In-hospital Bleeding Research Articles

New risk classification adapting SCAI shock stages to patients with pulmonary embolism (RISA-PE).

Pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment is based on risk stratification according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. However, emerging therapies in acute PE may require a more granular risk classification. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to propose a new RIsk claSsification Adapting the SCAI shock stages to right ventricular failure due to acute PE (RISA-PE). This registry included consecutive intermediate-high risk (IHR) or high-risk (HR)-PE patients selected for catheter-directed interventions (CDI) from 2018 to 2023 in 15 Spanish centers (NCT06348459). Patients were grouped according to RISA-PE classification as A (right ventricular dysfunction and troponin elevation); B (A + serum lactate >2 mmol/L OR shock index ≥1); C (persistent hypotension); D (obstructive shock); and E (cardiac arrest). In-hospital adverse events were assessed to evaluate RISA-PE performance. A total of 334 patients were included (age 62.1±15.2 years, 55.7% males). The incidence of in-hospital all-cause death was progressively higher with increasing RISA-PE stage (1.2%, 6.4%, 19.0%, 25.6%, and 57.7% for stages A, B, C, D, and E, respectively, P value for linear trend<0.001). However, using the ESC classification, there was an abrupt difference between IHR- and HR-PE patients regarding mortality (4.3% vs. 29.3%, P<0.001). The incidence of in-hospital major bleeding and acute kidney injury followed a similar pattern. The user-friendly RISA-PE classification may improve the granularity in stratifying PE patients' risk and warrants evaluation in larger studies with different therapeutic approaches in order to detect its utility as a decision-making scale.

Characteristics and outcomes of myocardial infarction among patients with bleeding or hypercoagulable disorders: A nationwide analysis

ObjectiveTo examine the characteristics and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with bleeding and/or hypercoagulable disorders. BackgroundStudies examining the outcomes of AMI in bleeding/hypercoagulable disorders are scarce. MethodsThe Nationwide Readmissions Database was utilized to identify hospitalizations with AMI from 2016 to 2020. The study cohort was divided into 4 groups: (1) MI without bleeding or hypercoagulable disorders, (2) MI with bleeding disorders, (3) MI with hypercoagulable disorders and (4) MI with mixed disorders. The main outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. ResultsA total of 4,206,005 weighted hospitalizations with AMI were identified during the study period, of which 382,118 (9.1 %) had underlying bleeding or hypercoagulable disorders.The utilization of invasive strategies for the management of MI was highest in patients without bleeding or hypercoagulable disorders (62.6 %) and lowest in patients with mixed disorders (39.3 %). In-hospital mortality was higher among patients with bleeding (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.22; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.21, 1.24) and mixed disorders (aOR 3.38; 95 % CI 3.27, 3.49) compared with patients without bleeding or hypercoagulable disorders. Among patients with any bleeding or hypercoagulable disorder, those who underwent invasive strategy had lower adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.28; 95 % CI 0.27, 0.30), ischemic stroke (aOR 0.60; 95 % CI 0.56, 0.64), bleeding (aOR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.61, 0.65), blood transfusion (aOR 0.95; 95 % CI 0.91, 0.99) and 30-day urgent readmissions (aOR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.68, 0.72). ConclusionsThe inpatient management and outcomes of AMI in patients with bleeding/hypercoagulable disorders differ from patients without those disorders.Revascularization in the setting of AMI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, which suggests that patients with bleeding/hypercoagulable disorders can be evaluated for standard approaches to managing AMI; however, confounding by indication may be a concern.

Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy in Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke With Thrombocytopenia: The CASE II Study.

