHIP was associated with adverse outcomes in 895 high-risk individuals with confirmed CAD, despite a high prevalence of these mutations.

Abstract 4143258: Sex Differences in Health Status Outcomes: Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Despite a lesser extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), women had a higher burden of angina than men in the ISCHEMIA trial, suggesting that other factors may explain symptom severity in women. We aim to describe demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as differences in care patterns, associated with health status differences in women, as compared with men, in the conservative and invasive treatment groups of the ISCHEMIA trial. Methods: The ISCHEMIA trial randomized participants with moderate or severe ischemia to a routine invasive strategy of cardiac catheterization with complete revascularization plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), or an initial conservative strategy of GDMT alone with catheterization reserved for GDMT failure. Health status was a key secondary outcome. Using linear regression models we compared raw and adjusted Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores in women and men at baseline and at 1 year, stratified by randomized treatment strategy. Within the invasive strategy, sex differences were adjusted for completeness of revascularization among those with ≥1 coronary stenosis ≥70%. Results: Of 4,617 ISCHEMIA participants with valid SAQ data, women had lower (worse) baseline SAQ summary scores (SS) throughout follow up (Figure) after adjustment for demographics and clinical characteristics, including severity of CAD (difference 5.4 points, 95% CI 4.0-6.7). Women had lower SAQ SS after adjustment for post-randomization treatment (i.e., medical therapy, achievement of risk factor goals and, in the invasive strategy, complete revascularization), 2.4 points lower (95% CI 0.7-4.1) in the conservative group (Figure), and 1.9 points lower than in men (95% CI 0.1-3.7) in the invasive group. Findings were similar for all SAQ subscales. Conclusions: Women with chronic coronary disease in ISCHEMIA had worse health status than men at baseline and 1 year later, which was not explained by demographic or clinical characteristics, intensity of medical therapy, or completeness of revascularization.

Abstract 4131460: Restrictive or Liberal Blood Transfusion in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Renal Insufficiency

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and anemia. Among patients with CKD and anemia who experience MI, it remains uncertain if a liberal transfusion threshold (LTT) strategy (hemoglobin cutoff [Hgb] < 10 g/dL) is superior to a restrictive transfusion threshold (RTT, Hgb 7-8 g/dL) strategy. Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of those with CKD randomized to RTT vs. LTT in the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial (NCT02981407). Methods: Among 3,495 MINT participants with non-missing creatinine (99.7%), we compared the baseline characteristics and outcomes at 30 days post-randomization of those individuals without CKD (N = 1279), CKD with eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (N = 999), CKD with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (N = 802), and CKD requiring dialysis (N = 415), both overall and by randomized transfusion strategy. Interaction terms for eGFR category by treatment assignment on each outcome were assessed. Results: Individuals with CKD compared to those without CKD more frequently presented with NSTEMI (all p < 0.001) and had a greater risk of all-cause death, recurrent MI, rehospitalization, and heart failure (all p < 0.05). Compared to a liberal transfusion strategy, a restrictive strategy among non-dialysis dependent individuals with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 was associated with an increased risk of death/recurrent MI ( Figure 1 ) and unplanned rehospitalization ( Figure 2 ). Among individuals with an eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , a restrictive strategy was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death ( Figure 1 ). No eGFR category by treatment assignment interaction terms were significant. Conclusions: In this prespecified analysis, individuals with CKD were at greater risk of death, recurrent MI, heart failure, and unplanned rehospitalization at 30 days post-randomization than those without CKD. In individuals with CKD, a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Anemia Acuity Effect on Transfusion Strategies in Acute Myocardial Infarction

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), limited physiologic adaptation to acute anemia might lead to greater benefit from a liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy. Data on such a possible benefit are lacking. To compare acute anemia with chronic anemia and post-MI outcomes and estimate the differential effect of a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy compared with a liberal strategy on post-MI outcomes according to anemia acuity. A prespecified subgroup analysis of the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 126 hospitals in 6 countries between April 26, 2017, and April 14, 2023, with 30-day follow-up and blinded adjudication of the primary outcome. The analysis included 3144 of 3504 MINT participants (89.7%) with acute MI, a hemoglobin (Hb) level less than 10 g/dL at randomization, and a first Hb measurement available on the day of or the day following hospital admission. The MINT trial randomized participants to a restrictive (Hb <7-8 g/dL) or liberal (Hb <10 g/dL) RBC transfusion strategy. Acute anemia was defined as having a first Hb value greater than 13 g/dL (men) or 12 g/dL (women), or as having a decrease greater than or equal to 2 g/dL between the first Hb measurement and measurement at randomization. Other Hb levels were categorized as chronic anemia. The primary outcome was a composite of death or recurrent MI up to 30 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were death, recurrent MI, cardiac death, heart failure, pulmonary complications, and major bleeding events. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Among 3144 included participants (mean [SD] age, 72.3 [11.6] years; 1715 [54.5%] male; 1307 [41.6%] with type 1 MI), 1078 [34.3%]) had acute anemia. Acute anemia was associated with an increased risk of death or recurrent MI (adjusted risk ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.48). The effect of a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy compared with a liberal strategy was similar for participants with either acute or chronic anemia for all outcomes. In this secondary analysis of the MINT trial, acute anemia was associated with less favorable post-MI outcomes than chronic anemia but did not modify the effects of the randomized transfusion strategy. In patients with anemia and MI, the acuity of anemia should not influence the choice of transfusion trigger. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02981407.

