Identify Cancer Survivors Research Articles

The Triglycerides - Glucose Index: An independent predictor of late subclinical cardiotoxicity in adult survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer

Abstract Introduction The Triglycerides - Glucose index (TyG index) has been identified as a reliable alternative for estimating insulin resistance (IR). Numerous recent studies have provided strong statistical evidence suggesting that this index is associated with the development and prognosis of cardiovascular pathologies. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive role of the TyG index on the decrease in left ventricular longitudinal global strain (GLS) assessed on two-dimensional echocardiography in asymptomatic adult survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer. Methods The study included patients aged 18 years and older, asymptomatic cardiovascular survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer treated with anthracyclines with or without mediastinal radiotherapy. Anthropometric characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatment-related characteristics were collected. The TyG index was calculated using the formula: ln [fasting triglycerides (mg/dl) × fasting glucose (mg/dl)/2]. GLS was assessed and expressed as an absolute value. A GLS equal to 17.3% was retained as the threshold value after calculation in a referent group matched to patients according to age and gender. Cardiac biomarkers GDF 15, ultra-sensitive troponin I and NT-proBNP levels were measured in addition to fasting blood glucose and lipid profiles. Multivariate analysis using linear regression was performed to identify associations between these different parameters. Results A total of 105 cancer survivors from childhood, adolescence and young adulthood were included. The sex ratio was 1.3. The mean age of the patients was 25 years, the mean time since completion of cancer treatment was 10.6 years, the mean cumulative doses of anthracyclines and mediastinal radiotherapy were successively 245.75 ± 75.14 mg/m2 and 34.6 ± 6.19 Gy. Mean GLS was 18.5 ± 2.83%, mean LVEF 60.6 ± 5.69%. None of the patients had any known diabetes or treatment to lower blood glucose or triglyceride levels. No patient had a history of cardiovascular disease. In the univariate study, the factors associated with lower GLS were patient age at recruitment (p = 0.03), mean time since completion of cancer treatment when this was greater than ten years (p = 0.005), dyslipidemia (p = 0.012), obesity (p = 0.037) and TyG (p = 0.037). In multivariate analysis, lower GLS was related to mean time since completion of cancer treatment (p = 0.015) and TyG index (p = 0.002). Conclusion Our results suggest that the TyG index, as a simple and inexpensive marker of insulin resistance, could help identify cancer survivors from childhood, adolescence and young adulthood who would be at risk of subclinical cardiac dysfunction. Prospective studies with larger numbers are needed to confirm these findings.

Association of frailty with annual healthcare expenditures of older adults during cancer survivorship.

352 Background: Frailty contributes to healthcare expenditures. Cancer and its therapies can further increase or accelerate the rate of frailty. Addressing geriatric deficits contributing to frailty of older cancer survivors (ages 65+) could potentially reduce health expenditures. However, little is known about how frailty affects health expenditures during the continuing survivorship period, a period after initial treatment but before the end-of-life. Given that older adults with cancer can live for years, it is important to examine health expenditures during this period by levels of frailty. Methods: We used the 2-year longitudinal panels of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative survey, to identify cancer survivors who are likely in the continuing survivorship period. We created 5 cohorts who were surveyed in 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020, and 2021, and in the previous year. In each cohort, we selected older individuals with an invasive cancer diagnosis in both previous and current years who did not die in the current year. We pooled the cohorts to estimate annual healthcare expenditures, representing a cancer population of 11,802,386 in the US (n=2,206). We constructed a deficit accumulation frailty index using survey items and divided patients into 3 categories: robust, pre-frail, and frail. We used generalized linear regression to estimate the associations of frailty with annual healthcare expenditures during the continuing survivorship period for older adults, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, immigration background, insurance coverage, family size, family income, and education. Costs were inflated to 2023 US dollars. Results: The per person annual healthcare expenditure among older adult survivors of all cancer types was $13499.13, $24698.77, and $34352.23 for those who were robust (75.2%), pre-frail (12.0%), and frail (12.8%), respectively, and being pre-frail and frail was associated with higher expenditures (P<0.001). In analyses by cancer type, being frail (vs. robust) was associated with higher expenditures for bladder (P<0.05), breast (P<0.01), cervical (P<0.01), and prostate (P<0.01) cancers. Pre-frail breast cancer patients also incurred more costs than those who were robust (P<0.01). Conclusions: Increased frailty was associated with higher annual healthcare expenditures among older cancer survivors during the continuing survivorship period. Addressing geriatric deficits and intervening to maintain function and prevent frailty progression during survivorship care could improve quality of life and reduce healthcare expenditures.

