Insulin Resistance In Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus Research Articles

Tumor necrosis factor-α: a continuum of liability between insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and carcinoma (review)

Summary In this review, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is identified as the uniting principle linking the pathogenesis of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and carcinoma. Elevated TNF-α initially increases, and then inhibits, the activity of a number of key enzymes involved in energy metabolism and major histocompatibility (MHC) class I molecule expression. These enzymes include: protein-tyrosine kinase (PTKase) and protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTPase – enzymes involved in energy metabolism, cell proliferation and stimulation of the MHC class I molecule pathway. Of primary importance is the inhibiting effect of TNF-α on PTKase, since this induces insulin resistance in NIDDM and carcinoma, and PTPase, which inhibits MHC class I molecule expression. Studies have shown that IDDM is associated with an increase in PTPase activity which leads to overexpression of MHC class I molecules and a concomitant destruction of pancreatic β cells. Conversely, carcinoma is associated with an inhibition of PTPase activity, which reduces the expression of MHC class I antigen expression on the cell surface thereby allowing malignant cells to escape immune surveillance. It will be argued that there is continuum of liability between these three conditions, initiated by the effect of TNF-α on these key enzymes.

Pioglitazone enhances splanchnic glucose uptake as well as peripheral glucose uptake in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

To evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on insulin resistance in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients, a double-blind placebo-controlled trial was carried out with 30 NIDDM patients. Twenty-one subjects, three on diet alone and 18 on sulfonylurea (SU), orally received 30 mg pioglitazone once daily for 12 weeks. Nine subjects, one on diet alone and eight on SU, received a matching placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Euglycemic (5.2 mmol/l) hyperinsulinemic (1200 pmol/l) clamp combined with an oral glucose load (OGL) was performed before and after 3-month treatment with pioglitazone or placebo to determine insulin-stimulated glucose disposal and splanchnic glucose uptake (SGU). No significant differences existed in the patients' characteristics, including age and body mass index, between the two study groups. The pioglitazone treatment increased the mean glucose infusion rate (GIR) prior to OGL from 8.2±2.2 to 9.2±2.0 mg/kg·min (means±SD, P=0.003) and increased the SGU rate from 28.5±19.4 to 59.4±27.1% ( P=0.010). The placebo treatment produced no significant changes in either GIR or SGU after treatment. A significant difference ( P=0.042) was observed in change of SGU between the pioglitazone and placebo treatment groups. In conclusion, the results indicate that pioglitazone is effective for ameliorating insulin resistance in NIDDM by enhancing SGU as well as peripheral glucose uptake.

Hyperamylinemia is associated with hyperinsulinemia in the glucose-tolerant, insulin-resistant offspring of two Mexican-American non—insulin-dependent diabetic parents

Several investigations have presented evidence that amylin inhibits insulin secretion and induces insulin resistance both in vitro and in vivo. However, basal and postmeal amylin concentrations proved similar in non—insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients and controls. Since hyperglycemia may alter both amylin and insulin secretion, we examined basal and glucose-stimulated amylin secretion in eight glucose-tolerant, insulin-resistant Mexican-American subjects with both parents affected with NIDDM (offspring) and correlated the findings with the insulin sensitivity data acquired by an insulin clamp. Eight offspring and eight Mexican-Americans without any family history of diabetes (controls) underwent measurement of fat free mass ( 3H 2O dilution method); 180-minutes, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and 40-mU/m 2, 180-minute euglycemic insulin clamp associated with 3H-glucose infusion and indirect calorimetry. Fasting amylin was significantly increased in offspring versus controls (11.5 ± 1.4 v 7.0 ± 0.8 pmol/L, P < .05). After glucose ingestion, both total (3,073 ± 257 v 1,870 ± 202 pmol · L −1 min −1, P < .01) and incremental (1,075 ± 170 v 518 ± 124 pmol · L −1 · min −1, P < .05) areas under the curve (AUCs) of amylin concentration were significantly greater in offspring. The amylin to insulin molar ratio was similar in offspring and controls at all time points. Basal and postglucose insulin and C-peptide concentrations were significantly increased in the offspring. No correlation was found between fasting amylin, postglucose amylin AUC or IAUC, and any measured parameter of glucose metabolism during a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (total glucose disposal, 7.21 ± 0.73 v 11.03 ± 0.54, P < .001; nonoxidative glucose disposal, 3.17 ± 0.59 v 6.33 ± 0.56, P < .002; glucose oxidation, 4.05 ± 0.46 v 4.71 ± 0.21, P = NS; hepatic glucose production, 0.29 ± 0.16 v 0.01 ± 0.11, P = NS; all mg · min −1 · kg −1 fat-free mass, offspring v controls). In conclusion, these data do not support a causal role for amylin in the genesis of insulin resistance in NIDDM.

Insulin receptor substrate (IRS) 1 is reduced and IRS-2 is the main docking protein for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in adipocytes from subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

The large docking protein IRS-1 is a major substrate for the insulin receptor and other tyrosine kinases. It plays a key role in eliciting many of insulin's actions, including binding and activation of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase and the subsequent increase in glucose transport. Gene disruption of IRS-1 in mice is associated with an impaired insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in vivo and glucose transport in vitro, but the survival of the animals and residual insulin sensitivity is dependent on the presence of the alternative docking protein IRS-2. We examined the expression and function of IRS-1 and IRS-2 in adipocytes from healthy and diabetic individuals. Cells from subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), but not with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, had an impaired insulin effect and a marked reduction (70 +/- 6%) in the expression of IRS-1 protein, whereas IRS-2 was unchanged. In normal cells, IRS-1 was the main docking protein for the binding and activation of insulin-stimulated PI 3-kinase; IRS-2 was also functional but required a higher insulin concentration for a similar binding and activation of PI 3-kinase. In contrast in NIDDM cells with a low IRS-1 content, IRS-2 became the main docking protein. These findings may provide important reasons for the insulin resistance in NIDDM.

Anorectic agents in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

The use of anorectic agents for the treatment of obesity has recently gained wider acceptance. In general, clinical trials have shown that obese subjects treated with appetite suppressants lose significantly more weight than those treated with placebo and a prescribed diet. The majority of patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) are obese, and this excess of body fat is thought to play a major role in the insulin resistance of NIDDM. The impact of appetite suppressant therapy on both weight loss and metabolic parameters in patients with NIDDM is reviewed.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 on islet function and insulin sensitivity in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Administration of the truncated glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) has been considered for treatment of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). We studied its antidiabetogenic mechanism by examining its influences on islet function and peripheral insulin sensitivity in six subjects (aged 56-74 yr) with well-controlled NIDDM. Islet function was evaluated with arginine stimulation at three plasma glucose levels (fasting, 14 mmol/L, and > 28 mmol/L). GLP-1 (1.5 pmol/kg per min iv) increased serum insulin levels at fasting glucose (P = 0.028), at 14 mmol/L glucose (P = 0.028), and at 28 mmol/L glucose (P = 0.028). The acute insulin response (AIR) to 5 g iv arginine was increased by GLP-1 at 14 mmol/L glucose (P = 0.028), and the slopeAIR, i.e., the glucose potentiation of insulin secretion, was markedly increased by GLP-1 (P = 0.028). Plasma glucagon levels were reduced by GLP-1 (P = 0.028), and arginine-stimulated glucagon secretion (AGR) was inhibited by GLP-1 at 14 (P = 0.046) and 28 mmol/L glucose (P = 0.028). Glucose-induced inhibition of arginine-stimulated glucagon secretion (slopeAGR) was not significantly affected by GLP-1. In contrast, GLP-1 did not affect the low insulin sensitivity during a hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp. Thus, GLP-1 improves islet dysfunction in diabetes, mainly by increasing the glucose-induced potentiation of insulin secretion. In contrast, the peptide does not seem to improve insulin resistance in NIDDM.

The effect of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and obesity on glucose transport and phosphorylation in skeletal muscle.

Defects of glucose transport and phosphorylation may underlie insulin resistance in obesity and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). To test this hypothesis, dynamic imaging of 18F-2-deoxy-glucose uptake into midthigh muscle was performed using positron emission tomography during basal and insulin-stimulated conditions (40 mU/m2 per min), in eight lean nondiabetic, eight obese nondiabetic, and eight obese subjects with NIDDM. In additional studies, vastus lateralis muscle was obtained by percutaneous biopsy during basal and insulin-stimulated conditions for assay of hexokinase and citrate synthase, and for immunohistochemical labeling of Glut 4. Quantitative confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to ascertain Glut 4 at the sarcolemma as an index of insulin-regulated translocation. In lean individuals, insulin stimulated a 10-fold increase of 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) clearance into muscle and significant increases in the rate constants for inward transport and phosphorylation of FDG. In obese individuals, the rate constant for inward transport of glucose was not increased by insulin infusion and did not differ from values in NIDDM. Insulin stimulation of the rate constant for glucose phosphorylation was similar in obese and lean subjects but reduced in NIDDM. Insulin increased by nearly twofold the number and area of sites labeling for Glut 4 at the sarcolemma in lean volunteers, but in obese and NIDDM subjects translocation of Glut 4 was attenuated. Activities of skeletal muscle HK I and II were similar in lean, obese and NIDDM subjects. These in vivo and ex vivo assessments indicate that impaired glucose transport plays a key role in insulin resistance of NIDDM and obesity and that an additional impairment of glucose phosphorylation is evident in the insulin resistance of NIDDM.

Effect of obesity on insulin resistance in normal subjects and patients with NIDDM

Insulin resistance (IR) is a characteristic feature of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) as well as obesity, and a majority of NIDDM patients are obese. To assess the effect of obesity independent of NIDDM on IR, we studied the relationship between IR and obesity in 65 normal and 58 NIDDM subjects; we used body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity and glucose infusion rate (GINF) during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (120 mU · m −2 · min −1 ) glucose clamp as a measure of IR. In lean normal subjects, GINF was 57.7 ± 2.2 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 (10.4 ± 0.4 mg · kg −1 · min −1 ) and the lean NIDDM subjects were markedly insulin-resistant, with a GINF of 34.4 ± 2.8 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 (6.2 ± 0.5 mg · kg −1 · min −1 ). Obese normal subjects were also insulin-resistant compared with lean normal subjects, with a GINF of 36.1 ± 2.2 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 (6.5 ± 0.4 mg · kg −1 · min −1 ), and obesity caused an increase in IR in NIDDM, with a GINF of 21.1 ± 1.4 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 (3.8 ± 0.25 mg · kg −1 · min −1 ) in the obese NIDDM subjects. Therefore, ∼61% of the IR in obese NIDDM subjects is due to NIDDM, with 39% due to obesity, demonstrating a greater impact of NIDDM than of obesity in causing IR. The correlation between GINF and BMI was much better in normal subjects ( r = −0.75) than in NIDDM subjects ( r = −0.50) as was the relationship between fasting insulin level and BMI ( r = −0.59 in normal subjects, r = −0.48 in NIDDM subjects). As expected, the fasting insulin level was also strongly correlated to GINF in normal subjects ( r = −0.61); however, this relationship was weaker in NIDDM subjects ( r = −0.46). In conclusion, 1 ) obesity has a major impact to cause insulin resistance in nondiabetic subjects, but the effect of obesity on IR in NIDDM is less; 2 ) NIDDM per se is the major contributor to IR in NIDDM; and 3 ) the fasting insulin level is a better surrogate marker of IR in nondiabetic subjects than in NIDDM patients.

Effect of Obesity on Insulin Resistance in Normal Subjects and Patients With NIDDM