Prognostic impact of the presence and absence of angina on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in the ISCHEMIA trial

Abstract Introduction Patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) manifested by myocardial ischemia may present with typical angina or with no anginal symptoms. It is unclear whether symptom status affects prognosis in these patients. Purpose To assess whether the risk of all-cause mortality and other cardiovascular (CV) outcomes varied according to the presence or absence of angina in patients with CCS and moderate to severe myocardial ischemia in the ISCHEMIA trial. Methods The ISCHEMIA data set was obtained from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute under a data use agreement. Subjects were divided into quartiles by baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency (SAQ AF) score. Quartile (Q)1 included patients with SAQ AF scores from 1-70 whereas all patients in Q4 had SAQ AF scores of 100, indicating no angina at baseline. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the student T-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. The cumulative incidence rate of outcomes up to five years was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and the rate curves were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with potential confounders from baseline characteristics, clinical history, and angiographic characteristics included. All tests were two-sided and P&amp;lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Of the 5,179 patients with CCS and at least moderate ischemia on stress testing, 1,434 were in Q1 and 1,635 were in Q4. Compared to Q1, patients in Q4 were older (66.4 (9.0) vs. 62.8 (9.6); P&amp;lt;0.001), more often male (82% vs. 73%; P&amp;lt;0.001), more often diabetic (43% vs. 38%; P=0.006) and less often current smokers (12% vs. 15%; P=0.001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in Q4 (82(22) vs. 86 (38); P=0.002). Fewer patients in Q4 had NYHA class II heart failure (37% vs. 62%) and more had Class I symptoms (63% vs. 38%) (P&amp;lt;0.001). Q4 patients had a lower ejection fraction (59% vs. 60%; P=0.002), a lower Duke jeopardy score (4.9(3.5) vs. 5.5 (3.3); P&amp;lt;0.001), less often had severe ischemia (47% vs. 56%), and more often had moderate ischemia (40% vs. 32 %) (P&amp;lt;0.001). The cumulative 5-year event rates for Q4 vs. Q1 were: all-cause death, 10.6% and 6.4% (P=0.002); CV death/MI, 16.3% vs. 13.7% (P=0.97); CV death, 7% vs. 3.7% (P=0.009); MI, 11.4% vs. 11.4% (P=0.2). On multivariable Cox regression, angina quartile (Q4 vs. Q1) was not independently associated with all-cause death (HR 1.34, 95% CI: 0.76-2.31; P=0.33), CV death/MI (HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52-1.14; P=0.19), CV death (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.50-2.43; P=0.82), or MI (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.45-1.08; P=0.11). Conclusion In the ISCHEMIA trial, patients with CCS and moderate to severe myocardial ischemia are at elevated risk for all-cause mortality and other major CV outcomes. This risk is not modified by the presence or absence of angina.

Effects of restrictive vs liberal transfusion strategies on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia: The 6-month follow up primary results of the MINT trial

Abstract Background The Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial identified a statistically non-significant increase in risk of 30-day death or myocardial infarction (MI) (primary endpoint) and all-cause death and a statistically significant increase in cardiac death in patients with an acute MI and anemia assigned to a restrictive transfusion strategy compared to a liberal transfusion strategy. Purpose To determine the effect of a restrictive versus a liberal transfusion strategy on all-cause and cause-specific death 6-months post-randomization (secondary endpoint). Methods The MINT trial randomized 3,504 patients with MI and hemoglobin &amp;lt;10 g/dL to a restrictive (hemoglobin threshold of 7 or 8 g/dL) or liberal (hemoglobin threshold of &amp;lt;10 g/dL) transfusion strategy implemented during the index hospitalization. Sites contacted patients at 30-days and 6-months post-randomization and recorded patient vital status, date of death, and site-reported cause of death (categorized as cardiac, non-cardiac, or unknown). A competing risk analysis (cumulative incidence estimation and Fine-Gray models) was conducted to estimate the effect of transfusion strategy on all-cause and cause-specific death. Results Patients were enrolled from 6 countries between 2017 and 2023; average age was 72 years, and 46% were female. Vital status at 6-months was obtained for 3419 (97.6%) randomized patients (restrictive: 98.1%; liberal: 97.0%); 2,690 (76.8%) patients were alive and 729 (20.8%) had died. At 6-months, all-cause death occurred in 376 patients in the restrictive arm (21.7%) and 353 in the liberal arm (20.5%), hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.93–1.24. Compared to the liberal arm, a greater proportion of deaths in the restrictive arm were cardiac (41.8% vs. 29.8%). The risk of cardiac death was significantly higher in patients in the restrictive arm (9.0% vs. 6.1%, HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.19–1.94) whereas risk of non-cardiac death (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.70–1.08) and unknown cause of death (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.64–1.21) did not differ between the restrictive and the liberal arms. Conclusions In patients with acute MI and anemia, the 6-month incidence of all-cause death did not differ with a restrictive versus a liberal transfusion strategy. However, the numerically higher rate of all-cause mortality, seen with the restrictive strategy at 30-days, persisted through 6-months and was driven by cardiac causes. The long-term findings from the MINT trial suggest that a restrictive transfusion strategy may be harmful for patients with MI and anemia.

