Intensity-modulated Stereotactic Radiosurgery Research Articles

Image-guided positioning in intracranial non-invasive stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastasis.

The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility of non-invasive image-guided radiosurgery to improve patient comfort and quality of life in stereotactic radiosurgery planning and treatment of patients with brain metastasis. Precise immobilization is a rule of thumb for stereotactic radiosurgery. Non-invasive immobilization techniques have the potential of improved quality of life compared with invasive procedures. A total of 92 lesions from 42 patients with brain metastasis were included in the study. After immobilization with a thermoplastic mask and a bite-block unlike the invasive frame-based procedure, planning computed tomography images were acquired and fused with magnetic resonance images. After contouring, intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IM-SRS) planning was done, and the patients were re-immobilized on the treatment couch for the therapy procedures. While patients were on the treatment couch, kilovoltage-cone beam computed tomography images were acquired to determine setup errors and achieve on-line correction and then repeated after on-line correction to confirm precise tumor localization. The patients then underwent single-fraction definitive treatment. For the 92 lesions treated, mean ± SD values of translational setup corrections in X (lateral), Y (longitudinal), and Z (vertical) dimensions were 0.7 ± 0.7 mm, 0.8 ± 0.7 mm, and 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and rotational set-up corrections were 0.5 ± 1.1°, 0.06 ± 1.1°, and -0.1 ± 1.1° in X (pitch), Y (roll), and Z (yaw), respectively. The mean three-dimensional correction vector was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm. Non-invasive image-guided radiosurgery for brain metastasis is feasible, and the non-invasive treatment approach can be routinely used in clinical practice to improve patients' quality of life.

Frameless single-isocenter intensity modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for simultaneous treatment of multiple intracranial metastases.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is well accepted treatment for patients with intracranial metastases, but the role of frameless radiosurgery is not well defined. Here, we describe our clinical experience applying a novel single-isocenter technique to frameless intensity modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMRS) for simultaneous treatment of multiple intracranial metastases. Between 2006 and 2012, 100 consecutive patients received frameless IMRS for multiple intracranial metastases using a single, centrally-located isocenter. Among these, 29 patients were treated for progressive or recurrent intracranial disease. A total of 465 metastases (median, 4 per patient, range, 2-18) were treated to a median dose of 20 Gy (range, 15-50 Gy). Follow-up including clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) occurred every 3 months. Median follow-up for all patients was 4.3 months (range, 0.2-58.3 months), with 83 patients (83.0%) followed until their death. For the remaining 17 patients alive at the time of analysis, median follow-up was 9.2 months (range, 2.2-58.3 months). Overall survival at 6 months was 49.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.3-63.6%]. Local control at 6 and 12 months was 88.9% (95% CI, 79.1-98.6%) and 81.5% (95% CI, 65.2-97.7%), respectively. Regional failure was observed in 39 patients (39%), and 25 patients (25%) received salvage therapy. Grade 3 or greater treatment-related toxicity was observed in 4 patients (4%) and included intracranial hemorrhage, seizure, and radionecrosis. Median total treatment time was 17.2 minutes (range, 2.8-55.3 minutes). Single-isocenter IMRS for multiple intracranial metastases can produce clinical outcomes comparable to those of conventional radiosurgery techniques.

Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning

BackgroundStereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a common tool used to treat Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) in anatomical locations associated with a risk of surgical complications. Despite high rates of clinical effectiveness, SRS carries a risk of toxicity as a result of radiation injury to brain tissue. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has increased because it may lead to improved PTV conformity and better Normal Tissue (NT) sparing compared to 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT). The aim of this study was twofold: 1) to develop simple patient stratification rules for the recommendation of IMRT planning strategies over 3DCRT in the treatment of AVMs with SRS; and 2) to estimate the impact of IMRT in terms of toxicity reduction using retrospectively reported data for symptomatic radiation injury following SRS.MethodsThirty-one AVM patients previously treated with 3DCRT were replanned in a commercial treatment planning system using 3DCRT and static gantry IMRT with identical beam arrangements. The radiotherapy planning metrics analyzed included AVM volume, diameter, and volume to surface area ratio. The dosimetric endpoints analyzed included conformity index improvements and NT sparing measured by the maximum NT dose, and the volume of surrounding tissue that received 7Gy and 12Gy.ResultsOur analysis revealed stratified subsets of patients for IMRT that were associated with improved conformity, and those that were associated with decreased doses to normal tissue. The stratified patients experienced an improvement in conformity index by −6-68%, a reduction in the maximum NT dose by −0.5-12.3%, a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 7Gy by 1-8 cc, and a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 12Gy by 0–3.7 cc. The reduction in NT receiving 12Gy translated to a theoretical decrease in the probability of symptomatic injury by 0–9.3%.ConclusionsThis work indicates the potential for significant patient improvements when treating AVMs and provides rules to predict which patients are likely to benefit from IMRT.

Clinical Outcomes of Single Isocenter Frameless Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases

Radiosurgery is well accepted in the treatment of patients with intracranial metastases, but the role of frameless radiosurgery is unknown. Here, we describe our clinical experience with a novel single isocenter technique for frameless intensity modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMRS) to treat multiple intracranial metastases.

Image-Guided Positioning in Intracranial Non-Invasive Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Brain Metastasis

The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility of non-invasive image-guided radiosurgery to improve patient comfort and quality of life in stereotactic radiosurgery planning and treatment of patients with brain metastasis. Precise immobilization is a rule of thumb for stereotactic radiosurgery. Non-invasive immobilization techniques have the potential of improved quality of life compared with invasive procedures. A total of 92 lesions from 42 patients with brain metastasis were included in the study. After immobilization with a thermoplastic mask and a bite-block unlike the invasive frame-based procedure, planning computed tomography images were acquired and fused with magnetic resonance images. After contouring, intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IM-SRS) planning was done, and the patients were re-immobilized on the treatment couch for the therapy procedures. While patients were on the treatment couch, kilovoltage-cone beam computed tomography images were acquired to determine setup errors and achieve on-line correction and then repeated after on-line correction to confirm precise tumor localization. The patients then underwent single-fraction definitive treatment. For the 92 lesions treated, mean ± SD values of translational setup corrections in X (lateral), Y (longitudinal), and Z (vertical) dimensions were 0.7 ± 0.7 mm, 0.8 ± 0.7 mm, and 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and rotational set-up corrections were 0.5 ± 1.1°, 0.06 ± 1.1°, and -0.1 ± 1.1° in X (pitch), Y (roll), and Z (yaw), respectively. The mean three-dimensional correction vector was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm. Non-invasive image-guided radiosurgery for brain metastasis is feasible, and the non-invasive treatment approach can be routinely used in clinical practice to improve patients' quality of life.

Overall and progression-free survival and visual and endocrine outcomes for patients with parasellar lesions treated with intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery

Linear accelerator single-fraction radiosurgery (SRS) for skull base lesions is usually delivered with dynamic conformal arcs (DCAs), but intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) is another option when SRS dose is limited by proximity of the optic nerve and chiasm. We review the long-term outcome of patients treated with IMRS for parasellar lesions. Fourteen patients with parasellar lesions were treated with IMRS when standard DCA radiosurgery was limited by optic nerve tolerance. Prospective patient data included endocrine function, visual acuity and field testing, nonoptic nerve cranial neuropathy, and overall survival. In addition, tumor control on serial magnetic resonance imaging is reported as progression-free survival (PFS). Six patients with cavernous sinus meningiomas and eight with recurrent pituitary adenomas were treated. Three of the pituitary tumors were hormonally active (two with Cushing disease, one with acromegaly). The median patient age was 50 years (range 24-70 years). Median follow-up was 54 months. Average tumor treatment volume was 4.99 ml (average dose 16 Gy, average of 10 IMRS fields). Tumor control was achieved in 11 of 14 (79%) patients. Median PFS has not been reached in our patient population. Thirteen patients are alive (one died of an unrelated cancer). No patients developed new endocrinological, ophthalmological, or cranial nerve deficits. IMRS allows for treatment of parasellar lesions when standard DCA SRS is limited by optic nerve tolerance. Although our follow-up period was relatively short and the number of patients was small, it appears that this can be accomplished with a high tumor control rate and survival without new endocrinopathies, optic neuropathies, or other complications in patients who have failed other therapies.

Single-Isocenter Frameless Intensity-Modulated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Simultaneous Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases: Clinical Experience

To describe our clinical experience using a unique single-isocenter technique for frameless intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IM-SRS) to treat multiple brain metastases. Twenty-six patients with a median of 5 metastases (range, 2-13) underwent optically guided frameless IM-SRS using a single, centrally located isocenter. Median prescription dose was 18 Gy (range, 14-25). Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical examination occurred every 2-4 months. Median follow-up for all patients was 3.3 months (range, 0.2-21.3), with 20 of 26 patients (77%) followed up until their death. For the remaining 6 patients alive at the time of analysis, median follow-up was 14.6 months (range, 9.3-18.0). Total treatment time ranged from 9.0 to 38.9 minutes (median, 21.0). Actuarial 6- and 12-month overall survivals were 50% (95% confidence interval [C.I.], 31-70%) and 38% (95% C.I., 19-56%), respectively. Actuarial 6- and 12-month local control (LC) rates were 97% (95% C.I., 93-100%) and 83% (95% C.I., 71-96%), respectively. Tumors <or=1.5 cm had a better 6-month LC than those >1.5 cm (98% vs. 90%, p = 0.008). New intracranial metastatic disease occurring outside of the treatment volume was observed in 7 patients. Grade >or=3 toxicity occurred in 2 patients (8%). Frameless IM-SRS using a single-isocenter approach for treating multiple intracranial metastases can produce clinical outcomes that compare favorably with those of conventional SRS in a much shorter treatment time (<40 minutes). Given its faster treatment time, this technique is appealing to both patients and personnel in busy clinics.

A Single-isocenter Technique for Frameless Intensity-modulated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases: Clinical Experience and Outcomes

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has a well-established role in the management of patients (pts) with brain metastases (BM). We describe here our clinical experience using a unique single-isocenter frameless intensity-modulated SRS (IMSRS) approach for multiple BM.

Effect of MLC Leaf Width and PTV Margin on the Treatment Planning of Intensity-Modulated Stereotactic Radiosurgery (IMSRS) or Radiotherapy (IMSRT)

We studied the effect of MLC (multileaf collimator) leaf width and PTV (planning target volume) margin on treatment planning of intensity modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMSRS) or radiotherapy (IMSRT). Twelve patients previously treated with IMSRS/IMSRT were retrospectively planned with 5- and 3-mm MLC leaf widths and 3- and 2-mm PTV margins using the already contoured clinical target volume and critical structures. The same beam arrangement, planning parameters, and optimization method were used in each of the 4 plans for a given patient. Each plan was normalized so that the prescription dose covered at least 99% of the PTV. Plan indices — D mean (mean dose), conformity index (CI), V 70 (volume receiving ≥ 70% of the prescription dose), and V 50 (volume receiving ≥ 50% of the prescription dose) — were calculated from the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the PTV, normal tissue, and organs at risk (OARs). Hypothesis testing was performed on the mean ratios of plan indices to determine the statistical significance of the relative differences. The PTV was well covered for all plans, as no significant differences were observed for D 95, V 95, D max, D min, and D mean of the PTV. The irradiated volume was ∼23% smaller when 2-mm instead of 3-mm PTV margin was used, but it was only reduced by ∼6% when the MLC leaf width was reduced from 5 mm to 3 mm. For normal tissue and brainstem, V 70, V 50, and D mean were reduced more effectively by a decrease in MLC width, while D mean of optic nerve and chiasm were more sensitive to a change in PTV margin. The DVH statistics for the PTV and normal structures from the treatment plan with 5-mm MLC and 2-mm PTV margin were equal to those with 3-mm MLC and 3-mm PTV margin. PTV margin reduction is more effective in sparing the normal tissue and OARs than a reduction in MLC leaf width. For IMSRS, where highly accurate setup and small PTV margins are routinely employed, the use of 5-mm MLC is therefore less desirable.

NOVALIS INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOSURGERY

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE The Novalis stereotactic radiotherapy system (BrainLAB, Heimstetten, Germany) allows for precise treatment of cranial base tumors with single-fraction radiosurgery. In some cases, however, proximity of the optic nerve and chiasm is a concern. In these cases, intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMRS) can be used to limit the dose to these structures. IMRS planning can be labor intensive, which poses a problem when it is performed on the day of treatment. We describe our methods and results of preprocedure planning for IMRS for patients with lesions in the cavernous sinus or parasellar regions in whom the dose to the optic nerve or chiasm might exceed our acceptable tolerance dose (8 Gy). METHODS Patients whose lesions were more than 4 mm from the optic nerve and chiasm on standard magnetic resonance imaging scans but who were questionable candidates for radiosurgery because of concerns of dose to the optic nerve or chiasm were considered for IMRS. Preprocedure imaging (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) was fused and analyzed using the BrainLAB BrainScan 5.3 treatment planning system. Dynamic conformal arc plans for stereotactic radiosurgery and IMRS were evaluated. Doses to the planning target volume and optic apparatus were assessed by dose-volume histograms and conformality index calculated to characterize the quality of the different plans. When IMRS was used, the preplan allowed for a rapid recalculation on the treatment day, minimizing the time patients were in the head frame before treatment. RESULTS We describe three patients with recurrent pituitary tumors and three with meningiomas. Doses were 1500 to 2000 cGy prescribed to the 80 to 96% isodose line delivered by eight to 22 fields. Tumor volumes ranged from 2.70 to 8.82 cm3 (mean, 5.7 cm3). In five of the six patients, the dynamic conformal arc plan precluded delivery of therapeutic dose without exceeding optic nerve tolerance. On the basis of 95% coverage of target volume, maximum prescription doses of 7.7 to 20.64 Gy were possible with the dynamic conformal arc plans without exceeding 8 Gy to the optic apparatus. IMRS allowed maximum doses of 20 to 31 Gy using the same optic apparatus dose restriction. No complications have occurred, and all tumors have remained stable since treatment (mean follow-up period, 30 mo). CONCLUSION We believe this pretreatment technique streamlines the process for IMRS, allowing for better patient comfort and efficient physician time use.

930 POSTER Comparative dosimetric study of dynamic conformal arc (DCA), conformal beam (CB) and intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) for childhood cerebral arteriovenous malformations (cAVM) treatment

Purpose: To present the TALON removable head frame system as an immobilization device for single-fraction intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMRS) and fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FS-IMRT); and to evaluate the repositioning accuracy by measurement of anatomic landmark coordinates in repeated computed tomography (CT) examinations.Methods and materials: Nine patients treated by fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy underwent repeated CTs during their treatment courses. We evaluated anatomic landmark coordinates in a total of 26 repeat CT data sets and respective x, y, and z shifts relative to their positions in the nine treatment-planning reference CTs. An iterative optimization algorithm was employed using a root mean square scoring function to determine the best-fit orientation of subsequent sets of anatomic landmark measurements relative to the original image set. This allowed for the calculation of the x, y, and z components of translation of the target isocenter for each repeat CT. In addition to absolute target isocenter translation, the magnitude (sum vector) of isocenter motion and the patient/target rotation about the three principal axes were calculated.Results: Anatomic landmark analysis over a treatment course of 6 weeks revealed a mean target isocenter translation of 0.95 ± 0.55, 0.58 ± 0.46, and 0.51 ± 0.38 mm in x, y, and z directions, respectively. The mean magnitude of isocenter translation was 1.38 ± 0.48 mm. The 95% confidence interval ([CI], mean translation plus two standard deviations) for repeated isocenter setup accuracy over the 6-week period was 2.34 mm. Average rotations about the x, y, and z axes were 0.41 ± 0.36, 0.29 ± 0.25, and 0.18 ± 0.15 degrees, respectively. Analysis of the accuracy of the first repeated setup control, representative of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery situations, resulted in a mean target isocenter translation in the x, y, and z directions of 0.52 ± 0.38, 0.56 ± 0.30, and 0.46 ± 0.25 mm, respectively. The mean magnitude of isocenter translation was 0.99 ± 0.28 mm. The 95% confidence interval for these radiosurgery situations was 1.55 mm. Average rotations at first repeated setup control about the x, y, and z axes were 0.24 ± 0.19, 0.19 ± 0.17, and 0.19 ± 0.12 degrees, respectively.Conclusion: The TALON relocatable head frame was seen to be well suited for immobilization and repositioning of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. Because of its unique removable design, the system was also seen to provide excellent repeat immobilization and alignment for fractionated stereotactic applications. The exceptional accuracy for the single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgical application of the system was seen to deteriorate only slightly over a 6-week fractionated stereotactic treatment course.

