Implementation Of Antibiotic Stewardship Programs Research Articles

The effect of the antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP): a before-after study.

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) has been implemented to improve rational and responsible antibiotic use by encouraging guideline adherence. Objective: This retrospective observational before-after study aimed to evaluate whether the ASP may improve guideline adherence, antibiotic exposure, and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized due to CAP in Hungary. Methods: The study was conducted at a pulmonology department of a tertiary care medical center in Hungary. The ASP implementation consisted of written and published guidelines available to all professionals, continuous supervision, and counseling services on antibiotic therapies at an individual level, with the aim of ensuring compliance with CAP guidelines. Overall guideline adherence (agent selection, route of administration, and dose), clinical outcomes (length of stay and 30-day mortality), antibiotic exposure, and direct costs were compared between the two periods. Fisher's exact test and t-test were applied to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. P-values below 0.05 were defined as significant. Results: Significant improvement in overall CAP guideline adherence (30.2%), sequential therapy (10.5%), and a significant reduction in the total duration of antibiotic therapy (13.5%) were observed. Guideline non-adherent combination therapies with metronidazole decreased significantly by 28.1%. Antibiotic exposure decreased by 7.2%, leading to a significant decrease in direct costs (23.6%). Moreover, the ASP had benefits for clinical outcomes, and length of stay decreased by 13.5%. Conclusion: The ASP may play an important role in optimizing empirical antibiotic therapy in CAP having a sustained long-term effect.

Are Nurses Aware of Their Contribution to the Antibiotic Stewardship Programme? A Mixed-Method Study from Qatar.

The antibiotic stewardship programme (ASP) is a new concept initiated by WHO, but nurses are not yet ready to adopt the program. The training and empowerment of nurses are the best strategies for enhancing their knowledge and engagement in ASP. This mixed-method study was used to assess perceived roles and barriers of nurses' involvement in ASP. An online survey was conducted among 420 clinical nurses to identify their role, and 23 individual interviews were performed among nurses and infection control practitioners to explore the barriers and recommendations to overcome the identified barriers. The majority of the nurses agreed with the sixteen identified roles in ASP, of which 'antibiotic dosing and de-escalation' (82.61%), 'IV to PO conversion of antibiotic, outpatient antibiotic therapy' (85.23%), and 'outpatient management, long-term care, readmission' of the patients (81.19%) had the lowest agreement from the participants. The major themes generated through the qualitative interviews were a lack of knowledge about ASP, poor communication between multidisciplinary teams, lack of opportunity and multidisciplinary engagement, lack of formal education and training about ASP, lack of ASP competency and defined roles in policy, role conflict or power/position, availability of resources, and lack of protected time. Nurses play an integral role in the successful implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs. The empowerment of nurses will help them to adopt the unique role in ASP. Nurses can significantly contribute to antibiotic stewardship efforts and improve patient outcomes through addressing these challenges.

Bacteriological profile of bloodstream infections in pediatric age group in a tertiary care centre, Solapur

Bloodstream infections (BSI) due to multidrug-resistant organisms from paediatric setup have become increasingly common. BSI can be transient and be rapidly cleared out by the host defence mechanism or be associated with high morbidity and mortality if it becomes persistent.Blood samples were collected from 1112 children within a 1-year study period (July 2022 to June 2023) which included all children admitted with complaint of fever and suspected of having sepsis in Paediatric department of Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Sarvopchar Rugnalaya (SCSMSR), Solapur. Blood volume was collected depending upon age and body weight of the patient with aseptic precautions and inoculated in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI) which was incubated at 37°C for 7 days. Subcultures were made on blood agar and MacConkey agar plates. Organisms were identified by biochemical reactions and antibiotic susceptibility test of the isolates were performed by disk diffusion. Out of 1112 suspected cases, 175 (15.74%) were culture positive. (27.43%) was the most common isolate followed by (16.57%) Most common Gram positive isolate was (11.43%) followed by (6.86%). Total Multidrug resistant (MDR) isolates in Gram negative and Gram positive were 50.35% and 31.25% respectively.High rates of antibiotic resistance are observed in both gram positive and gram negative organisms. Thus, there is an urgent need for proper implementation of antibiotic stewardship programme and infection prevention and control measures.

The pattern of antibiotic utilisation among intensive care unit patients hospitalised in a Gauteng (South African) provincial tertiary hospital: Comparing findings before and during COVID-19.

