Implementation Strategies Research Articles

Developing and testing Advance Choice Document implementation resources for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission

BackgroundAdvance Choice Documents (ACDs) have been recommended for use in England and Wales based on evidence from trials that show that they can reduce involuntary hospitalisation, which disproportionately affects Black African and Caribbean people. Our aim was therefore to develop and test ACD implementation resources and processes for Black people who have previously been involuntarily hospitalised and the people that support them.MethodsResource co-production workshops were held to inform the development of the ACD template and two types of training for all stakeholders, comprising a Recovery College course and simulation training. An ACD facilitator then used the ACD template developed through the workshops to create personalised ACDs with service users and mental health staff over a series of meetings. Interviews were then conducted with service user and staff participants and analysed to document their experience of the process and opinions on ACDs. Other implementation strategies were also employed alongside to support and optimise the creation of ACDs.ResultsNine ACDs were completed and were largely reported as appropriate, acceptable, and feasible to service users and staff. Both reported it being an empowering process that encouraged hope for better future treatment and therefore better wellbeing. Uncertainty was also expressed about the confidence people had that ACDs would be adhered to/honoured, primarily due to staff workload. The information provision training and the skills training were generally considered to be informative by trainees.ConclusionsThe project has developed an ACD creation resource that was reported as agreeable to all stakeholders; however, the generalisability of the findings is limited due to the small sample size. The project also highlights the importance of staff and ACD facilitator capacity and good therapeutic relationships in ACD completion. Further research is needed to determine the adjustments needed for large scale use, including for those under age 18 and those under the care of forensic mental health services; and how to include carers/supporters more in the process.

Evaluation of Nurses’ attitudes, behaviors, and barriers toward pressure ulcer prevention in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units

IntroductionPressure ulcers are a significant concern in pediatric intensive care units, with prevalence rates ranging from 0.8% to 27%. They pose serious physical and psychological challenges, particularly in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units (NICU and PICU). This study explores nursing strategies, attitudes, and barriers toward pressure ulcer prevention in NICU and PICU settings.MethodsUsing a descriptive study design, data were collected from 80 nurses working in NICU and PICU through validated questionnaires, including a demographic profile and a pressure ulcer survey. Descriptive statistics were employed to calculate mean scores and percentages, while inferential statistics assessed associations between variables.ResultsThe study revealed specific nursing strategies, along with significant barriers and attitudes toward pressure ulcer prevention in NICU and PICU. The total attitude mean score was 3.57, with the highest positive response (mean = 4.29) for “most pressure sores can be avoided”, and the highest negative response (mean = 3.86) for “pressure sore prevention is a low priority for me”. Among participants, 72.5% conducted risk assessments on all patients, 60% had written prevention care plans, and 76.3% implemented preventive strategies. Barriers such as staff shortages and time constraints were reported by 76.2% of nurses. Multivariate analysis indicated that nurses with more than 10 years of qualification (OR = 3.67) and permanent staff with over 10 years of employment (OR = 4.31) were significantly more likely to engage in preventive practices. The use of a pressure ulcer grading tool (OR = 2.49, P < 0.05) and participation in formal training (OR = 3.14, P < 0.05) were also positively associated with preventive practices.DiscussionThese findings underscore the importance of structured assessment tools, ongoing education, and the need to foster positive attitudes among nurses to effectively reduce pressure ulcer prevalence and enhance patient outcomes in NICU and PICU settings.

Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury.

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention is a major target for hospital quality metrics because it is linked to increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Health care systems use strict protocols surrounding catheterization and maintenance, which often disregard the clinical needs of special populations (eg, spinal cord injury [SCI]). However, for populations that rely on chronic instrumentation of the bladder, asymptomatic (ie, nonpathogenic) bacterial colonization in the bladder is common but not linked to adverse outcomes. Additionally, alterations in neurologic and sensory function after SCI make it difficult for clinicians to discern asymptomatic bacteriuria from acute urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics. Institutional policies for screening urine during SCI annual exams often lead to detection of bacteriuria but create a clinical decision-making challenge when determining whether antibiotic treatment is appropriate. To conduct preimplementation SCI-focused adaptations to the evidence-based practice (EBP) "Kicking CAUTI"-to develop a guide for SCI providers surrounding testing and treatment of CAUTI. Four 1-hour focus groups were conducted with SCI clinicians (prescribers and nursing staff) to assess insights on needed modifications to adapt Kicking CAUTI for SCI. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) was used to plan and report adaptations in this work and the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to guide adaptation of the EBP for the SCI population. Content and thematic analysis guided our process. The clinical algorithm was simplified, a urinary symptom assessment added, and provider- and patient-facing educational materials were developed to support implementation efforts to create the Test Smart Treat Smart Intervention. Traditional CAUTI protocols do not adequately address the needs of those with SCI and modifications are needed. Provider feedback provides valuable insights when adapting population appropriate interventions.

Eliminating Scraps in Refrigerator Door Sealing—A Six Sigma Case Study

This paper applies the Six Sigma method to an investigation and analysis of the factors contributing to sealing problems encountered in a refrigerated appliance model. By adopting a rigorous and systematic approach, the Six Sigma method relies on the use of advanced statistical and analytical tools to minimize variability and optimize processes. By utilizing the Six Sigma methodology, this work not only identifies and remedies sealing-related problems, but also contributes to a robust and efficient manufacturing process. The proposed methodology adopts the DMAIC approach and its associated tools to evaluate the impact of waste on the production process. This study aims to demonstrate how the DMAIC approach can effectively assist the company in minimizing scrap. Furthermore, detailed recommendations regarding the application and implementation of DMAIC tools are provided, enabling the company to thoroughly assess its existing processes. These insights will empower the company to identify areas for improvement and implement strategies for ongoing enhancement and operational excellence.

Applying the Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies methodology to inform the redesign of a selection-quality implementation toolkit for use in schools.

Implementation strategies are key to enhancing thetranslation of new innovations but there is a need to systematically design and tailor strategies to match the targeted implementation context and address determinants. There are increasing methods to inform the development and tailoring of implementation strategies to maximize their usability, feasibility, and appropriateness in new settings such as the Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS) approach. The aim of the current project is to apply the CWIS approach to inform the redesign of a multifaceted selection-quality implementation toolkit entitled Adoption of Curricular supports Toolkit: Systematic Measurement of Appropriateness and Readiness for Translation in Schools (ACT SMARTS) for use in middle and high schools. We systematically applied CWIS as the second part of a community-partnered iterative redesign of ACT SMARTS for schools to evaluate the usability and inform further toolkit redesign areas. We conducted three CWIS user testing sessions with key end users of school district administrators (n = 3), school principals (n = 6), and educators (n = 6). Our CWIS application revealed that end users found ACT SMARTS acceptable and relevant but anticipate usability issues engaging in the ACT SMARTS process. Results informed the identification of eleven usability issues and corresponding redesign solutions to enhance the usability of ACT SMARTS for use in middle and high schools. Results indicated the utility of CWIS in assessing implementation strategy usability in service of informing strategy modification as part of our broader redesign to improve alignment with end user, end recipient, and setting needs. Recommendations regarding the use of this participatory approach are discussed.

Implementing LGBTQ-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy: implementation strategies across five clinical trials.