There is scant evidence regarding the safety of antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with thrombocytopenia. Our study aims to address this concern by examining AIS patients with thrombocytopenia from a large database in real-world settings. We included patients with AIS with a platelet count <100×109/L who had complete records of antiplatelet drug use. Those requiring anticoagulation or having contraindications to antiplatelet therapy were excluded. Short-term safety outcomes were in-hospital bleeding events, while the long-term safety outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. A good clinical outcome was defined as functional independence, indicated by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at discharge. Propensity score matched analyses were used. We screened 169 423 patients with AIS from 90 stroke centers in the CASE II register, ultimately enrolling 2808 noncardioembolic patients with thrombocytopenia. In the propensity score matched analyses, no significant difference was observed between the antiplatelet and nonantiplatelet groups in terms of intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio=0.855 [95% CI, 0.284-5.478]; P=0.160) or gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio=2.034 [95% CI, 0.755-5.478]; P=0.160). Antiplatelet therapy was associated with improved functional outcomes at discharge (odds ratio=1.405 [95% CI, 1.028-1.920]; P=0.033), and showed a trend towards reducing 1-year mortality (odds ratio=0.395 [95% CI, 0.152-1.031]; P=0.058). The use of antiplatelet therapy lessened as platelet count decreased in patients with AIS with thrombocytopenia. However, our findings suggest that antiplatelet medications remain safe and effective for this population.

Presentation, care, coronary intervention and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI according to age: insights from the international prospective ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI registry.

Older people less frequently receive invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for NSTEMI than younger patients. We describe care, ICA data, and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of NSTEMI by age in a contemporary and geographically diverse cohort. Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by age (≥75years, n = 761). Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions, and data collected on ICA. Outcomes included in hospital acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, repeat myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, BARC Type ≥3 bleeding and death, as well as 30-day mortality. Patients aged ≥75years, compared with younger patients, at presentation had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and oral anticoagulation prescription (22.4% vs 7.6%, p< 0.001). Older patients less frequently received ICA than younger patients (78.6% vs 90.6%, p< 0.001) with the recorded reason more often being advanced age, comorbidities or frailty. Of those who underwent ICA, older patients more frequently demonstrated 3-vessel, 4-vessel and/or left main stem coronary artery disease compared to younger patients (49.7% vs 34.1%, p< 0.001) but less frequently received revascularisation (63.6% vs 76.9%, p< 0.001). Older patients experienced higher rates of in-hospital acute heart failure (15.0% vs 8.4%, p< 0.001) and bleeding (2.8% vs 1.3%, p= 0.006), as well as in-hospital and 30-day mortality (3.4% vs 1.3%, p< 0.001; 4.8% vs 1.7%, p< 0.001; respectively), than younger patients. Patients aged ≥75years with NSTEMI, compared with younger patients, less frequently received ICA and guideline-recommended care, and had worse short-term outcomes.

Outcomes following TAVR in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundWhile transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has broadened treatment options for critically ill patients, outcomes among those with concomitant cardiogenic shock (CS) are not well-explored. MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of major databases for studies comparing outcomes following TAVR in patients with and without CS since inception up to October 31, 2023. Our meta-analysis included five non-randomized observational. Dichotomous outcomes were assessed using the Mantel-Haenszel method (risk ratio, 95 % CI), and continuous outcomes were evaluated using mean difference and 95 % CI with the inverse variance method. Statistical heterogeneity was determined using the inconsistency test (I2). ResultsAmong 26,283 patients across five studies, 30-day mortality was higher in the CS group (7267 patients; 27.6 %) compared to those without CS (OR 3.41, 95 % CI [2.01, 5.76], p < 0.01), as well as 30-day major vascular complications (OR 1.72, 95 % CI [1.54, 1.92], p < 0.01). At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between the compared groups (OR 2.68, 95 % CI [0.53, 13.46], p = 0.12). No significant between-group differences were observed in the likelihood of 30-day aortic valve reintervention (OR 3.20, 95 % CI [0.63, 16.22], p = 0.09) or post-TAVR aortic insufficiency (OR 0.91, 95 % CI [0.33, 2.51], p = 0.73). Furthermore, 30-day stroke, pacemaker implantation, and in-hospital major bleeding were comparable between both cohorts. ConclusionAmong patients undergoing TAVR, short-term mortality is higher but one-year outcomes are similar when comparing those with, to those without, CS. Future studies should examine whether TAVR outcomes are improved when the procedure is delayed to optimize CS and when delay is not possible, whether particular management strategies lead to more favorable periprocedural outcomes.

Transjugular Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Early Compassionate Use Outcomes

BackgroundData on procedural and early outcomes after transjugular transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) are limited. ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate first-in-man procedural and clinical outcomes after transjugular TTVR with a special focus on patients who received large device sizes in whom TTVR outcomes have been questioned. MethodsThe retrospective registry included patients who underwent TTVR using the LuX-Valve Plus system (Jenscare Biotechnology Co Ltd) for symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR) from January 2022 until February 2024 at 15 international centers in a compassionate use setting. The endpoints were procedural TR reduction, in-hospital death, adverse events, and 1-month survival. We further stratified results according to the size of the implanted device (<55 vs ≥55 mm). ResultsThe registry included a total of 76 patients at a median age of 78 years (Q1-Q3: 72-83 years, 47.4% women). TR was reduced to ≤2+ and ≤1+ in 94.7% and 90.8% of patients (75.0% of patients received TTVR devices ≥55 mm) with well-sustained results at 1-month follow-up (TR ≤2+ in 95.0% and ≤1+ 86.8%). Residual TR was paravalvular in all cases. In-hospital death occurred in 4 patients (5.3%). Four patients (5.3%) underwent cardiac surgery during index hospitalization. Major in-hospital bleeding events occurred in 5 patients (6.6%). New in-hospital pacemaker implantation was required in 3.9% of patients in the overall cohort (5.7% in “pacemaker-naive” individuals). No cases of valve thrombosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary embolism were observed. At 1-month follow-up, survival was 94.4%, and NYHA functional class significantly improved. One further patient received a pacemaker, 1 further bleeding event occurred, and 2 patients underwent reintervention or surgery within the first 30 days after TTVR. No differences in procedural outcomes or adverse events were observed after stratification for valve size. ConclusionsTransjugular TTVR appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe TR with comparable outcomes in very large tricuspid anatomies.

Association of Dementia with Adverse Outcomes in Older Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in the ICU.

Dementia limits timely revascularization in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, it remains unclear whether dementia affects prognosis negatively in older individuals with AMI in the intensive care unit (ICU). This research aimed to evaluate the dementia effect on the outcomes in individuals with AMI in ICU.Data from 3,582 patients aged ≥ 65 years with AMI in ICU from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC IV) database were evaluated. The independent variable was dementia at baseline, and the primary finding was death from any cause during follow-up. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) showed 208 participants with and without dementia. The correlation between dementia and poor prognosis of AMI was verified using a double-robust estimation method.In the PSM cohort, the 30-day all-cause mortality was 37.50% and 33.17% in the dementia and non-dementia groups (P = 0.356), respectively, and the 1-year all-cause mortality was 61.06% and 51.44%, respectively (P = 0.048). Cox regression analysis showed no association between dementia and elevated 30-day (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84, 1.60) and 1-year (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.99, 1.66) all-cause mortality after AMI. Similarly, dementia was not connected with in-hospital mortality, bleeding, or stroke after AMI. Interaction analysis showed that 1-year all-cause mortality was 48.00% higher in individuals with dementia and diabetic complications than in those without diabetic complications.Dementia is not an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in AMI. Thus, it may be inappropriate to include dementia as a contraindication for invasive AMI therapy.

Associations Between Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score and Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis of More Than 27,000 Patients

BackgroundThe dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score was developed to identify patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are likely to derive benefit (score ≥ 2) or harm (score < 2) from extended DAPT beyond 1 year after PCI in terms of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. We examined the associations between DAPT score at index PCI and long-term mortality from an all-comers PCI registry in patients receiving DAPT according to the standard of care. MethodsWe retrospectively examined prospectively collected data from the Melbourne Interventional Group PCI database (2005-2018) and grouped patients as having DAPT score ≥ 2 or < 2. Long-term mortality was assessed from the Australian National Death Index linkage. The primary end point was long-term mortality as determined using survival analysis. Secondary end points included in-hospital events and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation. ResultsOf 27,740 study patients, 9402 (33.9%) had DAPT score ≥ 2. Patients with DAPT score ≥ 2 were younger, included more women, and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with DAPT score ≥ 2 had higher in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs 1.0%), major bleeding (2.3% vs 1.6%), 30-day MACE (7.1% vs 3.1%), and long-term mortality at a median follow-up of 5.17 years (21.9% vs 16.5%) P < 0.001 for all. ConclusionsOne-third of all-comer patients undergoing PCI had a DAPT score ≥ 2 with greater short-term ischemic and bleeding risk, and higher long-term mortality. Risk assessment with the DAPT score may guide the duration and intensity of DAPT beyond the early post-PCI period.

Low Remnant Cholesterol and In-Hospital Bleeding Risk After Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Bleeding risk brought by intensive lipid-lowering therapy and low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is concerning, while evidence regarding the relationship between remnant cholesterol and bleeding is frightening. This study aimed to investigate the association between remnant cholesterol at admission and an in-hospital bleeding event after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). A total of 3222 eligible patients admitted to Shanghai Huashan Hospital between 2015 and 2021 with complete lipid data were analyzed. Patients were classified into low (<20.0 mg/dL), moderate (20.0-29.9 mg/dL), and high (≥30 mg/dL) groups by remnant cholesterol. The mean age of patients was 63.0± 13.1 years, including 2301 (71.4%) men and 651 (20.2%) with TIA. The median (interquartile range) of remnant cholesterol was 18.6 (13.5-25.9) mg/dL. After adjustment for confounding variables, patients with low remnant cholesterol had a higher risk of bleeding events (odds ratio, 2.56 [95% CI, 1.12-6.67]) than those with moderate remnant cholesterol. The high remnant cholesterol group was not significantly associated with bleeding risk. Combined assessment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and remnant cholesterol further identified patients with the highest risk of bleeding events. Low remnant cholesterol levels were associated with bleeding events during the acute stage of ischemic stroke and TIA. The assessment of remnant cholesterol could inform the bleeding risk during hospitalization both for patients and physicians in clinical practice.

Development and internal validation of the Cleveland Clinic Bleeding Model to predict major bleeding risk at admission in medical inpatients

BackgroundGuidelines recommend pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for acutely ill medical patients at acceptable bleeding risk, but only the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) model has been validated for bleeding risk assessment. ObjectivesWe developed and internally validated a risk assessment model (RAM) to predict major in-hospital bleeding using risk factors at admission and compared our model with IMPROVE. MethodsWe selected patients admitted to medical services at 10 hospitals in the Cleveland Clinic Health System from 2017 to 2020. We identified major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, using a combination of diagnostic codes and laboratory values, and confirmed events with chart review. We fit a least absolute shrinkage selection operator logistic regression model in the training set and compared the discrimination and calibration of our model with the IMPROVE model in the validation set. ResultsAmong 46 314 admissions, 268 (0.58%) had a major bleed. The final RAM included 16 risk factors, of which prior bleeding (odds ratio [OR] = 4.83), peptic ulcer (OR = 3.82), history of sepsis (OR = 3.26), and steroid use (OR = 2.59) were the strongest. The Cleveland Clinic Bleeding Model had better discrimination than IMPROVE (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve = 0.85 vs 0.70; P < .001) and, at equivalent sensitivity (52%), categorized fewer patients as high risk (7.2% vs 11.8%; P < .001). Calibration was adequate (Brier score = 0.0057). ConclusionUsing a large population of medical inpatients with verified major bleeding events, we developed and internally validated a RAM for major bleeding whose performance surpassed the IMPROVE model.

