Intraocular Lens Implantation Research Articles

A New Technique of Sterile Polyethylene Instrument Cover as Temporary Corneal Patch to Reconstruct Anterior Chamber in Penetrating Keratoplasty Combined with Intraocular Surgery.

Complications such as explosive choroidal hemorrhage, residual cortex, and capsule rupture often occur during intraocular surgery combined with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) due to poor maintenance of the anterior chamber. To address these challenges, we have innovatively utilized a sterile polyethylene instrument cover to temporarily reconstruct the anterior chamber. In this report, we describe a technique where a 'temporary corneal patch' was created from a sterile instrument cover, using a trephine to ensure a diameter approximately 1-2 mm wider than the corneal bed or perforation. This patch was then sutured into the host corneal bed or the perforation with 10-0 nylon sutures during intraocular surgery combined with PKP. Each case was evaluated for surgical efficacy and complications. We successfully applied this technique in three cases of combined corneal transplantation surgery. In two cases, PKP, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation were successfully performed. In the third case, PKP, vitrectomy, and other intraocular procedures were performed. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. The use of a sterile polyethylene material as a temporary corneal patch for anterior chamber reconstruction represents a safe, effective, and cost-efficient approach for intraocular surgery combined with PKP or posterior segment surgery as a keratoprosthesis.

Manual Sutureless (MSICS) Cataract Surgery and Corneal Astigmatism

The most frequent preventable cause of blindness worldwide is cataracts. Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS) is still very much in use, even though cataract surgery is always changing. The resurgence of MSICS can be attributed to its low cost and safety, as it primarily uses easily sterilizable equipments and does not require sophisticated technology. This study aims to assess corneal astigmatism and manual sutureless (MSICS) cataract surgery after a month of follow-up. Forty individuals with cataract diagnoses were enrolled in this prospective study. During the procedure, a posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was done in addition to a superior manual minor incision under local anesthesia. The findings indicated that 15% or so of the patients experienced astigmatism following surgery. Also the findings revealed that sphere and cylinder refraction was significantly influenced by surgery. The means of sphere refraction before and after surgery were 3.93±6.37 and 0.93±0.98 D, while the corresponding means for cylinder refraction were 1.37±1.08 and 1.94±1.18 D. The results showed that means preoperative and postoperative Keratometry of cornea (K1) were 43.09±1.21 and 43.37±1.42 mm, while the corresponding means of Keratometry (K2) were 43.97±1.35 and 44.49±1.59 mm. The study concluded that the length of the superior incision (6.0 mm) may have contributed to the higher mean SIA than reported in other studies. However, more research is required to determine the impact of incision size on surgically produced astigmatism.

The Postoperative Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Trifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Different Biometric Characteristics.

We aimed to survey the potential correlation between biometric parameters and postoperative outcomes after implanting extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) and trifocal IOLs. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and patients receiving EDOF or trifocal IOL implantations were included. In total, 36 and 26 eyes were enrolled in the EDOF and trifocal groups, respectively. The primary outcomes of this study were the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and spherical equivalent (SE). The generalized linear model was applied to evaluate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of primary outcomes in patients with different biometric characters. The final UDVA of the EDOF group was significantly better than that of the trifocal group (p = 0.020), and the UNVA and SE did not show significant differences between the two groups throughout the postoperative period (all p > 0.05). In a multivariable analysis, the UDVA was significantly better in the EDOF group than in the trifocal group (p = 0.038). For the subgroup analysis, the high axial length (AXL) value correlated to a lower postoperative UDVA in the EDOF group (both p < 0.05). Additionally, a large white-to-white (WTW) diameter was related to worse postoperative UNVA in the trifocal group (p = 0.042), and a high AXL was associated with higher SE in both the EDOF and trifocal groups (both p < 0.05). In conclusion, a high AXL correlates to worse postoperative outcomes in both the EDOF and trifocal IOLs, and trifocal IOL outcomes could be affected by large WTW diameters.