Abstract C041: A systematic review of cardiovascular health among cancer survivors

Abstract Purpose: The most common non-cancer cause of death among cancer survivors is cardiovascular disease. Health behaviors (e.g., diet, physical activity, sleep, smoking) and health factors (e.g., blood pressure, hemoglobin A1C, cholesterol) associated with cancer mortality are also associated with cardiovascular mortality. The American Heart Association has termed these behaviors and factors “cardiovascular health” (CVH) or “Life’s Essential 8,” providing a metric to determine poor, intermediate, and high (ideal) CVH. Less than ideal CVH is associated with higher cancer mortality; however, little is known about the CVH of cancer survivors. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the extant literature on CVH among cancer survivors. MethodsIn accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we are systematically examining cardiovascular health among cancer survivors (including patients) within PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase databases without date limitations. Two reviewers are accessing articles at each level of review to determine concordance with inclusion criteria, coming to consensus via a shared discussion. Data from studies that meet inclusion criteria will be abstracted, assessed for risk of bias. and synthesized to understand themes of CVH among cancer survivors. Results To date, we have retrieved 1,990 studies from the named databases. Preliminary review of the title and abstracts suggests that CVH as a metric may be seldom used within extant literature. This review is ongoing. Conclusion: Given the co-morbid and iatrogenic nature of cardiovascular disease among cancer survivors, it is important to understand metrics that can be applied to both identify cancer survivors with increased risk of poor outcomes and educate/empower cancer survivors to make modifiable changes to reduce their risk. This review will provide much needed evidence to support future research, practice changes, and policy implications to support the long-term health of cancer survivors. Citation Format: Miriam A. Miles, Le’Andrea Anderson-Tolbert, Abigail A. Ninson, Cha-Breia Means, Tuchondriana Smith, Reagan Coleman, Laura Rogers, Joshua Joseph, Timiya S. Nolan. A systematic review of cardiovascular health among cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C041.

Group-based trajectory modeling for fear of cancer recurrence in cancer survivors: a systematic review.

We aimed to systematically review studies that used a group-based trajectory modeling approach to explore the categories of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) trajectories and their predictors in cancer survivors. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Three authors independently reviewed the literature for predefined eligibility criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools for Cohort Studies and the Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies were used to assess the quality of included studies. A qualitative synthesis of the included studies was performed. Ninety-eight studies were retrieved after removing duplicates, and 11 studies met the criteria for inclusion. There are four types of FCR trajectories: stable, decreasing, increasing, and stable-then-decreasing-then-increasing. The following factors were considered significant predictors of FCR trajectory category in at least one of the included studies: age, race, income, education, employment, cancer stage, physical symptoms, depression, anxiety, satisfaction with medical care, and selected cognitive and behavioral factors. There was considerable heterogeneity among the studies included in study design and FCR trajectory results. Factors that significantly predicted FCR trajectory categories mostly focused on psychological characteristics. The correlation of sociodemographic and disease-related predictors with FCR trajectory categories was not consistent among the included studies. We suggest that future scholars should incorporate more psychological factors when identifying cancer survivors who persistently maintain a high level of FCR and developing FCR mitigation measures.

Risk factors and health behaviors associated with loneliness among cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Loneliness may exacerbate poor health outcomes particularly among cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the risk factors of loneliness among cancer survivors. We evaluated the risk factors of loneliness in the context of COVID-19 pandemic-related prevention behaviors and lifestyle/psychosocial factors among cancer survivors. Cancer survivors (n = 1471) seen at Huntsman Cancer Institute completed a survey between August-September 2020 evaluating health behaviors, medical care, and psychosocial factors including loneliness during COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were classified into two groups: 'lonely' (sometimes, usually, or always felt lonely in past month) and 'non-lonely' (never or rarely felt lonely in past month). 33% of cancer survivors reported feeling lonely in the past month. Multivariable logistic regression showed female sex, not living with a spouse/partner, poor health status, COVID-19 pandemic-associated lifestyle factors including increased alcohol consumption and marijuana/CBD oil use, and psychosocial stressors such as disruptions in daily life, less social interaction, and higher perceived stress and financial stress were associated with feeling lonely as compared to being non-lonely (all p < 0.05). A significant proportion of participants reported loneliness, which is a serious health risk among vulnerable populations, particularly cancer survivors. Modifiable risk factors such as unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and psychosocial stress were associated with loneliness. These results highlight the need to screen for unhealthy lifestyle factors and psychosocial stressors to identify cancer survivors at increased risk of loneliness and to develop effective management strategies.

Association Between Alcohol Use Disorder and Hospital Readmission Rates and Outcomes in Cancer Survivors: A Population Cohort Study.

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is the most common substance use disorder and is characterized by heavy alcohol use and the inability to control drinking. This study sought to compare the rate, timing, length, and total costs of hospital readmissions among cancer survivors with and without AUD. We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database in 2017 and 2018 in this cohort study. Cancer survivors with an AUD diagnosis during their index hospitalization were included in the exposure group. Propensity score matching was used to identify cancer survivors without AUD for the control group. The primary outcome was all-cause readmission, and secondary outcomes included days to, length of, and total cost of readmission. Outcomes were measured after 90 and 180 days of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to measure the likelihood of readmission, and negative binomial regression and gamma regression were used for the other outcomes. Of 485,962 cancer survivors, 13,953 (2.9%) had co-occurring AUD. Cancer survivors with AUD had slightly higher odds of 90-day (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06-1.22) and 180-day (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.18) readmission compared with those without AUD. Cancer survivors with AUD who were readmitted after 90 days also had higher readmission costs ($3,785 vs $3,376; P=.03). No differences in time to and length of readmission were observed between groups. The odds of readmission were higher among cancer survivors with AUD irrespective of age and type of cancer. Male, but not female, cancer survivors with AUD were more likely than those without AUD to be readmitted in both follow-up periods. This population-based cohort study of cancer survivors in the United States found that AUD is associated with higher 90- and 180-day readmission rates and higher related health care costs after 90 days of follow-up. Hospitalized cancer survivors with AUD may benefit from addiction treatment and discharge planning that addresses their co-occurring AUD.

Association of weight-adjusted waist index with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among cancer survivors: a cohort study of the NHANES 1999-2018.

Obesity is becoming more widely acknowledged as a chronic illness that raises the risk of oncogenesis. This inquiry aimed to look into the correlation between cancer patient mortality and obesity, as measured by the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI). We used continuous data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018 as the benchmark, with a follow-up validity period of December 31, 2019. First, we assessed the correlation between WWI and the all-cause and cause-specific execution of cancer sufferers using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Second, a smoothed curve fit was utilized to examine the relationship between WWI and both cause-specific and all-cause mortality in cancer patients. Lastly, we analyzed the relationship between WWI and both cause-specific and all-cause mortality in cancer patients, to find out if this link held across the population subgroup evaluation and impact analyses were used as well during the last step. With a median follow-up of 87.8 months, 1,547 (34.7%) of the 4,463 cancer patients had deceased. Among them, 508 (11.4%) succumbed to cancer, while 322 (7.2%) passed away due to cardiovascular disease. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model of mortality among cancer patients revealed an all-cause mortality hazard ratio [HR=1.13; 95% CI (1.04, 1.23)] and cardiovascular mortality [HR=1.39; 95% CI (1.16, 1.67)]. Furthermore, for each unit increase in WWI, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in male cancer survivors than in female cancer survivors. Our study reveals substantial correlations between WWI and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US cancer survivors, helping to identify cancer survivors at higher risk of death and thus potentially guiding targeted interventions.

A quality improvement project to optimize access to psychosocial care for cancer survivors who experience fear of recurrence

Background The prevalence of moderate to high levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in cancer survivors may vary from 22% to 87%, although most are not usually referred to psychosocial support. The After Cancer Treatment Transition (ACTT) clinic in Women’s College Hospital (Toronto) provides follow-up care to cancer survivors but in a sample of 2893 patients seen April 2019 to March 2022, only 1.5% were referred to a social worker for psychosocial needs. A single-question screening tool is currently available to screen for FCR. Objective To evaluate the use of the single-question screening tool for FCR among cancer survivors and its impact on social work referrals. Results Between July and October 2022, 788 patients were seen in the ACTT clinic. Generally, most patients in ACTT are breast cancer survivors (75%), and the remaining survivors are a mix of other cancer types (colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, thyroid cancer, melanoma). Three hundred thirty (41.9%) ACTT patients completed the single-question screening tool for FCR. Most screened patients were female (96%), the average age was 60 years, and most were diagnosed with breast cancer (90%). Among screened patients, 37 (11%) indicated a moderately severe to high level of FCR and efforts were made to refer these 37 patients to a social worker. In the end, 22 (59.5%) patients with moderately severe/high levels of FCR were offered and accepted referral to a social worker. In comparison to the 1.5% referred to social work (among 2893 patients) prior to FCR screening, referrals increased to 6.7% (among 330 screened). Conclusion Use of a single-question FCR screening tool improved identifying cancer survivors in need of psychosocial support and improved access to a social worker.

