Intracochlear Pressure Research Articles

Quantitative in-vitro assessment of a novel robot-assisted system for cochlear implant electrode insertion.

As an increasing number of cochlear implant candidates exhibit residual inner ear function, hearing preservation strategies during implant insertion are gaining importance. Manual implantation is known to induce traumatic force and pressure peaks. In this study, we use a validated in-vitro model to comprehensively evaluate a novel surgical tool that addresses these challenges through motorized movement of a forceps. Using lateral wall electrodes, we examined two subgroups of insertions: 30 insertions were performed manually by experienced surgeons, and another 30 insertions were conducted with a robot-assisted system under the same surgeons' supervision. We utilized a realistic, validated model of the temporal bone. This model accurately reproduces intracochlear frictional conditions and allows for the synchronous recording of forces on intracochlear structures, intracochlear pressure, and the position and deformation of the electrode array within the scala tympani. We identified a significant reduction in force variation during robot-assisted insertions compared to the conventional procedure, with average values of 12mN/s and 32mN/s, respectively. Robotic assistance was also associated with a significant reduction of strong pressure peaks and a 17dB reduction in intracochlear pressure levels. Furthermore, our study highlights that the release of the insertion tool represents a critical phase requiring surgical training. Robotic assistance demonstrated more consistent insertion speeds compared to manual techniques. Its use can significantly reduce factors associated with intracochlear trauma, highlighting its potential for improved hearing preservation. Finally, the system does not mitigate the impact of subsequent surgical steps like electrode cable routing and cochlear access sealing, pointing to areas in need of further research.

Frequency dependence and harmonic distortion of stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level sounds

Previous reports have suggested that intracochlear pressures (PIC) measured at the base of the cochlea increase directly proportionally with stapes displacement (DStap) in response to moderately high (<130 dB SPL) level sounds. Consistent with this assumption, we have reported that for low frequency sounds (<1 kHz), stapes displacement and intracochlear pressures increase linearly with sound pressure level (SPL) for moderately high levels (<130 dB SPL), but saturate at higher exposure levels (>130 dB SPL). However, the magnitudes of each response were found to be frequency dependent, thus the relationship between DStap and PIC may vary at higher frequencies or higher levels.In order to further examine this frequency and level dependence, measurements of DStap and PIC were made in cadaveric human temporal bones prepared with a mastoidectomy and extended facial recess to expose the ossicular chain. PIC was measured in scala vestibuli (PSV) and scala tympani (PST) simultaneously with SPL in the external auditory canal (PEAC) and laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) measurements of stapes velocity (VStap). Consistent with prior reports, DStap and PSV increased proportionally with sound pressure level in the ear canal up to a frequency-dependent saturation point, above which both DStap and PSV showed a distinct deviation from proportionality with PEAC, suggesting that their relationship may remain constant at these high frequencies. Likewise, while the asymptotic value, and SPL at which saturation occurred were frequency dependent in both DStap and PSV, the reduction in gain with increasing SPL above this level was constant above this level at all frequencies, and the magnitude of responses at harmonics of the driving frequency increased with increasing level, consistent with harmonic distortion via peak clipping. Importantly, this nonlinear distortion shifts the energy arriving at the inner ear to higher frequencies than are present in incident stimulus, thus exposing the high frequency sensitive components of the auditory system to more noise than would be expected from measurement of that stimulus on its own. Overall, responses suggest that the cochlear representation of very high-level air conducted stimuli is limited by nonlinearities in the middle ear, and that this peak limiting leads to increased high frequency cochlear exposures than are present in the driving stimulus.

The impact of round window reinforcement on middle and inner ear mechanics with air and bone conduction stimulation