A liberal blood transfusion strategy is safe in patients with myocardial infarction, anemia, and heart failure: lessons from MINT

Abstract Background In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and anemia, the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial found a trend toward increased 30-day death or recurrent MI with a restrictive compared with a liberal blood transfusion strategy. Patients with and without heart failure (HF) may respond differently to blood transfusion. Purpose To characterize the effects of restrictive vs. liberal transfusion strategies on clinical outcomes in patients with MI and anemia with and without baseline HF. Methods In the MINT trial, 3504 patients with MI and hemoglobin &amp;lt;10 g/dL were randomized to restrictive (7-8 g/dL) or liberal (10 g/dL) transfusion thresholds. We compared outcomes between patients with and without baseline HF, defined as any history of HF, acute HF, or baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &amp;lt;45%. Outcomes included death or incident HF, death or recurrent MI, death, and incident HF, all at 30 days. Results Compared with patients without baseline HF (n=1633), patients with baseline HF (overall n=1871 (history of HF n=1066, acute HF n=780, LVEF &amp;lt;45% n= 1099) were older, more frequently male and Black, and had higher rates of prior PCI, diabetes, and hypertension. In the restrictive strategy, patients with and without baseline HF received an average of 0.63 and 0.80 units of blood and had a median LOS of 6 and 4 days, respectively. In the liberal strategy, patients with and without baseline HF received an average of 2.44 and 2.49 units of blood and had a median LOS of 5 and 4 days, respectively. Patients with baseline HF had higher rates of death or incident HF (18.0% vs. 10.0%, risk ratio [RR]=1.79 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.50-2.13]), death or recurrent MI (17.6% vs. 13.5%, RR=1.31 [95% CI 1.12-1.53]), and death (10.5% vs. 7.5%, RR 1.41 [95% CI 1.14-1.75]). Among patients with baseline HF, a restrictive transfusion strategy resulted in a trend toward an increase in death or HF and death or MI compared with a liberal transfusion strategy (Table, Figure). Among patients without baseline HF, the risk of incident HF was lower with restrictive than with liberal transfusion strategy. Conclusions Among patients with MI and anemia, a restrictive transfusion strategy resulted in a greater increase in death or HF, death or MI, and death in patients with baseline HF than in patients without baseline HF. A liberal transfusion strategy is safe for patients with MI and anemia, including those with prior or acute HF.TableFigure

Effect of four hemoglobin transfusion threshold strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia: a target trial emulation using MINT trial data

Abstract Background The hemoglobin (Hgb) threshold at which red blood cell transfusion affords greatest benefit, without increasing transfusion-associated risks, is uncertain for patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). The Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial recently showed a restrictive transfusion strategy (Hgb threshold &amp;lt;7-8g/dL) resulted in a 15% increased risk of 30-day all-cause death or recurrent MI (death/MI) compared with a liberal strategy (Hgb threshold &amp;lt;10g/dL) in 3,504 adults with acute MI and anemia. However, the transfusion effect at different Hgb thresholds remains uncertain. Purpose To better understand the gradient of effects from Hgb threshold transfusion triggers between 7g/dL and 10g/dL. We estimated the effects of four Hgb transfusion thresholds on 30-day death/MI and death in patients with acute MI and anemia. Methods We used data from the MINT trial and applied an innovative causal inference method, target trial emulation, to assess four Hgb thresholds. We emulated a hypothetical, 4-arm target trial of &amp;lt;10g/dL, &amp;lt;9g/dL, &amp;lt;8g/dL, and &amp;lt;7g/dL transfusion strategies in adults with acute MI and Hgb &amp;lt;10g/dL using a "cloning" procedure. The target trial protocol closely mirrored that of the MINT trial. We conducted a per-protocol analysis of the emulated target trial using censoring and inverse probability (IP) weighting; we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by fitting pooled logistic regression models with a time-dependent intercept for time free of the outcomes. We estimated IP weighted Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence curves under each strategy for 30-day outcomes. Results Of the MINT trial participants, 3,492 (99.7%) met eligibility criteria for the hypothetical target trial of four transfusion strategies. The unadjusted rate of 30-day death/MI was lowest in the &amp;lt;10g/dL strategy and highest in the &amp;lt;9g/dL strategy, and the rate of transfusions decreased monotonically as Hgb thresholds decreased. Relative to the &amp;lt;10g/dL strategy, the estimated HRs (95% CI) from the IP weighted model of 30-day death/MI were 1.07 (0.77-1.50) for the &amp;lt;9g/dL strategy, 1.14 (0.84-1.55) for the &amp;lt;8g/dL strategy, and 1.44 (0.99-2.09) for the &amp;lt;7g/dL strategy (Figure). A log-linear estimate over strategy thresholds between 7-10g/dL estimated a 1.12 (95% CI 1.00-1.27) times greater average risk of death/MI and a 1.12 (95% CI 0.92, 1.37) times greater average risk of death over 30 days for each 1g/dL decrease in the Hgb threshold. The IP weighted cumulative incidence curves showed similar increase in risk of death/MI as transfusion thresholds decreased throughout 30 days post-randomization. Conclusions Relative to a &amp;lt;10g/dL transfusion strategy, we estimated a progressively greater risk of 30-day death/MI as transfusion Hgb thresholds decreased within the range of 7-10g/dL. Targeting a Hgb concentration of 10g/dL in patients with a recent acute MI may avoid serious risks associated with anemia.Hazard ratios for 30-day death/MI

Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on angina frequency in the invasive arm of the ISCHEMIA trial

Abstract Introduction Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive, lesion-specific surrogate for myocardial ischemia. The use of FFR to guide lesion selection for revascularization is believed to improve outcomes compared to an angiographic approach because it allows categorization of lesions based on hemodynamic significance. Lesions that are not hemodynamically significant can be safely deferred while the revascularization of significant lesions has been reported to improve quality of life compared to medical therapy alone. Purpose To compare the outcomes of patients randomized to the invasive (INV) arm of the ISCHEMIA trial who underwent FFR during initial angiography with those whose treatment was guided by angiography alone. Methods The ISCHEMIA data set was obtained from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute under a data use agreement. Subjects randomized to the INV arm who underwent FFR were compared to those who underwent angiography alone. Categorial variables were compared using the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the student T-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariable linear mixed effects regression was used to evaluate the association of FFR use on SAQ7 AF score as well as assess changes across five years of follow-up. Covariates included in the model were based on their univariate and clinical significance. All tests were two-sided and P&amp;lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Of the 5,179 patients with chronic coronary syndromes and at least moderate ischemia on stress testing, 2588 were assigned to the INV strategy and 2210 had data available for analysis. Of these individuals, 410 (19%) had FFR performed during their diagnostic angiogram. Females comprised 24% of FFR patients and 24% of non-FFR patients (P=0.85). FFR patients were older than non-FFR patients (65.7 [8.7] years vs. 64.3 [9.6] years, P=0.006). The incidence of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, or prior MI at baseline did not differ between groups. Mean ejection fraction did not differ between groups. Fewer FFR patients had severe ischemia at baseline (45% vs. 52%) and more had mild or moderate ischemia (54% vs. 48%) (P=0.009). FFR patients had fewer native vessels with &amp;gt;70% stenosis than non-FFR patients (1.0[0.9] vs. 1.5[1.0], P&amp;lt;0.001), and less complex disease as assessed by the Duke jeopardy score (P&amp;lt;0.001). On multivariable linear mixed effects regression, FFR was not associated with a significant change in the SAQ AF score (0.56 (-0.85 – 1.97; P=0.44)), after adjusting for other covariates. However, the SAQ7 AF score was 0.22 units less in those that underwent FFR compared to those that did not (95%CI=-0.44 – -0.01; P=0.043) when assessed over follow-up time. Conclusion ISCHEMIA patients randomized to an INV strategy who underwent physiologic assessment with FFR had no improvement in angina frequency compared to those who underwent angiography alone.

