Inlay Group Research Articles

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for patients with cuff tear arthropathy: do clinical outcomes differ by inlay vs. onlay design?

The influence of position of the humeral tray (inlay or onlay) on clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with cuff tear arthropathy treated with RSA systems with inlay or onlay humeral tray design, similar neck-shaft angles, and lateralized glenospheres. This was a retrospective study of prospectively obtained data from 1 tertiary care center. We identified all patients who underwent primary RSA between 2009 and 2017 (N=511). We included 102 patients with diagnosed cuff tear arthropathy treated with RSA prostheses with a lateralized glenosphere and 135° neck-shaft angle (with either an inlay or onlay humeral tray design) who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up (mean, 44months; range, 24-125months). Sixty-three patients (62%) had an inlay humeral tray (inlay group) and 39 (38%) had an onlay tray (onlay group). All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative evaluations, including measures of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), shoulder range of motion (ROM) testing, and radiographic imaging. Clinical relevance of changes in PROs and ROM was evaluated using published values for minimal clinically important differences. The 2 groups did not differ by demographic characteristics except for a higher proportion of women in the inlay group (75%) than in the onlay group (56%) (P=.04). Preoperative PROs and ROM were not significantly different between groups. At final follow-up, PROs and ROM were not different between groups in terms of statistical significance or clinical relevance. We found no significant differences in the rate of baseplate loosening (inlay, 3.2% vs. onlay, 5.1%, P=.63), revision surgery (inlay, 0% vs. onlay 5.1%, P=.07), acromial stress fracture (inlay, 3.2% vs. onlay, 5.1%, P=.63), prosthesis dislocation (inlay, 0% vs. onlay, 2.6%, P=.20), or scapular notching (inlay, 21% vs. onlay, 7.7%, P=.08). At 2-year minimum follow-up, the position of the humeral tray in RSA prostheses (either inlay or onlay) for cuff tear arthropathy was not associated with PROs, shoulder ROM, or rates of complications, including baseplate loosening, acromial stress fracture, and scapular notching.

No clinical difference in outcomes between inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques during rotator cuff repair

BackgroundBoth inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (ABT) are common procedures performed during rotator cuff repair. The inlay method involves creating a bone socket in the bicipital groove to secure the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) using an interference screw. The onlay method utilizes a suture anchor to secure the LHBT on the surface of the bicipital groove. Little is known on the long-term differences in patient reported outcomes (PROs) between these two techniques. The primary purpose of this study was to compare PROs of inlay versus onlay ABT with a minimum follow-up of two years. Secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of rotator cuff tear size on outcomes and compare rates of complications between the two techniques. MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who had an ABT during a full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Any symptom specific to the biceps were noted, including pain and cramping, Popeye deformity, or revision surgery. Complication rates were compared between groups. The VAS pain score, ASES, SANE, and VR-12 scores were compared at two years. The impact of rotator cuff tear size was analyzed by categorizing into small/medium or large/massive based on operative reports and arthroscopic images. ResultsThere were 165 patients identified (106 in the inlay group and 59 in the onlay group). No revision surgeries were performed secondary to the biceps tendon in either group. Eleven patients (10%) in the inlay group complained of biceps pain or cramping compared to 2 patients (3%) in the onlay group (p = .11). One Popeye deformity was noted in each group (p = .67). No significant differences were found between groups for VAS (p=.41), ASES functional (p = .61), ASES Index (p = .91), SANE (p = .09), VR-12 PCS (p = .77), or VR-12 MCS (p = .09). Rotator cuff tear size within the groups also did not demonstrate statistical significance. ConclusionNo clinical differences or complications were found at minimum two-year follow-up between inlay and onlay arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair when controlling for tear size. The clinical relevance suggests either technique is effective and can be based on surgeon preference.

Myringoplasty - A Rewiev of 438 Cases.