The round window (RW) membrane plays an important role in normal inner ear mechanics. Occlusion or reinforcement of the RW has been described in the context of congenital anomalies or after cochlear implantation and is applied as a surgical treatment for hyperacusis. Multiple lumped and finite element models predict a low-frequency hearing loss with air conduction of up to 20 dB after RW reinforcement and limited to no effect on hearing with bone conduction stimulation. Experimental verification of these results, however, remains limited.Here, we present an experimental study measuring the impact of RW reinforcement on the middle and inner ear mechanics with air and bone conduction stimulation. In a within-specimen repeated measures design with human cadaveric specimens (n = 6), we compared the intracochlear pressures in scala vestibuli (PSV) and scala tympani (PST) before and after RW reinforcement with soft tissue, cartilage, and bone cement. The differential pressure (PDIFF) across the basilar membrane – known to be closely related to the hearing sensation - was calculated as the complex difference between PSV and PST.With air conduction stimulation, both PSV and PSTincreased on average up to 22 dB at frequencies below 1500 Hz with larger effect sizes for PST compared to PSV. The PDIFF, in contrast, decreased up to 11 dB at frequencies between 700 and 800 Hz after reinforcement with bone cement.With bone conduction, the average within-specimen effects were less than 5 dB for either PSV, PST, or PDIFF. The inter-specimen variability with bone conduction, however, was considerably larger than with air conduction.This experimental study shows that RW reinforcement impacts air conduction stimulation at low frequencies. Bone conduction stimulation seems to be largely unaffected. From a clinical point of view, these results support the hypothesis that delayed loss of air conduction hearing after cochlear implantation could be partially explained by the impact of RW reinforcement.

Impact of Insertion Speed, Depth, and Robotic Assistance on Cochlear Implant Insertion Forces and Intracochlear Pressure: A Scoping Review.

Cochlear implants are crucial for addressing severe-to-profound hearing loss, with the success of the procedure requiring careful electrode placement. This scoping review synthesizes the findings from 125 studies examining the factors influencing insertion forces (IFs) and intracochlear pressure (IP), which are crucial for optimizing implantation techniques and enhancing patient outcomes. The review highlights the impact of variables, including insertion depth, speed, and the use of robotic assistance on IFs and IP. Results indicate that higher insertion speeds generally increase IFs and IP in artificial models, a pattern not consistently observed in cadaveric studies due to variations in methodology and sample size. The study also explores the observed minimal impact of robotic assistance on reducing IFs compared to manual methods. Importantly, this review underscores the need for a standardized approach in cochlear implant research to address inconsistencies and improve clinical practices aimed at preserving hearing during implantation.

Acoustic stimulation of the human round window by laser-induced nonlinear optoacoustics.

The feasibility of low frequency pure tone generation in the inner ear by laser-induced nonlinear optoacoustic effect at the round window was demonstrated in three human cadaveric temporal bones (TB) using an integral pulse density modulation (IPDM). Nanosecond laser pulses with a wavelength in the near-infrared (NIR) region were delivered to the round window niche by an optical fiber with two spherical lenses glued to the end and a viscous gel at the site of the laser focus. Using IPDM, acoustic tones with frequencies between 20Hz and 1kHz were generated in the inner ear. The sound pressures in scala tympani and vestibuli were recorded and the intracochlear pressure difference (ICPD) was used to calculate the equivalent sound pressure level (eq. dB SPL) as an equivalent for perceived loudness. The results demonstrate that the optoacoustic effect produced sound pressure levels ranging from 140eq. dB SPL at low frequencies ≤ 200Hz to 90eq. dB SPL at 1kHz. Therefore, the produced sound pressure level is potentially sufficient for patients requiring acoustic low frequency stimulation. Hence, the presented method offers a potentially viable solution in the future to provide the acoustic stimulus component in combined electro-acoustic stimulation with a cochlear implant.

Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants.

The study evaluates the accuracy of predicting intracochlear pressure during bone conduction stimulation using promontory velocity and ear canal pressure, as less invasive alternatives to intracochlear pressure. Stimulating with a percutaneous bone conduction device implanted in six human cadaveric ears, measurements were taken across various intensities, frequencies, and stimulation positions. Results indicate that intracochlear pressure linearly correlates with ear canal pressure (R2 = 0.43, RMSE = 6.85 dB), and promontory velocity (R2 = 0.47, RMSE = 6.60 dB). Normalizing data to mitigate the influence of stimulation position leads to a substantial improvement in these correlations. R2 values increased substantially to 0.93 for both the ear canal pressure and the promontory velocity, with RMSE reduced considerably to 2.02 (for ear canal pressure) and 1.94 dB (for promontory velocity). Conclusively, both ear canal pressure and promontory velocity showed potential in predicting intracochlear pressure and the prediction accuracy notably enhanced when accounting for stimulation position. Ultimately, these findings advocate for the continued use of intracochlear pressure measurements to evaluate future bone conduction devices and illuminate the role of stimulation position in influencing the dynamics of bone conduction pathways.