Functional Outcomes After Refractive Lens Exchange With Implantation of a Glistening-Free Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens

PurposeTo evaluate visual outcomes and patient-reported results after bilateral femtosecond-laser assisted refractive lens exchange (RLE) with the implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). DesignProspective interventional case series MethodsA study of 27 patients (54 eyes) implanted with the Clareon PanOptix (Alcon) multifocal IOL during femtosecond laser assisted RLE in a university hospital setting. The uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, uncorrected (UIVA) and distance-corrected (DCIVA) intermediate visual acuity at 60cm, uncorrected (UNVA) and distance-corrected (DCNVA) near visual acuity at 40cm and 33cm were evaluated at three months postoperatively and compared with the preoperative values. In addition, we assessed the postoperative defocus curve, mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity, and patient-reported spectacle independence. ResultsThe mean postoperative binocular UDVA was -0.02±0.06 logMAR and CDVA was -0.11±0.05 logMAR. The UIVA was -0.07±0.05 logMAR and DCIVA was -0.07±0.07 logMAR. The UNVA at 40cm was 0.03±0.09 logMAR and DCNVA was -0.02±0.06 logMAR; and, at 33cm UNVA was 0.14±0.10 logMAR and DCNVA was 0.11±0.08 logMAR. In comparison to the preoperative binocular CDVA (-0.12±0.08 logMAR), no statistically significant change was observed (p=1.0), while all the other binocular visual acuities improved (p<0.01). In the mean binocular defocus curve, the visual acuity was better than 0.10 logMAR in the range between +0.5 D and -3.0 D. The mean contrast sensitivity was within the normal range, and most patients reported complete spectacle independence. ConclusionThe RLE surgery improved uncorrected visual acuity at far, intermediate and near distances without negatively affecting the CDVA. Patients achieved a high level of spectacle independence.

The outcomes of paediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens insertion in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review

ImportanceCataract is one of the leading causes of childhood blindness in Africa. The management of this condition requires timely surgical extraction of the cataractous lens with immediate optical correction and long-term follow-up to monitor visual improvement and manage complications that may arise. This review provides an opportunity to benchmark outcomes and to shed light on the reasons for those outcomes.ObjectivesTo review the published literature and report on the outcomes of paediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens insertion in sub-Saharan Africa.Data sourceThe EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles.Study selectionWe included all published primary studies from sub-Saharan Africa on cataract surgery outcomes in children aged 0–16 years with primary intraocular lens implantation conducted between 1990 and 2020. Eligible studies were those published in English or for which an English translation was available. In addition, reviewers screened the reference lists of all studies included in the full-text review for eligible studies. During the review, studies fitting the inclusion criteria above except for having been conducted in middle and high-income countries were tagged and placed in a comparison arm.Data extraction and synthesisStudy eligibility was determined by two independent reviewers, and data extraction was conducted by one reviewer with entries checked for accuracy by another reviewer. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for data synthesis were followed. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used for quality appraisal of the studies. The statistical software R was used in the analysis, and data were pooled using a random-effects model. Forest plots were generated using the R package ‘metafor’.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was visual acuity (VA) after cataract surgery and the proportions of eyes that achieved good, borderline, or poor visual outcome according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) categorisation of post-operative visual acuity. The secondary outcome measures reported included lag time to surgery, rates of follow-up, and rate of complications.ResultsEight out of 4763 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review, and seven were included in the quantitative analysis. There was a male preponderance in the study population, and the mean age at the time of cataract surgery ranged from 3.4 to 8.4 years. Visual outcomes were available for short-term visual outcomes (1 to 6 months) as the studies had a significant loss to follow-up. The pooled proportion of eyes that achieved a good visual acuity (i.e. equal to or greater than 6/18) in the short-term period was 31% (CI, 20–42). The comparative studies from middle and high-income countries reported proportions ranging from 41 to 91%, with higher thresholds for good visual acuity of 6/12 and 6/15.Conclusion and relevanceThis review reports that there is a lower proportion of eyes with good outcomes after undergoing paediatric cataract surgery in sub-Saharan Africa than in middle- and high-income countries. Furthermore, this review states that there is a high proportion of patients lost to follow-up and suboptimal refractive correction and amblyopia treatment after paediatric cataract surgery.