Investigating the influence of possible liver fibrosis on mortality in patients with coronary artery disease - a post-hoc ISCHEMIA trial analysis

Abstract Background There is a plethora of studies demonstrating that comorbidities (e.g., diabetes and renal dysfunction) directly influence outcomes in patients undergoing PCI or CABG for coronary artery disease (CAD). Yet, liver dysfunction is not really included in current risk assessment beyond the presence of liver cirrhosis. Retrospective single center evidence now suggests that the presence of liver fibrosis may be an indicator of elevated risk. Using the FIB-4 score, where increasing values correlate with increaseing degrees of histological liver fibrosis, liver fibrosis could already be detected with all required laboratory values (AST, ALT, platelets) within normal range. In addition, the study suggests a beneficial effect of off-pump CABG when FIB-4 is elevated. This finding contradicts current randomized evidence, negating any difference between off and on-pump CABG. Since randomized trials always suffer from strong selection of low risk patients, it is conceivable that trial patients may primarily have low FIB-4 scores. Purpose To address the distribution of FIB-4 scores in a selected trial population with CAD (from the ISCHEMIA trial) and relate the degree of liver fibrosis reflected by the score to mortality. Methods The FIB-4 score was calculated for all patients. According to the standard classification, a value of greater than 1.2 reflects a 90% chance of the presence of histological liver fibrosis. The imapct of FIB-4 on late all-cause mortality was assessed as a continuous and categorical variable using maximally selected rank statistics determined FIB-4 cutoff. Cox regression model was peformed including the adjustment for the main CAD risk factors. Results Among 3735 included patients, 58.8% had a FIB-4 value above 1.2. Patients with higher FIB-4 score (cutoff= 1.64) were slighly older, presented higher prevalence of male sex, prior PCI and CABG, and prior history of atrial fibrillation and cerebrovascular disease. FIB-4 score was directly associated with higher risk of mortality when addressed as a continouos variable and as a categorical variable (Fig. 1). This relationship was evident in the overall population and in all subsets (PCI, CABG and no revascularization; Fig. 2). Conclusions The use of Fib-4 to determine the degree of liver fibrosis may be powerful to predict mortality in CAD populations which may not show any evident clinical signs of liver dysfunction. The Fib-4 distribution in this trial population, considered as selected and low risk, warrants investigating randomized trial populations having compared on- and off-pump CABG.Figure 1.Mortality: overall population.Figure 2.Mortality: by therapy subsets.

Outcomes with revascularisation versus conservative management of participants with 3-vessel coronary artery disease in the ISCHEMIA trial.

Whether revascularisation (REV) improves outcomes in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease (3V-CAD) is uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate outcomes with REV (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG]) versus medical therapy in patients with 3V-CAD. ISCHEMIA participants with 3V-CAD on coronary computed tomography angiography without prior CABG were included. Outcomes following initial invasive management (INV) with REV (PCI or CABG) versus initial conservative management (CON) with medical therapy alone were evaluated. Regression modelling was used to estimate the outcomes if all participants were to undergo prompt REV versus those assigned to CON. Outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) death/myocardial infarction (MI), death, CV death, and quality of life. Bayesian posterior probability for benefit (Pr [benefit]) for 1 percentage point lower 4-year rates with REV versus CON were evaluated. Among 1,236 participants with 3V-CAD (612 INV/624 CON), REV was associated with lower 4-year CV death/MI (adjusted 4-year difference: -4.4, 95% credible interval [CrI] -8.7 to -0.3 percentage points, Pr [benefit]=94.8%) when compared with CON, with similar results for PCI versus CON (-5.8, 95% CrI: -10.8 to -0.5 percentage points, Pr [benefit]=96.4%) and CABG versus CON (-3.7, 95% CrI: -8.8 to 1.5 percentage points, Pr [benefit]=84.7%). Adjusted 4-year REV versus CON differences were as follows: death -1.2 (95% CrI: -4.7 to 2.2) percentage points, CV death -2.3 (95% CrI: -5.5 to 0.8) percentage points, with similar results for PCI and for CABG. The Pr (benefit) for death with REV (PCI or CABG) versus CON was 49-63%. The adjusted 12-month Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 summary score differences favoured REV: REV versus CON 4.6 (95% CrI: 2.7-6.4) percentage points; PCI versus CON 3.6 (95% CrI: 1.2-5.8) percentage points and CABG versus CON 4.3 (95% CrI: 1.5-6.9) percentage points with high Pr (benefit). In participants with 3V-CAD, REV (either PCI or CABG) was associated with a lower 4-year CV death/MI rate and improved quality of life, with similar results for PCI versus CON and CABG versus CON. The differences in all-cause mortality between REV and CON were small with wide confidence intervals. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01471522).

Female patients have fewer limb amputations compared to male patients in the BEST-CLI trial

ObjectiveFemale patients are less likely to be diagnosed with and treated for peripheral artery disease. When treated, there are also reported sex disparities in short- and long-term outcomes. We designed this study to compare outcomes after open and endovascular revascularization in the Best Endovascular vs best Surgical Therapy in patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial between females and males, and to examine outcomes of each revascularization type in an all-female cohort. MethodsIn a secondary analysis of cohorts 1 and 2 of the BEST-CLI Trial, patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing open surgical bypass (with or without adequate conduit) and endovascular therapy were stratified by sex. In addition, in a female-only cohort, we evaluated differences in outcomes between treatment arm (combined all bypasses from cohorts 1 and 2 and compared with all endovascular treatment in cohorts 1 and 2). Outcomes included major amputation, reintervention, major adverse limb event (MALE, a composite of major amputation and reintervention), all-cause death, and composite outcome of MALE or all-cause death. Univariable and adjusted Cox regressions were used to assess outcome between males and females. Similar methods were used to assess differences in outcomes between treatment arm in females. ResultsAmong 1830 patients, females were significantly underrepresented, comprising only 28% (n = 519) of the BEST-CLI cohort. Overall, the characteristics of females enrolled in the trial had some differences compared with males: females were more likely to have rest pain alone (72% vs 60%; P < .0001) and when presenting with an ischemic wound, were less likely to have a wound infection (38% vs 47%; P = .01). Females were less likely to have an adequate single-segment greater saphenous vein (SSGSV) available (82% vs 89%; P = .01). Controlled for baseline clinical factors, at 1 year, females had significantly lower rates of major limb amputation compared with males (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; P = .023), which drove better amputation- and MALE-free survival rates. All-cause death at 1 year was not statistically different between sexes (11.8% vs 11.2%; P = .286). In the all-female cohort, results paralleled the overall trial; open surgical bypass (with any conduit) had significantly better outcomes compared with endovascular therapy. Specifically, among females undergoing endovascular therapy, the rate of major reintervention was particularly high compared with females undergoing open surgical bypass (24.8% vs 10.5%; P < .001). ConclusionsDespite being underrepresented in BEST-CLI, the primary results of the trial, namely, improved MALE-free survival with open surgical bypass with SSGSV, were mirrored in the all-female subset. Female patients enrolled in BEST-CLI had better amputation-free survival at 1 year compared with male patients. These findings suggest that in treating female patients with CLTI considered appropriate for both open and endovascular revascularization, surgical bypass with optimal conduit is the preferred treatment option and can potentially ameliorate poor limb preservation outcomes associated with sex.

Developing an Individualized Patient Decision Aid for Chronic Coronary Disease Based on the ISCHEMIA Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND: Pursuing initial invasive or conservative management of chronic coronary disease (CCD) is a preference-sensitive decision that should include shared decision-making. Communicating the benefits of either approach is challenging, as individual patients rarely achieve the population-averaged outcomes reported in clinical trials. Our objective was to develop a patient decision aid (PDA) with patient-specific estimates of outcomes for initial invasive versus conservative management of CCD, based on the ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches). METHODS: This was a multiphase mixed-methods study using focus groups of outpatients with CCD, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Focus groups were held in Kansas City, MO and New York City, NY between September 2021 and June 2022. Patients with CCD were included if they had a positive stress test within 1 year. Phase 1 focused on patient priorities for outcomes to guide treatment decisions. Phase 2 involved PDA development and refinement. Phase 3 involved further refinement and member checking. Key themes involving shared decision-making and treatment preferences were elicited from focus groups using a deductive approach to develop a PDA representing the outcomes most important to patients. RESULTS: Of 46 patient and caregiver participants, the mean age was 63.5 years, 53% were female, 61% were White, 24% were Black, and 9% were Hispanic. When deciding between treatments, participants valued shared decision-making but generally deferred decisions to clinicians. The outcomes most important to participants were survival and quality of life, followed by physical functioning and symptoms. To represent these outcomes, participants favored simple visualizations, such as a speedometer or health meter. When deciding between treatment options, participants preferred to use the PDA collaboratively with a clinician instead of as a stand-alone tool. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel, patient-centered approach to developing a PDA for CCD with patient-specific outcomes has the potential to rapidly translate clinical trial results to individual patients and support shared decision-making.

International Variation in Health Status Benefits in Patients Undergoing Initial Invasive Versus Conservative Management for Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial

BACKGROUND: The ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) demonstrated greater health status benefits with an initial invasive strategy, as compared with a conservative one, for patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia. Whether these benefits vary globally is important to understand to support global adoption of the results. METHODS: We analyzed participants’ disease-specific health status using the validated 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ: &gt;5-point differences are clinically important) at baseline and over 1-year follow-up across 37 countries in 6 international regions. The average effect of initial invasive versus conservative strategies on 1-year SAQ scores was estimated using Bayesian proportional odds regression and compared across regions. RESULTS: Considerable regional variation in baseline health status was observed among 4617 participants (mean age=64.4±9.5 years, 24% women), with the mean SAQ summary scores of 67.4±19.5 in Eastern Europe participants (17% of the total), 71.4±15.4 in Asia-Pacific (18%), 74.9±16.7 in Central and South America (10%), 75.5±19.5 in Western Europe (26%), and 78.6±19.2 in North America (28%). One-year improvements in SAQ scores were greater in regions with lower baseline scores with initial invasive management (17.7±20.9 in Eastern Europe and 11.4±19.3 in North America), but similar in the conservative arm. Adjusting for baseline SAQ scores, similar health status benefits of an initial invasive strategy on 1-year SAQ scores were observed (ranging from 2.38 points [95% CI, 0.04–4.50] in North America to 4.66 points [95% CI, 2.46–6.94] in Eastern Europe), with an 88.3% probability that the difference in benefit across regions was &lt;5 points. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, initial invasive management was associated with a consistent health status benefit across regions, with modest regional variability, supporting the international generalizability of health status benefits from invasive management of chronic coronary disease. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01471522

Association of Electrocardiogram Findings With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: An Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Trials

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the association of electrocardiogram (ECG) findings with outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. MethodsThis secondary analysis of the ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD trials divided patients with chronic coronary syndrome into two groups, those with a normal ECG tracing and abnormal ECG tracing. Repolarization abnormalities included ST-segment depression ≥ 0.5 mm and T-wave inversion ≥ 1 mm; conduction abnormalities included left and right bundle branch block (LBBB and RBBB). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death. Outcomes were assessed using a covariate-adjusted Cox-regression model. ResultsOf 5876 patients, 2901 (49.4%) had a normal and 2975 (50.6%) an abnormal ECG tracing. An abnormal ECG tracing at baseline, compared with a normal ECG tracing, was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (257 of 2975 [8.6%] vs. 97 of 2901 [3.3%], adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.01, 95% CI 1.58-2.55) over a median follow-up period of 3.1 years (IQR 2.1-4.2). This finding was consistent across subgroups except for patients with black skin color and current smokers, in whom an abnormal ECG was not significantly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death. Individual ECG abnormalities (ST-segment depression [aHR 2.0, 95% CI 1.52-2.63], T-wave inversion [aHR 1.89, 95% CI 1.40-2.54], LBBB [aHR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05-2.90], and RBBB [aHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.04-2.22]) were independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death. ConclusionIn patients with chronic coronary syndrome, an abnormal ECG tracing was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death. Our findings underscore the importance of the ECG in cardiovascular risk stratification and prognostication. Trial RegistrationNCT01471522, BioLINCC ID 14539.

The impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial

ObjectiveSeveral observational studies have demonstrated an association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and above-ankle amputation after lower extremity revascularization (LER). However, data from prospective randomized trials is lacking. This analysis compares the outcomes of patients with and without DM enrolled in the Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial. MethodsBaseline characteristics were compared between patients with and without DM in the BEST-CLI trial. Cox regression was used to determine the association between DM and major outcomes of major adverse limb events (MALE), reintervention, above-ankle amputation, and all-cause death. ResultsAmong 1777 patients who underwent LER, 69.2% had DM. Compared with patients without DM, those with DM were significantly younger, less likely to be White, and more likely to be Hispanic. Patients with DM were more likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and renal disease and be on optimal medical therapy (antiplatelets and statins), whereas patients without DM were significantly more likely to be smokers and have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients with DM were significantly more likely to present with late Wound Ischemia foot Infection (WIfI) stages (3-4) (73.7% vs 45.9%; P < .001) that were driven predominantly by differences in wound and infection grade. Conversely, patients without DM had significantly lower ankle pressures and toe pressures and were significantly more likely to have WIfI ischemia grade 3 compared with patients with DM (60% vs 52.5%; P = .016). At 3 years, patients with DM exhibited higher rates of above-ankle amputation and all-cause death compared with patients without DM. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly higher MALE or all-cause death compared with patients without DM (3-year estimate: 53.5% vs 46.4%; P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders, regression analysis demonstrated that DM was independently associated with increased above-ankle amputation (1.75 [1.22-2.51]), all-cause death (1.63 [1.31-2.03]), and MALE or all-cause death (1.24 [1.04-1.47]). ConclusionsPatients with DM undergoing LER for chronic limb-threatening ischemia experienced a greater incidence of MALE or all-cause death compared with patients without DM. The impact of DM seems to be mediated by more severe wounds and infections at the time of presentation, and a higher prevalence of cardiac and renal disease.

Restrictive Versus Liberal Transfusion in Patients with Type 1 or Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Prespecified Analysis of the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) Trial.