Insulin resistance (IR) is a characteristic feature of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) as well as obesity, and a majority of NIDDM patients are obese. To assess the effect of obesity independent of NIDDM on IR, we studied the relationship between IR and obesity in 65 normal and 58 NIDDM subjects; we used body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity and glucose infusion rate (GINF) during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (120 mU.m-2.min-1) glucose clamp as a measure of IR. In lean normal subjects, GINF was 57.7 +/- 2.2 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (10.4 +/- 0.4 mg.kg-1.min-1) and the lean NIDDM subjects were markedly insulin-resistant, with a GINF of 34.4 +/- 2.8 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (6.2 +/- 0.5 mg.kg-1.min-1). Obese normal subjects were also insulin-resistant compared with lean normal subjects, with a GINF of 36.1 +/- 2.2 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (6.5 +/- 0.4 mg.kg-1.min-1), and obesity caused an increase in IR in NIDDM, with a GINF of 21.1 +/- 1.4 mumol.kg-1.min-1 (3.8 +/- 0.25 mg.kg-1.min-1) in the obese NIDDM subjects. Therefore, approximately 61% of the IR in obese NIDDM subjects is due to NIDDM, with 39% due to obesity, demonstrating a greater impact of NIDDM than of obesity in causing IR. The correlation between GINF and BMI was much better in normal subjects (r = -0.75) than in NIDDM subjects (r = -0.50) as was the relationship between fasting insulin level and BMI (r = -0.59 in normal subjects, r = -0.48 in NIDDM subjects). As expected, the fasting insulin level was also strongly correlated to GINF in normal subjects (r = -0.61); however, this relationship was weaker in NIDDM subjects ( r = -0.46). In conclusion, 1) obesity has a major impact to cause insulin resistance in nondiabetic subjects, but the effect of obesity on IR in NIDDM is less; 2) NIDDM per se is the major contributor to IR in NIDDM; and 3) the fasting insulin level is a better surrogate marker of IR in nondiabetic subjects than in NIDDM patients.

Contribution of obesity to insulin resistance in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Inasmuch as previous studies have obtained conflicting results on the contribution of obesity to insulin resistance in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), we studied 10 nonobese and 10 obese NIDDM patients with the isoglycemic-(approximately 10 mmol/L)-hyperinsulinemic clamp (two insulin infusions of 4 and 40 mU/m-2 min-1), combined with [3-3H]glucose infusion and indirect calorimetry. As compared with nonobese patients, obese NIDDM patients had higher baseline peripheral and estimated portal plasma insulin concentrations (113 +/- 18 vs. 46 +/- 3 pmol/L and 288 +/- 53 vs. 98 +/- 6 pmol/L, respectively; P < 0.05) and less suppressed endogenous insulin production during clamp. Hepatic glucose production was greater in obese than in nonobese patients (basal, 16 +/- 1.1 vs. 12 +/- 0.5 mumol/kg-1 fat-free mass (FFM) min-1; clamp, 5.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.2 mumol/kg-1 FFM min-1, P < 0.05). Glucose utilization increased to a lesser extent in obese than in nonobese patients (49 +/- 5 vs. 73 +/- 7 mumol/kg-1 FFM min-1, P < 0.05) during clamp because of a lower increase in nonoxidative glucose metabolism (30 +/- 5 vs. 50 +/- 7 mumol/kg-1 FFM min-1, P < 0.05). Plasma free fatty acid concentrations and rates of lipid oxidation were greater in obese (P < 0.05) patients and correlated with hepatic glucose production (r = 0.79 and 0.50, P < 0.05). In conclusion, obesity exaggerates hepatic as well as extra-hepatic insulin resistance in NIDDM. The impaired inhibition of pancreatic beta-cell function by exogenous insulin contributes to exaggerated hyperinsulinemia in obese NIDDM.

Increased epinephrine and skeletal muscle responses to hypoglycemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

We evaluated skeletal muscle counterregulation during hypoglycemia in nine subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) (HbA1c 9.4 +/- 0.5%, nl < 6.2%) compared with six normal controls, matched for age (51 +/- 3 and 49 +/- 5 yr, respectively) and body mass index (27.3 +/- 1.2 and 27.0 +/- 2.1 kg/m2). After 60 min of euglycemia (plasma insulin approximately 140 microU/ml), plasma glucose was lowered to 62 +/- 2 mg/dl by 120 min. Hypoglycemia induced a 2.2-fold greater increase in plasma epinephrine in NIDDM (P < 0.001), while the plasma glucagon response was blunted (P < 0.01). Hepatic glucose output ([3H-3]glucose) suppressed similarly during euglycemia, but during hypoglycemia was greater in NIDDM (P < 0.005). Conversely, glucose uptake during euglycemia was 150% greater in controls (P < 0.01) and remained persistently higher than in NIDDM during hypoglycemia. In NIDDM, plasma FFA concentrations were approximately fivefold greater (P < 0.001), and plasma lactate levels were approximately 40% higher than in controls during hypoglycemia (P < 0.01); the rates of glycolysis from plasma glucose were similar in the two groups despite a 49% lower rate of glucose uptake in NIDDM (3.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 6.9 +/- 1.3 mg/kg per minute, P < 0.001). Muscle glycogen synthase activity fell by 42% with hypoglycemia (P < 0.01) in NIDDM but not in controls. In addition, glycogen phosphorylase was activated by 56% during hypoglycemia in NIDDM only (P < 0.01). Muscle glucose-6-phosphate concentrations rose during hypoglycemia by a twofold greater increment in NIDDM (P < 0.01). Thus, skeletal muscle participates in hypoglycemia counterregulation in NIDDM, directly by decreased removal of plasma glucose and, indirectly, by providing lactate for hepatic gluconeogenesis. Consequently, in addition to inherent insulin resistance in NIDDM, the enhanced plasma epinephrine response during hypoglycemia may partially offset impaired glucagon secretion and counteract the effects of hyperinsulinemia on liver, fat, and skeletal muscle.

Testosterone Concentrations in Women and Men With NIDDM

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate androgen concentrations in relation to insulin resistance in men and women with and without NIDDM. Recent studies have indicated the potential importance of the regulation of insulin sensitivity by androgens in both women and men. Low sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) concentration is an independent risk factor for the development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in women and is strongly associated statistically with signs of insulin resistance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--We compared measurements of anthropometric variables and SHBG, steroid hormone, and insulin concentrations of women and men who have NIDDM with those of control subjects. RESULTS--Women with NIDDM had somewhat higher plasma insulin concentrations, lower SHBG, and higher free testosterone values than did control subjects with similar body mass index (BMI). Women with NIDDM had marginally higher waist-to-hip ratios (WHR). Plasma insulin concentrations correlated positively with BMI, WHR, and free testosterone and negatively with SHBG. In multivariate analyses, insulin concentrations remained positively associated with BMI and free testosterone. Men with NIDDM had higher fasting plasma insulin concentrations than did the nondiabetic control subjects. Testosterone and SHBG were lower in the diabetic men than in both control groups. The derived value of free testosterone was not different between groups. Univariate correlation analyses revealed tight statistical couplings between plasma insulin on the one hand and SHBG and testosterone concentrations (negative) on the other. In multivariate analyses, only the insulin-testosterone association remained. Women with NIDDM have high levels of free testosterone and low levels of SHBG. Insulin resistance is closely correlated with these signs of hyperandrogenicity as well as with obesity. Men with NIDDM also have low levels of SHBG and, in contrast to women, low testosterone values. Insulin values correlate negatively with these hormonal factors. Based on the results of experimental work and intervention studies, we suggest that these androgen abnormalities might be causally related to insulin resistance in NIDDM.

Effect of strict metabolic control on glucose handling by the liver and peripheral tissues in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

To examine the effect of strict glycemic control on the insulin resistance of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), we applied euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with an oral glucose load (OGL) to nine non-obese subjects with NIDDM and quantitated insulin-mediated glucose uptake by the liver (HGU) and peripheral tissues (PGU) simultaneously before and after 3 to 4 weeks of intimate glycemic control by preprandial regular insulin injections 3 times a day. The glucose infusion rate (GIR) required to maintain euglycemia during the clamp before OGL was considered as PGU. After OGL, the fraction of ingested glucose that is not extracted by the liver enters the systemic circulation and reduces the GIR required for the clamp. HGU was calculated from the difference between the amount of OGL and the cumulative decrements in GIR after OGL and was expressed as the ratio to the amount of OGL(%). Three to 4 weeks after initiation of strict metabolic control, FPG and HbAlc levels significantly improved (9.1 ± 0.5 vs. 6.4 ± 0.4 mmol/l, and 11.2 ± 0.8 vs. 8.3 ± 0.3%, P < 0.05). HGU significantly increased to 33.1 ± 9.5 from 14.5 ± 4.8%, while PGU did not change (38.2 ± 5.2 vs. 37.4 ± 3.9 μmol/kg · min). These data suggest that shortterm strict metabolic control ameliorates insulin resistance in NIDDM mainly at the hepatic level.

2 Hepatic glucose metabolism and insulin resistance in NIDDM and obesity

Insulin resistance is a well-established accompaniment of both obesity and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) (Moller and Flier, 1991; DeFronzo et al, 1992; Dinneen et al, 1992). Several recent studies suggest it may have a primary pathogenetic role in the development of NIDDM (Lillioja et al, 1988; Eriksson et al, 1989). Unlike muscle, where insulin resistance is manifest as decreased glucose uptake and disposal (DeFronzo et al, 1992), glucose transport in liver is not insulin sensitive. In this tissue continued glucose production in the presence of hyperinsulinaemia is the hallmark of insulin resistance. We will briefly review evidence that hepatic insulin resistance is present in NIDDM and obesity, and that it contributes significantly to both fasting hyperglycaemia and glucose intolerance in human diabetes. We will also examine the intrahepatic pathways responsible for maintaining hepatic glucose production, and indicate deficiencies in our current understanding of insulin action on these pathways. We will then address the question of which enzymatic steps might be altered in NIDDM. Finally, we will present a schema for action of insulin on the liver, based on a compilation of animal and human studies.

Pioglitazone increases insulin sensitivity by activating insulin receptor kinase.

A new oral agent, 5-[4-(2-(5-ethyl 12-pyridyl)ethoxy]- benzoyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone), has been developed for treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). This agent increases insulin sensitivity in vivo in genetically obese Wistar fatty rats. Administration of the agent (3 mg/kg/day) for 10 days to the rats ameliorated hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, indicating that it decreased insulin resistance. To clarify the mechanism of the drug to increase insulin sensitivity, we examined insulin binding and kinase activity of insulin receptors from muscles of both untreated and treated rats. Pioglitazone treatment did not change insulin binding in Wistar fatty rats but increased insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation of insulin receptors to 78% over the level in the control but not the basal state. Kinase activity toward exogenous substrate, poly Glu4Tyr1, was also increased to 87% over the level of untreated control obese rats. In contrast, in lean rats, pioglitazone treatment did not increase autophosphorylation and kinase activity toward exogenous substrates. To further elucidate the mechanism, we incubated insulin receptors with the agent and measured kinase activity. Incubation of solubilized receptors with the agent did not increase kinase activity. However, the receptors from IM-9 cells, which were incubated with 10(-8) M pioglitazone for 7 days, showed a 46% increase over the control in insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation and kinase activity. These results suggested that pioglitazone increased insulin sensitivity in part by activating kinase of the receptors through indirect effect on insulin receptors and that the drug may have useful benefits in insulin resistance of NIDDM.

Pathogenesis of NIDDM. A balanced overview.

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) results from an imbalance between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. Both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that the earliest detectable abnormality in NIDDM is an impairment in the body's ability to respond to insulin. Because the pancreas is able to appropriately augment its secretion of insulin to offset the insulin resistance, glucose tolerance remains normal. With time, however, the beta-cell fails to maintain its high rate of insulin secretion and the relative insulinopenia (i.e., relative to the degree of insulin resistance) leads to the development of impaired glucose tolerance and eventually overt diabetes mellitus. The cause of pancreatic "exhaustion" remains unknown but may be related to the effect of glucose toxicity in a genetically predisposed beta-cell. Information concerning the loss of first-phase insulin secretion, altered pulsatility of insulin release, and enhanced proinsulin-insulin secretory ratio is discussed as it pertains to altered beta-cell function in NIDDM. Insulin resistance in NIDDM involves both hepatic and peripheral, muscle, tissues. In the postabsorptive state hepatic glucose output is normal or increased, despite the presence of fasting hyperinsulinemia, whereas the efficiency of tissue glucose uptake is reduced. In response to both endogenously secreted or exogenously administered insulin, hepatic glucose production fails to suppress normally and muscle glucose uptake is diminished. The accelerated rate of hepatic glucose output is due entirely to augmented gluconeogenesis. In muscle many cellular defects in insulin action have been described including impaired insulin-receptor tyrosine kinase activity, diminished glucose transport, and reduced glycogen synthase and pyruvate dehydrogenase. The abnormalities account for disturbances in the two major intracellular pathways of glucose disposal, glycogen synthesis, and glucose oxidation. In the earliest stages of NIDDM, the major defect involves the inability of insulin to promote glucose uptake and storage as glycogen. Other potential mechanisms that have been put forward to explain the insulin resistance, include increased lipid oxidation, altered skeletal muscle capillary density/fiber type/blood flow, impaired insulin transport across the vascular endothelium, increased amylin, calcitonin gene-related peptide levels, and glucose toxicity.