The medical records of 438 patients who underwent myringoplasty followed up for a minimum of one year in the period of 1980 and 2015 were revised. Examination under otomicroscope was done of the ear to be operated. This was carried out with a speculum under the operating microscope to be reliably asses the tympanic membrane, site of perforation, to rule out any other pathology and assess the status of ossicular chain. All the patients submitted primary myringoplasty surgery were operated under postauricular, endaural and transcanal approach with overlay, underlay and inlay methods. In the study the patients were divided into three groups depending upon the technique utilized to repair the tympanic membrane. When we compared overlay technique group with underlay technique group, it was observed that overlay technique was no statistically significant difference between these three groups in term of age wise distribution, gender wise distribution, duration of disease and cause of disease, due to matching at the time of selection. In this study the outcome in terms of graft uptake rate was slight better in the overlay technique (94%) as compared to the underlay technique (86.2%), though the difference was statistically insignificant, P>0.05. Patients selection may have had a role in the high success rate in the present study as patients presenting with middle ear pathology were excluded. The complications rate in the present study was quite low, no case in inlay group, three cases of graft lateralization in underlay group, and 19 cases in overlay group. In this study, better results were achieved with overlay technique may probably be due to less surgical manipulation and faster healing process.

Fracture Resistance of Premolars Restored with Inlay/Onlay Composite and Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Block Restorations (An In Vitro Study)

Aim: To assess the fracture resistance of Premolars restored with inlay and onlay composite and E-max CAD/CAM block restoration.
 Material and method: Randomly, fifty maxillary premolar teeth were separated into three major groups: The first group was left unaltered (control group), while the other two groups were prepared with inlay and onlay cavities and restored with lithium disilicate blocks (IPS E.max CAD) and ceramic blocks (Cerasmart). Restorations were bonded using adhesive resin cement (RelyX Ultimate). All samples were thermocycling 500 cycles, between 5 to 55°C, and the cycle time was set at the 30s. The specimen was undergone compressive axial loading in a universal testing machine till the fracture occurred. The result was analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and LSD tests with a significance level set at 0.05.
 Result: There were no significant differences in means between the control group and the inlay groups that were restored with Emax and Cerasmart (P >.05).but, the control group has significantly higher means than onlay groups restored with Emax and Cerasmart (P< .05). The two materials show comparable results in both designs.
 Conclusion: The fracture resistance of inlay-prepared teeth showed comparable strength to the intact teeth. Conversely, the fracture resistance of onlay-prepared teeth is comparatively lower than intact teeth. The two materials show comparable results irrespective of cavity design.

Implants Placed with a Ring Technique Using Inlay and Onlay Block Xenografts in the Mandible of Rabbits

Background: Xenogenous bone has been proposed as an alternative to overcome the disadvantages of autogenous grafting. The aim of the present study was to study bone dynamics at inlay and onlay xenografts used for bone augmentation applying a ring technique. Methods: The bone at the lateral surface of the mandibular angle of 12 adult male New Zealand White rabbits was exposed bilaterally. The cortical layer received multiple perforations on one side of the mandible, and a xenograft block of collagenated cancellous equine bone, 7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in width, was fixed on the prepared surface using an implant (onlay group). On the opposite side, a defect 7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in depth was prepared, and the xenograft block was adapted to the defect and fixed with an implant (inlay group). Results: After ten weeks of healing, in the onlay grafts, new bone was mainly formed on the trabeculae surface, reaching in some specimens the most coronal regions of the block. In the inlay grafts, new bone was found arranged on the trabecular surfaces but also occupying the spaces among the trabeculae. The entrance of the defect was often found close to the top of the block by newly formed bone. A higher percentage of new bone was found in the inlay (19.0 ± 9.3%) compared to the onlay (10.4 ± 7.4%) groups (p = 0.031). The mean gain in osseointegration at the implant in relation to the base of the original 3 mm deep defect was 0.95 ± 1.05% in the onlay group and 0.78 ± 0.71% in the inlay group (p = 0.603). Conclusion: The inlay grafts exhibited a higher new bone percentage than the onlay block grafts possibly due to the defect conformation that presented more sources for bone growth. The trabecular conformation and the composition of the grafts made possible the expression of the osteoconductive properties of the material used. This resulted, in several specimens, in the growth of bone on the graft trabeculae toward the most superior regions in both groups and in the closure of the coronal entrance of the defects in the inlay group. The clinical relevance of this experiment is that the ring technique applied as an inlay method could be suitable for bone augmentation.

Histological Comparison of Collagenated Cancellous Equine Bone Blocks Used as Inlay or Onlay for Lateral Bone Augmentation in Rabbits.

The conformation of the recipient site for an inlay graft presents an increased contact with the parent bone compared to an onlay graft. This might favor bone growth within the inlay compared to onlay grafts. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the bone incorporation and remodeling processes of xenogeneic en bloc grafts placed using two bone grafting techniques, i.e., onlay vs. inlay. In this prospective, randomized, split-mouth study (test and control sides in the same animal), two bone grafting techniques were comparatively evaluated. The lateral aspect of the rabbit mandible was used as the recipient site, bilaterally. On one side of the mandible, the cortical bone was perforated with drills to allow a better bone formation from the bone wound and the marrow spaces. A xenogeneic bone block was fixed in the center of the prepared region, representing the onlay site. On the other side of the mandible, a 7 mm wide and 3 mm deep circumferential defect was prepared using trephines and drills. A xenogeneic bone block was fixed in the center of the defect, representing the inlay site. Two healing periods were applied in the study: 2 and 10 weeks, each represented by 10 rabbits (n = 10 for each period). After 2 weeks of healing, the mean percentage of new bone was 10.4% and 23.3% at the onlay and inlay grafts, respectively (p = 0.022). After 10 weeks of healing, new bone increased to 13.2% at the onlay sites and 25.4% at the inlay sites (p = 0.080). In the 10-week period, the inlay grafts presented a homogeneous growth of new bone in all regions, while in the onlay grafts, low percentages of new bone were observed in the external regions. The percentage of new bone increased faster and was higher in the inlay grafts than in the onlay grafts. This outcome might be related to the self-contained conformation of the recipient site in the inlay group, which offered more sources for new bone formation compared to the one-wall conformation of the recipient sites in the onlay group. The osteoconductive properties of the biomaterial allowed the newly formed bone to reach the most peripheral regions in both groups. The osteoconductive properties of the biomaterial, together with the protection offered by the collagen membrane, allowed marginal closure of the defects by newly formed bone in the inlay group.

Inlay structure can improve bone graft stability in the Bristow procedure

Compared with the Latarjet procedure, the Bristow procedure has a lower screw-related complication rate but poor bone healing. A modified Inlay Bristow procedure has been reported to significantly improve the bone healing rate, but the biomechanical mechanism is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of the bone graft between a modified Inlay Bristow procedure and the classic Bristow procedure. Sixteen left scapula models (Sawbones, Composite Scapula, 4th generation) were randomly divided into two groups (8:8). The bone graft in the first group was fixed with a 3.5 mm screw using the Inlay structure. The bone graft in the second group was fixed with a 3.5 mm screw via the traditional method. The maximum cyclic displacement, ultimate failure load and stiffness were evaluated biomechanically. The failure type was recorded for each model. Cyclic loading tests demonstrated that the maximum cyclic displacement of the Inlay procedure was significantly smaller (P = 0.001) than that of the classic procedure. The Inlay Bristow technique resulted in a significantly higher (P = 0.024) ultimate failure load than the classic Bristow technique. The stiffness of the classic group was 19.17±4.01 N/mm and that of the inlay group was 22.34±5.35 N/mm (P = 0.232). Failure was mainly due to bone graft fractures through the drill hole or glenoid bone fractures. Inlay Bristow fixation of the bone graft in a Sawbones model provides significantly stronger fixation and better time point zero stability than classic Bristow fixation, suggesting a higher likelihood of graft union.

Onlay Versus Inlay Biceps Tenodesis for Long Head of Biceps Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Proximal biceps tenodesis is a common surgical treatment of tendinosis of the long head of the biceps tendon. Two of the most common techniques incorporate onlay and inlay fixation methods, which can be done arthroscopically or open and in a variety of anatomic locations. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes between onlay versus inlay humeral fixation for biceps tenodesis for long head of the biceps tendon pathology. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Only studies reporting outcomes and complications after onlay and inlay biceps tenodeses were included. Six studies with a total of 418 patients (252 onlay, 166 inlay) with a mean age of 56.84 years were included. Visual analog pain scale scores, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score did not differ. "Popeye" deformity was found in 17 patients (7.80%) in the onlay group and in 15 patients (11.28%) in the inlay group (odds ratio, 0.28; P = 0.07). No difference in postoperative cramping or failure rates was found. Both onlay and inlay biceps tenodeses result in improved clinical outcomes and are at low risk of Popeye deformities, with no statistically significant differences between either method. Additional studies are required to assess the clinical significance of these differences.

Inlay versus onlay humeral design for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Since the introduction of the Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, the humeral stem design has been modified with improved clinical outcomes. Two distinct humeral designs have been used extensively: the inlay design, in which the humeral tray is seated within the metaphysis, and the onlay design, in which the humeral tray sits on the metaphysis at the level of the humeral neck cut. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether there are differences in clinical outcomes and complication rates between these designs. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to perform this systematic review. A search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase was performed to identify all studies comparing the clinical results of both humeral designs. Primary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures, shoulder range of motion, and incidence of complications. From the 156 identified publications, 12 studies were included in the final review. A total of 1447 patients were included, with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. At final follow-up, both implants demonstrated significant improvements in comparison to preoperative baseline. On comparison of the inlay vs. onlay groups, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was higher in the inlay group (mean difference, 2.53 [95% confidence interval, 0.27-4.78]; P=.03). Postoperative motion, even if statistically greater in the onlay group (differences of 5° in forward flexion [P<.001], 3° in abduction [P=.003], and 4° in external rotation [P<.001]), was not clinically different. On comparison of complications, the inlay group showed more instances of scapular notching (93 of 322 patients vs. 70 of 415 patients; odds ratio, 0.35; P<.001) but fewer scapular spine fractures (26 of 727 patients vs. 21 of 559 patients, P=.09). Inlay and onlay humeral tray designs in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate similar clinical improvements postoperatively. Onlay implants have a low rate of scapular notching but a higher rate of scapular spine fracture. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the 2 humeral tray designs is important to provide surgeons with options to tailor surgical plans for high-risk patients.

Effect of cyclic thermal stress on the fatigue life of teeth restored with gold inlay.

This study aimed to evaluate the stress distribution that results from temperature changes in teeth restored with gold inlay and to predict the fatigue life of the teeth. A thermal load regimen for finite element analysis (FEA) was established in an in vivo experiment, in which participants with gold inlays drank hot and cold water. An extracted human maxillary molar was converted into a 3D FEA model. The tooth models with Class I and II preparations were restored with gold inlay in the experimental groups. The stress distribution was analyzed under the thermal loads. Also, lifetime prediction was conducted using Basquin's formulation. The gold inlay groups showed a higher stress distribution than the preparation-only groups regardless of the type of preparation. The Class II gold inlay group showed the shortest fatigue life of 2.48×1011 cycles, whereas the Class I preparation group showed the longest fatigue life of 4.49×1016 cycles.

Comparison of Inlay Cartilage Butterfly and Underlay Temporal Fascia Tympanoplasty.