The MINT trial raised concern for harm from a restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and anemia. Type 1 and type 2 MI are distinct pathophysiological entities that may respond differently to blood transfusion. This analysis sought to determine if the effects of transfusion varied among patients with a type 1 or a type 2 MI and anemia. We hypothesized that the liberal transfusion strategy would be of greater benefit in type 2 than in type 1 MI. We compared rates of death or MI at 30 days in patients with type 1 (n=1460) and type 2 (n=1955) MI and anemia who were randomly allocated to a restrictive (threshold of 7 to 8 g/dL) or a liberal (threshold of 10 g/dL) transfusion strategy. The primary outcome of death or MI was observed in 16% of type 1 MI and 15.4% of type 2 MI patients. The rate of death or MI was higher in patients with type 1 MI randomized to a restrictive (18.2%) versus liberal (13.2%) transfusion strategy (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04 - 1.67) with no difference observed between the restrictive (15.8% ) and liberal (15.1% ) transfusion strategies in patients with type 2 MI (RR 1.05 95% CI 0.85-1.29). The test for a differential effect of transfusion strategy by MI type was not statistically significant (P-interaction = 0.16). The concern for harm with a restrictive transfusion strategy in patients with acute MI and anemia raised in the MINT primary outcome manuscript may be more apparent in patients with type 1 than type 2 MI. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02981407.

Atherosclerosis quantification and cardiovascular risk: the ISCHEMIA trial.

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived atherosclerotic plaque analysis in ISCHEMIA. Atherosclerosis imaging quantitative computed tomography (AI-QCT) was performed on all available baseline CCTAs to quantify plaque volume, composition, and distribution. Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the association between baseline risk factors (age, sex, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, ejection fraction, prior coronary disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and statin use), number of diseased vessels, atherosclerotic plaque characteristics determined by AI-QCT, and a composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction over a median follow-up of 3.3 (interquartile range 2.2-4.4) years. The predictive value of plaque quantification over risk factors was compared in an area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Analysable CCTA data were available from 3711 participants (mean age 64 years, 21% female, 79% multivessel coronary artery disease). Amongst the AI-QCT variables, total plaque volume was most strongly associated with the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.25-1.97 per interquartile range increase [559 mm3]; P = .001). The addition of AI-QCT plaque quantification and characterization to baseline risk factors improved the model's predictive value for the primary outcome at 6 months (AUC 0.688 vs. 0.637; P = .006), at 2 years (AUC 0.660 vs. 0.617; P = .003), and at 4 years of follow-up (AUC 0.654 vs. 0.608; P = .002). The findings were similar for the other reported outcomes. In ISCHEMIA, total plaque volume was associated with cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. In this highly diseased, high-risk population, enhanced assessment of atherosclerotic burden using AI-QCT-derived measures of plaque volume and composition modestly improved event prediction.

Association of prediabetes with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a post hoc analysis of the ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD trials

BackgroundThere is conflicting evidence whether prediabetes is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. We aimed to assess the effect of prediabetes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome on clinical outcomes.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of data from the ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD trials, including patients with chronic coronary syndrome determined by coronary computed tomography angiography or exercise-stress testing. Participants were assigned to the normoglycemia group (HbA1c < 5.7% [< 39 mmol/mol]), prediabetes group (HbA1c 5.7–6.4% [40–47 mmol/mol]), or diabetes group (HbA1c ≥ 6.5% [≥ 48 mmol/mol]). The primary end point of this study was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events and composites thereof.ResultsOverall, the primary endpoint all-cause mortality occurred in 330 (8.4%) of 3910 patients over a median follow-up time of 3.1 years (IQR 2.1–4.1). The primary endpoint all-cause mortality occurred in 37 (5.2%) of 716 patients in the normoglycemia group, in 63 (6.9%) of 911 in the prediabetes group, and in 230 (10.1%) of 2283 in the diabetes group. In the covariate-adjusted Cox model analysis, the estimated adjusted HR (aHR) in the prediabetes group as compared with the normoglycemia group was 1.45 (95%CI, 0.95–2.20). The aHR in the diabetes group as compared with the normoglycemia group was 1.84 (95%CI, 1.29–2.65). Prediabetes, compared with normoglycemia, was associated with an increased risk of stroke (aHR, 3.44, 95%CI, 1.15–10.25). Subgroup analyses suggested an increased risk of all-cause death associated with prediabetes in males and patients under 65 years.ConclusionsIn patients with chronic coronary syndrome, diabetes but not prediabetes was associated with significantly increased risk of all-cause death within a median follow-up period of 3.1 years.Trial Registration NCT01471522, BioLINCC ID 13936.

Common Criticisms and Rebuttals of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (BEST-CLI) Trial

The Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia trial was a landmark trial which provides high-quality data for the decision-making regarding the treatment of chronic-limb threatening ischemia. Overall, the trial suggests that in patients with adequate greater saphenous vein conduit, bypass surgery should be offered as a first line treatment given superior outcomes. In this article, we outline the common critiques of the trial, followed by responses to provide a deeper understanding of the strengths and limitations of this important trial.