Incidence Of irAEs Research Articles

Peripheral blood biomarkers in immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in metastatic melanoma.

e21543 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are extensively employed in the management of various solid cancers. Our study aims to assess the potential prognostic and predictive value of peripheral blood biomarkers, as well as their correlation with adverse events. Methods: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data retrieved from a cohort of 23 patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma at a single institution between 2015 and 2019. Specifically, we focused on analyzing the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), absolute neutrophil+monocyte-to-absolute lymphocyte+eosinophil ratio (ANMC/ALEC) from complete blood count (CBC), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level from peripheral blood to assess their correlation with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results: Our findings revealed that NLR values less than 0.34 and ANMC/ALEC ratio less than 3.45 were associated with improved PFS and OS, as well as a lower incidence of immune-related adverse events, which supports our initial hypothesis. However, these results were not statistically significant due to the low power of our study. On the other hand, high NLR values were significantly associated with higher pre-treatment LDH levels (P-value = 0.037), which is a well-established adverse prognostic factor in melanoma. Additionally, high ANMC/ALEC ratios were also found to be associated with high LDH levels, although this relationship was not statistically significant (P-value = 0.133). Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that patients with lower pre-treatment NLR and ANMC/ALEC ratios have better PFS and OS, as well as lower incidence of irAEs. Conversely, those with high NLR and high ANMC/ALEC ratios exhibited lower PFS and OS, as well as higher incidence of irAEs. High NLR and ANMC/ALEC ratios were also found to be associated with higher pre-treatment LDH levels, which have previously been demonstrated to be an adverse prognostic factor in melanoma. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with liver metastases in patients with esophageal cancer: A retrospective, real-world study.

e16033 Background: Advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer patients tend to have a poor prognosis. The liver is the most common organ of distant metastasis in esophageal cancer. The liver metastases associated with a higher risk of survival. Developing the optimal treatment modalities is especially important for those patients. The efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors have not been clearly clarified in liver metastasis of esophageal cancer. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, real-world study. We collected general information and clinical data from patients with liver metastasis of esophageal cancer who admitted to Luoyang Central Hospital between April 2020 and October 2023. All patients were first diagnosed esophageal cancer with liver metastasis and received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor regimen or chemotherapy regimen for the first time. Patients treated with interventional therapy or who had received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were excluded. The efficacy and safety of patients receiving immunotherapy were evaluated, including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), and immune-related adverse events (irAE). We also evaluated the relationship between clinical features and outcomes using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We enrolled 61 patients with a median age of 61 (44-88) years, 63.9% males; 37 in the immunotherapy group (23 in the first-line group, 62.2%) and 24 in the chemotherapy group (19 in the first-line group, 79.2%). Median OS was 14.1 (95% CI 11.4-16.8) months in the immunotherapy group and 9.2 (95% CI 8.5-9.9, p < 0.01) months in the chemotherapy group; In first-line treatment, the median OS in the two groups was 19.4 (95%CI 15.0-22.2) months and 9.6 (95%CI 8.9-10.3, p < 0.01) months. In all patients, Median PFS was 7.2 (95% CI 6.4 – 8.0) months in the immunotherapy group and 4.6 (95% CI 3.8 – 5.4) months in the chemotherapy group, p = 0.174. The ORR of immunotherapy and chemotherapy was 56.8% and 33.3%; DCR was 78.4% and 62.5%. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that N stage and treatment regimen were significant factors related with OS. Grade 3 TRAE in immunotherapy group and chemotherapy group were 29.7% and 29.2%, respectively. The incidence of irAEs was 10.8%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This real-world data showed PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors might have good efficacy and manageable safety in EC patients with liver metastases, especially in first-line patients. [Table: see text]

A single institution review of immunotherapy use, adverse events, and outcomes in early-onset cancer.