ObjectiveTo systematically review the results of inlay cartilage butterfly tympanoplasty and standard underlay temporal fascia tympanoplasty for anatomic and functional end points.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL/Lilacs) databases were searched from inception through April 2, 2021. No restrictions on language, publication year, or publication status were applied.Review MethodsThe meta-analysis included data from articles that met inclusion criteria and were extracted by 2 authors independently. The PRISMA statement was followed. Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. The primary outcome was tympanic membrane closure rate. The secondary outcome was improvement of the air-bone gap.ResultsTen studies were included, 9 cohort studies and 1 randomized clinical trial, with 577 patients. The graft take rate was 82.8% in the butterfly cartilage inlay tympanoplasty group and 85.2% in the temporal fascia underlay tympanoplasty group (relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.11; I2 = 42%, P = .08). The air-bone gap reduction ranged from 6.1 to 11.28 in the butterfly cartilage inlay group and from 5.2 to 12.66 in the temporal fascia underlay group, with a mean difference between groups of −2.08 (95% CI, −3.23 to −0.94; I2 = 58%, P = .04), favoring temporal fascia underlay.ConclusionThe 2 tympanoplasty techniques analyzed here produced similar results in terms of successful reconstruction of the tympanic membrane and reduction in the air-bone gap. Neither age nor follow-up length of time influenced outcomes.

Fracture Resistance of Root-Canal Treated Premolars Restored with Dentin Replacement Materials: An In-vitro Study.

Conservative restorations of endodontically treated premolars have yielded mixed results. The present study aimed to compare fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with Class II mesial-occlusal cavity preparations, restored with either Smart Dentin Replacement (SDR; Dentsply Sirona) material, Biodentine (Septodont) or ceramic inlays. Thirty-two extracted premolars were randomly divided into four equal groups (n = 8): Group 1 served as a control group with teeth left intact; teeth in the remaining three groups received root canal treatment followed by a mesio-occlusal cavity preparation. These crowns were restored with: Biodentine in group 2, SDR in group 3 and ceramic inlays in group 4. A computer-controlled Instron universal testing machine subjected all specimens to compressive load until failure. Force at failure and fracture mode (above or below the cementoenamel junction) were recorded. The data were analysed using Fisher's exact test and one-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Tukey's test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The lowest mean load at failure was recorded for the inlay group. Loads at failure were statistically significantly higher for teeth restored with Biodentine than with SDR (p = 0.012) and ceramic inlays (p = 0.007). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of fracture mode (p = 0.440). Endodontically treated premolars with mesial-occlusal cavity preparation restored with Biodentine were more resistant to fracture than those restored with either SDR or ceramic inlays. Biodentine may prove a promising material to restore endodontically treated teeth with one missing proximal wall.

Onlay versus inlay humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Advances have been made to the traditional inlay Grammont Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) design such as the onlay humeral component prosthesis. Currently, there is no agreement in the literature regarding the best option for the humeral component when comparing inlay and onlay designs. This review compares the outcomes and complications between onlay versus inlay humeral components for RSA. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase. Only studies reporting outcomes comparing onlay versus inlay RSA humeral components were included. Four studies with 298 patients (306 shoulders) were included. Onlay humeral components were associated with better external rotation (ER) (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in forward flexion (FF) or abduction was found. Constant scores (CS) and VAS scores did not differ. Increased scapular notching was found in the inlay group (23.18%) versus the onlay group (7.74%) (p = 0.02). Postoperative scapular fractures and acromial fractures did not differ. Onlay and inlay RSA designs are associated with improved postoperative range of motion (ROM). Onlay humeral designs may be associated with greater ER and lower rate of scapular notching; however, no difference was found in Constant and VAS scores, so further studies are required to assess the clinical significance of these differences.

Meshplasty in Ventral &amp;Incisional Hernia (A Comparative Study between Onlay &amp; Inlay Techniques)

Introducion&Objectives: Ventral hernia of both types spontaneous & incisional are commonly encountered in surgical practice. Despite the frequency of surgical repair, perfect results continue to elude surgeons & the rate of surgical failure may approach 10- 30%. Nowadays meshplasty is regarded as ideal procedure for hernia repair & actually primary suture repair is abandoned except for hernia with defect size of less than 2.5cm.Different types of mesh used for repair &different sites of placement described including onlay, inlay, sublay & sandwich pattern with different results. Aim of this study is to evaluate meshplasty in ventral &incisional hernia &to compare between onlay &inlay techniques in regard of operative ease, time, early& late postoperative complications. Design: Prospective comparative study. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on (60) patients with ventral &incisional hernia admitted to surgical department of Kirkuk general hospital between the periods Feb-2010 to Feb-2013. All patients were grouped randomly into two groups: Group (1) including (30) patients with onlay meshplasty &Group (2) including (30) patients with inlay technique. Results: The age of the patients was ranged (22-75) years with mean age of (48.5) years. Most of the patients were at fourth decade (48.3%) (n=29). (70%) of all patients (n=42) were females & (30%) of them (n=18) were males. (66.6%) of all patients (n=40) had incisional hernia & (33.3%) of patients with spontaneous hernia (n=20). The operative time in patients of Group (1) onlay technique was (60-100) minutes compared to (50-80) minutes in patients of Group (2) inlay technique. (3) Patients (10%) of Onlay Group developed seroma, (2) patients (6.6%) had deep wound infection. None of all patients of either group had sinus or enterocutanous fistula. (4)patients(13.3%) of Onlay Group had recurrence of their hernia during(12)months period follow up but only one patient (3.3%) of Inlay Group developed recurrence during same period of follow up. Conclusion:-Inlay meshplasty for repair of ventral abdominal hernia is more effective& gives better results in regard of operative ease, time, early &postoperative complications.

Resistance against Fracture in Teeth Managed by Root Canal Treatment on Restoring with Onlays, Inlays, and Endocrowns: A Comparative Analysis

To compare the fracture resistance in teeth managed by root canal treatment after restoring with different types of onlays, inlays, and endocrowns prepared with hybrid ceramics and pulp chambers restored with fiber-reinforced composite and resin composite that were radiopaque, light-cured, and flowable. The present study was carried out on 252 extracted mandibular molars. All the specimens were divided into six groups randomly. Each group consisted of 42 specimens. Group 1 consisted of intact teeth without any access cavity. It was the control group. Group 2 consisted of teeth with endocrown and empty pulp chamber. Group 3 consisted of teeth with mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) onlay prepared with hybrid ceramics and pulp chamber filled with flowable, light-cured, radiopaque resin composite. Group 4 consisted of teeth with MOD onlay and pulp chamber filled with fiber-reinforced composite. Group 5 consisted of teeth with MOD inlay and pulp chamber filled with flowable, light-cured, radiopaque resin composite. Group 6 consisted of teeth with MOD inlay and pulp chamber filled with fiber-reinforced composite. Inlay, onlay, and endocrowns were prepared with computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided machine (CAM) using hybrid ceramics. Universal testing machine was used for the measurement of the fracture resistance of each specimen. Inferential statistics were performed by applying Fisher's exact test and chi-square test. Fracture strength was found to be maximum in the intact teeth group followed by the endocrown. The fracture strength was minimum in the inlay group. The fracture strength was intermediate in the onlay groups. Endocrown showed maximum fracture resistance as compared to the inlay and onlay restorations. Proper management of root canal-treated teeth is one of the greatest challenges for endodontists. It has been observed that tooth preparation design and the material used for the restoration of root canal-treated teeth play a vital role in the resistance against fracture in the teeth.

Can Lateralization of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Improve Active External Rotation in Patients with Preoperative Fatty Infiltration of the Infraspinatus and Teres Minor?

(1) Background: Postoperative recovery of external rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been reported despite nonfunctional external rotator muscles. Thus, this study aimed to clinically determine the ideal prosthetic design allowing external rotation recovery in such a cohort. (2) Methods: A monocentric comparative study was retrospectively performed on patients who had primary RSA between June 2013 and February 2018 with a significant preoperative fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus and teres minor. Two groups were formed with patients with a lateral humerus/lateral glenoid 145° onlay RSA—the onlay group (OG), and a medial humerus/lateral glenoid 155° inlay RSA—the inlay group (IG). Patients were matched 1:1 by age, gender, indication, preoperative range of motion (ROM), and Constant score. The ROM and Constant scores were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years. (3) Results: Forty-seven patients have been included (23 in OG and 24 in IG). Postoperative external rotation increased significantly in the OG only (p = 0.049), and its postoperative value was significantly greater than that of the IG by 11.1° (p = 0.028). (4) Conclusion: The use of a lateralized humeral stem with a low neck-shaft angle resulted in significantly improved external rotation compared to a medialized humeral 155° stem, even in cases of severe fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus and teres minor. Humeral lateralization and a low neck-shaft angle should be favored when planning an RSA in a patient without a functional posterior rotator cuff.

Radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty using inlay versus onlay components: is there really a difference?

IntroductionAchieving soft tissue tension in RSA occurs by displacement of the humerus from the glenoid. We compared the lateral and inferior humeral displacement of two RSA systems radiographically. Each system utilized a humeral implant with a 135-degree neck-shaft angle and offered lateralized glenospheres. One had an onlay component and the other an inlay. Our primary hypothesis was that an alteration of surgical technique would negate the differences in their geometries radiographically. Secondarily, we sought to determine if a difference in complications or revisions occurred with these different designs. MethodsTwo hundred and eleven patients underwent RSA by a single surgeon with either an inlay or onlay prosthesis over a 2-year period. A true AP Grashey radiograph was utilized to measure: 1) Glenohumeral offset (GHO); 2) Acromiohumeral distance (AHD); 3) Pivot point (PP); 4) Humeral head cut surrogate (HHC) and 5) Humeral Socket Depth (HSD). Complications recorded included postoperative acromial fractures, revision for any reason, instability, and infections. ResultsThere was no significant difference in GHO or AHD between the two groups. There was a difference in PP and HHC between the groups (P < .001). The onlay group had an HHC 1.8 mm larger than inlay. Of the inlay group patients, 66% had their humeral tray placed above the level of the humeral osteotomy. DiscussionA larger HHC in the onlay group and implanting the inlay above the humeral osteotomy negates differences in AHD and GHO. Level of evidenceLevel III; Retrospective Comparative Study

No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries

BackgroundThere is controversy regarding the optimal treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) -based multi-ligamentous injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the subjective and objective clinical outcomes of arthroscopic transtibial reconstruction and tibial inlay reconstruction. MethodsFrom 2005 to 2013, a total of 135 patients with PCL-based multi-ligamentous injuries were consecutively identified. Patients were operated with the arthroscopic transtibial technique or the open tibial inlay technique group. Other injured structures were reconstructed or repaired simultaneously. All of the patients underwent a preoperative and postoperative physical examination, KT-1000 measurement, stress radiography under anesthesia and subjective evaluations including Tegner score, Lysholm score, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) score. ResultsFifty-seven patients (64.8%) underwent arthroscopic transtibial PCL reconstruction, and 31 patients (35.2%) underwent PCL reconstruction with the tibial inlay technique. The average follow up period was 45.9 ± 17.0 months (24–77 months). At the final follow up, for the arthroscopic transtibial group, the side-to-side difference of KT-1000 decreased from 13.5 ± 4.8 mm to 2.4 ± 3.4 mm (P < 0.001); the tibial posterior translation by stress radiograph decreased from 14.9 ± 7.1 mm to 4.6 ± 4.0 mm (P < 0.001). For the open inlay group, the side-to-side difference of KT-1000 decreased from 13.7 ± 5.2 mm to 2.2 ± 3.6 mm (P < 0.001) and the posterior translation by stress radiograph decreased from 14.9 ± 5.9 mm to 4.3 ± 3.9 mm (P < 0.001) at the final follow up. The inter-group clinical outcomes pre- and postoperatively were not significantly different at any time point. ConclusionThere was no statistically significant difference in objective and subjective outcome between the arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay PCL reconstruction in patients with multi-ligamentous injuries.

Endoscopic Tympanoplasty: Inlay Cartilage Versus Underlay Cartilage Graft

Aim: Several graft placement methods have been described in tympanoplasty. The aim of this study is to assess the surgical effects of the endoscopic tympanoplasty utilizing inlay cartilage or underlay cartilage graft. Methods: We reviewed medical records of 123 patients who experienced endoscopic tympanoplasty for chronic otitis media with a minimum twelve-month follow-up period. Perforations were divided into central, posterior, and anterior ones based on the place of the perforation to malleus handle. Graft success rate, air conduction pure tone audiometry (PTA) before surgery and after surgery, hearing gain and air bone gap (ABG) reduction were calculated following surgery. Results: No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of the distribution of the follow-up period, age, perforation location, and gender (p&gt;0.05). The average air conductions (AC) before surgery and after surgery for the inlay group were 36.3 ± 13.7 dB and 25.4 ± 12.3 dB 6 months after surgery and 22.5 ± 10.5 dB 12 months after surgery. They were 35.6 ± 13.3 dB and 24.8 ± 12.4 dB 6 months after surgery and 22.7 ± 9.7 12 months after surgery for the underlay group. A significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of ABG (P=0.037). There was no significant difference in the mean ABG in each group (small perforation P =0.473, medium perforation P=0.876 and large perforation P=0.341). Conclusion: The inlay method can be used with high graft success rate, low risk of complications among the appropriate patients, and shorter operation time as a reliable surgical option for treatment.

Onlay versus inlay reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes

IntroductionRecent innovations in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have presented 2 distinct humeral stem designs: an onlay system that rests above the anatomic neck and an inlay component that rests within the metaphysis. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between inlay and onlay-designed humeral stems in lateral center of rotation RSA implant systems. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on primary RSA patients treated by 2 surgeons at 2 separate hospitals with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were categorized based on treatment with an onlay or inlay humeral design and matched 1:1 by indication and age. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Visual Analog Score for pain, as well as active motion (forward elevation, internal rotation) were recorded at pre- and postoperative intervals. An Inlay-Onlay index assessed the degree of inset or offset of each particular implant referencing the anatomic neck. Radiographic analysis focused on scapular notching, bone resorption around the humeral stem, and acromion stress fractures. ResultsA total of 92 patients participated in the 1:1 matched analysis (46 each group). Cohorts were similar in age, gender, indication, follow-up length, and preoperative PROMs, with the exception of Simple Shoulder Test. At the most recent follow-up, there were no differences in all PROMs between groups. There were no differences in active internal rotation, but patients with an onlay-configuration demonstrated greater external rotation (P< .001) and forward flexion (P< .001). Greater tuberosity and calcar resorption occurred in 34 (74%) and 18 (39%) patients with an onlay-designed prosthesis, compared to 13 (28%) and 1 (2%) in the inlay group, respectively (P< .0001). Both groups had low rates of scapular notching (P= 1.0), while acromial fractures occurred in 6 patients with an onlay stem and in 4 patients with the inlay stem (P= .73). ConclusionThere were no differences in clinical outcomes or incidence of acromial fractures following RSA with an onlay- or inlay-style humeral stem prosthesis. Bone resorption of the proximal humerus occurred more frequently in patients with an onlay prosthesis, suggesting that an inlay prosthesis may afford better prevention of humeral stress shielding. Level Of EvidenceLevel III; Retrospective Comparative Study