Analysis of the gene sequences of the insulin receptor and the insulin-sensitive glucose transporter (GLUT-4) in patients with common-type non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Insulin resistance is a common feature of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and "diabetes susceptibility genes" may be involved in this abnormality. Two potential candidate genes are the insulin receptor (IR) and the insulin-sensitive glucose transporter (GLUT-4). To elucidate whether structural defects in the IR and/or GLUT-4 could be a primary cause of insulin resistance in NIDDM, we have sequenced the entire coding region of the GLUT-4 gene from DNA of six NIDDM patients. Since binding properties of the IRs from NIDDM subjects are normal, we also analyzed the sequence of exons 16-22 (encoding the entire cytoplasmic domain of the IR) of the IR gene from the same six patients. When compared with the normal IR sequence, no difference was found in the predicted amino acid sequence of the IR cytoplasmic domain derived from the NIDDM patients. Sequence analysis of the GLUT-4 gene revealed that one patient was heterozygous for a mutation in which isoleucine (ATC) was substituted for valine (GTC) at position 383. Consequently, the GLUT-4 sequence at position 383 was determined in 24 additional NIDDM patients and 30 nondiabetic controls and all showed only the normal sequence. From these studies, we conclude that the insulin resistance seen in the great majority of subjects with the common form of NIDDM is not due to genetic variation in the coding sequence of the IR beta subunit, nor to any single mutation in the GLUT-4 gene. Possibly, a subpopulation of NIDDM patients exists displaying variation in the GLUT-4 gene.

Effect of the antilipolytic nicotinic acid analogue acipimox on whole-body and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Increased nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels may be important in causing insulin resistance in skeletal muscles in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The acute effect of the antilipolytic nicotinic acid analogue Acipimox (2 X 250 mg) on basal and insulin-stimulated (3 h, 40 mU/m2 per min) glucose metabolism was therefore studied in 12 patients with NIDDM. Whole-body glucose metabolism was assessed using [3-3H]glucose and indirect calorimetry. Biopsies were taken from the vastus lateralis muscle during basal and insulin-stimulated steady-state periods. Acipimox reduced NEFA in the basal state and during insulin stimulation. Lipid oxidation was inhibited by Acipimox in all patients in the basal state (20 +/- 2 vs. 33 +/- 3 mg/m2 per min, P less than 0.01) and during insulin infusion (8 +/- 2 vs. 17 +/- 2 mg/m2 per min, P less than 0.01). Acipimox increased the insulin-stimulated glucose disposal rate (369 +/- 49 vs. 262 +/- 31 mg/m2 per min, P less than 0.01), whereas the glucose disposal rate was unaffected by Acipimox in the basal state. Acipimox increased glucose oxidation in the basal state (76 +/- 4 vs. 50 +/- 4 mg/m2 per min, P less than 0.01). During insulin infusion Acipimox increased both glucose oxidation (121 +/- 7 vs. 95 +/- 4 mg/m2 per min, P less than 0.01) and nonoxidative glucose disposal (248 +/- 47 vs. 167 +/- 29 mg/m2 per min, P less than 0.01). Acipimox enhanced basal and insulin-stimulated muscle fractional glycogen synthase activities (32 +/- 2 vs. 25 +/- 3%, P less than 0.05, and 50 +/- 5 vs. 41 +/- 4%, P less than 0.05). Activities of muscle pyruvate dehydrogenase and phosphofructokinase were unaffected by Acipimox. In conclusion, Acipimox acutely improved insulin action in patients with NIDDM by increasing both glucose oxidation and nonoxidative glucose disposal. This supports the hypothesis that elevated NEFA concentrations may be important for the insulin resistance in NIDDM. The mechanism responsible for the increased insulin-stimulated nonoxidative glucose disposal may be a stimulatory effect of Acipimox on glycogen synthase activity in skeletal muscles.

Pretranslational suppression of a glucose transporter protein causes insulin resistance in adipocytes from patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and obesity.