e23320 Background: A significant portion of cancer patients are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and many experience immune related adverse events (irAE) which impact treatment and outcomes. A paucity of data exists related to use of ICIs in Early Onset Cancers (EOC), their irAE, and its correlation to outcomes. Methods: A single institution database of immunotherapy use from an NCI-designated cancer center (NCI-CC) was reviewed with patients treated from 2010-2019. Two cohorts were examined: EOC (age ≤50 at diagnosis), and age > 50. Clinically significant irAEs were defined as those requiring hospitalization (≥grade 3). Pearson's Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: A total of 1067 patients were identified, 173 were EOC. Race and ethnicity were similar between groups, the EOC group had significantly higher proportion of females, private insurance, working, single, treated at main campus, and ECOG 0. Main cancer types in EOCs were skin cancers (38.2%), lung (16.2%), and heme malignancies (11.6%); those > 50 were lung (46.6%), skin cancer (21.6%), and GU malignancies (11.2%). Stages of cancer were not statistically different nor was type or doses of ICI. EOCs were more likely to get a greater number of ICIs. IrAE requiring hospitalization were similar between groups; 20 (11.6%) in EOC vs 95 (10.6%) in > 50. There was no difference in the incidence of specific irAEs. Further stratification of EOC cohort by age group 13-30, 31-40, and 41-50 demonstrated no difference in experience of an irAE. Ipilimumab had the highest incidence of irAE in EOC; 12 (75.0%) vs 52 (33.1%), as did receiving 2+ ICIs: 11 (68.8%). The number of doses of a specific ICI was not correlated to irAE in EOC. EOC patients without an irAE were more likely to have a disease response; either stable disease, partial response, or a complete response: 21 (70.0%) vs 1 (12.5%); there was no difference in mortality. Conclusions: In a single NCI-CC review of ICI use, EOC had no difference in ≥grade 3 irAEs or in specific irAEs relative to older adults. Within EOCs, those who experienced a significant irAE were more likely to have received Ipilimumab or 2+ ICIs and were less likely to obtain a response to treatment, although mortality was not different. [Table: see text]

Routine documentation of pre-treatment functional variables to predict survival in patients on immunotherapy.

e14701 Background: Medical providers often describe concerns about a patient’s functional status in routine clinical documentation (e.g., hard of hearing, recent falls, difficulty with home medication). These clinician-documented pretreatment functional variables (PFVs) may be predictive of outcomes among patients receiving immunotherapy. The goal of this retrospective study is to check for an association between the documentation of PFVs with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Methods: We created a retrospective registry of all patients who received at least one dose of an immune checkpoint inhibitor for any indication between 2/1/2011 and 4/7/2022 at a comprehensive cancer center. The investigators created a validated REDCap registry; clinical research specialist at Vasta Global captured most data. PFVs were collected by review of routine clinical documentation 30 days before or after the first dose. Patients were stratified by their number of PFVs (0,1, or 2+) and by their age (≥ or <65 years). PFVs assessed function, nutritional status and social support and were dichotomized to indicate impaired vs not with ten total categories. We used Cox proportional hazard modeling for survival analyses between the three PFV groups, calculated from the first dose of immunotherapy to disease progression, death, and last known follow-up controlling for age, BMI, smoking, and disease type with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Results: From the overall cohort (n = 3,101), 35% had no PFVs, 32% had one PFV, and 32% had two or more PFVs; 52.5% were considered younger, and 47.5% geriatric-aged (≥65yo). PFVs were more common among the geriatric-aged population (mean 1.43 vs 0.89). The most common cancer types were lung cancer (45%), melanoma (14%), and kidney (6%). The most noted PFVs were visual impairment (26%), unintentional weight loss (22%), inability to walk a quarter block (17%), living alone (16%), and falls (14%). In the overall population, an increasing number of PFVs was associated with shorter OS. When stratified by age, the number of PFVs was associated with shorter progression-free survival (p <0.01) and overall survival (p <0.01) among the geriatric and non-geriatric populations (Table). There was no association between increasing PFVs and incidence of irAEs. Conclusions: Although often considered to be signs of aging, documentation of multiple PFVs was associated with worse OS and PFS among geriatric-aged and non-geriatric-aged populations. This study highlights the utility of routine clinical documentation on health status, including function, nutrition, and social support, to estimate survival regardless of chronologic age. [Table: see text]