LGBTQ-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based treatment for reducing transdiagnostic mental and behavioral health concerns among LGBTQ individuals. Preserving the effects of this intervention as it is translated into practice can maximize public health benefits. This study systematically identifies and evaluates implementation strategies for LGBTQ-affirmative CBT. First, we identified and operationalized implementation strategies used across five trials of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT using the Pragmatic Implementation Reporting Tool. Second, we evaluated the relative importance of these strategies via a quantitative assessment (N = 31 unique trial implementers). Survey responses were analyzed descriptively within each trial. Across all trials, we organized strategies as (1) high priority, (2) moderate priority, and (3) optional (if resources are available) for implementing LGBTQ-affirmative CBT. Within each trial, we identified 20 or more implementation strategies that were used, many of which overlapped across trials. We identified nine high priority strategies (e.g., working with clients to engage them in LGBTQ-affirmative CBT), nine moderate priority strategies (e.g., conducting ongoing training in LGBTQ-affirmative CBT), and nine optional/resource dependent strategies (e.g., showing visual indicators of LGBTQ affirmation within the physical spaces where LGBTQ-affirmative CBT is delivered). LGBTQ-affirmative CBT is a complex intervention requiring a package of implementation strategies. Our findings provide guidance for implementers in settings with different levels of resources regarding the highest priority strategies that may be needed to preserve the effectiveness of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT as it is translated into real-world settings.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Lifestyle Interventions in Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review

This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions, including dietary changes, physical activity, smoking cessation, and alcohol reduction, in preventing chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity. Chronic diseases pose a significant burden globally, and lifestyle interventions are increasingly recommended to reduce risk factors. A comprehensive search was conducted in databases like PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, focusing on studies published in the past decade. Included studies assessed adult populations at risk of chronic diseases, using interventions targeting lifestyle modifications with measurable health outcomes. Findings indicate that dietary changes and increased physical activity significantly reduce chronic disease risk, while smoking cessation and alcohol reduction further contribute to improved health outcomes. Combination interventions generally showed the most substantial impact on preventing chronic disease. Although the evidence strongly supports lifestyle changes for disease prevention, variations in intervention type, duration, and adherence remain a limitation. Future research should explore long-term effects and implementation strategies in diverse populations. This review underscores the need for integrating effective lifestyle interventions into healthcare policies to improve public health.

Toward evidence-informed policymaking in Nigeria? A systematic review of agricultural evidence syntheses

This article studies the body of agriculture evidence synthesis in Nigeria as a basis for evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM). EIPM is seen by its advocates as an objective way of identifying problems and proffering solutions that work, given its potential to offer sound bases for choices, helping with more effective decisions, and preventing detrimental policy outcomes. Yet, according to the EIPM literature, policymakers hardly use evidence or use it to justify pre-existing beliefs. At the same time, EIPM is often criticized as being susceptible to bias, especially given the large volumes of research being published that may arrive at different conclusions. One tool that could address these challenges is research evidence syntheses, known to be objective and rigorous, although there is a gap in knowledge on whether they are produced in ways that make them easily usable by decision makers. To bridge this knowledge gap, this study develops an analytical framework from the literature on facilitators and barriers of scientific evidence use to analyze existing agriculture-based evidence syntheses in Nigeria. The analytical framework was used to analyse and identify gaps in these syntheses that may limit their use by decision makers. Based on pre-defined search criteria, we find 19 relevant syntheses which are more qualitative and useful in defining policy-relevant problems; however, they mostly do not provide quotable economic statistics, solutions to address the problems identified, or implementation strategies. Given the currently limited number of evidence syntheses, especially those evaluating effectiveness of policy solutions, stakeholders interested in strengthening EIPM in Nigeria could facilitate collaborations between policymakers and researchers to popularize policy-relevant evidence synthesis and ensure such are made available and accessible to users in timely and usable formats.

Electroanalysis of Statin Drugs: A Review on the Electrochemical Sensor Architectures Ranging from Classical to Modern Systems.

An overview of the latest advances in the design of electrochemical sensor architectures dedicated to the determination of drugs from the statin class is presented in this review. Statins are drugs widely consumed for cholesterol control, and their determination in different matrices through the application of electroanalysis is growing considering advantages such as operational simplicity, lower cost and ease of sample preparation. Within the context of statins, electrochemical sensor architectures can be subdivided into conventional/classical electrodes such as glassy carbon electrodes, carbon paste electrodes, pencil graphite electrodes, boron-doped diamond electrodes and metallic electrodes, and more modern electrode systems, including the screen-printed electrodes and 3D-printed electrodes. Thus, different aspects related to the preparation of these electrochemical sensors and analytical performance are presented, also reflecting advances in terms of designs of new architectures and possible improvements not previously reviewed. Analyzed samples, advantages and disadvantages of different implemented sensor's modification strategies and perspectives for the electroanalysis of statins are also included throughout the work.

Protocol for leading health services innovation: a hybrid type 2 mixed method implementation trial for developing and assessing a codesigned graduate certificate program in health innovation

BackgroundA significant issue with innovative problem-solving in healthcare is an existing deficiency in continuing education for many healthcare professionals, which hinders the successful implementation of inventive solutions and progress in the field. Educators play a crucial role in guiding students to cultivate the knowledge and skills necessary to confront these challenges, including problem solving, collaboration, and the use of rapidly advancing technologies. It is vital to design educational programs that empower and motivate students to develop the proficiency and knowledge they need to be effective problem solvers, collaborators, and cultivators of innovative solutions. This project aims to assess the implementation and effectiveness of a codesigned postgraduate university program for a multidisciplinary health workforce.MethodsThe Leading Health Services Innovation Project is a hybrid type 2 mixed method implementation trial of a codesigned Graduate Certificate in Health Services Innovation. In collaboration with a large tertiary and quaternary health service, we developed a codesign process to guide the project, with time quarantined to create space for two-way learning between health sector partners and healthcare academics. Qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys for primary users will evaluate the implementation strategies. The reach, effectiveness, adoption implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework will guide the evaluation and maintenance of the program.ResultsIntegrating a codesign strategy complemented by a well-structured implementation and evaluation protocol that is a combination of implementation science theoretical frameworks (Knowledge to Action, Evidence-Based Co-design, RE-AIM) may lead to translational competence as a potential outcome.Anticipated outcomesThe application, resourcing and commitment to codesigned tertiary-level learning and qualification will demonstrate the achievement of a contemporary and comprehensive postgraduate university degree program in health innovation management.

Zero Trust Architecture in Cloud Computing: A Paradigm Shift in Platform Engineering Security

This article explores the paradigm shift in platform engineering security brought about by Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) in cloud computing environments. As organizations increasingly adopt cloud-native architectures and microservices, traditional perimeter-based security models prove inadequate for protecting complex, distributed systems. The article examines the core principles of ZTA, including robust identity and access management, least privilege access, micro-segmentation, continuous monitoring, and secure communication. It delves into the implementation strategies of ZTA in platform engineering, highlighting its benefits such as enhanced security, improved compliance, increased resilience against threats, adaptability to dynamic environments, and improved visibility. The article also addresses the challenges of implementing ZTA, including complexity, potential performance concerns, user experience considerations, cost implications, and the risk of vendor lock-in. Through an analysis of industry trends, adoption rates, and quantified benefits, the article demonstrates how ZTA addresses critical security challenges in modern cloud environments, ultimately enabling organizations to create more resilient, compliant, and adaptable platforms in the face of evolving cyber threats.

Integrating the Polysocial Risk Score: Enhancing Comprehensive Healthcare Delivery.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are known to determine a significant portion of a person's health, influencing downstream outcomes and widespread disparities. Screening for SDOH in clinical practice can improve efficacy of medical care, highlighting the potential for polysocial risk scores (PsRS) to help evaluate a patient's risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and other conditions. This review highlights existing research about the efficacy of PsRS in practical risk assessment, current gaps in the literature, and opportunities to refine the design and implementation of PsRS in real-world clinical settings. PsRS present unique opportunities to improve traditional risk prediction models for heart disease and other conditions, particularly if they examine both individual and area-level SDOH. Future studies should assess novel methods for extracting SDOH data from patients' medical records as well as PsRS implementation strategies that promote efficiency and patient confidentiality in real-world clinical settings.

