Incidence Of Sphincter Tears Research Articles

Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades

Objectives Anal sphincter rupture is a serious complication of a vaginal delivery. A considerable number of women suffer permanent anal incontinence after this type of injury. The incidence of sphincter tears is believed to have increased over several decades in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland, but there seem to be significant differences in the incidence rates among these countries. The aim of this study is to compare frequency of anal sphincter tears among the four Nordic countries, and to discuss the possible reasons for the development. Study design Ecological register study. Anal sphincter ruptures are registered as third and fourth degree perineal tears in the national birth and hospital registries in the Nordic countries. Data from these registries were sampled from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. The incidences of anal sphincter ruptures were calculated as percentages of all vaginal deliveries and caesarean sections were excluded. The test of relative proportions, Chi-square and linear regression modelling were used to study the difference between countries and time trends. Results The frequency of anal sphincter rupture was significantly higher in three countries, Denmark 3.6%, Norway 4.1% and Sweden 4.2%, compared to Finland 0.6%. The trend was clearly increasing from the early 1970s in all countries. Conclusions There is a significant difference in the Nordic countries in the incidence of anal sphincter tears and a significant increment in the incidence over three decades. Our hypothesis is that change in the routines during labour may be one reason for this increment. Higher episiotomy frequency in Finland may be one contributing reason. We assume that there has been a change in the conduct of labour during the last decades, and protecting the perineum may have lost its importance in the three Nordic countries, while the classic method of protecting perineum is still in use in Finland.

Morbidité maternelle immédiate après extraction instrumentale par spatules de Thierry et par ventouse obstétricale

ObjectiveTo compare maternal morbidity after Thierry's spatulas or vacuum-assisted deliveries. Patients and methodsRetrospective study, at the French hospital la Conception, in Marseilles. All successful instrumental deliveries between November 2003 and May 2005 were reviewed, that is to say 264. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed comparing maternal morbidity in the two groups. The primary outcome measure was perineal trauma. Secondary outcomes were blood loss and duration of hospitalization. ResultsAmong the 264 deliveries, there were 96 vacuum deliveries and 168 Thierry's spatulas extraction. Thierry's spatulas were use more often in nulliparous patient (<0.001). Patients in the group of Thierry's spatulas have a higher rate of epidural analgesia (p=0.05), a longer duration of first (p=0.002) and second stage of labor (p=0.03). There was no difference in incidence of sphincter tears between women who underwent Thierry's spatulas and those who underwent vacuum delivery with respective incidence of 4.2 and 3.2% (p=0.67). There was a significant difference in post-partum hemoglobin value with a higher blood loss in the group of Thierry's spatulas (<0.001). Mean duration of hospitalization was longer in the group with Thierry's spatulas (5.6days) than in the group who underwent vacuum delivery (4.7days) (p<0.001). Discussion and conclusionIncidence of third degree tears was similar between the vacuum and Thierry's spatulas group. Deliveries with vacuum are associated with less blood loss and a shorter hospitalization stay.