Effects of Transradial Access on In-Hospital Outcomes in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Insights from the Japanese Nationwide Database

Due to its superior safety profile and improved outcomes, trans-radial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) has become the preferred access in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of native coronary disease. This study investigated the impact of TRI on in-hospital outcomes after PCI for coronary artery bypass graft vessels (GV-PCI). We analyzed patients who underwent GV-PCI in 2019–2022 from the Japanese nationwide registry. Patients were categorized into the TRI and trans-femoral percutaneous coronary intervention (TFI) groups. We assessed the association of TRI and in-hospital outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death and major bleeding. GV-PCI was performed in 2,295 Out of 972,370 total PCI procedures. The primary outcomes occurred in 29 patients (1.3%), including 17 deaths (0.7%). Major bleeding occurred in 12 patients (0.5%), and access site bleeding in seven patients (0.3%). The TRI group (N=1,521) showed lower crude rates of the primary outcome (0.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.039), major bleeding (0.3% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.027), and access site bleeding (0.1% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.047) compared to the TFI group (N=774). Univariable logistic regression demonstrated a significant association of TRI with reduced primary outcome (odd ratio (OR):0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.22-0.98), major bleeding (OR:0.25, 95% CI:0.07-0.80), and access site bleeding (OR:0.20, 95% CI:0.03-0.94). In the multivariable analysis, TRI was still significantly associated with a decrease in major bleeding events (OR:0.29, 95% CI:0.07-0.93). In conclusion, the use of TRI was associated with a reduction in bleeding events when referenced to TFI in the context of GV-PCI.

Effect of Early Heparin Anticoagulation on Blood Flow and Cardiac Function in Patients with Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of early administration of heparin anticoagulation on blood flow and cardiac function in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 730 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI at the Department of Cardiology of the Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital of Chengdu from December 2017 to May 2023. According to the timing of heparin administration. The patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of heparin administration: the early group (3000 U unfractionated heparin administered immediately after the diagnosis of STEMI) and the delayed group (Intravenous injection of ordinary heparin 3000 U after successful interventional catheterization following the diagnosis of STEMI). The study compared general clinical data, myocardial injury markers (initial troponin, peak troponin, and tmax troponin), interventional related indicators (preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, postprocedural TIMI flow grade, stent length, and thrombus aspiration), and postoperative indexes ST segment resolution (STR), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and bleeding events. Results: The early group had a lower proportion of TIMI 0–1 grade and a higher proportion of TIMI 2–3 grade compared to the delayed group (p &lt; 0.05). The early group showed better ST segment resolution (p &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in LVEF and NT-proBNP classification between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested an interaction between early heparin anticoagulation and left anterior descending infarct-related artery (IRA) on cardiac function. There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE and bleeding events between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that early heparin anticoagulation was a predictor of immediate TIMI grade 2–3 flow, and TIMI grade 2–3 flow was negatively correlated with early heparin anticoagulation. Conclusions: Early heparin anticoagulation can improve the patency of the IRA and myocardial perfusion in patients with STEMI. Additionally, it can reduce myocardial injury and improve cardiac function without increasing the risk of in-hospital bleeding.