The talon removable head frame system for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy: measurement of the repositioning accuracy

Purpose: To present the TALON removable head frame system as an immobilization device for single-fraction intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMRS) and fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FS-IMRT); and to evaluate the repositioning accuracy by measurement of anatomic landmark coordinates in repeated computed tomography (CT) examinations.Methods and materials: Nine patients treated by fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy underwent repeated CTs during their treatment courses. We evaluated anatomic landmark coordinates in a total of 26 repeat CT data sets and respective x, y, and z shifts relative to their positions in the nine treatment-planning reference CTs. An iterative optimization algorithm was employed using a root mean square scoring function to determine the best-fit orientation of subsequent sets of anatomic landmark measurements relative to the original image set. This allowed for the calculation of the x, y, and z components of translation of the target isocenter for each repeat CT. In addition to absolute target isocenter translation, the magnitude (sum vector) of isocenter motion and the patient/target rotation about the three principal axes were calculated.Results: Anatomic landmark analysis over a treatment course of 6 weeks revealed a mean target isocenter translation of 0.95 ± 0.55, 0.58 ± 0.46, and 0.51 ± 0.38 mm in x, y, and z directions, respectively. The mean magnitude of isocenter translation was 1.38 ± 0.48 mm. The 95% confidence interval ([CI], mean translation plus two standard deviations) for repeated isocenter setup accuracy over the 6-week period was 2.34 mm. Average rotations about the x, y, and z axes were 0.41 ± 0.36, 0.29 ± 0.25, and 0.18 ± 0.15 degrees, respectively. Analysis of the accuracy of the first repeated setup control, representative of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery situations, resulted in a mean target isocenter translation in the x, y, and z directions of 0.52 ± 0.38, 0.56 ± 0.30, and 0.46 ± 0.25 mm, respectively. The mean magnitude of isocenter translation was 0.99 ± 0.28 mm. The 95% confidence interval for these radiosurgery situations was 1.55 mm. Average rotations at first repeated setup control about the x, y, and z axes were 0.24 ± 0.19, 0.19 ± 0.17, and 0.19 ± 0.12 degrees, respectively.Conclusion: The TALON relocatable head frame was seen to be well suited for immobilization and repositioning of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. Because of its unique removable design, the system was also seen to provide excellent repeat immobilization and alignment for fractionated stereotactic applications. The exceptional accuracy for the single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgical application of the system was seen to deteriorate only slightly over a 6-week fractionated stereotactic treatment course.

Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery using dynamic micro-multileaf collimation

Purpose: The implementation of dynamic leaf motion on a micro-multileaf collimator system provides the capability for intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMSRS), and the consequent potential for improved dose distributions for irregularly shaped tumor volumes adjacent to critical organs. This study explores the use of IMSRS to provide improved tumor coverage and normal tissue sparing for small cranial tumors relative to plans based on multiple fixed uniform-intensity beams or traditional circular collimator arc-based stereotactic techniques. Methods and Materials: Four patient cases involving small brain lesions are presented and analyzed. The cases were chosen to include a representative selection of target shapes, number of targets, and adjacent critical areas. Patient plans generated for these comparisons include standard arcs with multiple circular collimators, and fixed noncoplanar static fields with uniform-intensity beams and IMSRS. Parameters used for evaluation of the plans include the percentage of irradiated volume to tumor volume (PITV), normal tissue dose–volume histograms, and dose–homogeneity ratios. All IMSRS plans were computed using previously established IMRT techniques adapted for use with the BrainLAB M3 micro-multileaf collimator. The algorithms comprising the IMRT system for optimization of intensity distributions and conversion into leaf trajectories of the BrainLab M3 were developed at our institution. The ADAC Pinnacle 3 radiation treatment-planning system was used for dose calculations and for input of contours for target volumes and normal critical structures. Results: For all cases, the IMSRS plans showed a high degree of conformity of the dose distribution with the target shape. The IMSRS plans provided either ( 1) a smaller volume of normal tissue irradiated to significant dose levels, generally taken as doses greater than 50% of the prescription, or ( 2) a lower dose to an important adjacent critical organ. The reduction in volume of normal tissue irradiated in the IMSRS plans ranged from 10% to 50% relative to the other arc and uniform fixed-field plans. Conclusion: The case studies presented for IMSRS demonstrate significant dosimetric improvements for small, irregularly shaped lesions of the brain when compared to treatments using multiple static fields or standard SRS arc techniques with circular collimators. For all cases, the IMSRS plan yielded a smaller volume of normal tissue irradiated, and/or a reduction in the volume of an adjacent critical organ (i.e., brainstem) irradiated to significant dose levels.

39 Intensity modulated stereotactic radiosurgery using a micro-multileaf compared with gamma knife and linac arc radiosurgery

39 Intensity modulated stereotactic radiosurgery using a micro-multileaf compared with gamma knife and linac arc radiosurgery