Immunosuppressive Treatment In Patients Research Articles

Clinical predictors of physiologic change after treatment with immunosuppression in hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

Treatment of hypersensitivity pneumonitis involves removal of the antigen and may include the use of immunosuppression or antifibrotic therapy. It remains unclear whether antifibrotic or immunosuppressive therapy is more beneficial in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis or if clinical markers can predict a patient's response to therapy. We evaluated a retrospective cohort in order to determine if certain clinical characteristics can predict physiologic improvement with immunosuppressive treatment in patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Patients with a diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis with a moderate, high, or definite confidence according to the American Thoracic Society criteria were included in the study. Overall immunosuppression did not lead to improvement in % predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) and % predicted diffusion capacity (DLCO%). Patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and those with familial interstitial lung disease demonstrated a decline in FVC% predicted as well as DLCO% predicted over one year and the use of immunosuppression does not modify that risk. In contrast, patients with extensive ground glass demonstrated improvement in DLCO% predicted but not FVC% predicted over one year with or without the use of immunosuppression. Our study demonstrates that certain radiographic variables trend toward a significant impact on FVC% predicted as well as DLCO% predicted and suggests that antifibrotic therapy may be a better initial choice of therapy in patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis as decline occurred with or without the use of immunosuppression.

Effect of Immunosuppression on the Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination.

Immunosuppressive treatment in patients with rheumatic diseases can maintain disease remission but also increase risk of infection. Their response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is frequently blunted. In this study we evaluated the effect of immunosuppression exposure on humoral and T cell immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in two distinct cohorts of patients; one during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and 3 months later during convalescence, and another prior to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with follow up sampling 6 weeks after vaccination. Results were compared between rituximab-exposed (in previous 6 months), immunosuppression-exposed (in previous 3 months), and non-immunosuppressed groups. The immune cell phenotype was defined by flow cytometry and ELISA. Antigen specific T cell responses were estimated using a whole blood stimulation interferon-γ release assay. A focused post-vaccine assessment of rituximab-treated patients using high dimensional spectral cytometry was conducted. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection was characterised by T cell lymphopenia, and a reduction in NK cells and naïve CD4 and CD8 cells, without any significant differences between immunosuppressed and non-immunosuppressed patient groups. Conversely, activated CD4 and CD8 cell counts increased in non-immunosuppressed patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection but this response was blunted in the presence of immunosuppression. In rituximab-treated patients, antigen-specific T cell responses were preserved in SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but patients were unable to mount an appropriate humoral response.

Serum Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer and galectin-3 levels in adult-onset Still's disease and their association with cytokines.

Autoinflammation with cytokine dysregulation may be implicated in the pathophysiology of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD); however, the relationship between galectins and cytokines in patients with active AOSD remains unknown. We aimed to examine the relationship between circulating cytokines/chemokines and galectin-3 (Gal-3) or its ligand, Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi), in Japanese patients with AOSD. We recruited 44 consecutive patients diagnosed with AOSD according to the Yamaguchi criteria, 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as disease controls, and 27 healthy participants. Serum M2BPGi levels were directly measured using a HISCL M2BPGi reagent kit and an automatic immunoanalyzer (HISCL-5000). Serum Gal-3 concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The serum levels of 69 cytokines were analyzed in patients with AOSD using a multi-suspension cytokine array. We performed a cluster analysis of each cytokine expressed in patients with AOSD to identify specific molecular networks. Significant increases in the serum concentrations of Gal-3 and M2BPGi were found in the serum of patients with AOSD compared with patients with RA and healthy participants (both p <0.001). There were significant positive correlations between serum Gal-3 levels and AOSD disease activity score (Pouchot score, r=0.66, p <0.001) and serum ferritin levels. However, no significant correlations were observed between serum M2BPGi levels and AOSD disease activity scores (Pouchot score, r = 0.32, p = 0.06) or serum ferritin levels. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between the serum levels of Gal-3 and various inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-18, in patients with AOSD. Immunosuppressive treatment in patients with AOSD significantly reduced serum Gal-3 and M2BPGi levels (p = 0.03 and 0.004, respectively). Although both Gal-3 and M2BPGi were elevated in patients with AOSD, only Gal-3 was a useful biomarker for predicting disease activity in AOSD. Our findings suggest that circulating Gal-3 reflects the inflammatory component of AOSD, which corresponds to proinflammatory cytokine induction through inflammasome activation cascades.