Strategies to Improve Environmental Comfort of Institutionalized Older Adults: A Scoping Review

The demographic trends of an aging global population present significant challenges and opportunities for healthcare, particularly in providing optimal care environments for older adults living in long-term care facilities, with it being imperative to ensure these environments provide basic care and promote overall well-being through enhanced environmental comfort. This scoping review intends to show evidence-based practices enhancing the environmental comfort of institutionalized older people. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology, this scoping review’s inclusion criteria included studies in English, Portuguese, or Spanish between 2013 and 2023, focused on institutionalized people over the age of 65 years residing in long-term care settings where nurses implemented strategies or interventions designed to enhance environmental comfort in which older residents themselves directly evaluated, indexed in Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, DART-Europe, or Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP). Out of 497 initially retrieved studies, none of them met the established criteria, leading this study to be an empty review. The absence of studies meeting the inclusion criteria indicates a significant gap in the existing literature, highlighting the need for specialized training programs that equip nurses with the skills and knowledge to implement effective comfort-enhancing interventions, ensuring that the unique and challenging needs of older people are covered.

Medical students as teachers: impact of peer-led teaching sessions on NBME exam performance

Introduction/BackgroundPeer-led teaching sessions (PLTS) supplement conventional medical education, allowing students to share knowledge effectively. PLTS have shown significant academic benefits for student instructors. However, the impact on attendees, especially concerning NBME-style examinations, remains underexplored.MethodsThis study analyzed de-identified data from 67 first-year medical students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, divided into PLTS attendees (study group) and non-attendees (control group) based on session participation. Data were collected before two NBME examinations, with attendees defined as those attending at least five Peer-led teaching sessions. Academic performance was measured using NBME Customized Assessment Services (CAS) exam scores. Statistical analyses, including p-tests, chi-square, and t-tests, assessed differences in performance and potential biases based on MCAT scores, first-generation status, and socioeconomic background.ResultsThe study group initially had 26 students, and the control group had 31 students. Post-first examination, the study group adjusted to 22 students, and the control group to 35 students. MCAT scores and demographics showed no significant differences between groups. The first examination revealed a significant higher score in PLTS attendees’ scores (4.28% increase, p = 0.036), indicating a positive impact of PLTS on basic science knowledge. The second examination on organ systems physiology showed no significant difference (p = 0.722).DiscussionPLTS effectively enhance foundational science understanding but may be less impactful for advanced topics. The diminishing effect may result from increased use of diverse study resources and adaptation to medical school. Future research should explore long-term benefits, optimal implementation strategies, and the impact of instructor quality and engagement. Therefore, the overall conclusion is that PLTS positively influence NBME-style exam performance in early medical education, but benefits decrease over time.

The UPFRONT project: tailored implementation and evaluation of a patient decision aid to support shared decision-making about management of symptomatic uterine fibroids

ObjectiveTo evaluate implementation of a patient decision aid for symptomatic uterine fibroid management to improve shared decision-making at five clinical settings across the United States.MethodsWe used a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge design and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) planning and evaluation framework. We conducted clinician training, monthly reach tracking with feedback to site clinical leads, patient and clinician surveys, and visit audio-recordings. Implementation strategies included assessment of organizational readiness for shared decision-making, synchronous clinician training, audit and feedback of decision aid reach, and access to multiple decision aid formats. Outcomes and analyses included patient-level reach, clinician-level adoption, and associations of patient-reported decision aid exposure (as treated) and setting-level implementation (intention-to-treat) with patient-reported (collaboRATE measure) and observed (OPTION-5 measure) shared decision-making. We also designed and assessed setting-level plans for sustainability and other factors impacting sustained decision aid use.ResultsThe decision aid was adopted by 72 of the 74 eligible gynecologists (97%) and reached 2553 patients across five settings. CollaboRATE scores improved among patients who reported receiving the decision aid (as-treated analysis, 69% vs. 59%; OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.16–2.27). CollaboRATE scores remained consistent before and after setting-level decision aid implementation (intention-to-treat analysis, 64% vs. 63%; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.61–1.22). Participants would prefer to receive a decision aid at multiple time points (91.9% before the visit, 90.7% during the visit, 86.5% after the visit). Shared decision-making experiences did not improve when comparing pre vs. post-implementation collaboRATE scores across included settings (intention-to-treat, 64% vs. 63%; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.61–1.22).ConclusionWhen patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids are given decision aids, they report higher shared decision-making scores. However, the differences we observed between the as-treated and intention-to-treat results suggest that unaddressed implementation challenges continue to limit the extent to which patients receive decision aids and likely hinder their overall impact. Future efforts to implement decision aids should explore enhancing their integration into clinical workflows and standard operating procedures, supported by organizational incentives that prioritize shared decision-making.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03985449; registered 6 June 2019.

Vaccine equity implementation: exploring factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine delivery in the Philippines from an equity lens

BackgroundDuring the early phase of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, low and middle-income countries (LMICs) were facing challenges in achieving equitable vaccine delivery. Few studies have contextualized global vaccine distributive injustice into national-specific contexts to understand its impact on vaccine delivery from an equity perspective. We aimed to investigate factors influencing equitable COVID-19 vaccine delivery in the Philippines and to provide recommendations to enhance equitable vaccine delivery in LMICs to prepare for future health emergencies.MethodsThe Health Equity Implementation Framework was employed to guide this qualitative study. We recruited participants using purposeful and snowballing sampling strategies. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants in person, online, or over the phone. A reflective thematic analysis approach was employed to analyze data.ResultsWe recruited 38 participants including seven high-level stakeholders from the public and private sectors, 14 health workers, and 17 community members in the province of Negros Occidental, Philippines. Equitable delivery of COVID-19 vaccines was influenced by an interplay of multiple factors operating in different domains. Contextually, the rapidly evolving nature of the COVID-19 virus, ongoing scientific advancements, and international negotiations directed national-level vaccine policies. Political commitment and support were recognized as crucial drivers for successful vaccine delivery, with a strong emphasis on health information framing and communication and adherence to human rights principles. The vulnerability of the health system significantly impacted the timely and effective distribution of vaccines. Furthermore, the geographical characteristics of the Philippines presented unique logistical challenges to vaccine delivery. At the recipient domain, individual perceptions of vaccines, shaped by their socioeconomic status, exposure to (mis)information, social influence, and entrenched religious beliefs, played a major role in their vaccine decisions and thus vaccine coverage regionally. Additionally, vaccine characteristics and operational challenges related to its distribution also impacted fair allocation.ConclusionsThe findings highlight the urgent need for LMICs to strengthen their health system resilience and sustainability and use multilevel strategies to build public trust to improve vaccine uptake and coverage. Moreover, each LMIC must be attentive to its unique contextual factors to develop tailored implementation strategies to promote equitable vaccine distribution.

Improvement of Care Cascade for Hypertension and Diabetes in Rural China: Protocol for an Implementation Study.

The management of hypertension and diabetes poses significant challenges to China's healthcare system, necessitating seamless patient progression through screening, diagnosis, management, and control. Utilizing the care cascade model, this study aims to systematically identify patient drop-offs and devise strategies to address healthcare delivery bottlenecks for hypertension and diabetes in rural China. This study consists of three phases. In Phase 1, qualitative interviews are conducted to explore healthcare experiences and identify determinants across the care cascade. Phase 2 involves systematically assessing barriers identified in Phase 1 and collaborating with local stakeholders using intervention mapping and co-design to generate interventions and implementation strategies. Phase 3 is a cluster randomized controlled trial involving 48 villages, randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, to compare changes in hypertension and diabetes care. Intervention villages will implement interventions developed in Phase 2 for 1 year, while control villages will continue with usual care. Primary outcomes include between-group differences in achieving blood pressure and glycemic targets, along with service and implementation outcomes. This study aims to identify the stage with the largest patient retention gap in the care cascade and develop intervention strategies through participatory co-design with practitioners, emphasizing feasible, low-cost approaches. The pragmatic cluster RCT will assess strategy effectiveness, offering valuable insights for practical interventions to enhance hypertension and diabetes care in rural settings, potentially shaping impactful programs and improving healthcare outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. identifier: NCT06141278.

AI AND MACHINE LEARNING IN BUSINESS PROCESS AUTOMATION: INNOVATING WAYS AI CAN ENHANCE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES OR CUSTOMER EXPERIENCES IN U.S. ENTERPRISES

This study presents a comprehensive review of the transformative role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in enhancing business processes across various industries. By examining a total of 75 peer-reviewed articles, the review highlights key areas where AI and ML have demonstrated significant impact, including operational efficiency, customer engagement, and strategic decision-making. Findings indicate that AI-driven process optimizations, particularly through predictive maintenance and resource management, have led to substantial cost savings and improved productivity by minimizing downtime and enhancing workflow efficiencies. Additionally, AI’s ability to support personalized customer experiences—through recommendation systems, dynamic pricing, and chatbots—has proven instrumental in driving customer satisfaction, retention, and engagement, making it a critical tool in customer relationship management. Furthermore, the strategic adoption of AI and ML has enabled data-driven decision-making, allowing companies to respond more effectively to market changes and forecast business outcomes with greater accuracy. The study also explores the transition from Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to AI as a foundational step, illustrating how RPA provides a structured entry point for advanced AI applications, creating an automation-ready environment. However, challenges such as technical limitations, ethical concerns, and organizational resistance persist, underscoring the need for careful implementation strategies. Addressing these challenges will be vital for organizations aiming to maximize the benefits of AI-driven automation in an increasingly competitive digital landscape. This review underscores the significant potential of AI and ML in reshaping business models and emphasizes the importance of ongoing research and development in these fields to support sustainable and scalable innovations.

Pendidikan Inklusi dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Islam: Mewujudkan Keadilan dan Kesetaraan untuk Semua

Inclusive education in the context of Islamic education is an important and relevant topic in efforts to create a fair and equitable education system for all individuals, including children with special needs. This research aims to describe, analyze, and provide a deep understanding of inclusive education in Islamic education. Using a qualitative method and a literature review approach, this research presents findings that demonstrate the importance of inclusion in creating education that embraces all children, amidst multicultural complexity. These findings have significant implications for inclusive education practices in Islamic schools and provide recommendations for future policies and practices. This research also offers suggestions for further research in this area, including more in-depth studies on effective inclusive education implementation strategies.

Should We Use Clinician Self-Report to Tailor Implementation Strategies? Predicting Use of Youth CBT with Clinician Self-Report Versus Direct Observation.

Developing tailored implementation strategies to increase the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) requires accurate identification of predictors of their use. However, known difficulties with measuring EBP use complicates interpretation of the extant literature. In this proof-of-concept study, we examined whether the same predictors of use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are identified when CBT use is measured with clinician self-report compared to direct observation. We examined four candidate predictors of CBT use - clinician participation in an EBP training initiative, years of experience, caseload, and employment status - in a sample of 36 clinicians (64% female; 72% White and 28% Black) from 19 community mental health agencies treating youth in greater Philadelphia. CBT use was captured for 100 unique client sessions (M = 2.8 recorded sessions per clinician) through both clinician self-report and direct observation, using parallel measures. We used three-level (client, clinician, and agency) regression models with random intercepts to estimate the relationship between each predictor variable and CBT use in both measures and compared the magnitude and direction of each model across self-report and direct observation using z-tests. There was no alignment for any of the four candidate predictors between predictive relationships identified by self-report compared to those identified by direct observation. The findings in this study extend literature documenting limitations of using clinician self-report to capture clinician behavior and suggest that even the characteristics that predict higher self-reported CBT use do not align with (and often are discordant with) those that predict directly observed CBT use. This raises questions about the utility of relying on self-reported use to inform implementation strategy design.