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit due to immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). In this retrospective study, we determined the incidence, treatment patterns and survival outcomes of this patient population at a comprehensive cancer center. All patients admitted to the ICU due to irAEs from ICI treatment between January 2015 and July 2022 were included. Descriptive statistics were reported on patient characteristics and treatment patterns during hospital admission. Overall survival (OS) from the time of ICU discharge to death was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Over the study period, 5561 patients received at least one ICI administration, of which 32 patients (0.6%) were admitted to the ICU due to irAEs. Twenty patients were treated with anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 treatment, whereas 12 patients were treated with ICI monotherapy. The type of irAEs were de novo diabetes-related ketoacidosis (n = 8), immune-related gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 8), myocarditis or myositis (n = 10), nephritis (n = 3), pneumonitis (n = 2), and myelitis (n = 1). The median duration of ICU admission was 3 days (interquartile range: 2-6 days). Three patients died during ICU admission. The median OS of the patients who were discharged from the ICU was 18 months (95% confidence interval, 5.0-NA). The incidence of irAEs leading to ICU admission in patients treated with ICI was low in this study. ICU mortality due to irAEs was low and a subset of this patient population even had long-term survival.

The prognostic impact of peripheral blood eosinophil counts in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have gained approval for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the response rate is still limited. Therefore, it is urgent to explore novel markers of responses to ICIs that can help assess clinical benefits. Recently, it has been noted that peripheral blood eosinophil counts are an independent factor correlated with clinical outcome of ICIs in some types of cancer. We investigated peripheral blood absolute eosinophil counts (AECs) at baseline and 4 weeks after the initiation of nivolumab for mRCC patients between February 2016 and May 2022. In addition, we examined clinicopathological features including irAEs and analyzed the correlation between AECs and clinical efficacy of nivolumab. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 5.7 and 25.5 months, respectively. The median AECs in patients with irAEs were significantly higher at baseline and 4 weeks after the treatment compared to those without irAEs (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). With the cutoff value of AECs of 329 cells/µL at 4 weeks after the treatment for prediction of irAEs, high-AECs groups had significantly higher number of responders compared with that in low-AECs group (p < 0.001). Accordingly, the PFS and OS were significantly better in patients with high-AECs group than those in low-AECs group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.009). High-AECs at 4 weeks after the treatment serve as the prominent surrogate marker associated with the incidence of irAEs and better clinical outcome in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab.

Safe Stop IPI-NIVO trial: early discontinuation of nivolumab upon achieving a complete or partial response in patients with irresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma treated with first-line ipilimumab-nivolumab – study protocol

BackgroundPatients with irresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma presenting with poor prognostic factors are usually treated with a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), consisting of ipilimumab and nivolumab. This combination therapy is associated with severe immune related adverse events (irAEs) in about 60% of patients. In current clinical practice, patients are usually treated with ICIs for up to two years or until disease progression or the occurrence of unacceptable AEs. The incidence of irAEs gradually increases with duration of treatment. While durable tumour responses have been observed after early discontinuation of treatment, no consensus has been reached on optimal treatment duration. The objective of the Safe Stop IPI-NIVO trial is to evaluate whether early discontinuation of ICIs is safe in patients with irresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma who are treated with combination therapy.MethodsThe Safe Stop IPI-NIVO trial is a nationwide, multicentre, prospective, single-arm, interventional study in the Netherlands. A total of 80 patients with irresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma who are treated with combination therapy of ipilimumab-nivolumab and have a complete or partial response (CR/PR) according to RECIST v1.1 will be included to early discontinue maintenance therapy with anti-PD-1. The primary endpoint is the rate of ongoing response at 12 months after start of ICI. Secondary endpoints include ongoing response at 24 months, disease control at different time points, melanoma specific and overall survival, the incidence of irAEs and health-related quality of life.DiscussionFrom a medical, healthcare and economic perspective, overtreatment should be prevented and shorter treatment duration of ICIs is preferred. If early discontinuation of ICIs is safe for patients who are treated with the combination of ipilimumab-nivolumab, the treatment duration of nivolumab could be shortened in patients with a favourable tumour response.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05652673, registration date: 08–12-2022.