Characterisation of Intraocular Lens Injectors.

In modern ophthalmic surgery, an intraocular lens (IOL) is commonly implanted into the patient's eye with an IOL injector. Many injectors are available, showing various technological differences, from the early manually loaded injector systems to the modern preloaded injectors. This review aims to give a concise overview of the defining characteristics of injector models and draws attention to complications that may occur during IOL implantation. One can differentiate injectors according to their preoperative preparation (manually loaded or preloaded), their implantation mechanism (push-type or screw-type or combined or automated), the size of the nozzle tip, the presence of an insertion depth control feature, and the injector's reusability. Potential complications are IOL misconfigurations such as a haptic-optic adhesion, adherence of the IOL to the injector plunger, an overriding plunger, uncontrolled IOL rotation, a trapped trailing haptic, or damage to the IOL. Additionally, during IOL implantation, the nozzle can become damaged with scratches, extensions, cracks, or bursts to the tip. While these complications rarely produce long-term consequences, manufacturers should try to prevent them by further improving their devices. Similarly, surgeons should evaluate new injectors carefully to ensure the highest possible surgical safety.

Phacoemulsification Techniques and Their Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Visual Acuity: A Review of "Direct-Chop" and "Stop-and-Chop" Approaches Under Topical Anesthesia.

Phacoemulsification is a widely adopted technique in cataract surgery that offers a minimally invasive approach to lens removal and intraocular lens implantation. Among the various methods of phacoemulsification, "direct-chop" and "stop-and-chop" techniques are particularly notable for their efficiency and safety profiles. This review aims to evaluate the effects of these two techniques on corneal endothelial cells and visual acuity, specifically under topical anesthesia. Cataract surgery outcomes hinge on the preservation of corneal endothelial cells and the achievement of optimal visual acuity. Endothelial cell loss can lead to corneal decompensation, while visual acuity is a primary measure of surgical success. The "direct-chop" technique involves the immediate chopping of the lens nucleus after groove creation, reducing phacoemulsification time and energy. Conversely, the "stop-and-chop" technique incorporates a central groove before chopping, offering increased control and safety. This review synthesizes current research and clinical studies to compare these techniques, focusing on their respective impacts on endothelial cell count and postoperative visual acuity. It examines the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, considers the role of surgeon experience, phacoemulsification energy, and anterior chamber stability, and assesses patient outcomes under topical anesthesia. The findings aim to provide insights that can guide surgeons in selecting the most appropriate technique for their patients, ultimately enhancing surgical outcomes by ensuring the preservation of corneal health and the achievement of superior visual acuity.

Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation Versus Four-Flanged Scleral Fixation Technique for Patients With Loss of Capsular Support During Routine Cataract Surgery.

To compare the outcomes of anterior chamber intraocular lens (AC-IOL) implantation versus the four-flanged scleral fixation technique in eyes with loss of capsular support during routine cataract surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients in whom an IOL was implanted either during or after short-term aphakia due to loss of capsular and sulcus support in a routine cataract surgery with at least 6 months of follow-up time between 2015 and 2023 in a tertiary medical center in Israel. Two different IOL implantation techniques were compared: the implantation of an angle-supported ACIOL and four-flanged scleral fixation. Main outcome measures included postoperative complications such as pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, loss of intraocular pressure control and glaucoma, IOL subluxation, and retinal detachment. Sixty-five eyes of 65 patients were included in the study, 33 eyes in the AC-IOL group and 32 eyes in the flange group. Follow-up time was 29.92 ± 20.02 months in the AC-IOL group and 20.17 ± 15.56 months in the flange group (P = .087). Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy was observed in 10 (30.3%) patients in the AC-IOL group and in 1 (3.1%) patient in the flange group (P = .04). This association remained significant using survival analysis (P = .006). In 4 (12.1%) patients in the AC-IOL group, a glaucoma filtering procedure was performed to control the intraocular pressure compared with none in the flange group (P = .042). In the setting of loss of capsular support during routine cataract surgery, four-flanged scleral fixation showed an overall lower rate of complications and significantly reduced rate of subsequent surgical interventions. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e520-e526.].

Special Commentary: Reporting Clinical Endpoints in Studies of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) refers to a group of procedures generally characterized by an ab interno approach, minimal trauma to ocular tissue, moderate efficacy, an excellent safety profile, and rapid recovery. The number of MIGS procedures continues to increase, and their use has become widespread among glaucoma and cataract specialists. Standardization of the methodology and reporting of clinical endpoints in MIGS investigations enhances interpretation and comparison across different studies. The assessment of surgical interventions not only should consider statistical significance, but also whether the outcome is meaningful to patients. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest change in a treatment outcome that is considered beneficial for an individual patient and prompts a change in their clinical management. Expert consensus is an accepted approach to determine the MCID. The American Academy of Ophthalmology's Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern® Committee is an expert panel that develops guidelines identifying characteristics and components of quality eye care. The Committee recommends that the cumulative probability of surgical success at 2 years with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis be used as the primary efficacy endpoint in MIGS studies. The Committee suggests that surgical success for standalone MIGS be defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) of 21 mmHg or less and reduced by 20% or more from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The proposed MCID for the cumulative probability of success of standalone MIGS at 2 years is 50%. The panel recommends that surgical success for MIGS combined with cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (CE-IOL) be defined as a decrease in glaucoma medical therapy of 1 medication or more from baseline without an increase in IOP or IOP of 21 mmHg or less and reduced by 20% or more from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The suggested MCID for the cumulative probability of success for MIGS combined with CE-IOL at 2 years is 65%. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction by American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery formulas and Barrett True-K TK in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery.

To evaluate the prediction accuracy of various intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas on American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) calculator and Barrett True-K total keratometry (TK) in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery for myopia. This retrospective study included eyes with history of myopic laser refractive surgery, which have undergone clear or cataractous lens extraction by phacoemulsification followed by IOL implantation. Those who underwent uneventful crystalline lens extraction were included. Eyes with any complication of refractive surgery or those with eventful lens extraction procedure and those who were lost to follow-up were excluded. Formulas compared were Wang-Koch-Maloney, Shammas, Haigis-L, Barrett True-K no-history formula, ASCRS average power, ASCRS maximum power on the ASCRS post-refractive calculator and the IOLMaster 700 Barrett True-K TK. Prediction error was calculated as the difference between the implanted IOL power and the predicted power by various formulae available on ASCRS online calculator. Forty post-myopic laser-refractive surgery eyes of 26 patients were included. Friedman's test revealed that Shammas formula, Barrett True-K, and ASCRS maximum power were significantly different from all other formulas (P < 0.00001 for each). Median absolute error (MedAE) was the least for Shammas and Barrett True-K TK formulas (0.28 [0.14, 0.36] and 0.28 [0.21, 0.39], respectively) and the highest for Wang-Koch-Maloney (1.29 [0.97, 1.61]). Shammas formula had the least variance (0.14), while Wang-Koch-Maloney formula had the maximum variance (2.66). In post-myopic laser refractive surgery eyes, Shammas formula and Barrett True-K TK no-history formula on ASCRS calculator are more accurate in predicting IOL powers.

Refractive Outcomes After Scleral Fixation of the Carlevale Intraocular Lens.

To assess the refractive predictability of the Carlevale sutureless scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOL) (Sole-ko IOL Division) power calculation. This retrospective, non-comparative, interventional case series included patients without a capsular support having undergone sutureless scleral fixation IOL implantation in two French hospitals between October 2019 and April 2022. IOL calculation was performed with the Barrett Universal II, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas with constant optimization to achieve a mean arithmetic prediction error equal to zero. The main outcomes were prediction error (PE) and its standard deviation (SD-PE), the median absolute error (MedAE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the percentage of eyes with PE within ±0.50, ±1.00 and ±2.00 diopters (D) 6 months after surgery. Thirty eyes of 30 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 66.6 years, the mean axial length was 24.31 mm, and the mean keratometry was 43.07 D. SDPE ranged from 0.73 to 0.87 D depending on the formula. MedAE ranged from 0.38 to 0.61 D, and MAE from 0.52 to 0.68 D. Between 46.7% and 56.7% of eyes were within ±0.50 D, 76.7% and 90.0% were within ±1.00 D, and 96.7% were within ±2.00 D of target equivalent. No statistically significant difference was observed between the four formulas for any outcomes. This study confirmed that the design of the Carlevale sutureless scleral fixation IOL provides satisfactory refractive results. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e527-e532.].

Traumatic Rosette cataract: A case report

Rosette cataract is characterized by a star-shaped opacity that forms in the lens of the eye after blunt or penetrating trauma. Traumatic cataracts constitute a significant portion of ocular injuries, with rosette cataract being a distinctive subtype. Understanding its formation and progression is critical for effective management. Blunt trauma to the eye causes a shock wave that disrupts the lens fibres. This disruption leads to the characteristic rosette pattern due to peculiar lens fibres arrangement. Patients may present with blurred vision, glare, and photophobia due to associated traumatic iritis. The rosette pattern may be visible upon slit-lamp examination. In early stages, observation and protective eyewear may be recommended. Significant visual impairment due to rosette cataract will require cataract surgery. Either small incision cataract surgery or Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is the standard treatment for advanced cases. Timing of surgery depends on the degree of visual impairment and patient’s needs.

The Effects of Axis-flip of the Refractive Cylinder on vision and patient reported outcome measures following Toric Intraocular Lens implantation.

To investigate the effects of cylinder axis-flip following toric intraocular lens (TIOL) implantation on vision and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. Post-hoc analysis of data from patients who participated in a prospective randomised study of TIOLs. Axis-flip was defined as a change in post-operative refractive cylinder axis of 900 +/- 22.50 from the pre-operative biometric axis. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA), residual refractive cylinder (RC), and CATPROM-5 and EQ5D3L quality of life (QOL) scores were analysed. At 6 months, axis flip occurred in 29 (34.5%) of 84 eyes, of which 28 had with-the-rule astigmatism (WTR) pre-operatively. Mean (+/-standard deviation) UDVA (logMAR) was 0.13 (0.16) in flipped cases (FC) and 0.10 (0.14) in un-flipped cases (UF) (p=0.88). BDVA was 0.01 (0.11) in FC and was 0.00 (0.09) in UF (p=0.68). Mean RC was 0.74 dioptres (D) (0.41) in FC and 0.93D (0.47) in UF (p=0.08). Mean CATPROM-5 score was -6.22.98 (2.56) in FC and -5.52 (3.03) in UF (p=0.29). Mean EQ5D3L calibrated score was 0.89 (0.19) in FC and 0.85 (0.19) in UF (p=0.35). Retrospectively applying coefficients of adjustment to account for posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA), suggested that 6 eyes (21%) of FC with WTR might have avoided axis-flip. Axis flipping following TIOL implantation did not adversely influence visual acuity or PROMs scores. Most FC had WTR pre-operatively. Adjusting for PCA might have reduced axis flip in some of these eyes.

Photo-crosslinked hydrogel as injectable intraocular lens for cataract surgery implantation

Cataract is the leading cause of the blindness worldwide. Natural lens removal followed with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is the main clinical treatment for cataract. However, the shape and the optical power of current IOLs were fixed, which were not favorable for patients, especially for children with congenital cataracts. An injectable IOL is an immerging replacement for a regular IOL due to the accommodation of external packing shapes. In this study, we developed a rapid, in situ gelation of an injectable photo-crosslinked hydrogel as an injectable IOL material. In this investigation, injectable hydrogel (G/D hydrogel) was fabricated from Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and N- (3, 4-dihydroxyphenylidene ethyl) methacrylamide (DMA) via photo-crosslinking for injectable IOL applications. Different preparation parameters such as the concentration, proportion, light intensity, and curing time were optimized based on the gelation time, swelling ratio, and mechanical properties of the produced G/D hydrogels. The results of in vitro cellular experiments showed that the G/D hydrogel had good and stable clearance of lens epithelial cells. The hydrogel was implanted into the eyes of the young rabbits for 1 month, and the results also showed that injectable G/D hydrogel can obtain good intraocular implants and have inhibitory effects on posterior capsular opacification. Thus such photo-crosslinked G/D hydrogel can serve as an injectable IOL application in cataract surgery.

Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Children-A Systematic Review.

Objectives: The selection of an appropriate formula for intraocular lens power calculation is crucial in phacoemulsification, particularly in pediatric patients. The most commonly used formulas are described and their accuracy evaluated in this study. Methods: This review includes papers evaluating the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for children's eyes published from 2019-2024. The articles were identified by a literature search of medical and other databases (Pubmed/MEDLINE, Crossref, Google Scholar) using the combination of the following key words: "IOL power calculation formula", "pediatric cataract", "congenital cataract", "pediatric intraocular lens implantation", "lens power estimation", "IOL power selection", "phacoemulsification", "Hoffer Q", "Holladay 1", "SRK/T", "Barrett Universal II", "Hill-RBF", and "Kane". A total of 14 of the most recent peer-reviewed papers in English with the maximum sample sizes and the greatest number of compared formulas were considered. Results: The outcomes of mean absolute error and percentage of predictions within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were used to assess the accuracy of the formulas. In terms of MAE, Hoffer Q yielded the best result most often, just ahead of SRK/T and Barrett Universal II, which, together with Holladay 1, most often yielded the second-best outcomes. Considering patients with PE within ±1.0 D, Barrett Universal II most often gave the best results and Holladay 1 most often gave the second-best. Conclusions: Barrett Universal II seems to be the most accurate formula for intraocular lens calculation for children's eyes. Very good postoperative outcomes can also be achieved using the Holladay 1 formula. However, there is still no agreement in terms of formula choice.

Visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus toric intraocular lens using a mini-monovision approach.

To evaluate the clinical outcomes following bilateral implantation of the AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ toric extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). Prospective interventional case series. Patients with bilateral significant cataracts and pre-existing corneal astigmatism underwent cataract surgery and implantation with the AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ toric IOL. Dominant eyes were targeted at emmetropia and non-dominant eyes at -0.50D. Primary endpoints were binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA at 66cm) and near (UNVA at 40cm) acuities at 3months. Secondary outcomes were corrected distance (CDVA), distance corrected intermediate (DCIVA) and distance corrected near (DCNVA), refractive predictability, rotational stability, binocular defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, Questionnaire for Visual Disturbances (QUVID) and Visual Function Index (VF-14) questionnaire scores. All visual acuities were converted to logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for analysis. 30 patients underwent uneventful phacoemulsification. The mean binocular UDVA, UIVA and UNVA were 0.06 ± 0.12, 0.11 ± 0.10 and 0.26 ± 0.10 respectively. The mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) for dominant and non-dominant eyes were - 0.07D ± 0.27 and - 0.12D ± 0.54 respectively. 92.4% of dominant eyes and 84.6% of non-dominant eyes within 0.50D of target. The mean IOL rotation was 3.85° ± 5.09 with 86.7% of eyes with less than 5° of rotation. 26.7%, 20% and 36.7% of patients reported starbursts, haloes and glare respectively. The mean VF-14 score was 91.77. Bilateral implantation of the AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ Toric IOL resulted in very good unaided visual acuities for far and intermediate distance with functional near vision. Dysphotopsias were reported but despite this, a high level of visual function was achieved.

Refractive Surgery in Myopic Children.

In this paper, we summarize the current knowledge on refractive surgery performed in the myopic pediatric population. We describe the main concerns about refractive surgery in myopic children and the indications for refractive surgery in this age group. We present a range of surgical procedures that are being used for the management of unilateral/bilateral myopia in children: corneal refractive surgery (PRK, LASEK, LASIK, FS-LASIK and SMILE) and intraocular refractive surgery (phakic intraocular lens implantation, refractive lens exchange or clear lens extraction), with both their advantages and drawbacks. We also describe the various complications and measures to prevent them.

Visual performance, safety, and patient satisfaction after binocular clear lens extraction and trifocal intraocular lens implantation in Chinese presbyopic patients

BackgroundAddressing presbyopia in the aging population, particularly in non-cataractous patients, remains a challenge. This study evaluates the outcomes of refractive lens exchange (RLE) with AT LISA tri 839MP trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a Chinese presbyopic population without cataracts.MethodsThe study included 164 eyes from 82 patients undergoing bilateral RLE at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Comprehensive evaluations encompassed visual acuities, refraction, ocular aberrometry, and subjective outcomes via the VF-14 questionnaire. The focus was on postoperative visual performance, refractive outcomes, safety, objective optical quality, and patient satisfaction.Results100%, 90.2%, and 89.0% of patients achieved binocular UDVA, UNVA, and UIVA of logMAR 0.1 or better at 6 months postoperatively. 97.6% of eyes were within ± 1.00 D of emmetropia postoperatively. Optical quality assessments showed increases in modulation transfer function and Strehl ratios (p < 0.05). High-order aberrations decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Despite the high incidence of posterior capsule opacification (83.2%), managed with early Nd: YAG capsulotomy, no other severe complications were reported. Patient-reported outcomes indicated high satisfaction, with an average VF-14 score of 94.3 ± 10.2 and 93.5% achieving complete spectacle independence. Halo (66.2%) was the most commonly reported optical phenomena, followed by glare (18.2%), and starburst (7.8%) after surgery.ConclusionsBilateral RLE with trifocal IOLs in presbyopic patients without cataracts significantly improves visual acuity and reduces ocular aberrations in presbyopic patients. The procedure offers high patient satisfaction and spectacle independence, though it requires careful patient selection and management of expectations regarding potential photic phenomena.

Biomechanical changes of the cornea after orbital decompression in thyroid-associated orbitopathy measured by corvis ST

This study aims to investigate the changes in ocular biomechanical factors in patients with inactive thyroid eye disease (TED) who undergo orbital decompression surgery. This observational prospective study include 46 eyes of 31 patients with inactive TED undergoing orbital decompression at a tertiary university hospital from October 2021 to September 2023. All participants underwent a full ophthalmic examination, and a biomechanical examination was performed using corvis ST at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. The study participants had a mean age of 45 ± 11.6 years, and 58.1% of them were female. The second applanation time (A2T) increased from baseline to postoperative month 1 and continued to increase to postoperative month 3 (P < 0.001). The first applanation velocity (A1V), highest concavity (HC) peak distance, and pachymetry parameters also increased from postoperative month 1 to postoperative month 3 (P = 0.035, P = 0.005, and P = 0.031, respectively). The HC time increased from baseline to postoperative month 3 (P = 0.027). Other changes were statistically insignificant. The P-values were adjusted according to biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP). Baseline Hertel significantly influenced A2 time (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that ocular biomechanical parameters may change following decompression surgery in patients with inactive TED. Specifically, an increase in A2T, A1V, and HC peak distance suggests a decrease in corneal stiffness, although the increased HC time contradicts this. It is recommended to postpone keratorefractive or intraocular lens implantation surgeries until corneal biomechanics stabilize after decompression surgery for optimal results.

Endoscopic Surgery for Congenital or Acquired Cataract Associated with Persistent Fetal Vasculature: A Case Series.

Persistent fetal vasculature (PFV) is a congenital malformation caused by a failure in regression of the primary vitreous and hyaloid vessels. An abnormal PFV occurs in the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Surgery for PFV carries the risk of retinal detachment. We report four cases of cataracts associated with PFV, in which our novel surgical technique with an intraocular endoscope was safely performed. Lensectomy and vitrectomy were performed in cases 1, 3, and 4, while lensectomy, vitrectomy, and intraocular lens implantation using an endoscope were performed in case 2. In all cases, after lens removal, a slit at the posterior lens capsule was created to avoid the retrolental fibrovascular membrane using underwater electric coagulation. Moreover, the endoscope was inserted, by which the intraocular region was observed to determine the treatment method for the fibrovascular membrane and vitreous stalk. No additional surgeries were required for complications before or after any of the surgeries. Using an endoscope during cataract surgery associated with PFV, observing the vitreous stalk at high magnification and ensuring safe treatment were possible. Endoscopic surgery could be considered an effective method for treating PFV-associated cataracts.