A major portion of insulin-mediated glucose uptake occurs via the translocation of GLUT 4 glucose transporter proteins from an intracellular depot to the plasma membrane. We have examined gene expression for the GLUT 4 transporter isoform in subcutaneous adipocytes, a classic insulin target cell, to better understand molecular mechanisms causing insulin resistance in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and obesity. In subgroups of lean (body mass index [BMI] = 24 +/- 1) and obese (BMI = 32 +/- 2) controls and in obese NIDDM (BMI = 35 +/- 2) patients, the number of GLUT 4 glucose transporters was measured in total postnuclear and subcellular membrane fractions using specific antibodies on Western blots. Relative to lean controls, the cellular content of GLUT 4 was decreased 40% in obesity and 85% in NIDDM in total cellular membranes. In obesity, cellular depletion of GLUT 4 primarily involved low density microsomes (LDM), leaving fewer transporters available for insulin-mediated recruitment to the plasma membrane (PM). In NIDDM, loss of GLUT 4 was profound in all membrane subfractions, PM, LDM, as well as high density microsomes. These observations corresponded with decrements in maximally stimulated glucose transport rates in intact cells. To assess mechanisms responsible for depletion of GLUT 4, we quantitated levels of mRNA specifically hybridizing with human GLUT 4 cDNA on Northern blots. In obesity, GLUT 4 mRNA was decreased 36% compared with lean controls, and the level was well correlated (r = + 0.77) with the cellular content of GLUT 4 protein over a wide spectrum of body weight. GLUT 4 mRNA in adipocytes from NIDDM patients was profoundly reduced by 86% compared with lean controls and by 78% relative to their weight-matched nondiabetic counterparts (whether expressed per RNA, per cell, or for the amount of CHO-B mRNA). Interestingly, GLUT 4 mRNA levels in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (BMI = 34 +/- 4) were decreased to the same level as in overt NIDDM. We conclude that, in obesity, insulin resistance in adipocytes is due to depletion of GLUT 4 glucose transporters, and that the cellular content of GLUT 4 is determined by the level of encoding mRNA over a wide range of body weight. In NIDDM, more profound insulin resistance is caused by a further reduction in GLUT 4 mRNA and protein than is attributable to obesity per se. Suppression of GLUT 4 mRNA is observed in patients with impaired glucose tolerance, and therefore, may occur early in the evolution of diabetes. Thus, pretranslational suppression of GLUT 4 transporter gene expression may be an important mechanism that produces and maintains cellular insulin resistance in NIDDM.

Low Urinarychiro-Inositol Excretion in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

Inositol is a major component of the intracellular mediators of insulin action. To investigate the possible role of altered inositol metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), we used gas chromatography and mass spectrometry to measure the myo-inositol and chiro-inositol content of urine specimens from normal subjects and patients with NIDDM: The study subjects were whites, blacks, and Pima Indians. The type of inositol and its concentration in insulin-mediator preparations from muscle-biopsy specimens from normal subjects and diabetic patients were also determined. The urinary excretion of chiro-inositol was much lower in the patients with NIDDM (mean [+/- SE], 1.8 +/- 0.8 mumol per day) than in the normal subjects (mean, 84.9 +/- 26.9 mumol per day; P less than 0.01). In contrast, the mean urinary myo-inositol excretion was higher in the diabetic patients than in the normal subjects (444 +/- 135 vs. 176 +/- 46 mumol per day; P less than 0.05). There was no correlation between chiro-inositol excretion and the age, sex, or weight of the diabetic patients, nor was there any correlation between urinary chiro-inositol and myo-inositol excretion in either group. The results were similar in a primate model of NIDDM, and chiro-inositol excretion was decreased to a lesser extent in animals with prediabetic insulin resistance. chiro-Inositol was undetectable in insulin-mediator preparations from muscle-biopsy samples obtained from patients with NIDDM: Similar preparations from normal subjects contained substantial amounts of chiro-inositol. Furthermore, the chiro-inositol content of such preparations increased after the administration of insulin during euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic-clamp studies in normal subjects but not in patients with NIDDM: NIDDM is associated with decreased chiro-inositol excretion and decreased chiro-inositol content in muscle. These abnormalities seem to reflect the presence of insulin resistance in NIDDM: