The Shanggong Au deposit is a world-class Au deposit in the southern margin of the North China Craton. Pyrite, as the primary Au carrier in this deposit, is an ideal mineral for dissecting the complex ore-forming process and origin of this deposit. Four types of pyrite were identified by EPMA, SEM, LA-ICP-MS, and NanoSIMS analyses: the coarse-grained cubic, disseminated pyrite (Py1) in the early ore stage (S1) and three types of the fine-grained pentagonal dodecahedron, disseminated pyrite (Py2-1, Py2-2, and Py2-3) with zoning textures in the main ore stage (S2). Py1 is relatively depleted in most metals but enriched in Co and Bi compared with other types of pyrite in S2. On the other hand, both Py2-1 and Py2-3 contain relatively high contents of As, Au, and other metals, whereas Py2-2 contains highest Au, As, Ag, Cu, Sb, Te, Tl, and Pb. Oscillatory zoning in Py2-1 resulted from repeated local fluid phase separation at the near-surface of pyrite crystal due to sharp fluid pressure fluctuation. The Au and As-rich Py2-2 was probably formed under both extrinsic fluctuations in fluid pressure and composition and intrinsic local crystal-fluid interface kinetic effects (e.g., diffusion-limited self-organization, surface electrochemistry-driven adsorption). Crystallization of Py2-1 and Py2-2 has exhausted the metals in the residual fluids, wherein the trace element-poor Py2-3 crystallized and locally replaced Py2-2 through a dissolution-reprecipitation process. Our new data and previous results suggest the ore-forming fluids were likely initial produced by degassing of the concealed pluton, and the metals were sourced from both the crust (e.g., the Taihua complex and Xiong’er Group) and the mantle. The negative δ34S values for pyrite in the S2 stage might result from both the isotopic fractionation between sulfide and sulfate minerals via oxidation of the ore-forming fluid and the input of biogenic sulfur.
Read full abstract