Treatment response and its predictors of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with severe or very severe aplastic anemia

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a hematological condition with high morbidity and mortality. Treatment with immunosuppressive agents is alternative treatment if bone marrow transplant is not available. Several studies reported predictors of successful treatment in patients with SAA. However, the results are not consistent and not specific to anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporine. This study aimed to evaluate the predictor of response to treatment in this specific regimen. This study was a retrospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria were adult patients with SAA or very SAA who received this regimen. Clinical factors predictive of response to treatment were computed. There were 92 patients met the study criteria. Of those, 56 patients (60.87%) were in a group of response to treatment. There were nine factors in the predictive model for good response to treatment. Only body mass index was independently associated with response to treatment with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval of 1.04, 1.67). Age or hematological laboratory factors such as lymphocyte or neutrophil count were not significant. Low body mass index may be less likely to response to immunosuppressive treatment in patients with severe or very severe aplastic anemia.

Phenotyping by persistent inflammation in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease: a EUSTAR database analysis

BackgroundSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous disease with frequently associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). We aimed to determine the prognostic potential of phenotyping patients with SSc and SSc-ILD by inflammation...

Use of immunosuppression and subsequent cancer incidence: cohort study

ObjectiveEvaluate the association between cancer incidence and immunosuppressive treatment in patients with ocular inflammatory disease (OID).Methods and analysisWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients from 10 US OID subspecialty...

Current Status Regarding Immunosuppressive Treatment in Patients after Renal Transplantation.

Renal transplantation is now the best treatment for end-stage renal failure. To avoid rejection and prolong graft function, organ recipients need immunosuppressive therapy. The immunosuppressive drugs used depends on many factors, including time since transplantation (induction or maintenance), aetiology of the disease, and/or condition of the graft. Immunosuppressive treatment needs to be personalised, and hospitals and clinics have differing protocols and preparations depending on experience. Renal transplant recipient maintenance treatment is mostly based on triple-drug therapy containing calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, and antiproliferative drugs. In addition to the desired effect, the use of immunosuppressive drugs carries risks of certain side effects. Therefore, new immunosuppressive drugs and immunosuppressive protocols are being sought that exert fewer side effects, which could maximise efficacy and reduce toxicity and, in this way, reduce both morbidity and mortality, as well as increase opportunities to modify individual immunosuppression for renal recipients of all ages. The aim of the current review is to describe the classes of immunosuppressive drugs and their mode of action, which are divided by induction and maintenance treatment. An additional aspect of the current review is a description of immune system activity modulation by the drugs used in renal transplant recipients. Complications associated with the use of immunosuppressive drugs and other immunosuppressive treatment options used in kidney transplant recipients have also been described.

Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease in an atypical patient

Therapeutic algorithms and recommendations for haemorrhoidal disease proposed in the literature are based on the stage of the disease. Less typical situations, such as reduced immunity in HIV infection, cancer patients on chemotherapy, chronic immunosuppressive treatment in patients after organ transplantation or patients with inflammatory bowel disease, as well as elderly patients with comorbidities that increase the risk of perioperative complications, are not usually discussed. On the other hand, publications on treatment complications in immunocompromised patients marginalise the problem of anorectal conditions, including common haemorrhoids. This paper presents the therapeutic management of haemorrhoidal disease in atypical patients. Furthermore, the specifics of the management of haemorrhoidal disease in a pregnant patient and in the perinatal period are also discussed.

Immunogenicity of Hepatitis B Vaccine in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients.

Pediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at increased infectious risk caused by underlying immunologic dysregulation and immunosuppressive therapy. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) could be reactivated during the immunosuppressive treatment in patients with past HBV infections. Information on immunogenicity after hepatitis B (HB) immunization and reimmunization are still scarce. SLE patients 5-18 years of age who had completed a primary HB immunization were enrolled. Anti-HBs levels at enrollment and after each vaccine dose were determined. Patients with anti-HBs levels < 10 mIU/mL were administered 1 booster dose. After 1 booster dose, patients with negative anti-HBs levels were administered 2 more booster doses. Ninety-three SLE patients were enrolled. The prevalence of seroprotection assessed by anti-HBs > 10 mIU/mL after completion of a primary HB immunization was 25.8% (95% CI: 17.2-34.4). Lupus nephritis was associated with unprotective anti-HBs levels [odds ratio (OR): 4.341; 95% CI: 1.044-18.040]. The anti-HBs seroconversion was 72.3% (95% CI: 61.5-83.0) after 1 booster dose and increased up to 93.4% (95% CI: 86.9-98.4) after 3 booster doses. SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 score ≥ 4 (OR: 4.625; 95% CI: 1.45-14.80) was significantly associated with nonseroconversion after the first booster dose. Hypocomplementemia before the first and second booster doses (OR: 27; 95% CI: 1.26-578.35) was significantly associated with nonseroconversion after 3 booster doses. All pediatric SLE patients should be evaluated for HBV serological status before immunosuppressive treatment. SLE patients with SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 score > 4 should need 3 booster doses if their anti-HBs level was < 10 mIU/mL.

APA scoring system: a novel predictive model based on risk factors of pregnancy loss for recurrent spontaneous abortion patients

The aim of this study was to analyse the risk factors of pregnancy loss of patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) and develop a scoring system to predict RSA. Clinical data of 242 cases, with RSA who were treated at Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children’s Hospital, were selected. The factors of pregnancy loss for RSA patients were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. There were 242 RSA patients, of whom 34 (14.0%) developed pregnancy loss. A multivariate analysis showed the following adverse risk factors for RSA: antinuclear antibody spectrum, protein s deficiency and antiphospholipid antibodies. The pregnancy loss rates of antinuclear antibody spectrum group, protein S deficiency group and antiphospholipid antibodies group were 25.0%, 22.5% and 19.4%, respectively. Each of these factors contributed 1 point to the risk score. The pregnancy loss rates were 6.3%, 24.6%, 50% for the low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories, respectively (p < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the score of RSA was .733. Our findings suggest that this validated and simple scoring system could accurately predict the risk of pregnancy loss of RSA patients. The score might be helpful in the selection of risk-adapted interventions to decrease the incidence. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? The live birth rate increases to 80%–90% after anticoagulant and/or immunosuppressive treatment in patients with RSA. However, there is still a high rate of re-abortion even after active treatment. What do the results of this study add? Antinuclear antibody spectrum, protein s deficiency and antiphospholipid antibodies were independent risk factors for pregnancy loss. A novel predictive model based on these factors was then established and validated. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The newly developed score might be helpful in the selection of risk-adapted interventions to decrease the incidence. For patients in the intermediate-risk and high-risk groups, we should conduct more targeted studies and formulate corresponding therapies to improve the success rate of treatment.

Nailfold capillaries and myositis-specific antibodies in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis.

This study aimed to quantify nailfold capillary (NFC) abnormalities in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) -positive DM patients and to evaluate the association with clinical parameters, including serum biomarkers. In addition, we aimed to clarify the period leading to remission of NFC abnormalities during immunosuppressive treatment in patients with DM. A prospective observational study was conducted including patients (n = 10) who first visited Hiroshima University Hospital and were diagnosed with DM or clinically amyopathic DM with anti-MDA5 antibodies. We compared the NFC abnormalities detected by nailfold-video capillaroscopy (NVC), physical findings, blood tests, respiratory function tests, and vascular-related growth factors measured using a LEGENDplexTM Multi-Analyte Flow Assay Kit. NFC abnormalities improved in all patients from 2 to 17 weeks after the initiation of immunosuppressive treatment. The NVC scores were inversely correlated with anti-MDA5 antibody titres at baseline. NVC scores and forced vital capacity were positively correlated. Baseline values of M-CSF and stem cell factor were correlated with anti-MDA-5 titres. Our study suggested that NVC scores and disease activity were inversely correlated before treatment. Vascular-related growth factors, such as M-CSF and stem cell factor, may be associated with the disease mechanism in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM.

Temporary withdrawal of immunosuppressive treatments in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Aims: There is currently no evidence-based guideline to show how to manage immunosuppressive treatment in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) during the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Therefore, we updated our routine clinical protocol to 1) inform patients with ongoing treatment about the potential risks of their medications in the case of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, 2) discuss opt out of treatment temporarily, and 3) perform a closer follow-up on a monthly basis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with HS, who suspended and continued immunosuppressive therapy following COVID-19 outbreak. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with HS, who had been receiving biologic/immunosuppressive treatment when the COVID-19 pandemic was announced. Those who withdrew treatment for any reason or continued were analyzed. The primary endpoint was physician-diagnosed disease exacerbation. The secondary outcomes were changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) and COVID-19 diagnosis. Results: A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. The majority of the patients were on adalimumab treatment (n=33). Fifteen (40.5%) patients withdrew the treatment for COVID-19 related concerns. During 83.2±0.6 days of follow-up following the withdrawal, all patients in this group had at least one exacerbation. Also, the mean VAS score increased from 5.7±0.56 to 8.6±0.57 (p=0.001). On the other hand, three patients (13.6%) who continued the treatment reported worsening in disease course, 12 patients (54.5%) remained stable and seven of them (31.9%) had clinical relief. We did not observe any confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in any of our 37 HS patients. Conclusions: The present study suggests that even a temporary withdrawal of biologic/immunosuppressive treatments may have significant adverse consequences on disease course and quality of life in patients with HS. These individuals may safely continue the treatment provided that maximum measures are taken to avoid COVID-19 infection.

Effect of immunosuppressive drugs in immune-mediated inflammatory disease during the coronavirus pandemic.

The safety of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with Immune‐Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs) during the Coronavirus pandemic is questioned and it is utmost important for public health. We searched studies trough MEDLINE/EMBASE database, including patient with IMID, undergoing immunosuppressive treatment with a positive diagnosis for SARS‐CoV 2. We included 11 studies for the descriptive analysis and 10 studies for the pooled analysis, with a total population of 57 and 53 IMID‐affected SARS‐CoV‐positive patients respectively. Overall no death was reported; 16 patients were hospitalized (30.2%) and only two cases were admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (3.8%). We found a significant association between the risk of hospitalization and older age (P .03), obesity (P .02), and presence of multi‐comorbidity (P .03). No significant association was found between the risk of hospitalization and the use of biological or conventional DMARDs (respectively P .32 and .26), neither when they are used combined (P .85). We found consistent results in the sub‐analysis of Psoriasis: 10 patients were hospitalized (31.3%) and only one case was admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (3.1%) Particular attention should be placed for patients with older age, obesity and multi‐comorbidity that are at higher risk of hospitalization.

Uveitis in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: 18-Year Outcome in the Population-based Nordic Cohort Study

To assess the long-term outcome of uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Population-based, multicenter, prospective JIA cohort, with a cross-sectional assessment of JIA-associated uveitis (JIA-U) 18 years after the onset of JIA. A total of 434 patients with JIA, of whom 96 had uveitis, from defined geographic areas of Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Patients with onset of JIA between January 1997 and June 2000 were prospectively followed for 18 years. Pediatric rheumatologists and ophthalmologists collected clinical and laboratory data. Cumulative incidence of uveitis and clinical characteristics, JIA and uveitis disease activity, ocular complications, visual outcome, and risk factors associated with the development of uveitis-related complications. Uveitis developed in 96 (22.1%) of 434 patients with JIA. In 12 patients (2.8%), uveitis was diagnosed between 8 and 18 years of follow-up. Systemic immunosuppressive medication was more common among patients with uveitis (47/96 [49.0%]) compared with patients without uveitis (78/338 [23.1%]). Active uveitis was present in 19 of 78 patients (24.4%) at the 18-year visit. Ocular complications occurred in 31 of 80 patients (38.8%). Short duration between the onset of JIA and the diagnosis of uveitis was a risk factor for developing ocular complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.8). Patients with a diagnosis of uveitis before the onset of JIA all developed cataract and had an OR for development of glaucoma of 31.5 (95% CI, 3.6-274). Presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) was also a risk factor for developing 1 or more ocular complications (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.7). Decreased visual acuity (VA) <6/12 was found in 12 of 135 eyes (8.9%) with uveitis, and 4 of 80 patients (5.0%) with JIA-U had binocular decreased VA <6/12. Our results suggest that uveitis screening should start immediately when the diagnosis of JIA is suspected or confirmed and be continued for more than 8 years after the diagnosis of JIA. Timely systemic immunosuppressive treatment in patients with a high risk of developing ocular complications must be considered early in the disease course to gain rapid control of ocular inflammation.

Double-filtration plasmapheresis combined with immunosuppressive treatment for severe pemphigus: 10 years' experience of a single center in China.

Pemphigus is a group of rare and severe autoimmune blistering disease mediated by pathogenic autoantibodies against desmogleins. Plasmapheresis can directly remove autoantibodies from circulation, which has been applied to the treatment of pemphigus as an adjuvant therapy. But the results of the researches are controversial. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) combined with immunosuppressive treatment for patients with severe pemphigus in our single center. We retrospectively analyzed 17 patients with severe pemphigus who were unresponsive to high-dose corticosteroid and received DFPP treatment between January 2010 and January 2020. The information on demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes were collected. All the patients were diagnosed as severe pemphigus and had a period of at least 1 week of high-dose prednisone (1-1.5 mg/kg/day), but they were unresponsive to corticosteroid and immunosuppressants treatment. They received DFPP treatment as an adjuvant therapy. After DFPP treatment, the titers of desmogleins antibodies significantly decreased (P < .001), Nikolsky's sign became negative and no new blisters appeared. The dosage of corticosteroid could begin to taper down rapidly in 9 ± 4 days. On discharge, the dosage of prednisone decreased significantly (51 ± 3 mg/day, P < .001). No major adverse events happened that could lead to the termination of DFPP treatment. Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with immunosuppressive treatment is an effective and safe therapeutic regimen for severe pemphigus. DFPP can also contribute to the dosage reduction of steroid to avoid more drug-related side effect.

A Practical Approach to Managing Patients With Myasthenia Gravis-Opinions and a Review of the Literature.

When the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been secured, the aim of management should be prompt symptom control and the induction of remission or minimal manifestations. Symptom control, with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as pyridostigmine, is commonly employed. This may be sufficient in mild disease. There is no single universally accepted treatment regimen. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with more than mild MG to induce remission. Immunosuppressive therapies, such as azathioprine are prescribed in addition to but sometimes instead of corticosteroids when background comorbidities preclude or restrict the use of steroids. Rituximab has a role in refractory MG, while plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin therapy are commonly prescribed to treat MG crisis and in some cases of refractory MG. Data from the MGTX trial showed clear evidence that thymectomy is beneficial in patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized MG, up to the age of 65 years. Minimally invasive thymectomy surgery including robotic-assisted thymectomy surgery has further revolutionized thymectomy and the management of MG. Ocular MG is not life-threatening but can be significantly disabling when diplopia is persistent. There is evidence to support early treatment with corticosteroids when ocular motility is abnormal and fails to respond to symptomatic treatment. Treatment needs to be individualized in the older age-group depending on specific comorbidities. In the younger age-groups, particularly in women, consideration must be given to the potential teratogenicity of certain therapies. Novel therapies are being developed and trialed, including ones that inhibit complement-induced immunological pathways or interfere with antibody-recycling pathways. Fatigue is common in MG and should be duly identified from fatigable weakness and managed with a combination of physical therapy with or without psychological support. MG patients may also develop dysfunctional breathing and the necessary respiratory physiotherapy techniques need to be implemented to alleviate the patient's symptoms of dyspnoea. In this review, we discuss various facets of myasthenia management in adults with ocular and generalized disease, including some practical approaches and our personal opinions based on our experience.

Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia during Immunosuppressive Treatment in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Study.

This study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) infection in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to identify risk factors for PJP using a retrospective case-control study. Of 4,525 patients with UC treated between 2007 and 2019, we identified those who satisfied the criteria for PJP. The Lichtiger clinical activity index (LCI) was compared between the initiation of immunosuppressive drug treatment and the onset of PJP. A retrospective case-control study was conducted using a PJP group and a non-PJP group. Nine patients experienced PJP, of whom two died. Since October 2014, there were no cases of PJP among UC patients aged ≥50 years who were prescribed three or more immunosuppressive agents given prophylactic sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (TPM-SMX). The median LCI (range) was 13 (8-17) at the initiation of treatment versus 2 (1-8) at PJP onset (p = 0.016). The median time to PJP onset was 83 days after treatment initiation. In the PJP group the median age was significantly greater (p = 0.022), three immunosuppressants were used significantly more frequently (p = 0.004), and the lymphocyte counts during treatment were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than in the non-PJP group. The cut-off lymphocyte count that distinguished PJP patients from non-PJP patients was 570/μL according to a receiver-operating curve analysis. Prophylactic administration of TPM-SMX prevented further cases of PJP. The onset of PJP occurred at the same time as the symptoms of UC were stabilizing and the immunosuppressive drugs were being reduced. Greater age, lower lymphocyte count, and treatment with three immunosuppressive drugs were risk factors for PJP.

Opportunistische Infektionen durch humane Herpesviren*

Infections in immunosuppressed patients represent a particular challenge in the diagnostics and treatment. They often present with atypical and particularly severe courses, for which rapid diagnostics and treatment are decisive for treatment success. Opportunistic infections with human herpes viruses occur not only more frequently in immunocompromised patients compared to healthy people but also represent a special challenge. In the treatment of immunosuppressed patients, e.g. with human immunodeficiency virus infections and patients with solid organ transplantations, infections with herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus are particularly important. The symtoms are very variable, ranging from asymptomatic detection of viremia to vital life-threatening organ manifestations. This review article describes the most important clinical presentations of these opportunistic infections. Furthermore, the diagnostic, therapeutic and prophylactic strategies for human herpes viruses are summarized.

Risk factors related to relapse after first immunosuppressive treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (4464)

Risk factors related to relapse after first immunosuppressive treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (4464)

Mucormycosis experience through the eyes of the laboratory

Background: Mucormycosis is a rare, worldwide fungal infection with high mortality, which mostly affects immunocompromised patients. Compared to large parts of Asia, Europe, and the USA, information on clinical expression and fungal species distribution in mucormycosis in Turkey is limited.Objectives and methods: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the demographic features of mucormycosis cases, identify the isolates at the species level by using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF), compare culture results with histopathological examination and determine the antifungal susceptibility patterns of the pathogens.Results: Between 2016 and 2018, 10 mucormycosis cases (six female, four male; age range: 35–74 years) were evaluated retrospectively. The predominance of the cases were in late autumn and winter. Diabetes mellitus was the most common underlying condition. Seven patients had rhinoorbitocerebral, two had pulmonary and one had cutaneous mucormycosis. By mycological culture and direct microscopic examination nine strains were identified as Rhizopus spp. and one as Mucor spp. Seven of these strains were identified at the species level by MALDI-TOF. Histopathological examination of eight tissues were reported as compatible with mucormycosis. All isolates were resistant to azoles and echinocandins. Two isolates were resistant to Amphotericin B and one was resistant to posaconazole. Surgical debridement combined with antifungal therapy was the main treatment option. The mortality rate was 40% (n = 4) and the mean number of days between the onset of complaints and the initiation of treatment was 9.25.Conclusions: Early, rapid and accurate diagnosis of mucormycosis is of critical importance in the treatment of immunosuppressed patients.