Association of Different Anticoagulation Strategies With Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Background Therapeutic anticoagulation is the cornerstone of treatment for pulmonary embolism (PE), but the impact of different anticoagulation strategies on patient outcomes remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the association of different anticoagulation strategies with the outcomes of patients with acute PE. Methods A retrospective chart review of 207 patients with acute PE who were admitted to one of three urban teaching hospitals in the Mount Sinai Health System (in New York City) from January 2020 to September 2022 was performed. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were recorded for all patients. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess the association of different outcomes with the approach of therapeutic anticoagulation used. Results The median age of the included patients was 65 years, and 50.2% were women. The most common approach (n = 153, 73.9%) to therapeutic anticoagulation was initial treatment with unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin followed by a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC), while heparin alone (either unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin) was used in 37 (17.9%) patients, and another 17 (8.2%) patients were treated with heparin followed by bridging to warfarin. Hospital length of stay was longer for patients in the "heparin to warfarin" group (risk-adjusted incidence rate ratio of 2.52). The rates of in-hospital bleeding, all-cause 30-day mortality, and all-cause 30-day re-admissions did not have any significant association with the therapeutic anticoagulation approach used. Conclusion Patients with acute PE who were initially treated with heparin and subsequently bridged to warfarin had a longer hospital stay. Rates of in-hospital bleeding, 30-day mortality, and 30-day re-admission were not associated with the strategy of therapeutic anticoagulation employed.

The Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Research for Hospital Medication Management Based on the Web of Science Database.

Identify the collaborations between authors, countries, and institutions, respectively, and explore the hot issues and prospects for research on hospital medication management. Publications on hospital medication management were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric analyses were performed using CiteSpace 6.1.R3, HistCite 2.1, and VOSviewer 1.6.16. The network maps were created between authors, countries institutions, and keywords. A total of 18,723 articles related to hospital medication management studies were identified. Rapid growth in the number of publications since 2017. The high papers were published in AM J HEALTH-SYST PH, while JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC was the most co-cited journal. Manias E and WHO ranked first in the author and cited author. There were active collaborations among the top authors. Bates DW was the key author in this field. The authors have active collaborations in adverse drug events, acute coronary syndrome, in-hospital major bleeding, and so on. The US was the leading contributor in this field. The UK, Australia, and China are also very active. Active cooperation between countries and between institutions was observed. The main hot topics included matters related to outcome indicators, hospital pharmacy service behaviors, and medication use in pain management. More recent keywords focus on chronic disease medication management and clinical medication management. Hospital medication management studies have significantly increased after 2017. There was active cooperation between authors, countries, and institutions. The application of hospital medication management in the emergency department and the relationship between medication management and medication adherence are current research hotspots. In addition, with the continuous progress of society, chronic diseases have become an important factor affecting people's health, and medication management is becoming more and more subdivided, so the direction of chronic disease medication management as well as precise medication may become the development direction of future research.

Clinical outcomes of adjusted-dose versus standard-dose prasugrel in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction

BackgroundThe comparative efficacy and safety of adjusted- and standard-dose prasugrel in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain unclear. This study aimed to comparatively assess the ischaemic and bleeding outcomes of adjusted-dose (maintenance dose: 3.75 mg) and standard-dose (maintenance dose: 10 mg) prasugrel in East Asian patients with AMI undergoing PCI. MethodsFrom a combined dataset sourced from nationwide AMI registries in Japan and South Korea (n = 17,118), patients treated with either adjusted- or standard-dose prasugrel were identified. Patients who did not undergo emergent PCI, those on oral anticoagulants, and those meeting the criteria of contraindication of prasugrel in South Korea (age ≥ 75 years, body weight < 60 kg, or history of stroke) were excluded. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding events were compared between the adjusted-dose (n = 1160) and standard-dose (n = 1086) prasugrel groups. ResultsWithin the propensity-matched cohort (n = 702 in each group), no significant difference was observed in the in-hospital MACE between the adjusted- and standard-dose prasugrel groups (1.85% vs. 2.71%, odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33–1.38, p = 0.286). However, the incidence of in-hospital major bleeding was significantly lower in the adjusted-dose prasugrel group than in the standard-dose group (0.43% vs. 1.71%, OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07–0.88, p = 0.031). The cumulative 12-month incidence of MACE was equivalent in both groups (4.70% vs. 4.70%, OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.61–1.64, p = 1.000). ConclusionsAmong East Asian patients with AMI undergoing PCI, those administered adjusted-dose prasugrel exhibited a lower risk of in-hospital bleeding events than those administered standard-dose prasugrel, while maintaining a comparable 1-year incidence of MACE.