Various mechanisms may contribute to and direct the progression of antibiotic resistance. A prominent driver associated with antibiotic resistance is inappropriate use or consumption. The sudden emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 ) changed the conventional practices related to antibiotic utilisation through repurposing the use of antibiotics. Apart from the implementation of antibiotic stewardship programmes, the pressure COVID-19 placed on healthcare systems resulted in poor prescribing and medication review practices, potentially exacerbating antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, the public health system has issues that make it difficult to routinely monitor, quantify antibiotic consumption, and offer evaluation, feedback and intervention, particularly in low- and middle- income countries such as South Africa (SA). Therefore, this study aimed to determine antibiotic utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Gauteng provincial tertiary hospital (GPTH) in SA. To determine, examine, and compare antibiotic consumption among intensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted to a GPTH during the pre-COVID-19 period and during the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to determining the prevalence of the World Health Organisation (WHO) 'watch' category antibiotics before and following the emergence of COVID-19 . A retrospective cross-sectional data analysis was undertaken of 335 medical files of ICU patients hospitalised in a GPTH between January 2017 and December 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to examine patient characteristics and antibiotic prescribing variables (antibiotic selection, dosage, route of administration, frequency, duration of course and indication for which antibiotic was prescribed). The study found that the most frequently prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin in combination with clavulanate (pre-pandemic 31.99%; amid-COVID-19 38.43%), followed by ceftriaxone (pre-pandemic 15.44%; amid-COVID-19 14.55%), piperacillin in combination with tazobactam (pre-pandemic 11.40%; amid-COVID-19 8.58%) and azithromycin (pre-pandemic 7.725%; amid-COVID-19 19.78%). The macrolide and penicillin (in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor) classes demonstrated an increase in consumption from the pre-pandemic period moving into the COVID-19 pandemic. This highlights the need for improved antibiotic stewardship programmes and policies to combat inappropriate and unnecessary antibiotic usage.

Assessment of challenges and opportunities in antibiotic stewardship program implementation in Northwest Ethiopia

BackgroundIndiscriminate use of antibiotics leads to antibiotic resistance (AMR) and results in mortality, morbidity, and financial burden. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) with education can resolve a number of barriers recognized in the implementation of successful ASPs. The aim of this study was to assess health professionals’ perceptions and status of ASPs in hospitals in 2022. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from September 1, 2022 to October 30, 2022. A total of 181 health professionals were included, and a self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. The status of hospitals was assessed using a checklist. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, and descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests (X2) at a P-value of <0.05 were used. ResultsOf the 181 respondents, 163 (90.1 %), and 161 (89.0 %) believed that AMR is a significant problem in Ethiopia and globally, respectively. Easy access to antibiotics 155 (85.6 %), and inappropriate use 137 (75.7 %) were perceived as key contributors to AMR. Antibiotics were believed to be prescribed/dispensed without laboratory results 86 (47.5 %), and antibiotic susceptibility patterns were not considered to guide empiric therapy 81 (44.8 %). ASP was believed to reduce the duration of hospital stays and associated costs 137 (75.7 %), and improve the quality of patient care 133 (73.5 %), whereas 151 (83.4 %), 143 (79 %), and 142 (78.5 %) suggested education, institutional guidelines, and prospective audits with feedback interventions to combat AMR in their hospitals, respectively. There were significant differences in perception among professionals based on professional category and attempts by hospitals to implement ASPs. Although ASPs were not functioning according to standard, there have been attempts to implement it in three hospitals. The issue of ASP had never been heard in general hospitals. Currently, it is feasible to implement ASPs in four hospitals. ConclusionThe status of ASP in hospitals was very poor. Despite a lack of prior knowledge on ASPs, most respondents do have a positive perception of AMR and the implementation of ASPs. Pharmacist-led prospective audits and feedback with education and institutional guidelines for empiric antibiotic use can be better implemented in hospitals. Involvement of representatives from infection prevention and control, and collaboration among hospitals in ASP implementation will help establish a strong ASP in the area.

How Might Antibiotic Stewardship Programs Influence Clinicians' Autonomy and Organizations' Liability?

Federal and state governments mandate some health care organizations to implement antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). Some early adopters developed model ASPs that have helped set industry standards; other benchmarks will likely be forged in subsequent regulation, legislation, and jurisprudence. This article considers how ASP designs can affect professional autonomy, especially of frontline antibiotic stewards who are usually physicians and pharmacists. This article also considers how ASP development and implementation might influence standards of care and malpractice liability.

Barriers and Facilitators Affecting Long-Term Antibiotic Prescriptions for Acne Treatment

Dermatologists prescribe more oral antibiotics per clinician than clinicians in any other specialty. Despite clinical guidelines that recommend limitation of long-term oral antibiotic treatments for acne to less than 3 months, there is little evidence to guide the design and implementation of an antibiotic stewardship program in clinical practice. To identify salient barriers and facilitators to long-term antibiotic prescriptions for acne treatment. This qualitative study assessed data collected from stakeholders (including dermatologists, infectious disease physicians, dermatology resident physicians, and nonphysician clinicians) via an online survey and semistructured video interviews between March and August 2021. Data analyses were performed from August 12, 2021, to January 20, 2024. Online survey and qualitative video interviews developed with the Theoretical Domains Framework. Thematic analyses were used to identify salient themes on barriers and facilitators to long-term antibiotic prescriptions for acne treatment. Among 30 participants (14 [47%] males and 16 [53%] females) who completed the study requirements and were included in the analysis, knowledge of antibiotic guideline recommendations was high and antibiotic stewardship was believed to be a professional responsibility. Five salient themes were to be affecting long-term antibiotic prescriptions: perceived lack of evidence to justify change in dermatologic practice, difficulty navigating patient demands and satisfaction, discomfort with discussing contraception, iPLEDGE-related barriers, and the absence of an effective system to measure progress on antibiotic stewardship. The findings of this qualitative study indicate that multiple salient factors affect long-term antibiotic prescribing practices for acne treatment. These factors should be considered in the design and implementation of any future outpatient antibiotic stewardship program for clinical dermatology.

Public hospital pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices for antibiotic stewardship implementation in Limpopo Province, South Africa

BackgroundHospital pharmacists are important in antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP), a global strategy to combat antibiotic resistance (ABR). South African public hospitals have limited ASP implementation. This study describes Limpopo Provincial Hospital pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice toward ASP implementation.MethodA questionnaire to explore pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding ASP implementation comprised 43 questions hosted online. A link was sent by invitation e-mail to eligible respondents in November 2021. Five questions on respondents’ demographics, 15 questions on ASP knowledge, 10 Likert scale questions on attitude, and 13 on ASP practices were included. Mean (standard deviation (SD)) knowledge and attitude scores and a median (interquartile range (IQR)) practice score was calculated. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using chi-square/Fisher’s exact analysis (p < 0.05), with Cramér’s V as effect size.ResultsThe survey yielded 35 responses (13.1%). Twenty (57.1%) respondents were female. Seventeen (48.6%) respondents were between the ages of 31 and 40 years. The mean knowledge score of respondents was 9.8 (2.6) (N = 34), with knowledge gaps on One Health and socioeconomic determinates of ABR. Ten (29.6%) respondents thought One Health discouraged multi-sector collaboration, and nineteen (55.9%) respondents thought ASP was the only strategic response to ABR. Sixteen (47.1%) respondents did not know that poor access to clean water accelerates ABR and seventeen (50.0%) did not know that poverty could be a determinant for antibiotic use. The mean respondent attitude score was 8.0 (1.7) (N = 28). Twenty-seven (96.4%) respondents agreed that ASP was necessary and agreed to participate in ASP respectively. All 28 (100.0%) respondents agreed to lead an ASP. The median (IQR) respondents’ practice score was − 2.0 (IQR: -6.0–5.8) (N = 16). Respondents were inconsistently (never, sometimes, every time) participating in multi-disciplinary forums (6/16, 37.5%) and expressed a desire for training (11/13, 84.6%) on ASP through in-service (7/27, 25.9%). Respondents thought ASP training should include medical officers (12/29, 41.4%) and nurses (9/29, 31.8%). Knowledge score was associated with gender (p = 0.048; V = 0.416) and attitude score (p = 0.013; V = 0.556).ConclusionOur study found pharmacists had good knowledge and a positive attitude toward ASP implementation but poor ASP practices. A multi-disciplinary in-service training could address identified knowledge and practice gaps.

Assessment of Physicians' Practice in Implementing Antibiotic Stewardship Program in Najran City, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

One of the main causes of illness, mortality, and rising medical costs is antimicrobial resistance, which is a global healthcare concern. This study explores the practice of physicians toward the effective implementation of Antibiotic Stewardship Programs (ASPs) in Najran city, Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians working at primary care setting in Najran city, Saudi Arabia, between May and August 2023. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among the physicians composed of three parts: socio-demographic data, a questionnaire about physicians' practice in the efficacy of ASP, and a questionnaire about physicians' practice regarding prescribing antibiotics. Of the 128 physicians who participated in the study, 60.2% were males, and 43.8% were aged between 36 and 45 years. Among the practices in implementing the ASP effectively, controlling the source of infection domain received the highest score (mean score: 4.83). Every practice domain mean score was greater than 3, indicating that study participants possessed a moderate level of ASP practice and implementation skills. The overall mean practice score in the effective implementation of ASP was 154.9 ± 25.5 out of 185 points, with good, moderate, and poor practices constituting 67.2%, 28.1%, and 4.7%, respectively. The physicians showed a moderate level of practice for the effective implementation of ASPs in Najran city. The factors significantly associated with increased practice score include older age, male gender, Saudi nationality, handling five or fewer infection cases daily, and infection-initiated antibiotic prescribing treatment managed per day. These findings suggest the need for targeted interventions and educational programs to enhance physicians' adherence to ASP guidelines and promote appropriate antibiotic prescribing practices, ultimately contributing to global efforts in combating antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes.

Conversion of a classical microbiology laboratory to a total automation laboratory enhanced by the application of lean principles.

Laboratory automation in microbiology improves productivity and reduces sample turnaround times (TATs). However, its full potential can be unlocked through the optimization of workflows by adopting lean principles. This study aimed to explore the relative impact of laboratory automation and continuous improvement events (CIEs) on productivity and TATs. Laboratory automation took place in November 2020 and consisted of the introduction of WASPLab and VITEK MS systems. CIEs were run in May and September 2021. Before the conversion, the laboratory processed about ~492 samples on weekdays and had 10 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff for a productivity of 49 samples/FTE/day. In March 2021, after laboratory automation, the caseload went up to ~621 while the FTEs decreased to 8.5, accounting for productivity improvement to 73 samples/FTE/day. The hypothetical productivity went up to 110 samples/FTE/day following CIEs, meaning that the laboratory could at that point deal with a caseload increase to ~935 with unchanged FTEs. Laboratory conversion also led to an improvement in TATs for all sample types. For vaginal swabs and urine samples, median TATs decreased from 70.3 h [interquartile range (IQR): 63.5-93.1] and 73.7 h (IQR: 35.6-50.7) to 48.2 h (IQR: 44.8-67.7) and 40.0 h (IQR: 35.6-50.7), respectively. Automation alone was responsible for 37.2% and 75.8% of TAT reduction, respectively, while the remaining reduction of 62.8% and 24.2%, respectively, was achieved due to CIEs. The laboratory reached productivity and TAT goals predefined by the management after CIEs. In conclusion, automation substantially improved productivity and TATs, while the subsequent implementation of lean management further unlocked the potential of laboratory automation.IMPORTANCEIn this study, we combined total laboratory automation with lean management to show that appropriate laboratory work organization enhanced the benefit of the automation and substantially contributed to productivity improvements. Globally, the rapid availability of accurate results in the setting of a clinical microbiology laboratory is part of patient-centered approaches to treat infections and helps the implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs backed by the World Health Organization. Locally, from the point of view of laboratory management, it is important to find ways of maximizing the benefits of the use of technology, as total laboratory automation is an expensive investment.

Combating antimicrobial resistance: audits of practices to target actions

Antibiotic resistance is a public health emergency requiring a concerted approach and motivating the implementation of antibiotic stewardship programmes. As part of an institutional project at the Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, we collected data on the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions in various medical and surgical departments in order to identify areas for improvement. The results show that there is room for improvement and that there are differences between departments, particularly regarding surgical prophylaxis administered beyond the operating time, adaptation of the spectrum and duration. Prescribing appropriateness data is an essential complement to consumption data for adapting effective intervention strategies.

Impact of Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program for Optimizing Antibiotic Treatment in Gram-negative Bacilli Bacteremia.

