You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Invasive (II)1 Apr 20131618 IMPACT OF URINARY DIVERSION ON CANCER SPECIFIC-SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER AND PATHOLOGIC POSITIVE LYMPH NODES Federico Pellucchi, Lorenzo Rocchini, Carmen Maccagnano, Giuseppe Zanni, Giovanni La Croce, Marco Moschini, Giorgio Gandaglia, Patrizio Rigatti, Francesco Montorsi, and Renzo Colombo Federico PellucchiFederico Pellucchi Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Lorenzo RocchiniLorenzo Rocchini Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Carmen MaccagnanoCarmen Maccagnano Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Giuseppe ZanniGiuseppe Zanni Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Giovanni La CroceGiovanni La Croce Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Marco MoschiniMarco Moschini Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Giorgio GandagliaGiorgio Gandaglia Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Patrizio RigattiPatrizio Rigatti Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Francesco MontorsiFrancesco Montorsi Milan, Italy More articles by this author , and Renzo ColomboRenzo Colombo Milan, Italy More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3168AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To examine the impact of urinary diversion on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy (RC) and found with pathologic positive nodes (N+) METHODS Overall, 210 consecutive patients submitted to RC at our institution between 1999 and 2011 for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and positive lymph node metastases were retrospectively evaluated. All patients received either an ileal neobladder or an ileal conduit as the urinary diversion. Complete clinical, pathological data (including T stage, grade, age, gender, diversion type) and follow-up were available for 133 patients (63%). The CSS probability using the Kaplan-Meier method, was investigated. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were adopted to assess the effect of urinary diversion on CSS. RESULTS Overall, mean age was 68.2 yr (median: 68; range: 48-87). Of the 133 patients, 24 (18%) patients were female and 109 (82%) were male. All patients were found with high grade disease. The pathologic stage distribution was pT2, pT3 and pT4 in 21 (15.7%), 69 (52%) and 43 (32.3%) cases, respectively. The pathologic nodal status (according to the Sixth Edition of TNM classification) was defined as pN1 in 43 (32.4%), and pN2 in 90 (67.6%). An ileal conduit and an ileal neobladder was completed in 72 (54.2%) and 61 (45.8%) patients, respectively. Mean follow-up time was 71 months (median: 51; range 1-125). The overall 5-year CSS was 55.7%. When analyses were stratified according to urinary diversion, the 5-year CSS was documented to be 56.3%, 54.7% for the ileal conduit and the orthotopic bladder substitution, respectively. At multivariate analyses, both age (HR 1.03, p=0.01) and number of positive nodes (HR 1.04, p=0.02) were associated with worst CSS. After adjustement for potential confounders, ileal conduit and ileal neobladder showed similar CSS (p=0.9). No statistically significant differences could be observed for the remaining variables (all p>0.2). CONCLUSIONS In patients with pathologic positive nodal status submitted to ileal conduit or orthotopic bladder substitution after RC, a similar cancer specific survival may be expected. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e665 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Federico Pellucchi Milan, Italy More articles by this author Lorenzo Rocchini Milan, Italy More articles by this author Carmen Maccagnano Milan, Italy More articles by this author Giuseppe Zanni Milan, Italy More articles by this author Giovanni La Croce Milan, Italy More articles by this author Marco Moschini Milan, Italy More articles by this author Giorgio Gandaglia Milan, Italy More articles by this author Patrizio Rigatti Milan, Italy More articles by this author Francesco Montorsi Milan, Italy More articles by this author Renzo Colombo Milan, Italy More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract