Implementation Of Biosecurity Measures Research Articles

Epidemiologic analysis of nosocomial Salmonella infections in hospitalized horses

To examine the relationship between abdominal surgery and nosocomial Salmonella infections and the relationship between high caseload in combination with abdominal surgery and nosocomial Salmonella infections in hospitalized horses with signs of gastrointestinal tract disease. 140 horses. Case-control study. To accomplish the first objective, 1 to 4 control horses were matched with each nosocomial case horse on the basis of admission date of a primary case horse. The frequency of abdominal surgery and other investigated exposure factors were compared between nosocomial case horses and control horses. For the second objective, 4 control horses were matched with each nosocomial case horse on the basis of year of admission. The frequency of high caseload (>or=26 inpatients), abdominal surgery, and other factors was compared between nosocomial case horses and control horses. The odds of nosocomial Salmonella infection were 8 times as high (odds ratio=8.2; 95% confidence interval=1.11, 60.24) in horses that underwent abdominal surgery, compared with the odds for horses that did not undergo surgery. High caseload alone or in combination with abdominal surgery was not associated with increased risk of nosocomial Salmonella infection. Abdominal surgery was identified as a risk factor for nosocomial Salmonella infections in horses. Horses that undergo abdominal surgery require enhanced infection control and preventative care. Risk of nosocomial Salmonella infections may be reduced by implementation of biosecurity measures (such as the use of plastic boots, gloves, and footbaths) immediately after surgery.

Leptospirosis in Cattle

Leptospirosis is a disease first described in the literature nearly 70 years ago. In cattle the principal serovars of Leptospira interrograns are L. hardjo-bovis, L. pomona, L. canicola, L. icterhaemorrhagiae, L. grippotyphosa and L. szwajjizak. L. hardjo-bovis is the serovar most frequently associated with reproductive wastage in the United States. Of the remaining serovars, L. pomona is the most significant. Many aspects of the disease remain poorly understood, e.g. variation in disease pattern and disease impact associated with different strains of the same host-maintained serovor in different management systems and different parts of the world.
 This presentation focuses on L. hardjo-bovis. Cattle are the maintenance host and the only reservoir. In general, a disease associated with infection of the maintenance host is sub-clinical, produces low antibody titers and affects young or pregnant animals with a very rapid transmission rate from animal to animal. Maintenance host diseases can be very difficult to diagnosis. L. hardjo-bovis is currently diagnosed using a combination of serology and identification of leptospires in the urine. A prevalence study indicated there is a high prevalence of L. hardjo-bovis in the rolling plains of Texas.
 Control of this disease consists of implementing biosecurity measures, use of antibiotics to clear carrier states and use of a vaccine effective for L. hardjo-bovis.

Biosecurity issues associated with current and emerging embryo technologies.

A variety of procedures associated with in vivo and in vitro embryo production, as well as cloning and transgenics, are in current use by both researchers and practitioners. Biohazards associated with these procedures could influence clinical proficiency and the outcome of basic research or result in unusual distribution of pathogens in populations of animals. By their nature, embryo technologies are vulnerable to contamination from numerous sources. Although pathogens can originate in the physical environments in which embryo technologies are applied, they are more likely to be introduced via animals or materials of animal origin. However, it is important to note that both the occurrence and consequences of contamination are heavily influenced by environmental circumstances. This paper represents a philosophical description of biohazards associated with three generations of embryo technologies using the cow as a model species. Emphasis is placed on sources of contamination, current or suggested preventive actions and the issue of environmental changes as they relate to the emergence of biohazards and the implementation of biosecurity measures. Some specific pathogens are discussed for illustration. In addition, details of the risks associated with introducing bovine viral diarrhoea virus in each of three generations of embryo technologies are described.

Biosecurity issues associated with current and emerging embryo technologies

A variety of procedures associated with in vivo and in vitro embryo production, as well as cloning and transgenics, are in current use by both researchers and practitioners. Biohazards associated with these procedures could influence clinical proficiency and the outcome of basic research or result in unusual distribution of pathogens in populations of animals. By their nature, embryo technologies are vulnerable to contamination from numerous sources. Although pathogens can originate in the physical environments in which embryo technologies are applied, they are more likely to be introduced via animals or materials of animal origin. However, it is important to note that both the occurrence and consequences of contamination are heavily influenced by environmental circumstances. This paper represents a philosophical description of biohazards associated with three generations of embryo technologies using the cow as a model species. Emphasis is placed on sources of contamination, current or suggested preventive actions and the issue of environmental changes as they relate to the emergence of biohazards and the implementation of biosecurity measures. Some specific pathogens are discussed for illustration. In addition, details of the risks associated with introducing bovine viral diarrhoea virus in each of three generations of embryo technologies are described.

Physical Examination of the Canine Respiratory System

Biosecurity, defined as a series of measures aiming to stop disease-causing agents entering or leaving an area where farm animals are present, is very important for the continuing economic viability of the United Kingdom dairy sector, and for animal welfare. This study gathered expert opinion from farmers, veterinarians, consultants, academics, and government and industry representatives on the practicality and effectiveness of different biosecurity measures on dairy farms. The study used best-worst scaling, a technique that allows for greater discrimination between choices and avoids the variability in interpretation associated with other methods, such as Likert scales and ranking methods. Keeping a closed herd was rated as the most effective measure overall, and maintaining regular contact with the veterinarian was the most practical measure. Measures relating to knowledge, planning, and veterinary involvement; buying-in practices; and quarantine and treatment scored highly for effectiveness overall. Measures relating to visitors, equipment, pest control, and hygiene scored much lower for effectiveness. Overall, measures relating to direct animal-to-animal contact scored much higher for effectiveness than measures relating to indirect disease transmission. Some of the most effective measures were also rated as the least practical, such as keeping a closed herd and avoiding nose-to-nose contact between contiguous animals, suggesting that real barriers exist for farmers when implementing biosecurity measures on dairy farms. We observed heterogeneity in expert opinion on biosecurity measures; for example, veterinarians rated the effectiveness of consulting the veterinarian on biosecurity significantly more highly than dairy farmers, suggesting a greater need for veterinarians to promote their services on-farm. Still, both groups rated it as a practical measure, suggesting that the farmer-veterinarian relationship holds some advantages for the promotion of biosecurity.