Ipsilateral Nucleus Isthmi Research Articles

Bilateral efferents from nucleus isthmi to the optic tectum in goldfish (Carassius auratus) are spatially restricted

The projection from nucleus isthmi (NI) to the optic tectum (OT) was investigated in the goldfish, Carassius auratus, by retrograde transport of biocytin applied at various sites in a tectal lobe. In previous studies, this projection is described as predominantly from the ipsilateral NI and maps topographically along the approximate rostrocaudal axis of both brain areas. However, the rostromedial tectal lobe, the tectal region representing the binocular visual field, receives afferents from both the ipsilateral and the contralateral NI. The contralateral isthmic neurons are found at the most caudal position in NI and are not topographic with the tectum. The bilateral projection from NI to the tectum may play a role in functions requiring the coordination of both eyes.

The organization of the pretectal nuclei in the trout: A revision based on experimental holodogical studies

The neuronal tracer DiI was applied to different brain centers of the rainbow trout in order to study the connections of pretectal nuclei. Our results showed that some pretectal nuclei receive a direct projection from the contralateral retina: the parvocellular superficial pretectal nucleus, the central pretectal nucleus, the intermediate pretectal nucleus and the ventral accessory optic nucleus. In turn, the central pretectal, the intermediate pretectal and the ventral accessory optic nuclei, together with the paracommissural nucleus, project to the cerebellum and the torus longitudinalis. The magnocellular superficial pretectal nucleus does not receive retinal projections, but receives ipsilateral projections from the optic tectum and the mesencephalic tegmentum. In turn, it projects to the ipsilateral oculomotor nucleus and lateral nucleus of the valvula. The posterior pretectal nucleus and the parvocellular superficial pretectal nucleus receive afferents from the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi. The posterior pretectal nucleus projects to the inferior hypothalamic lobe. Our results reveal a conspicuous projection from the ipsilateral parvocellular superficial pretectal nucleus to the contralateral one and also to the contralateral posterior prectectal nucleus, not reported in previous experimental studies of teleosts. Pretectal centers appear to integrate visual/optic-related centers mainly with the hypothalamus and the cerebellum. The organization of the trout pretectum was compared with the pretectal organization patterns proposed in various teleosts.

Current source density analysis of contra- and ipsilateral isthmotectal connections of the frog

The nucleus isthmi (NI) of the frog receives input from the ipsilateral optic tectum and projects back to both optic tecta. After ablation of NI, frogs display no visually elicited prey-catching or threat avoidance behavior. Neural mechanisms that underlie the loss of such important behavior have not been solved. Electrophysiological examination of the contralateral isthmotectal projection has proved that it contributes to binocular vision. On the other hand, there are very few physiological investigations of the ipsilateral isthmotectal projection. In this study, current source density (CSD) analysis was applied to contra- and ipsilateral isthmotectal projections. The contralateral projection produced monosynaptic sinks in superficial layers and in layer 8. The results confirmed former findings obtained by single unit recordings. The ipsilateral projection elicited a prominent monosynaptic sink in layer 8. Recipient neurons were located in layers 6-7. These results, combined with those from the former intracellular study, led to the following neuronal circuit. Afferents from the ipsilateral NI inhibit non-efferent pear shaped neurons in the superficial layers, and strongly excite large ganglionic neurons projecting to the descending motor regions. Thus feedback to the output neurons strengthens the visually elicited responses.

Relative number of cells projecting from contralateral and ipsilateral nucleus isthmi to loci in the optic tectum is dependent on visuotopic location: Horseradish peroxidase study in the leopard frog

Relative number of cells projecting from contralateral and ipsilateral nucleus isthmi to loci in the optic tectum is dependent on visuotopic location: Horseradish peroxidase study in the leopard frog

Relative number of cells projecting from contralateral and ipsilateral nucleus isthmi to loci in the optic tectum is dependent on visuotopic location: Horseradish peroxidase study in the leopard frog

Relative number of cells projecting from contralateral and ipsilateral nucleus isthmi to loci in the optic tectum is dependent on visuotopic location: Horseradish peroxidase study in the leopard frog

Seeing beyond the midline: the role of the contralateral isthmotectal projection in the leopard frog.