Uncovering Vulnerable Phases in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion: Insights from an In Vitro Model.

The aim of this study is to improve our understanding of the mechanics involved in the insertion of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays. A series of 30 insertion experiments were conducted by three experienced surgeons. The experiments were carried out in a previously validated artificial temporal bone model according to established soft surgery guidelines. The use of an in vitro setup enabled us to comprehensively evaluate relevant parameters, such as insertion force, intracochlear pressure, and exact electrode array position in a controlled and repeatable environment. Our findings reveal that strong intracochlear pressure transients are more frequently caused during the second half of the insertion, and that regrasping the electrode array is a significant factor in this phenomenon. For choosing an optimal insertion speed, we show that it is crucial to balance slow movement to limit intracochlear stress with short duration to limit tremor-induced pressure spikes, challenging the common assumption that a slower insertion is inherently better. Furthermore, we found that intracochlear stress is affected by the order of execution of postinsertion steps, namely sealing the round window and posterior tympanotomy with autologous tissue and routing of the excess cable into the mastoid cavity. Finally, surgeons' subjective estimates of physical parameters such as speed, smoothness, and resistance did not correlate with objectively assessed measures, highlighting that a thorough understanding of intracochlear mechanics is essential for an atraumatic implantation. The results presented in this article allow us to formulate evidence-based surgical recommendations that may ultimately help to improve surgical outcome and hearing preservation in cochlear implant patients.

The effect of surgeon experience and insertion speed on intracochlear pressures during in-vitro cochlear implantation

HypothesisThat increased insertion speed is associated with increased intracochlear pressure variation.BackgroundPreservation of residual hearing is an important goal of modern cochlear implant surgery. Many factors, including intracochlear pressure changes during insertion, are thought to be significant in the preservation of residual hearing through the reduction in intraoperative trauma to the cochlea.MethodsParticipants at a cochlear implantation hearing preservation workshop open to surgeons and audiologists were invited to participate in a challenge to insert a cochlear implant electrode into an in-vitro model of a cochlea. Intracochlear pressure variation was measured as a surrogate marker for intracochlear trauma against insertion speed, method of insertion, moisturization of the electrode, and participant experience.ResultsThe study demonstrated that the relative experience of a surgeon and the speed of insertion were significant for maximal intracochlear pressure variation. The more experienced participants were likely to demonstrate lower pressure variation, and a slower insertion on average produced significantly smaller pressure changes than faster insertions. No other variables were deemed significant for maximal intracochlear pressure variation.ConclusionSurgeon experience and speed of implant insertions were significant factors in the reduction of intracochlear pressure variation during cochlear implantation simulations

Vibroacoustic simulations of asymmetric tapered duct mimicking cochlear hydrodynamics

Upon excitation by two pure-tone closely spaced in frequency, the cochlea produces intermodulation distortion tones which can be measured at the ear canal as otoacoustic emissions (OAE). Although OAEs have been widely used in auditory diagnosis, their mechanism of generation and backward propagation are not well-understood. It is known that sound stimulation elicits two types of intracochlear pressure waves: the fluid-borne compression wave, which travels at the speed of sound and the fluid-structure coupled traveling wave, which propagates significantly slowly, especially as it approaches the best place. However, compression wave excitation of the cochlear structures, such as the basilar membrane (BM), has been questioned on the basis of the classical Peterson-Bogert model. This question has significant implications for identifying the mechanism of backward propagation of OAE. To address this question, vibroacoustic simulations are performed in this study in symmetric and asymmetric tapered ducts mimicking the passive human cochlea with the objective of clarifying how compression wave can excite the BM. The two ducts are separated by BM without restricting its number of radial modes. The details of compression wave excitation of the BM are shown up to very high frequencies, and insights on this interaction are brought out.

Lumped element models of sound conduction in the human ear: A systematic review.

Lumped element models facilitate investigating the fundamental mechanisms of human ear sound conduction. This systematic review aims to guide researchers to the optimal model for the investigated parameters. For this purpose, the literature was reviewed up to 12 July 2023, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Seven models are included via database searching, and another 19 via cross-referencing. The quality of the models is assessed by comparing the predicted middle ear transfer function, the tympanic membrane impedance, the energy reflectance, and the intracochlear pressures (ICPs) (scala vestibuli, scala tympani, and differential) with experimental data. Regarding air conduction (AC), the models characterize the pathway from the outer to the inner ear and accurately predict all six aforementioned parameters. This contrasts with the few existing bone conduction (BC) models that simulate only a part of the ear. In addition, these models excel at predicting one observable parameter, namely, ICP. Thus, a model that simulates BC from the coupling site to the inner ear is still lacking and would increase insights into the human ear sound conduction. Last, this review provides insights and recommendations to determine the appropriate model for AC and BC implants, which is highly relevant for future clinical applications.

Development of Automated Tool for Electrode Array Insertion and its Study on Intracochlear Pressure.

The present work develops a simple, reliable, and compact device for automatically inserting the electrode array during cochlear implantation and test the device to observe intracochlear pressure during simulated electrode insertion. The device actuates the electrode array by a roller mechanism. For testing the automated device, a straight cochlea having the dimension of the scala tympani and a model electrode is developed using a 3D printer. A pressure sensor is utilized to observe the pressure change at different insertional conditions. The electrode is inserted into a prototype cochlea at different speeds without any pause, and it is noticed that the pressure is increased with the depth of insertion of the electrode irrespective of the speed of electrode insertion. The rate of pressure change is observed to be increased exponentially with the speed of insertion. At an insertion speed of 0.15 mm/s, the peak pressure is observed to be 133 Pa, which can be further evaluated in anatomical models for clinical scenarios. N/A Laryngoscope, 134:1388-1395, 2024.

Intracochlear pressure and temporal bone motion interaction under bone conduction stimulation

BackgroundUnder bone conduction (BC) stimulation, the otic capsule, and surrounding temporal bone, undergoes a complex 3-dimentional (3D) motion that depends on the frequency, location and coupling of the stimulation. The correlation between the resultant intracochlear pressure difference across the cochlear partition and the 3D motion of the otic capsule is not yet known and is to be investigated. MethodsExperiments were conducted in 3 fresh frozen cadaver heads, individually on each temporal bone, resulting in a total of 6 samples. The skull bone was stimulated, via the actuator of a BC hearing aid (BCHA), in the frequency range of 0.1–20 kHz. Stimulation was applied at the ipsilateral mastoid and the classical BAHA location via a conventional transcutaneous (5-N steel headband) and percutaneous coupling, sequentially. Three-dimensional motions were measured across the lateral and medial (intracranial) surfaces of the skull, the ipsilateral temporal bone, the skull base, as well as the promontory and stapes. Each measurement consisted of 130–200 measurement points (∼5–10 mm pitch) across the measured skull surface. Additionally, intracochlear pressure in the scala tympani and scala vestibuli was measured via a custom-made intracochlear acoustic receiver. ResultsWhile there were limited differences in the magnitude of the motion across the skull base, there were major differences in the deformation of different sections of the skull. Specifically, the bone near the otic capsule remained primarily rigid across all test frequency (above 10 kHz), in contrast to the skull base, which deformed above 1-2 kHz. Above 1 kHz, the ratio, between the differential intracochlear pressure and the promontory motion, was relatively independent of coupling and stimulation location. Similarly, the stimulation direction appears to have no influence on the cochlear response, above 1 kHz. ConclusionsThe area around the otic capsule appears rigid up to significantly higher frequencies than the rest of the skull surface, resulting in primarily inertial loading of the cochlear fluid. Further work should be focused at the investigation of the solid-fluid interaction between the bony walls of the otic capsule and the cochlear contents.

Estimating vibration artifacts in preclinical experimental assessment of actuator efficiency in bone-conduction hearing devices