In-hospital outcomes and postdischarge mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation

BackgroundIt is unclear whether advances in management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and introduction of novel oral anticoagulants have changed outcomes in patients with ACS with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF). ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the incidence of AF in patients admitted for ACS and to evaluate its association with adverse outcomes, given the recent advances in management of both diseases. MethodsNatural language processing search algorithms identified AF in patients admitted with ACS across 13 Northwell Health Hospitals from 2015 to 2021. Hierarchical generalized linear mixed modeling was used to assess the association between AF and in-hospital mortality, bleeding, and stroke outcomes; marginal Cox regression modeling was used to assess the association between AF and postdischarge mortality. ResultsOf 12,315 patients admitted for ACS, 3018 (24.5%) had AF with 1609 (53.3%) newly diagnosed. AF patients more commonly received anticoagulation with an oral anticoagulant (80.4% vs 12.3%) or heparin (61.9% vs 56.9%), had lengthier intensive care unit stay (72 vs 49 hours), and underwent fewer percutaneous coronary interventions (31.9% vs 53.1%). In-hospital bleeding, stroke, and mortality were higher in the AF group (15.3% vs 5.0%, 7.4% vs 2.4%, and 6.9% vs 2.1%, respectively). AF was an independent risk factor for all in-hospital outcomes (odds ratios of 2.5, 2.7, and 2.0 for bleeding, stroke, and mortality, respectively) as well as for postdischarge mortality (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2–1.5). ConclusionAF is present in 25% of ACS patients and increases risk of in-hospital and postdischarge adverse outcomes. Additional data are required to direct optimal management.

Protein-based tissue adhesive reduces time to haemostasis in peripheral vascular surgery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of protein-based tissue adhesive (Bioglue®) in reducing time to haemostasis in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. From January to December 2021, 100 consecutive patients from 4 centres have been treated with open peripheral vascular surgery including upper and lower limb interventions. Patients have been allocated in each centre into control with no use of Bioglue® (Group no-Bio, 50 patients) or use of Bioglue® (Group Bio, 50 patients) by a block randomization method 10:10 until the required sample size was reached. Perioperative parameters including time to haemostasis, number of adjunctive stitches, and in-hospital bleeding have been analysed and compared in the two groups by means of mean independent-samples tT -test and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic data, preoperative risk factors, and preoperative medical therapy except for a higher percentage of active smokers in Group Bio (52% vs. 24%, p = 0.004). Femoral endarterectomy was most common in Group Bio (44% vs. 24%, p = 0.03), whilst the percentage of lower limb vein bypasses was higher in Group no-Bio (50% vs. 36%, p = 0.03). Bovine pericardium was the preferred material in Group Bio (20 cases, 40%), whilst autologous vein is mostly used in Group no-Bio (26 cases, 52%) (p = 0.01). Time to haemostasis was faster in Group Bio (4.4 vs. 9.6 minutes, p < 0.001). The need for adjunctive stitches was higher in Group no-Bio (8 cases, 16%, Group Bio vs. 25 cases, 50%, Group no-Bio; p < 0.001). The overall rate of in-hospital bleeding, including those requiring reintervention, was not different between the two groups (9 cases, 18%, Group Bio vs. 7 cases, 14%, Group no-Bio; p = 0.39). The protein-based tissue adhesive Bioglue® reduced time to haemostasis and need for adjunctive stitches in peripheral vascular surgery. However, it did not affect the overall rate of perioperative bleedings. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these outcomes.

Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Nonacute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock.

Evidence on the comparative outcomes following percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist devices (pVAD) versus intra-aortic balloon pump for nonacute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock is limited. We included 704 and 2140 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 years treated with pVAD and intra-aortic balloon pump, respectively, for nonacute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock from 2016 to 2020. Patients treated using pVAD compared with those treated using intra-aortic balloon pump were more likely to be concurrently treated with mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and blood transfusions. We computed propensity scores for undergoing pVAD using patient- and hospital-level factors and performed a matching weight analysis. The use of pVAD was associated with higher 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.59-2.33]) but not associated with in-hospital bleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.81-1.24]), stroke (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.56-1.47]), sepsis (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.64-1.28]), and length of hospital stay (adjusted mean difference, +0.4 days [95% CI, -1.4 to +2.3]). A quasi-experimental instrumental variable analysis using the cross-sectional institutional practice preferences showed similar patterns, though not statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.28-6.89). Our investigation using the national sample of Medicare beneficiaries showed that the use of pVAD compared with intra-aortic balloon pump was associated with higher mortality in patients with nonacute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock. Providers should be cautious about the use of pVAD for nonacute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock, while adequately powered high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine the clinical effects of pVAD.

In-hospital and readmission outcomes of patients with cancer admitted for pulmonary embolism treated with or without catheter-based therapy

BackgroundCancer patients are at risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). Catheter-based therapies (CBT) are novel reperfusion options for PE though data in patients with cancer is lacking. Study design and methodsPatients with intermediate- or high-risk PE were identified using the National Readmission Database (NRD) from 2017 to 2020. Primary outcome were in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital bleeding, 90-day readmission for venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related or right heart failure-related reasons and bleeding. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression and inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between CBT and no CBT as well as CBT versus systemic thrombolysis. ResultsA total of 7785 patients were included (2511 with high-risk PE) of whom 1045 (13.4%) were managed with CBT. After IPTW, CBT was associated with lower rates of index hospitalization death (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83–0.96) and 90-day readmission (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.81) but higher rates of in-hospital bleeding (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03–1.20) which was predominantly post-procedural bleeding. CBT was associated with lower risk of major bleeding (20.8% vs 24.8%; OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68–0.94) compared with systemic thrombolysis. InterpretationAmong patients with cancer with intermediate or high-risk PE, CBT was associated with lower in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. CBT was also associated with decreased risk of index hospitalization major bleeding compared with systemic thrombolysis. Prospective, randomized trials with inclusion of patients with cancer are needed to confirm these findings.

Validation of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) risk scores for venous thromboembolism and bleeding in an independent population

BackgroundMultiple guidelines recommend assessment of bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in adult medical inpatients to inform prevention strategies. There is no agreed-upon method for VTE and bleeding risk assessment. ObjectivesTo validate the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) VTE and bleeding risk scores in an independent population. MethodsIn this retrospective study, we calculated the IMPROVE VTE and bleeding risk scores in medical inpatients admitted between 2010 and 2019 at the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC). Patients were followed for in-hospital bleeding events while hospitalized and VTE events while hospitalized and for 3 months after discharge. We assessed calibration of the risk models by comparing the observed incidence of events in the UVMMC and IMPROVE populations across the published risk categories. We also assessed performance of the IMPROVE risk factors after refitting the models in the UVMMC population. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsVTE occurred in 270 (1.1%) of 23,873 admissions, with 92 (34%) occurring during admission, and bleeding occurred in 712 (4.7%) of 15,240 admissions. When the IMPROVE-VTE risk factors were refitted to the UVMMC data, the AUC was 0.64. When the IMPROVE bleeding risk factors were refitted to the UVMMC data, the AUC was 0.67. The IMPROVE-VTE score tended to overestimate risk at higher scores, and the IMPROVE bleeding score underestimated risk at lower scores and overestimated risk at higher scores. ConclusionWhile the refitted IMPROVE VTE and bleeding risk scores had reasonable model fit, the scores were poorly calibrated and did not reliably identify or differentiate patients at risk for VTE and bleeding. Different methods are needed for risk assessment of medical inpatients for VTE and bleeding risk.