The ground level visual field of each eye of the leopard frog includes the entire ipsilateral 180-deg field and approximately 60 deg into the frontal contralateral field. When one eye is covered with an opaque patch, a frog responds to prey stimuli over the entire field of the other eye. Nevertheless, when one optic nerve is cut, the animal responds to prey in the ipsilateral hemifield of the connected eye, but only responds as far as about 30 deg past the frontal midline. If one optic tract is cut, the animal does not respond to prey past the frontal midline. We hypothesized that the responses past the frontal midline might be mediated by input from contralaterally projecting isthmotectal fibers. These fibers originate in the nucleus isthmi, a posterior midbrain structure. We found that when we placed an opaque patch over one eye and either ablated the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi, or cut crossing isthmotectal fibers in the optic chiasm, or blocked input to nucleus isthmi by ablating the ipsilateral tectal lobe, animals did not respond to prey stimuli past the frontal midline. We found that when we placed an opaque patch over one eye and cut crossing optic fibers in the anterior part of the optic chiasm (sparing crossing isthmotectal fibers), animals responded to prey stimuli in the nasal half of the seeing eye's contralateral frontal field. Our results suggest that contralaterally projecting isthmotectal fibers enable the frog to respond to stimuli past the frontal midline. We suggest a one-dimensional model of how nucleus isthmi influences tectal function.

Synaptic interrelationships between the optic tectum and the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi in Rana pipiens.

The nucleus isthmi is reciprocally connected to the ipsilateral optic tectum. Ablation of the nucleus isthmi compromises visually guided behavior that is mediated by the tectum. In this paper, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) histochemistry and electron microscopy were used to explore the synaptic interrelationships between the optic tectum and the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi. After localized injections of HRP into the optic tectum, there are retrogradely labeled isthmotectal neurons and orthogradely labeled fibers and terminals in the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi. These terminals contain round, clear vesicles of medium diameter (40-52 nm). These terminals make synaptic contact with dendrites of nucleus isthmi cells. Almost half of these postsynaptic dendrites are retrogradely labeled, indicating that there are monosynaptic tectoisthmotectal connections. Localized HRP injection into the nucleus isthmi labels terminals primarily in tectal layers B, E, F, and 8. The terminals contain medium-sized clear vesicles and they form synaptic contacts with tectal dendrites. There are no instances of labeled isthmotectal terminals contacting labeled dendrites. Retrogradely labeled tectoisthmal neurons are contacted by unlabeled terminals containing medium-sized and small clear vesicles. Fifty-four percent of the labeled fibers connecting the nucleus isthmi and ipsilateral tectum are myelinated fibers (average diameter approximately 0.6 microns). The remainder are unmyelinated fibers (average diameter approximately 0.4 microns).

Afferent connections of the optic tectum in channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus

Horseradish peroxidase was injected unilaterally into the optic tectum of the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. The sources of tectal afferents were thereby revealed by retrogradely labeled neurons in various brain centers. Retrogradely labeled cells were seen in both the ipsilateral and contralateral telencephalon. The superficial pretectal area was labeled on both sides of the brain. Ipsilateral projections were also observed coming from the entopeduncular nucleus. Both the anterior thalamic nucleus and the ventro-medial thalamic nucleus projected to the ipsilateral optic tectum. Cells in the ipsilateral nucleus of the posterior commissure were seen to project to the tectum. Labeled fibers were visualized in the lateral geniculate nucleus ipsilateral to the injected tectum, however, no labeled cell bodies were observed. Therefore, tectal cells project to the lateral geniculate nucleus, but this projection is not reciprocal. No labeled cells were found in the cerebellum. Labeled cells occurred in both the ipsilateral and contralateral medial reticular formation; they were also observed in the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi. A projection was seen coming from the dorsal funicular nucleus. Furthermore, labeled cells were shown in the inferior raphe nucleus.

Neuroanatomy and electrophysiology of the lacertilian nucleus isthmi

Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) tracings showed a bidirectional connection between the optic tectum (OT) and the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi (NI) pars magnocellularis (Imc) in nocturnal Gekko gekko and diurnal Shinisaurus crocodilurus. We found that, in addition to a direct neuronal pathway, there is an indirect pathway from OT to Imc via the nucleus profundus mesencephali (NPM). The morphology of cells in OT, NPM and NI was studied. Visual units extracellularly recorded from NI were located within Imc based on cobalt sulphide markings. They responded to moving contrast targets, without reacting to tactile and auditory stimulation. HRP and Golgi-Cox studies showed that Imc is a nucleus independent of its parvocellular partner, Ipc.