You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection & Screening VII1 Apr 2018MP82-06 INVERSE STAGE MIGRATION PATTERNS IN NORTH AMERICAN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOCAL PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT: A CONTEMPORARY POPULATION-BASED UPDATE IN LIGHT OF THE 2012 USPSTF RECOMMENDATIONS Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, Pierre Karakiewicz, Raisa Pompe, Felix Preisser, Emmanuelle Zaffuto, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Alberto Briganti, Omar Nafez, Margit Fisch, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, and Lars Budäus Sami-Ramzi Leyh-BannurahSami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah More articles by this author , Pierre KarakiewiczPierre Karakiewicz More articles by this author , Raisa PompeRaisa Pompe More articles by this author , Felix PreisserFelix Preisser More articles by this author , Emmanuelle ZaffutoEmmanuelle Zaffuto More articles by this author , Paolo Dell'OglioPaolo Dell'Oglio More articles by this author , Alberto BrigantiAlberto Briganti More articles by this author , Omar NafezOmar Nafez More articles by this author , Margit FischMargit Fisch More articles by this author , Thomas SteuberThomas Steuber More articles by this author , Markus GraefenMarkus Graefen More articles by this author , and Lars BudäusLars Budäus More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2734AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Recent studies demonstrated ongoing inverse stage migration in prostate cancer (PCa) patients towards more advanced and unfavourable tumors. The USPSTF grade D recommendation may impact this trend in North American patients. To assess contemporary stage migration- and treatment-trends in a large North American cohort diagnosed with PCa 2009-2014. METHODS Time-trend-analyses were performed in patients within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, with complete data of clinical tumor stage, biopsy Gleason score and validated PSA values, resulting in 211,645 assessable patients. Patients were stratified according to their different treatment methods (radical prostatectomy[RP], radiotherapy[RT], no local treatment[NLT])and according to clinical and pathological risk stratification (D′Amico and CAPRA-S score). RESULTS Proportions of D′Amico low-(LR), intermediate(IR)- and high-risk(HR) PCa patients changed from 35.0-29.6%, 38.0-39.7% and 27.1-30.7% (p>0.05), respectively. These trends were more distinct and statistically significant in men ≥70 years (D′Amico LR 27.5-19.3%, p<0.001 vs. HR 35.9-42.8%, p=0.013). NLT proportions increased, most notably in D′Amico LR ≥70 years (35.5-51.2%, p<0.001). Conversely, RP proportions remained stable in younger HR patients (52.4-51.6% p=0.3) and increased in older HR patients (12.1-15.6%, p=0.003). Similar patterns were demonstrated in the RP-treated subgroup: Unfavourable D′Amico HR, pT3 and/or lymph-node invasion or CAPRA-S HR proportions increased from 23.5-30.8%, 24.3-32.9% and 10.7-16.3% (each p≤0.015). CONCLUSIONS Inverse stage migration with increase of unfavourable PCa continues in most contemporary North American patients. However, a paradigm-shift to treat LR patients with less invasive methods (NLT) was demonstrated. Contrary, HR patients increasingly undergo LT. Future studies with long-term follow-up might answer if inverse stage migration- vs. treatment-trends translate into different PCa metastases/mortality rates vs. proposed NLT benefits, particularly related to USPSTF-recommended reduced PSA screening. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e1107-e1108 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah More articles by this author Pierre Karakiewicz More articles by this author Raisa Pompe More articles by this author Felix Preisser More articles by this author Emmanuelle Zaffuto More articles by this author Paolo Dell'Oglio More articles by this author Alberto Briganti More articles by this author Omar Nafez More articles by this author Margit Fisch More articles by this author Thomas Steuber More articles by this author Markus Graefen More articles by this author Lars Budäus More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract