Initial Karnofsky Performance Scale Score Research Articles

The relationship between repeat resection and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma: a time-dependent analysis.

OBJECTIVEPrevious studies assessed the relationship between repeat resection and overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma, but ignoring the timing of repeat resection may have led to biased conclusions. Statistical methods that take time into account are well established and applied consistently in other medical fields. The goal of this study was to illustrate the change in the effect of repeat resection on OS in patients with glioblastoma once timing of resection is incorporated.METHODSThe authors conducted a retrospective study of patients initially diagnosed with glioblastoma between January 2005 and December 2014 who were treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Patients underwent at least 1 craniotomy with both pre- and postoperative MRI data available. The effect of repeat resection on OS was assessed with time-dependent extended Cox regression controlling for extent of resection, initial Karnofsky Performance Scale score, sex, age, multifocal status, eloquent status, and postoperative treatment.RESULTSEighty-nine (55%) of 163 patients underwent repeat resection with a median time between resections of 7.7 months (range 0.5-50.8 months). Median OS was 18.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.3-20.5 months) from initial resection. When timing of repeat resection was ignored, repeat resection was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.90, p = 0.01); however, when timing was taken into account, repeat resection was associated with a higher risk of death (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.47-3.28, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSIn this study, accounting for timing of repeat resection reversed its protective effect on OS, suggesting repeat resection may not benefit OS in all patients. These findings establish a foundation for future work by accounting for timing of repeat resection using time-dependent methods in the evaluation of repeat resection on OS. Additional recommendations include improved data capture that includes mutational data, development of algorithms for determining eligibility for repeat resection, more rigorous statistical analyses, and the assessment of additional benefits of repeat resection, such as reduction of symptom burden and enhanced quality of life.

Prognostic factors associated with pain palliation after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy.

OBJECT The number of patients with spinal tumors is rapidly increasing; spinal metastases develop in more than 30% of cancer patients during the course of their illness. Such lesions can significantly decrease quality of life, often necessitating treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery has effectively achieved local control and symptomatic relief for these patients. The authors determined prognostic factors that predicted pain palliation and report overall institutional outcomes after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS Records of patients who had undergone treatment with SBRT for either primary spinal tumors or spinal metastases from June 2008 through June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected at the initial visit just before treatment and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Collected clinical data included Karnofsky Performance Scale scores, pain status, presence of neurological deficits, and prior radiation exposure at the level of interest. Radiation treatment plan parameters (dose, fractionation, and target coverage) were recorded. To determine the initial extent of epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC), the authors retrospectively reviewed MR images, assessed spinal instability according to the Bilsky scale, and evaluated lesion progression after treatment. RESULTS The study included 99 patients (mean age 60.4 years). The median survival time was 9.1 months (95% CI 6.9-17.2 months). Significant decreases in the proportion of patients reporting pain were observed at 3 months (p < 0.0001), 6 months (p = 0.0002), and 12 months (p = 0.0019) after treatment. Significant decreases in the number of patients reporting pain were also observed at the last follow-up visit (p = 0.00020) (median follow-up time 6.1 months, range 1.0-56.6 months). Univariate analyses revealed that significant predictors of persistent pain after intervention were initial ESCC grade, stratified by a Bilsky grade of 1c (p = 0.0058); initial American Spinal Injury Association grade of D (p = 0.011); initial Karnofsky Performance Scale score, stratified by a score of 80 (p = 0.002); the presence of multiple treated lesions (p = 0.044); and prior radiation at the site of interest (p < 0.0001). However, when multivariate analyses were performed on all variables with p values less than 0.05, the only predictor of pain at last follow-up visit was a prior history of radiation at the site of interest (p = 0.0038), although initial ESCC grade trended toward significance (p = 0.073). Using pain outcomes at 3 months, at this follow-up time point, pain could be predicted by receipt of radiation above a threshold biologically effective dose of 66.7 Gy. CONCLUSIONS Pain palliation occurs as early as 3 months after treatment; significant differences in pain reporting are also observed at 6 and 12 months. Pain palliation is limited for patients with spinal tumors with epidural extension that deforms the cord and for patients who have previously received radiation to the same site. Further investigation into the optimal dose and fractionation schedule are needed, but improved outcomes were observed in patients who received radiation at a biologically effective dose (with an a/b of 3.0) of 66.7 Gy or higher.

Male sex as a risk factor for the clinical course of skull base chordomas

Chordomas of the skull base are rare and locally invasive and have a poor prognosis. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the current pattern of care and clinical course and to identify prognostic factors. A total of 47 patients (26 men; mean age 48.5 years) treated in 5 centers were included. Histology was centrally reviewed; additionally, semiquantitative N- and E-cadherin expression analysis was performed. Prognostic factors were obtained from multivariate regression models. For survival analysis the Kaplan-Meier method was used. The median follow-up period was 5.2 years. Complete resection, incomplete resection, and extended biopsy were performed in 14.9%, 80.9%, and 4.3% of patients, respectively. Surgical morbidity was not associated with extent of resection. Adjuvant radiation therapy was performed in 30 (63.8%) of 47 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 years. Complete resection prolonged median overall survival (OS) (p = 0.04). Male patients presented with worse PFS (4.8 years vs 9.8 years; p = 0.04) and OS (8.3 years vs not reached; p = 0.03) even though complete resection was exclusively achieved in the male subpopulation. Multivariate analysis confirmed male sex as the most important risk factor for tumor progression (p = 0.04) and death (p = 0.02). Age, duration of symptoms, initial Karnofsky Performance Scale score, brainstem compression, involvement of the petrous bone, infiltration of the dura mater, modality and dose of radiation therapy, and the E- and N-cadherin expression patterns did not gain prognostic relevance. In skull base chordomas, male patients bear a higher risk of progressive disease and death. Male patients might benefit from more aggressive adjuvant therapy and/or from a closer follow-up schedule.

Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery and whole brain radiotherapy for multiple metastatic brain tumors

We aimed to analyze the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for multiple metastatic brain tumors. Over a period of 5 years, 156 patients with multiple metastatic brain tumors were enrolled and freely assigned by the referring doctors to either gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS, Group A, n = 56), or to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT, Group B, n = 100). The follow-up time was set at 1200 days (3.3 years) post-treatment. The number of tumors, patient age, extent of systemic disease and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score, were recorded and recursive partitioning analysis used. The outcomes analyzed were: mortality, survival time, neurological complications, post-treatment KPS score, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and cost-effectiveness. A paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. Mortality rates for patients receiving GKRS and WBRT were 81.1% and 93.0%, respectively ( p = 0.05). The mortality rate was lower for GKRS (74.4%) than for WBRT (97.1%) in patients with initial KPS ⩾ 70 ( p = 0.02). The mortality rate was also significantly lower for GKRS (78.9%) than WBRT (95.5%) in patients with 2–5 tumors ( p < 0.05). Post-treatment KPS score (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.] was higher for patients receiving GKRS (73.8 ± 13.2) than for those receiving WBRT (45.5 ± 26.0), p < 0.01. The median survival time for GKRS and WBRT was 9.5 months and 8.3 months, respectively, p = 0.72. The mean (± s.d.) QALY was 0.76 ± 0.23 for GKRS and 0.59 ± 0.18 for WBRT, respectively ( p < 0.05). The cost-effectiveness per unit of QALY was better for the GKRS treatment (US$10,381/QALY) than in the WBRT treatment (US$17,622/QALY), p < 0.05. The cost-effectiveness per KPS score was also higher for the GKRS treatment (US$139/KPS score) than for WBRT (US$229/KPS score), p < 0.01. Thus, the mortality rate for multiple metastatic brain tumors treated by GKRS is significantly better with a good initial KPS score and when the tumor number is 2–5. GKRS results in a better post-treatment KPS score, QALY, and higher cost-effectiveness than WBRT for treating multiple metastatic brain tumors.

Gamma Knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors

The authors compared results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for brain metastases obtained at 2 institutions in Japan. They analyzed a consecutive series of 2390 patients with brain metastases who underwent GKS from 1998 through 2005 in 2 institutes (1,181 patients in Chiba; 1,209 in Mito). In the 2 facilities, 1 neurosurgeon each was responsible for diagnosis, patient selection, GKS procedures, and follow-up (T.S. in Chiba, M.Y. in Mito). Even if tumor numbers exceeded 4, all visible lesions were irradiated with a total skull integral dose (TSID) of <or= 10-12 J. No prophylactic whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was applied. If new distant lesions were detected, salvage GKS was appropriately performed. The distributions of patient and treatment factors did not differ between institutes. The most common primary tumors were lung cancer (1,572 patients), followed by gastrointestinal tract (316), breast (211), kidney (113), and other cancers (159). The median survival periods were 7.7 months in Chiba and 7.0 months in Mito (p = 0.0635). The significant poor prognostic factors for overall survival were active extracranial disease status, male sex, and low initial Karnofsky Performance Scale score on multivariate analysis (all p < 0.0001). The neurological survival rates at 1 year were 86.6% in Chiba and 84.2% in Mito (p = 0.3310). This 2-institute study demonstrated no significant institutional differences in any of the treatment result items. Gamma Knife surgery for brain metastases without prophylactic WBRT prevents neurological death and allows a patient to maintain good brain condition. However, there is 1 important patient selection criterion: regardless of how many tumors there are, all lesions can be irradiated with a TSID of <or=12 J.

Gamma knife treatment for multiple metastatic brain tumors compared with whole-brain radiation therapy

Object. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for multiple cerebral metastases with that of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Methods. Ninety-six consecutive patients with cerebral metastases from nonsmall cell lung cancer were treated between 1990 and 1999. The entry criteria were the presence of between one and 10 multiple brain lesions at initial diagnosis, no surgically inaccessible tumors with more than a 30-mm diameter, no carcinomatous meningitis, and more than 2 months of life expectancy. The patients were divided into two groups: the GKS group (62 patients) and the WBRT group (34 patients). In the GKS group, large lesions (&gt; 30 mm) were removed surgically and all other small lesions (≤ 30 mm) were treated by GKS. New distant lesions were treated by repeated GKS without prophylactic WBRT. In the WBRT group, the patients were treated by the traditional combined therapy of WBRT and surgery. In both groups, chemotherapy was administered according to the primary physician's protocol. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, initial Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score, type, lesion number, and size of lesion, systemic control, and chemotherapy. Neurological survival and qualitative survival of the GKS group were longer than those of the WBRT group. In multivariate analysis, significant poor prognostic factors were systemically uncontrolled patients, WBRT group, and poor initial KPS score. Conclusions. Gamma knife radiosurgery without prophylactic WBRT could be a primary choice of treatment for patients with as many as 10 cerebral metastases from nonsmall cell cancer.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: a final report of 31 patients

From February 1989 to December 1992, 31 patients who presented with an initial pathological diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme underwent tumor debulking or biopsy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and standard radiation therapy as part of their primary treatment. Presenting characteristics in the 22 men and nine women included a median age of 57 years, Karnofsky Performance Scale score median of 80, and median tumor volume of 16.4 cm3. Stereotactic radiosurgery delivered a central dose of 15 to 35 Gy with the isocenter location, collimator size, and beam paths individualized by means of three-dimensional software developed at the University of Wisconsin. The peripheral isodose line varied from 40% to 90% with a median of 72.5% and a mode of 80%. The mean follow-up period was 12.84 months with a median of 9.5 months. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank comparison of risk factor groups. The parameters of age, initial Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and biopsy were significantly different in patient survival from debulking; but no difference was noted between single and multiple isocenters and patterns of steroid requirement. Radiographic recurrences were divided by location into the following categories: central (within central stereotactic radiosurgery dose), 0; peripheral (within 2 cm of central dose), 19; and distant (> 2 cm), 4. There is no evidence of recurrence in five surviving patients. Actuarial 12-month survival was 37%, with a median survival of 9.5 months. These values are similar to previous results for surgery and standard radiotherapy alone. The results suggest that the curative value of radiosurgery is significantly limited by peripheral recurrences.

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage in glioma patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism.

To determine the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with malignant gliomas who are treated with anticoagulant drugs for late postoperative venous thromboembolism, the authors retrospectively reviewed the computerized data base of all patients with primary brain tumors seen at the University of California, San Francisco, over a 9-year period. Of 915 patients 18 years of age or older who had a pathological diagnosis of malignant glioma and an initial Karnofsky performance scale score of 60% or higher, 36 (4%) developed venous thromboembolism 6 to 246 weeks postoperatively and 22 were treated with anticoagulant drugs. Anticoagulant therapy usually consisted of intravenous heparin for 7 to 10 days, followed for at least 3 to 6 months by either subcutaneous heparin (5000 to 8000 U twice daily) or oral warfarin. All patients were closely monitored to ensure control of hypertension, compliance with therapy, maintenance of prothrombin time within the therapeutic range, and early recognition of adverse side effects. No patient had an intracranial hemorrhage. Thus, anticoagulant agents can be safely administered after intracranial operations for malignant gliomas without increased risk of morbidity or mortality if the patients are carefully monitored according to established guidelines.