Current Status and Prospect of PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced NSCLC

The incidence of cancer is closely correlated with age, as 75% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are aged at least 65 years. The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has altered the available NSCLC therapeutic pattern. Limited studies on elderly patients have demonstrated that ICIs as monotherapy provide substantial benefits for patients aged 65-75 years, showing no significant difference compared to younger patients. This benefit is also observed in combination with immune-combined chemotherapy or radiotherapy. For individuals older than 75 years, the survival effect was not evident, though. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with ICIs alone were similar in incidence across age categories. Immune-combination chemotherapy resulted in a higher incidence of irAEs than chemotherapy alone, and patients ≥75 years of age were more likely to experience higher-grade irAEs. Besides the fact that immunosenescence in older patients influences the immune milieu in a multifaceted manner, which in turn impacts the effectiveness of immunotherapy, the prognosis is also influenced by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, among other factors. For certain individuals aged ≥75 years or in poor physical health, immunotherapy combined with low-intensity chemotherapy has emerged as a viable treatment option. However, there are fewer related studies, so there should be a conscious effort to increase the number of elderly patients enrolled in the trial and a comprehensive assessment to explore individualized treatment options. To provide additional references and guidance for immunotherapy in elderly NSCLC patients and to propose new therapeutic perspectives in combination with their characteristics, this review aims to summarize and analyze the pertinent studies on the application of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in these patients. .

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients aged over 80 years: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundImmuno-oncology (IO) drugs are essential for treating various cancer types; however, safety concerns persist in older patients. Although the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is similar among age groups, higher rates of hospitalization or discontinuation of IO therapy have been reported in older patients. Limited research exists on IO drug safety and risk factors in older adults. Our investigation aimed to assess the incidence of irAEs and identify the potential risk factors associated with their development.MethodsThis retrospective analysis reviewed the clinical data extracted from the medical records of patients aged > 80 years who underwent IO treatment at our institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the incidence of irAEs.ResultsOur study included 181 patients (median age: 82 years, range: 80–94), mostly men (73%), with a performance status of 0–1 in 87% of the cases; 64% received IO monotherapy. irAEs occurred in 35% of patients, contributing to IO therapy discontinuation in 19%. Our analysis highlighted increased body mass index, eosinophil counts, and albumin levels in patients with irAEs. Eosinophil count emerged as a significant risk factor for any grade irAEs, particularly Grade 3 or higher, with a cutoff of 118 (/μL). The group with eosinophil counts > 118 had a higher frequency of irAEs, and Grade 3 or higher events than the group with counts ≤ 118.ConclusionIO therapy is a safe treatment option for patients > 80 years old. Furthermore, patients with elevated eosinophil counts at treatment initiation should be cautiously managed.

Endocrine immune-related adverse event is a prognostic biomarker independent of lead-time bias

ObjectivesImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) are known to be associated with clinical efficacy and better prognoses in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. In particular, endocrine irAE (e-irAE) is related to better prognoses. Since the incidence of irAEs increase as treatment duration becomes longer, we should consider lead-time bias not to overvalue the result. We evaluated the impact of e-irAE on the outcome before and after 6-, 9-, and 12-week landmark analyses. Materials and MethodsWe evaluated 222 patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer who received anti-PD-1 antibodies such as nivolumab or pembrolizumab from January 2016 to April 2021. Treatment efficacy and outcomes of patients with or without e-irAE (e-irAE group or no e-irAE group) were retrospectively evaluated. In addition, we performed 6-, 9-, and 12-week landmark analyses to exclude the effect of lead-time bias. ResultsMedian progression free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the e-irAE group than in the no e-irAE group (overall: 15.3 vs 3.9 months, p < 0.0001; 6-week: 15.3 vs 4.9 months, p < 0.0002; 9-week: 19.8 vs 6.1 months, p = 0.0012, 12-week: 19.8 vs 8.4 months, p = 0.017). Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the e-irAE group (overall: not reached (NR) vs 15.4 months, p = 0.0003; 6-week: NR vs 19.1 months, p = 0.0049, 9-week: NR vs 22.2 months, p = 0.006; 12-week: NR vs 23.3 months, p = 0.04). We used the multivariate cox proportional hazard model to adjust for confounding factors and found that e-irAE had better impact on both PFS and OS (PFS: overall: hazard ratio 0.37 [95% confidence interval 0.23–0.56], 6-week: 0.41 [0.26–0.63], 9-week: 0.43 [0.24–0.63], 12-week: 0.52 [0.31–0.84]; OS: overall: 0.40 [0.22–0.68], 6-week: 0.46 [0.25–0.79], 9-week: 0.47 [0.24–0.84], 12-week: 0.58 [0.29–1.08]). ConclusionThe occurrence of endocrine irAE was associated with better efficacy and prognoses regardless of the lead-time bias.

The relationship between immune-related adverse events during ipilimumab monotherapy and survival outcomes among melanoma patients: A systematic review.

Ipilimumab disinhibits immune system activity which results in the elimination of malignant cells. An unintended consequence of ipilimumab therapy is off-target immune-related adverse events (irAEs). It has therefore been proposed that the incidence of irAEs is a manifestation of treatment effectiveness. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the relationship between irAEs and survivability among melanoma patients administered ipilimumab monotherapy. A comprehensive search was conducted across several databases which yielded a total of 2381 studies. Clinical trials and prospective studies administering ipilimumab monotherapy to melanoma patients were included. Furthermore, there was no restriction placed on publication date. After screening, five studies were included for data extraction. The primary outcome of median overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome of OS hazard ratio were extracted from the included studies. Based on qualitative analysis of the included studies, there seemed to be an association between the occurrence of non-lethal irAEs and improved survival outcomes among melanoma patients administered ipilimumab monotherapy. With that being said, the poorer survivability among patients who experienced high-grade irAEs may be the result of subsequent treatment discontinuation. Potential confounders such as corticosteroid use should be accounted for. Finally, landmark analyses may be conducted to account for immortal time bias. The findings from this systematic review provide evidence suggesting that the incidence of irAEs is a marker of an improved anti-tumor response.

Association of Baseline Tumor-Specific Neoantigens and CD8+ T-Cell Infiltration With Immune-Related Adverse Events Secondary to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Recent evidence has shown that higher tumor mutational burden strongly correlates with an increased risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). By using an integrated multiomics approach, we further studied the association between relevant tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) features and irAEs. Leveraging the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, we extracted cases of suspected irAEs to calculate the reporting odds ratios (RORs) of irAEs for cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). TIME features for 32 cancer types were calculated on the basis of the cancer genomic atlas cohorts and indirectly correlated with each cancer's ROR for irAEs. A separate ICI-treated cohort of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was used to evaluate the correlation between tissue-based immune markers (CD8+, PD-1/L1+, FOXP3+, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs]) and irAE occurrence. The analysis of 32 cancers and 33 TIME features demonstrated a significant association between irAE RORs and the median number of base insertions and deletions (INDEL), neoantigens (r = 0.72), single-nucleotide variant neoantigens (r = 0.67), and CD8+ T-cell fraction (r = 0.51). A bivariate model using the median number of INDEL neoantigens and CD8 T-cell fraction had the highest accuracy in predicting RORs (adjusted r2 = 0.52, P = .002). Immunoprofile assessment of 156 patients with NSCLC revealed a strong trend for higher baseline median CD8+ T cells within patients' tumors who experienced any grade irAEs. Using machine learning, an expanded ICI-treated NSCLC cohort (n = 378) further showed a treatment duration-independent association of an increased proportion of high TIL (>median) in patients with irAEs (59.7% v 44%, P = .005). This was confirmed by using the Fine-Gray competing risk approach, demonstrating higher baseline TIL density (>median) associated with a higher cumulative incidence of irAEs (P = .028). Our findings highlight a potential role for TIME features, specifically INDEL neoantigens and baseline-immune infiltration, in enabling optimal irAE risk stratification of patients.

