"Only Your Labels Split Me"Epistemic Privilege, Boundaries, and Pretexts of 'Religion' Lilith Acadia (bio) "Only your labels split me." —gloria anzaldúa1 "[W]ords create worlds, especially those categories that order dominant discourses." —timothy fitzgerald2 "[T]here's an enormous amount of damage done around the world in the name of religion and certainty." —barack obama3 "I assert most unhesitatingly, that the religion of the South is a mere covering for the most horrid crimes,—a justifier of the most appalling barbarity,—a sanctifier of the most hateful frauds,—and a dark shelter under which the darkest, foulest, grossest, and most infernal deeds of slaveholders find the strongest protection." —frederick douglass4 Like the unmapped globe, the individual has no borders until identity categories delineate political lines, dividing what was previously a unique, unified whole. Gloria Anzaldúa describes this imposition of borders on an intact "me," whom "[o]nly your labels split." The labels are imprecise, ill-fitting identity categories of gender, race, class, and politics that belong to someone else. She rejects the suggestion that such an identity assemblage makes her "confused" or "[a]mbivalent," because the borders are foreign to her otherwise unbroken self: label confusion does not imply identity confusion. Identity categories are the kinds of concepts that those with political and epistemic power use to draw borders on individuals and maps, to impose distinctions and hierarchies suiting [End Page 1] their objectives, to "create worlds" with words to "order dominant discourses," as Timothy Fitzgerald explains. The powerful can then apply those concepts and the worlds they create to discursively justify their beliefs: repeated enough, the words and their worlds begin to sound natural, and then epistemically powerful, so that audiences trust the speakers who invoke those words and believe the knowledge from those conceptual worlds. 'Religion' is one powerful example of such a word that creates a naturalized category whose epistemic privilege makes it, as Barack Obama and Frederick Douglass observe in the epigraphs, a dangerous weapon. 'Religion' here is not the synonym for spirituality or faith regularly assumed in common discourse; rather it describes an epistemic category. Treating religion as an epistemic category recognizes the concept's genealogy as an Enlightenment construct based on a Christian prototype, with discursively particular characteristics such as universality, plurality, cosmological explanation, and (sui generis) uniqueness. The concept we recognize today arises in the European Enlightenment from the combination of two seemingly contradictory logics: an imperialism seeking to dissolve borders by extending empires to new lands, and an epistemology dualistically drawing borders to justify such expansion. Religion, in turn, contributes to defining the epistemic borders of Enlightenment thought, and serves as a pretext for transcending borders to extend empires. The conceptual borders helped dissolve political ones by delineating institutions or practices Europeans find resemble their prototype of Christianity sufficiently to be called religions. Distinctions between conceptual and political realms are products of this epistemology, which pursues knowledge by erecting borders that often dualistically define one concept in contradistinction to the other, such as civilization against barbarity or religion against the secular. Drawing and Dissolving Borders "With awe and wonder you look around, recognizing the preciousness of the earth, the sanctity of every human being on the planet, the ultimate unity and interdependence of all beings—solos todos un paíz." —gloria anzaldúa5 [End Page 2] Calling for a "spiritual activism," Anzaldúa envisions a universality that dissolves borders and engrains difference as part of an interwoven whole in ways that disclose the possibility of what she terms Borderlands. The positive action she envisions occurring across cultures, transcending political borders, is premised on a mystical unity of all humans (and perhaps non-humans) bound together by a divine sanctity of belonging to one Earth. Unlike the unified and borderless universal spirituality Anzaldúa envisions, the universality of religion in modern discourse posits religion as an institution with many manifestations (religions) around the world and across time: a plurality divided by ideological borders. The prevalent—and historically misinterpretive—narrative of Islam emerging as a religion in contradistinction to its prequel religion Christianity, which in turn arose from and defined itself against an originary Abrahamic...
Read full abstract