Antibiotic Stewardship Programs (ASP) have improved empirical and directed antibiotic treatment in Gram-negative bloodstream infections. A decrease in mortality, readmission, and length of hospitalization has been reported. A pre-post-quasi-experimental study was conducted between November and April 2015-2016 (pre-intervention period), 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019 (post-intervention periods), to analyse the impact of ASP on empirical, directed, and entire treatment optimization, as well as mortality, readmission, and length of hospitalization, in hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections. One hundred seventy-four patients were included (41 in the pre-intervention group, 38 in the first-year post-intervention group, 50 in the second-year post-intervention group, and 45 in the third-year post-intervention group). There was a significant improvement in directed treatment optimization (43.9% in the pre-intervention group, 68.4% in the first-year post-intervention group, 74% in the second-year post-intervention group, and 88.9% in the third-year post-intervention group, P <0.001), as well as in entire treatment optimization (19.5%, 34.2%, 40.0%, and 46.7%, respectively, P=0.013), with increased optimal directed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-8.58) and entire treatment (aOR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.27-8.58). Although a tendency toward improvement was observed in empirical treatment after ASP implementation, it did not reach statistical significance (41.5% vs. 57.9%, P=0.065). No changes in mortality, readmission, or length of hospitalization were detected. ASP implementation improved both directed and entire treatment optimization in patients with GNB bloodstream infections over time. Nevertheless, no improvement was found in clinical outcomes such as mortality, readmission, or length of hospitalization.

Trends in the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection in Germany.

Despite reports of a declining incidence over the last decade, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is still considered the most important healthcare-associated causes of diarrhea worldwide. In Germany, several measures have been taken to observe, report, and influence this development. This report aims to analyze the development of hospital coding for CDI in Germany over the last decade and to use it to estimate the public health burden caused by CDI. Reports from the Institute for Hospital Remuneration Systems, German Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS), the Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI), Saxonian authorities and hospital quality reports during 2010-2021 were examined for CDI coding and assessed in a structured expert consultation. Analysis was performed using 2019 versions of Microsoft Excel® and Microsoft Access®. Peaks of 32,203 cases with a primary diagnosis (PD) of CDI and 78,648 cases with a secondary diagnosis (SD) of CDI were observed in 2015. The number of cases had decreased to 15,412 PD cases (-52.1%) and 40,188 SD cases (-48.9%) by 2021. These results were paralleled by a similar decline in notifiable severe cases. However, average duration of hospitalization of the cases remained constant during this period. Hospital coding of CDI and notification to authorities has approximately halved from 2015 to 2021. Potential influential factors include hospital hygiene campaigns, implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs, social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and a decrease in more pathogenic subtypes of bacteria. Further research is necessary to validate the multiple possible drivers for this development.

Distribution and antibacterial susceptibility pattern of isolated bacteria from endotracheal aspirates among ventilator-assisted pneumonia patients in Indonesia.

An accurate and timely identification of causative microorganisms as well as determination of their antibiotic susceptibility patterns will help in the selection of proper antibiotics and prevention of their misuse in pneumonia patients. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacteria isolated from endotracheal aspirates of ventilator-assisted pneumonia patients in Indonesia. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Zainoel Abidin Hospital, a provincial reference hospital in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, from January to December 2021. Ventilator-assisted pneumonia patients aged ≥17 years treated in the hospital were considered eligible. Antibiotic susceptibility was valuated using Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion followed with VITEK 2 Compact. We included 57 patients of which 73.7% males and 26.3% aged 56-65 years (represent the majority group of the patients). Each patient reported at least one comorbidity and the average duration of receiving mechanical ventilation was 8.68 days, and more than half (59.7%) of the patients had a poor clinical outcome (died). A total 57 bacteria isolates (consisting nine species) were recovered; 68.5% Gram-negative and 31.5% Gram-positive bacteria. Among 57 patients, Acinetobacter baumannii was the most frequent isolated Gram-negative bacteria (19.3%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.8%), and Achromobacter denitrificans (12.3%). A. baumannii exhibited <70% sensitivity to aminoglycoside and carbapenem antibiotics and 100% resistance to third-generation cephalosporins. The most abundant Gram-positive bacteria was Staphylococcus aureus (17.5%), followed by S. haemolyticus (10.5%) and S. epidermidis (3.5%). All S. aureus were sensitive to linezolid, tigecycline, vancomycin, and macrolide antibiotics (azithromycin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, and erythromycin), whereas 50% were sensitive to some beta-lactams. However, 50% of S. aureus were methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Given the magnitude of multi-drug resistance, an empiric antimicrobial therapy in particular to specific settings and implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs are crucial.

BACTERIAL PROFILE AND ANTIBIOGRAM OF MICROORGANISMS ISOLATED FROM DIFFERENT BODY SITE INFECTIONS AMONG PATIENTS OF A PRIVATE HOSPITAL, KARACHI

Objective:It is crucial to keep an eye on current patterns of multi-drug resistance and extensively drug resistance at local level to facilitate physicians in making justified decision regarding empirical therapy during this era of rising superbugs. Material and Methods: This antibiogram was made up according to CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute) M100 guidelines. Samples were received for a period of 2-years from June 2019-June 2021 at National Medical Center Karachi. These samples were urine, blood, pus, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), central venous pressure (CVP) tip, sputum and tracheal aspirates. Results: Out of 10564 samples received, 4582 were positive for growth of microorganisms. Sample distribution patterns according to the frequency of positive growth of isolates were predominantly urine (58%) and blood (17%) followed by pus (8%) and pus swab (6%) 2% fluid and 2% tracheal secretions, and 7% others like tips growth. Blood cultures were mainly received from Intensive care unit (50%) followed by out-patients departments (34%). The pattern of resistance observed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) revealed ampicillin as the most resistant among all antibiotics (93%) followed by cefixime (77%). Most sensitive antibiotic was amikacin (99%). The Staphylococcus aureus isolates were highly susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid (100%) followed by gentamicin (89%) and chloramphenicol (85%). Vancomycin resistance was observed in Enterococcus faecium (8%). Conclusion: Antimicrobial resistance among gram negative and gram-positive bacteria is increasing. This has left us with fewer therapeutic options which in turn highlights the issue of antimicrobial resistance being a global health concern. This emphasizes the significance of surveillance of antimicrobial patterns, development of antibiograms and implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs by judicious use of antibiotics for prevention of further spread of antimicrobial resistance. Key Words: Antibiogram, Antimicrobial resistance, Multidrug resistance, Extensively drug resistance

A qualitative evaluation of frontline clinician perspectives toward antibiotic stewardship programs.

To examine the perspectives of caregivers that are not part of the antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) leadership team (eg, physicians, nurses, and clinical pharmacists), but who interact with ASPs in their role as frontline healthcare workers. Qualitative semistructured interviews. The study was conducted in 2 large national healthcare systems including 7 hospitals in the Veterans' Health Administration and 4 hospitals in Intermountain Healthcare. We interviewed 157 participants. The current analysis includes 123 nonsteward clinicians: 47 physicians, 26 pharmacists, 29 nurses, and 21 hospital leaders. Interviewers utilized a semistructured interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which was tailored to the participant's role in the hospital as it related to ASPs. Qualitative analysis was conducted using a codebook based on the CFIR. We identified 4 primary perspectives regarding ASPs. (1) Non-ASP pharmacists considered antibiotic stewardship activities to be a high priority despite the added burden to work duties: (2) Nurses acknowledged limited understanding of ASP activities or involvement with these programs; (3) Physicians criticized ASPs for their restrictions on clinical autonomy and questioned the ability of antibiotic stewards to make recommendations without the full clinical picture; And (4) hospital leaders expressed support for ASPs and recognized the unique challenges faced by non-ASP clinical staff. Further understanding these differing perspectives of ASP implementation will inform possible ways to improve ASP implementation across clinical roles.

Impact of an antibiotic stewardship program on antibiotic utilization, bacterial susceptibilities, and cost of antibiotics

Antimicrobial misuse is a worldwide issue, and antimicrobial resistance is considered the most challenging aspect of health care. It has been reported that as much as 30–50% of antimicrobials prescribed in hospitals are deemed unnecessary or inappropriate. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) include policies that apply continuous management of judicious anti-infectious treatment in the clinical setting. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of ASPs on antibiotic consumption, the costs of antibiotic expenditure, and the sensitivity of antimicrobials. A retrospective, quasi-experimental study was performed to assess the effect of ASP at An-Najah National University Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in the West Bank, Palestine, over a period of 20 months before and 17 months after the implementation of the ASP. Data on antibiotic consumption were reported monthly as days of therapy per 1000 patient-days and monthly costs (USD/1000 patient-days). A total of 2367 patients who received one or more of the targeted antibiotics (meropenem, colistin and tigecycline) during their hospital stay were included in the study. They have split into two groups: 1710 patients in the pre-ASP group, and 657 patients in the post ASP group. The most significant reduction in DOT per 1000 patient-days was seen with tigecycline, with a percentage of change of − 62.08%. Furthermore, the mean cost of the three antibiotics decreased significantly by 55.5% in the post-ASP phase compared to the pre-ASP phase. After the implementation of ASP, there was a statistically significant increase in susceptibility to meropenem, piperacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam with respect to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, changes in mortality rates were not statistically significant (p = 0.057). ASP positively reduced costs and antimicrobial consumption, with no statistically significant effect on the overall mortality rate. However, a long-term evaluation of the ASP's impact is needed to conclude its lasting impact on infection-related mortality and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.

Perspectives on Antibiotic Stewardship Programs among Health Care Providers at Two University Hospitals in Egypt

The perspectives of healthcare professionals on antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) should be explored. Any antibiotic stewardship strategy must be individualized based on patient needs, prescription habits, and local resources. The current study aimed to explore the perspectives of healthcare providers on antibiotics stewardship and their awareness of these perspectives. Furthermore, potential barriers to the application of ASPs should be identified and addressed. This exploratory cross-sectional study utilized a qualitative method to evaluate critical care physicians, pediatricians, and clinical pharmacists (n = 43). The mean age of the physicians was 32 ± 1.5 years. Among them, approximately two-thirds (66%) were women. A thematic content analysis was performed to examine the responses of the participants and to prioritize the recommendations for and barriers to the implementation of ASPs from the perspective of healthcare providers. According to the interviewees, the primary obstacles include lack of time in implementation and monitoring and lack of awareness of the need for ASPs. All respondents recommended the implementation of supervised and continuous trainings. In conclusion, the abovementioned barriers must be adequately addressed to facilitate the implementation of ASPs.

Impact of Infection Control on Prevalence of Surgical Site Infections in a Large Tertiary Care Hospital in Haiphong City.

Few point prevalence surveys (PPS) have been conducted in Vietnam on Surgical Site Infections (SSI) or antimicrobial use in surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the PPSs of SSI before and after implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) and infection control (IC) in a Vietnamese tertiary care hospital. ASP and IC practices were implemented in operating rooms and the orthopedic department, including antibiotic training, skin preparation, hand hygiene, gloves and sterile instruments, and SSIs risk factors. A PPS of SSIs and antimicrobial use was performed in January 2016 according to methods from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, before ASP and IC, and in December 2019. Information recorded included surgical data, antibiotic prophylaxis, microorganisms, and SSI risk factors. Skin preparation compliance assessed preoperative washing and antisepsis. SSI prevalence was 7.8% in 2016 versus 5.4% in 2019 (p = 0.7). The use of prophylactic antibiotics decreased from 2016 to 2019. A third-generation cephalosporin was prescribed more than 48 h after surgery for most patients. Skin preparation compliance increased from 54.4% to 70.5% between assessments. The decreased SSI, although non-statistically significant, warrants continuing this program. Vietnamese hospitals must provide comprehensive IC education to healthcare workers to address the prevention of SSI and establish IC policies.

Implementation of antibiotic stewardship programmes in paediatric patients in regional referral hospitals in Tanzania: experience from prescribers and dispensers

In 2017, Tanzania launched the National Action Plan for Antimicrobial Resistance (NAPAR), 2017-2022 and implementation of antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASPs) was one of the agendas. Since the launch of the National Action Plan, no study has been done to assess its implementation. To explore the experiences of prescribers and dispensers on implementing ASPs among paediatric patients attending Regional Referral Hospitals (RRHs) in Tanzania. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted among key informants, in 14 RRHs in Tanzania between July and August 2020. A total of 28 key informants, 14 dispensers in charge of pharmacies and 14 medical doctors in charge of paediatric departments (prescribers), were interviewed. A hybrid thematic analysis was conducted on the gathered information. Most of the study participants were not conversant with the term 'antibiotic stewardship'. Some had heard about the programmes but were not aware of the activities involved in the programme. Those who were knowledgeable on ASPs mentioned the lack of existence of such programmes in their settings. They further added that absence or limited knowledge of the stewardship concepts may have influenced the current poor practices. Barriers to the implementation of ASPs mentioned were lack of laboratory facilities to support culture and susceptibility tests, lack of materials and reagents, management pressure to prevent loss or to generate income, patients' influence and limited training opportunities. Despite launching the NAPAR in 2017, we found limited implementation of ASPs in the management of paediatric patients. This study highlighted some barriers and identified possible intervention points.