Occurrence and Management of Immunotherapy-Associated Adverse Events in Patients with Gynecological Cancers.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an essential therapeutic approach in treating many solid tumors. ICIs enhance the body's anti-tumor T-cell activity, resulting in a novel spectrum of immunotherapy-related side effects. This novel spectrum of adverse events differs significantly from the side effects of conventional chemotherapy. It, therefore, requires special attention in the diagnosis and management of immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs). The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the incidence, diagnosis, and management of irAEs in patients with gynecologic malignancies who received ICIs and to discuss these findings in the context of the recent literature. In the present retrospective overview, we evaluated patients with gynecologic malignancies (breast, endometrial, cervical, ovarian) who received ICIs with regard to the incidence, type, and time to onset of irAEs. A total of 61 patients treated at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany, between 2018 and 2023 were included in the analysis. A total of 32.8% of patients developed an irAE of any grade or type. The median time to irAE was 24 weeks. The most frequently observed irAEs were grade 1 (20%) or 2 (35%). Immunotherapy-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 45% of patients (40% grade 3, 5% grade 4). The most common type of irAE in our cohort was hypothyroidism, followed by hepatitis and colitis. Cox regression analysis identified the duration of ICI therapy as the only significant factor influencing the incidence of irAEs (p = 0.004). The broad spectrum of irAEs and the onset time of irAEs are important challenges of therapy with ICIs, requiring proactive monitoring and tailored management strategies to optimize the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy.

Organ-specific accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in identifying immune-related adverse events in patients with high-risk melanoma treated with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor

PurposeThis study aimed to determine the organ-specific accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in identifying immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with high-risk (stage III/IV) surgically resected melanoma treated with an adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and determine the incidence of irAEs within the first year after starting treatment.Materials and methodsThis registry-based study included individuals who had undergone surgical removal of melanoma and were undergoing adjuvant ICI treatment (either nivolumab or pembrolizumab). The study specifically enrolled patients who had undergone both a baseline and at least one subsequent follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT scan. Follow-up scans were performed every third month in the first year after surgery to screen for disease recurrence. We retrospectively compared the follow-up scans with baseline scans to identify irAEs. Clinical information on irAEs was obtained from medical records and served as a reference standard for determining the accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT.ResultsA total of 123 patients with 363 [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans were included, and 65 patients (52.8%) developed irAEs. In decreasing order, the organ-specific incidences of irAEs were: skin 26/65 (40%), muscle and joints 21/65 (32.3%), intestines 13/65 (20%), thyroid gland 12/65 (18.5%), lungs 4/65 (6.2%), and heart 2/65 (3.1%). The sensitivities and specificities of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing irAEs were: skin 19% (95% CI: 7–39%) and 95% (88–98%), muscles and joints 71% (48–89%) and 83% (75–90%), intestines 100% (75–100%) and 85% (77–91%); thyroid gland 92% (62–99%) and 95% (89–98%), lungs 75% (19–99%) and 90% (83–95%), and heart 50% (13–99%) and 97% (92–99%), respectively.Conclusion[18F]FDG-PET/CT generally had moderate to high sensitivities (except for skin and heart) and specificities in diagnosing irAEs in patients receiving adjuvant ICI; this could be suggested to be systematically assessed and reported in scan reports.

Risk of cardiovascular toxicity with combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and angiogenesis inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs) have been investigated for the treatment of several tumor types. Both ICIs and AIs may lead to cardiovascular adverse events, and their combination may potentially increase the risk for cardiovascular toxicity. In the present meta-analysis, we aim to assess the cardiovascular toxicity of ICIs plus AIs vs. AIs alone. Secondary objectives are non-cardiovascular adverse events and efficacy. Systematic review was performed according to PRISMA statement. Phase II and III randomized clinical trials were identified by searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library and ASCO Meeting abstracts, from inception to June 2022. The pooled risks for overall response rate (ORR), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), immune-related AEs, (irAEs), hypertension, and vascular events defined as stroke, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolisms, were calculated. In terms of cardiovascular toxicity, we found higher risk for severe hypertension among patients treated with ICIs plus AIs as compared with those receiving AIs (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.53), but no significant difference was found for any-grade hypertension, and for vascular events. There was also no difference in terms of overall AEs, whereas the incidence of irAEs was increased in the ICIs plus AIs arm, as expected. In terms of efficacy, ICIs plus AIs achieved better ORR (OR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.70-2.97) and PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39-0.63) as compared to AIs alone. The addition of ICIs to AIs significantly increased the risk of high-grade hypertension, but not that of acute vascular events.

Breaking boundaries: Exploring extended pembrolizumab in first-line treatment of renal cell carcinoma with axitinib-pembrolizumab combination.

436 Background: The standard first-line treatment for metastatic renal cancer (mRCC) combines immune checkpoint- (ICI) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). While TKI therapy continues until disease progression, ICI treatment is typically stopped after 24 months or 35 cycles, aligning with approval study criteria. However, in real-world practice, the decision to discontinue ICI therapy upon achieving a positive response can be distressing for both patients and healthcare providers; thus ICIs are not stopped. We conducted an initial analysis of prolonged pembrolizumab (Pem) use in axitinib-pembrolizumab (Axi-Pem) combination therapy to evaluate its effects and toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from mRCC patients treated with first-line Axi-Pem in 10 German tertiary care centers between 2019 and 2023. After completing 35 cycles or 24 months of Pem, patients were offered continued ICI therapy if positive response was assessed. We calculated objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the treatment start to achievement of 36 therapy months. Adverse events (irAEs) were reported following CTCAE 5.0 criteria. Results: Out of 72 patients, 27 met strict eligibility criteria from the Keynote-426 study (NCT02853331), with a response at 24 months and continuous Pem therapy. Patients had a median age of 65.7 years (range: 34-84), and IMDC risk was favorable/intermediate/poor in 22.2%/55.5%/18.5%. Median follow-up was 33.2 months (range: 25.3-48.4). At the 36-mos landmark, median PFS was not reached (PFS 64.7%), ORR was 63.6%, with complete response, partial response, and stable disease observed in 9.1%(1)/54.5%(6)/9.1%(1) of cases, respectively. Permanent Pem discontinuation occurred due to progressive disease in two cases and complete response in one case. Another case led to Pem discontinuation due to immune-related toxicity. Conclusions: In our selected real-world patient cohort seeking prolonged ICI therapy, responders who received continuous Pem beyond 24 months achieve sustained efficacy in first-line treatment. Furthermore, the incidence of irAEs does not increase with prolonged exposure to ICI therapy. Additional results beyond the 36-month landmark are urgently needed to further support the clinical necessity and feasibility of ongoing ICI treatment in light of its impact on the overall financial burden of cancer care.

Detection and evaluation of signals for immune-related adverse events: a nationwide, population-based study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are one of the main pillars of cancer therapy. Since other studies such as clinical trial and retrospective study have limitations for detecting the immune-related adverse events (irAEs) characterized by unpredictable onset, nonspecific symptoms and wide clinical spectrum, we aimed to identify the incidence of irAEs and to detect and evaluate the signals using real-world data. Cancer patients treated with anticancer medications were analyzed using the nationwide health insurance claims database of South Korea from 2017 to 2019, and Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) database of Asan Medical Center (AMC), a tertiary referral hospital, from 2012 to 2019. AEs of ICI users were compared with those of non-ICI anticancer medication users. PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab) were evaluated. We defined an AE as a newly added diagnosis after the ICI prescription using an ICD-10 diagnostic code. A signal was defined as an AE that was detected by any one of the four indices of data mining: hazard ratio (HR), proportional claims ratio (PCR), claims odds ratio (COR), or information component (IC). All detected signals were reviewed and classified into well-known or potential irAEs. Signal verification was performed for targeted AEs using CDW of AMC using diagnostic codes and text mining. We identified 118 significant signals related to ICI use. We detected 31 well-known irAEs, most of which were endocrine diseases and skin diseases. We also detected 33 potential irAEs related to disorders in the nervous system, eye, circulatory system, digestive system, skin and subcutaneous tissues, and bones. Especially, portal vein thrombosis and bone disorders such as osteoporosis with pathological fracture and fracture of shoulder, upper arm, femur, and lower leg showed high HR in ICI users than in non-ICI users. The signals from hospital database were verified using diagnostic codes and text mining. This real-world data analysis demonstrated an efficient approach for signal detection and evaluation of ICI use. An effective real-world pharmacovigilance system of the nationwide claims database and the EMR could complement each other in detecting significant AE signals.

Incidence of immune-related adverse events in U.S. veterans treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Emerging clinical practice reports have suggested higher incidence of irAEs in real-world settings than initially observed in phase III clinical trials. Objectives were to determine the incidence of irAEs associated with ICIs in a clinical population, the Veterans Health Administration, characterize their time to onset, and explore potential risk factors. This retrospective observational study included patients from eight Midwest VA medical centers who initiated an ICI between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2022. Courses of incident prednisone therapy lasting at least seven days at a dose ≥ 20 mg/day were used to identify irAEs, within two years following ICI initiation. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore potential irAE risk factors. Of 1314 patients, the incidence of irAEs was 19.8%, with most (86.5%) occurring within one year of ICI initiation. Monthly incidence rates peaked three months following ICI initiation at 3.0% and decreased thereafter. Female gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-4.00) and combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab (HR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.44-4.21) were significantly associated with irAE incidence. These findings are consistent with recent studies in clinical populations that demonstrate higher irAE incidence rates than originally reported in clinical trials. Our findings may enhance prompt recognition and treatment of irAEs for VA patients.

Adverse events of neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy for resectable cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy is changing the treatment landscape for patients with cancer. Exploring the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in relation to this novel approach may provide valuable insights for future clinical investigations. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) websites were searched for all relevant literature from their inception to November 24, 2023. We then extracted the required data from the included studies and used the R software to analyze the pooled incidence of irAEs. Subgroup analyses examined the pooled incidence of irAEs according to cancer and combination types using a random-effects model. Sixteen studies involving 501 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Considering the heterogeneity of the study design, we analyzed the randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and the single-arm studies separately. In RCTs, the incidence of any-grade irAEs was 95.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.3-99.3) and that of grade ≥3 irAEs was 24.0% (95% CI 13.7-36.0). In single-arm studies, the incidence of any-grade irAEs was 89.4% (95% CI 75.0-98.0) and grade ≥3 irAEs was 20.3% (95% CI 8.7-35.2). In both RCTs and single arms, the most common any- grade irAEs were rash and fatigue, while the most common grade ≥3 irAEs was abnormal liver function and colitis. Due to irAEs, 9.4% of patients in RCTs and 6.9% of patients in single-arm studies did not complete the prescribed neoadjuvant treatment cycle. This study comprehensively summarized the incidence of irAEs in neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. The occurrence of irAEs varies depending on the cancer and combination types. Our meta-analysis provides clinicians with essential guidance for the management of patients with cancer. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023387969.

Single Institution Experience with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Vulvar and Vaginal Melanomas.

This study aimed to report clinical outcomes of patients with vaginal melanoma (VaM) or vulvar melanoma (VuM) who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and discuss the development of immune-related adverse events (irAE). This is a retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with VaM or VuM between July 2011 and September 2022 at the University of Virginia, Emily Couric Clinical Cancer Center. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment outcomes, and adverse events were abstracted. The primary outcome was incidence of irAE. Eight patients were included in this study, four with VaM and four with VuM. Most (n = 6) had local or regional disease at first presentation, and 25% (n = 2) presented with distant metastasis. All patients received a CTLA-4 inhibitor and 75% (n = 6) received PD-1 inhibitor alone or in combination with a CTLA-4 inhibitor. Most (75%, n = 6) patients experienced irAE. Of those who had irAE, 83% (n = 5) required therapy interruption or discontinuation. Most (66%, n = 4) underwent ICI rechallenge of which 75% (n = 3) experienced subsequent irAE. Of all patients in the series, 75% of patients (n = 6) had partial or complete response to ICI. This series is the first to detail incidence of irAEs and ICI rechallenges in vulvovaginal melanoma. Our findings indicate that while ICIs are effective, their use is associated with significant irAE development. Rechallenge of ICI after irAE is feasible but associated with risk of recurrent/new irAE. Further studies are needed to better quantify this risk.