Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database Research Articles

Association Between Spring Season of Birth and Crohn's Disease

As for many complex diseases, the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is higher among individuals born during certain seasons. This difference could arise from seasonal variations in many factors, including exposure to sunlight, antibiotics, or infectious agents. We investigated the relationship between season of birth, early childhood exposure to antibiotics, and incidence of IBD. We performed a nested case-control analysis using data from the University of Manitoba inflammatory bowel disease epidemiology database. We compared seasons of birth among 11,145 individuals with IBD (cases) and 108,633 controls using conditional logistic regression models. We collected data on use of antibiotics in the first year of life for cases and controls from the Manitoba Drug Program Information Network-a comprehensive database of all prescriptions given to residents of Manitoba since 1995. Approximately 27.0% of cases were born from April through June, compared with 25.6% of controls (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.12; P = .002). Comparisons made by sex (male vs female) and type of IBD (ulcerative colitis vs Crohn's disease) showed statistical significance only for men with Crohn's disease (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.25; P = .009). At ages 6 months and older, cases and controls born from April through June received a significantly greater number of prescriptions for antibiotics than cases and controls born in other months. Men with Crohn's disease are more likely to have been born in the months of April through June.

The Epidemiology of Colectomy in Ulcerative Colitis: Results From a Population-Based Cohort

Previous studies have reported colectomy rates of over 50% in ulcerative colitis (UC), although changes in management may have influenced the rates of colectomy in the modern era. We sought to determine the incidence of colectomy in UC and identify risk factors associated with early colectomy (EC) and late colectomy (LC). We used the University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database, a population-based data set including UC patients with up to 25 years of post diagnosis follow-up. We tracked the occurrence of total colectomy in all patients with known UC, subdivided into EC (≤90 days from diagnosis date) and LC (>90 days from diagnosis). Survival curves were created and stratified by age, sex, era of diagnosis, and inpatient/hospital diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine which risk factors were predictive of either EC or LC. Among 3,752 patients with UC, 367 underwent colectomy. The 5-, 10- and 20-year actuarial risk of requiring colectomy was 7.5%, 10.4%, and 14.8%, respectively. Male sex (hazard ratio (HR): 2.63, [corrected] 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-4.36) and being initially diagnosed during a hospitalization (HR: 12.46, 95% CI: 7.40-21.0) were predictive of EC after adjustment for confounders. In-hospital diagnosis was predictive of LC, whereas being diagnosed more recently was protective against LC (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98). The cumulative incidence of colectomy in UC is lower than previously reported, and appears to be decreasing further among more recently diagnosed cohorts of patients. Male sex and hospitalization at the time of diagnosis are major risk factors for EC and LC.

A Population-Based Study of Health-Care Resource Use Among Infliximab Users

We sought to describe the characteristics of health-care utilization (HCU) among patients with Crohn's disease using infliximab (IFX). Using the University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database (UMIBDED), we extracted all subjects with newly prescribed IFX, newly prescribed purine analogs (azathioprine, AZA) (without IFX), newly prescribed steroids (Ster) (without IFX or purine analogs) after 2001, and those not prescribed any of these drugs (ND). All of the subjects must have had HCU data available for 5 years before initial prescription and for 3 years afterward. We analyzed the number of physician visits, hospital visits, and surgeries. IBD-associated physician visits were consistently higher for IFX, both pre- and post-initial dosing, although overall physician visits were similar between IFX, AZA, and Ster. There was a steep rise in hospitalizations in the 6 months before initial prescription of IFX, AZA, or Ster, and hospitalizations were higher in the IFX cohort until 18-24 months after the first prescription, at which point levels fell to those evident 2-5 years before initiating IFX and to levels in the other drug groups. Likelihood of surgery post-dosing was greater in IFX than in AZA or ND for up to 36 months but was not different than Ster. In a "step-up" approach to IFX use, it takes 2 years for the physician visits to reduce to 2-year pre-dosing rates and 18-24 months to reach hospitalization rates at 2 years pre-dosing and hospitalization rates of the AZA and Ster groups. Surgical rates to 3 years post-dosing were still higher than in AZA or ND groups.

Mesalamine in IBD: Multiple hats?

Mesalamine in IBD: Multiple hats?

Does the use of 5-aminosalicylates in inflammatory bowel disease prevent the development of colorectal cancer?

Objectives There is increased interest in determining whether 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) use can prevent the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to determine whether use of 5-ASA was associated with a reduced risk of CRC in these patients. Methods We extracted from our population-based University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database the number of patients with a new diagnosis of CRC between the years 1997 and 2000. From within our Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database we extracted a control group of IBD patients who did not develop CRC matched to the case group who did develop CRC by age, sex, diagnosis, year of diagnosis, and geographic area of residence. We linked cases and controls with Manitoba Health's Drug Program Information Network to study 5-ASA use within 2 yr before CRC diagnosis. The Drug Program Information Network database is a population-based database that was established in 1995 and that records all prescription drugs. Results There were 25 cases of IBD identified as having CRC. These were matched with 348 cases of IBD who did not develop CRC. CRC cases were more likely to be exposed to 5-ASA (odds ratio = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.58–3.73) but this result was not statistically significant. The mean total days of use was 400.9 days ± 185.9 among CRC cases versus 420.2 days ± 241.7 among non-CRC cases ( p = 0.92). The prescribed daily dose was 2295 mg/day ± 1041 mg among CRC cases and 1811 mg ± 520 mg among controls ( p = 0.21). Conclusion These data do not support 5-ASA as protective in preventing CRC.

Does the use of 5-aminosalicylates in inflammatory bowel disease prevent the development of colorectal cancer?

There is increased interest in determining whether 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) use can prevent the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to determine whether use of 5-ASA was associated with a reduced risk of CRC in these patients. We extracted from our population-based University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database the number of patients with a new diagnosis of CRC between the years 1997 and 2000. From within our Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database we extracted a control group of IBD patients who did not develop CRC matched to the case group who did develop CRC by age, sex, diagnosis, year of diagnosis, and geographic area of residence. We linked cases and controls with Manitoba Health's Drug Program Information Network to study 5-ASA use within 2 yr before CRC diagnosis. The Drug Program Information Network database is a population-based database that was established in 1995 and that records all prescription drugs. There were 25 cases of IBD identified as having CRC. These were matched with 348 cases of IBD who did not develop CRC. CRC cases were more likely to be exposed to 5-ASA (odds ratio = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.58-3.73) but this result was not statistically significant. The mean total days of use was 400.9 days +/- 185.9 among CRC cases versus 420.2 days +/- 241.7 among non-CRC cases (p = 0.92). The prescribed daily dose was 2295 mg/day +/- 1041 mg among CRC cases and 1811 mg +/- 520 mg among controls (p = 0.21). These data do not support 5-ASA as protective in preventing CRC.

The association between corticosteroid use and development of fractures among IBD patients in a population-based database

Objective Because the rate of fracture among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is only slightly higher than that in the general population, it is important to define high-risk groups worthy of diagnostic evaluation or prophylactic interventions. Corticosteroid use has been considered in other diseases to be a risk for fracture, although not all studies in IBD are concordant on this point. We aimed to determine whether patients with IBD drawn from a population-based database who sustain fractures are more likely to have been using corticosteroids than a matched group of IBD patients who did not fracture. Methods We extracted from our population-based University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database the number of patients with a new diagnosis of fracture between the years 1997–2000. From within our Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database, we extracted a control group of IBD patients who did not develop fractures matched to the case group who did by age, gender, diagnosis, year of diagnosis, and geographic area of residence. We linked our cohorts with Manitoba Health’s Drug Program Information Network to study corticosteroid use within 2 yr before fracture diagnosis. The Drug Program Information Network is a population-based database, established in 1995, which records all prescription drugs. Results Fractures were identified in 13 patients with Crohn’s disease and in 28 patients with ulcerative colitis. The control group included 103 Crohn’s disease and 173 ulcerative colitis patients who did not fracture. In Crohn’s disease, for the group who fractured compared with the controls who did not fracture, corticosteroid use before fracture was evident in seven (54%) compared with 21 (22%) who did not fracture (χ 2 = 4.45, df = 1, p = 0.035). In ulcerative colitis, for the group who fractured compared with the controls who did not fracture, corticosteroid use before fracture was evident in five (18%) compared with 37 (21%) who did not fracture (χ 2 = 0.031, df = 1, p = 0.861). Fracture cases were more likely to be exposed to oral corticosteroids (OR = 1.75; 95% CI = 0.82–3.75), but this result is not significant. Regarding corticosteroid dosing among the 12 patients with IBD who fractured and used corticosteroids, the mean total days supply was 314 days ± 236 days compared with 258 days ± 278 days in those who did not fracture ( p = 0.16). The prescribed daily dose among corticosteroid users was comparable for those who fractured versus those who did not fracture (18 mg/day vs 21 mg/day, p = 0.90). Conclusions Patients who require corticosteroids in Crohn’s disease should be considered at risk for fracture. Further research is required to delineate after how much corticosteroid use are subjects at risk and/or after what duration of active disease.