2025 Background: Increased contrast enhancement on brain imaging following chemoradiotherapy is often interpreted as progression of disease (PD). However, there is growing evidence that radiographic and even clinical worsening may result from effects of therapy, i.e. PsPr, rather than from true PD. Methods: 80 patients (pts) with GBM were treated in an IRB-approved phase 2 clinical trial with concurrent RT and TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ. MRI was performed post-RT. PsPr was defined as increased contrast enhancement on the initial post-RT MRI scan that improved without changing chemotherapy, or as histologically documented necrosis. True PD was defined as continued progression on subsequent scans, or histologically documented viable tumor. MR perfusion imaging with relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and FDG PET imaging were collected in subsets of patients. Results: There were 33 pts with increased enhancement on the initial post-RT MRI; 8 (24%) had PsPr, 17 (52%) had true PD, and 8 (24%) discontinued TMZ (PsPr vs. true PD unknown). Of the 8 pts with PsPr, 2 had MR perfusion scans; both demonstrated increased rather than decreased rCBV. Two others had FDG PET scans; both showed hyper- rather than hypometabolism. Of the 17 patients with true PD, 5 had MR perfusion scans: 4 had increased rCBV and 1 had decreased rCBV; none had PET scans. The single patient with histologically documented PsPr had at the time of surgery, after 2 cycles of adjuvant TMZ, both increased rCBV and hypermetabolic PET scan; perfusion imaging was not performed with his first post-RT MRI. 6 of the 8 pts with PsPr were clinically worse at their post-RT visit; 7 of the 17 with true PD were clinically worse. Conclusions: At least 24% of our pts with increased contrast enhancement post-RT had PsPr; the incidence could be as high as 48% if all 8 pts who discontinued TMZ for a worsening scan actually had PsPr. MR perfusion, FDG PET, and clinical status were not predictive of PsPr versus true PD. It may be reasonable to consider findings on the post-RT MRI as a new baseline, rather than an assessment of response to chemo-RT, because of the high (24–48%) risk of PsPr. This approach would also minimize the likelihood of overestimating the benefits of second-line treatment. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Schering-Plough Schering-Plough
Read full abstract