ObjectivesTest feasibility of a means to distinguish artifact from relevant signal in an experimental method for pre-clinical assessment of bone conduction (BC) stimulation efficiency based on measurement of intracochlear pressure (ICP). MethodsExperiments were performed on fresh-frozen human temporal bones and cadaver heads. In a first step, fiber optic pressure sensors inserted into the cochlea through cochleostomies were intentionally vibrated to generate relative motion versus the stationary specimen, and the resulting ICP artifact recorded, before and after attaching the sensor fiber to the bone with glue. In a second step, BC stimulation was applied in the conventional location for a commercial bone anchored implant, as well as two alternative locations closer to the otic capsule. Again, ICP was recorded and compared with an estimated artifact, calculated from the previous measurements with intentional vibration of the fiber. ResultsIntentional vibration of the sensor fiber creates relative motion between fiber and bone, as intended, and causes an ICP signal. The stimulus does not create substantial promontory vibration, indicating that the measured ICP is all artifact, i.e. would not occur if the sensor were not in place. Fixating the sensor fiber to the bone with glue reduces the ICP artifact by at least 20 dB. BC stimulation also creates relative motion between sensor fiber and bone, as expected, from which an estimated ICP artifact level can be calculated. The ICP signal measured during BC stimulation is well above the estimated artifact, at least in some specimens and at some frequencies, indicating “real” cochlear stimulation, which would result in an auditory percept in a live subject. Stimulation at the alternative locations closer to the otic capsule appear to result in higher ICP (no statistical analysis performed), indicating a trend towards more efficient stimulation than at the conventional location. ConclusionsIntentional vibration of the fiber optic sensor for measurement of ICP can be used to derive an estimate of the artifact to be expected when measuring ICP during BC stimulation, and to characterize the effectiveness of glues or other means of reducing the artifact caused by relative motion of fiber and bone.

3D Finite Element Model of Human Ear with 3-Chamber Spiral Cochlea for Blast Wave Transmission from the Ear Canal to Cochlea

Blast-induced auditory trauma is a common injury in military service members and veterans that leads to hearing loss. While the inner ear response to blast exposure is difficult to characterize experimentally, computational models have advanced to predict blast wave transmission from the ear canal to the cochlea; however, published models have either straight or spiral cochlea with fluid-filled two chambers. In this paper, we report the recently developed 3D finite element (FE) model of the human ear mimicking the anatomical structure of the 3-chambered cochlea. The model consists of the ear canal, middle ear, and two and a half turns of the cochlea with three chambers separated by the Reissner's membrane (RM) and the basilar membrane (BM). The blast overpressure measured from human temporal bone experiments was applied at the ear canal entrance and the Fluent/Mechanical coupled fluid-structure interaction analysis was conducted in ANSYS software. The FE model-derived results include the pressure in the canal near the tympanic membrane (TM) and the intracochlear pressure at scala vestibuli, the TM displacement, and the stapes footplate (SFP) displacement, which were compared with experimentally measured data in human temporal bones. The validated model was used to predict the biomechanical response of the ear to blast overpressure: distributions of the maximum strain and stress within the TM, the BM displacement variation from the base to apex, and the energy flux or total energy entering the cochlea. The comparison of intracochlear pressure and BM displacement with those from the FE model of 2-chambered cochlea indicated that the 3-chamber cochlea model with the RM and scala media chamber improved our understanding of cochlea mechanics. This most comprehensive FE model of the human ear has shown its capability to predict the middle ear and cochlea responses to blast overpressure which will advance our understanding of auditory blast injury.

A Sleeve-Based, Micromotion Avoiding, Retractable and Tear-Opening (SMART) Insertion Tool for Cochlear Implantation.

In conventional cochlear implantation, the insertion of the electrode array is strongly affected by the local anatomy and human kinematics. Herein, we present a concept for an insertion tool that allows to optimize the insertion trajectory beyond anatomical constraints and stabilizes the electrode array in manual implantation. A novel sleeve-based design allows the instrument to be compliant and potentially protective to intracochlear structures, while a tear-open mechanism allows it to be removed after insertion by simply retracting the tool. Conventional and tool-guided manual insertions were performed by expert cochlear implant surgeons in an analog temporal bone model that allows to simultaneously record intracochlear pressure, insertion forces and electrode array deformation. Comparison between conventional and tool-guided insertions demonstrate a substantial reduction of maximum insertion forces, force variations, transverse intracochlear electrode array movement, and pressure transients. The presented tool can be utilized in manual cochlear implantation and significantly improves key metrics associated with intracochlear trauma. The instrument may ultimately help improve hearing outcomes in cochlear implantation. The versatile design may be used in both manual cochlear implantation and motorized and robotic insertion, as well as image-guided surgery.

Real-time measurement of stapes motion and intracochlear pressure during blast exposure

Blast-induced auditory injury is primarily caused by exposure to an overwhelming amount of energy transmitted into the external auditory canal, the middle ear, and then the cochlea. Quantification of this energy requires real-time measurement of stapes footplate (SFP) motion and intracochlear pressure in the scala vestibuli (Psv). To date, SFP and Psv have not been measured simultaneously during blast exposure, but a dual-laser experimental approach for detecting the movement of the SFP was reported by Jiang et al. (2021). In this study, we have incorporated the measurement of Psv with SFP motion and developed a novel approach to quantitatively measure the energy flux entering the cochlea during blast exposure.Five fresh human cadaveric temporal bones (TBs) were used in this study. A mastoidectomy and facial recess approach were performed to identify the SFP, followed by a cochleostomy into the scala vestibuli (SV). The TB was mounted to the “head block”, a fixture to simulate a real human skull, with two pressure sensors – one inserted into the SV (Psv) and another in the ear canal near the tympanic membrane (P1). The TB was exposed to the blast overpressure (P0) around 4 psi or 28 kPa. Two laser Doppler vibrometers (LDVs) were used to measure the movements of the SFP and TB (as a reference). The LDVs, P1, and Psv signals were triggered by P0 and recorded simultaneously.The results include peak values for Psv of 100.8 ± 51.6 kPa (mean ± SD) and for SFP displacement of 72.6 ± 56.4 μm, which are consistent with published experimental results and finite element modeling data. Most of the P0 input energy flux into the cochlea occurred within 2 ms and resulted in 10–70 μJ total energy entering the cochlea. Although the middle ear pressure gain was close to that measured under acoustic stimulus conditions, the nonlinear behavior of the middle ear was observed from the elevated cochlear input impedance.For the first time, SFP movement and intracochlear pressure Psv have been successfully measured simultaneously during blast exposure. This study provides a new methodology and experimental data for determining the energy flux entering the cochlea during a blast, which serves as an injury index for quantifying blast-induced auditory damage.

A chemo-mechanical cochleostomy preserves hearing for the in vivo functional imaging of cochlear cells.

In vivo and real-time multicellular imaging enables the decoding of sensory circuits and the tracking of systemic drug uptake. However, in vivo imaging of the auditory periphery remains technically challenging owing to the deep location, mechanosensitivity and fluid-filled, bone-encased nature of the cochlear structure. Existing methods that expose the cochlea invariably cause irreversible damage to auditory function, severely limiting the experimental measurements possible in living animals. Here we present an in vivo surgical protocol that permits the imaging of cochlear cells in hearing mice. Our protocol describes a ventro-lateral approach for preserving external and middle ear structures while performing surgery, the correct mouse positioning for imaging cochlear cells with effective sound transmission into the ear, the chemo-mechanical cochleostomy for creating the imaging window in the otic capsule bone that prevents intracochlear fluid leakage by maintaining an intact endosteum, and the release of intracochlear pressure that separates the endosteum from the otic capsule bone while creating an imaging window. The procedure thus preserves hearing thresholds. Individual inner and outer hair cells, supporting cells and nerve fibers can be visualized in vivo while hearing function is preserved. This approach may enable future original investigations, such as the real-time tracking of ototoxic drug transport into the cochleae. The technique may be applied to the monitoring of sound-evoked functional activity in multiple cochlear cells, in combination with optogenetic tools, and may help to improve cochlear implantation in humans. The cochleostomy takes ~1 h and requires experience in surgery.

Occluded insertion loss from intracochlear pressure measurements during acoustic shock wave exposure

IntroductionInjuries to the peripheral auditory system are among the most common results of high intensity impulsive noise exposure. Hearing protection can mitigate this injury, but careful assessment of the insertion loss they provide is necessary. Insertion loss is typically measured using microphone-based acoustic manikins to measure the decrease in sound pressure level transmitted into the ear canal, which precisely measure the change in air conducted sound, but neglect alternate pathways to the inner ear such as bone conduction. In a previous study we reported intracochlear pressures in cadaveric human specimens to acoustic shock waves, which revealed a substantial bone conducted component (Greene, et al., 2018). Here we evaluate insertion loss to several hearing protection devices (HPDs) in those same specimens using intracochlear pressure measurements. MethodsHuman cadaver heads were exposed to impulsive acoustic pressure waves with peak overpressures of 7 and 28 kPa (171 & 183 dB SPL). Ear canal (EAC), middle ear, and intracochlear sound pressure levels were measured bilaterally with fiber-optic pressure sensors. Surface-mounted sensors measured SPL and skull strain near the opening of each EAC and at the forehead. Responses were measured with specimen ears unoccluded, as reported previously, as well as fitted with four types of HPDs. Impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL) and impulse spectrum insertion loss (ISIL) were calculated for each HPD. ResultsFor all HPDs, IPIL generally increases with exposure level, though ISIL tended to be more consistent, and the spectral characteristics across frequency appear to be highly dependent on exposure level. ISIL measured in the ear canal tended to overestimate insertion loss measured in the cochlea, particularly at frequencies > 1 kHz; however, low signal-to-noise in intracochlear pressures limited comparisons. As a proof of concept, 36 low-level unoccluded exposures, were averaged together, and the resulting signal-to-noise ratio was improved by up to 15 dB. ConclusionsInsertion loss measured in the cochlea was lower than in the ear canal, suggesting substantial contributions from transmission pathways in parallel with air conduction (e.g., bone conduction) were present, which will require novel strategies to mitigate. However, high variance was observed, and noise reduction strategies should be utilized in future studies to facilitate more precise insertion loss estimates.

Effects of Varying Laser Parameters During Laser Stapedotomy on Intracochlear Pressures.

Sensorineural hearing loss is a known complication of stapes surgery. We previously showed that laser stapedotomy can result in intracochlear pressures that are comparable to high sound pressure levels. Optimizing laser settings to those that correspond with the lowest pressure changes may mitigate risk for postoperative hearing loss. Here we quantify the effects of various laser parameters on intracochlear pressures and test the hypothesis that intracochlear pressure changes are proportional to the laser energy delivered. Basic and translational science. Cadaveric dissection and basic science laboratory. Cadaveric human heads underwent mastoidectomies. Intracochlear pressures were measured via fiber-optic pressure probes placed in scala vestibuli and tympani. Pulses of varied stimulus power and duration from a 980-nm diode laser were applied to the stapes footplate. Sustained high-intensity pressures were observed in the cochlea during all laser applications. Observed pressure magnitudes increased monotonically with laser energy and rose linearly for lower stimulus durations and powers, but there was increased variability for laser applications of longer duration (200-300 ms) and/or higher power (8 W). Results confirm that significant pressure changes occur during laser stapedotomy, which we hypothesize may cause injury. Overall energy delivered depends predictably on duration and power, but surgeons should use caution at the highest stimulus levels and longest pulse durations due to the increasing variability in intracochlear pressure under these stimulus conditions. While the risk to hearing from increased intracochlear pressures from laser stapedotomy remains unclear, these results affirm the need to optimize laser settings to avoid unintended injury.

Intracochlear pressure as an objective measure for perceived loudness with bone conduction implants

BackgroundThe generally accepted method to assess the functionality of novel bone conduction implants in a preclinical stage is to experimentally measure the vibratory response of the cochlear promontory. Yet, bone conduction of sound is a complex propagation phenomenon, depending on both frequency and amplitude, involving different conduction pathways. ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to validate the use of intracochlear sound pressure (ICP) as an objective indicator for perceived loudness for bone conduction stimulation. It is investigated whether a correlation exists between intracochlear sound pressure measurements in cadaveric temporal bones and clinically obtained results using the outcome of a loudness balancing experiment. MethodsTen normal hearing subjects were asked to balance the perceived loudness between air conducted (AC) sound and bone conducted (BC) sound by changing the AC stimulus. Mean balanced thresholds were calculated and used as stimulation levels in a cadaver trial (N = 4) where intracochlear sound pressure was measured during AC and BC stimulation to assess the correlation with the measured clinical data. The intracochlear pressure was measured at the relatively low stimulation amplitude of 80 dBHL using a lock-in amplification technique. ResultsApplying AC and BC stimulation at equal perceived loudness on cadaveric heads yield a similar differential intracochlear pressure, with differences between AC and BC falling within the range of variability of normal hearing test subjects. ConclusionComparing the perceived loudness at 80 dB HL for both AC and BC validates intracochlear pressure as an objective indicator of the cochlear drive. The measurement setup is more time-intensive than measuring the vibratory response of the cochlear promontory, yet it provides direct information on the level of the cochlear scalae.