Risk Factors of Health-Related Quality of Life among Gastrointestinal Cancer Survivors in the U.S.: With a Focus on Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health (SBDH).

Increasing numbers of long-term gastrointestinal (GI) cancer survivors highlight the importance of understanding the factors contributing to their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We investigated the risk factors of HRQoL, including demographics, clinical characteristics, and social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDH). Data on adult GI cancer survivors (n = 3201) from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys from 2014-2021 (except for 2015) were analyzed. Unadjusted/adjusted logistic regression was used. The majority were women (54%) and white (78%), with a median age of 67. Survivors who were 65 years or older, diagnosed with colorectal cancer, or who had fewer comorbidities were more likely to report significantly better HRQoL. Significant social factors of poor HRQoL included unmarried, racial and ethnic minorities, poor socioeconomic status, and poor healthcare access. Significant behavioral factors of poor HRQoL were lack of physical activity, heavy alcohol consumption, and current smoking, with lack of physical activity being the most significant factor. The SBDH has a critical role in HRQoL. Future studies are warranted to develop a tailored survivorship intervention, such as physical rehabilitation, and to explore machine learning/artificial intelligence-based predictive models to identify cancer survivors at a high risk of developing poor HRQoL.

The gold standard program (GSP) for smoking cessation: a cohort study of its effectiveness among smokers with and without cancer

Background Smoking cessation treatment is an important prognostic factor for survival after a cancer diagnosis, especially for tobacco-related cancers. After being diagnosed with lung cancer, approximately 50% of patients continue smoking or frequently relapse after a quit attempt. Given the importance of smoking cessation treatment for cancer survivors, the objective was to compare the effectiveness of a 6-week intensive smoking cessation intervention, the Gold Standard Program (GSP), among cancer survivors compared with smokers without cancer. Second, we compared successful quitting among socioeconomically disadvantaged cancer survivors with that among nondisadvantaged cancer survivors. Materials and Methods This was a cohort study based on 38,345 smokers from the Danish Smoking Cessation Database (2006–2016). Linkage to the National Patient Register was used to identify cancer survivors undergoing the GSP after being diagnosed with cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer). Linkage to the Danish Civil Registration System was used to identify participants who died, went missing, or emigrated before the follow-up. Logistic regression models were applied to evaluate effectiveness. Results and Conclusion Six percent (2438) of the included smokers were cancer survivors at the time they undertook the GSP. Their 6-month successful quitting showed no difference compared to that of smokers without cancer, neither before nor after adjustment; 35% versus 37% in crude rates and an aOR of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.97–1.32). Likewise, the results for disadvantaged compared to nondisadvantaged cancer survivors were not significantly different (32% versus 33% and an adjusted aOR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.69–1.11)). Overall, an intensive smoking cessation program seems effective in helping both people without cancer and cancer survivors become successful quitters.

Protocol: Can coronary artery calcium score identified on thoracic planning CT scans be used and actioned to identify cancer survivors at high risk of cardiac events: A feasibility study in cancer survivors undergoing radiotherapy in Australia

IntroductionA coronary artery calcium (CAC) CT scan can identify calcified plaque and predict risk of future cardiac events. Cancer survivors undergoing thoracic radiotherapy routinely undergo a planning CT scan, which...

Associations of cancer history, food insecurity, and nonmedical financial worry and mortality risk in the US.

6537 Background: Cancer survivors often face substantial out-of-pocket medical costs, which can adversely affect their financial well-being. Cutting expenses on food and housing to save money are common coping strategies. However, little is known about the extent to which food insecurities and non-medical financial worries affect mortality risk after consideration of medical financial hardship. Methods: The 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the NHIS linked mortality files with vital status through December 31, 2019 were used to identify cancer survivors (ages 18-64: n=5,110; ages 65-79: n=4,949) and individuals without a cancer history (ages 18-64: n=115,643; ages 65-79: n=24,785). Medical financial hardship included 3 domains: material, psychological, and behavioral. Food insecurity (e.g., worry about food running out) and non-medical financial worries (e.g., paying for monthly bills and housing) were separately summarized and categorized as severe, moderate, and minor/none levels. Using age as the time scale, associations of cancer history, food insecurity and non-medical financial worry and mortality risk were examined with weighted Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted models included medical financial hardship, sex, educational attainment, marital status, health insurance, comorbid conditions, and survey year. All estimates accounted for complex survey design. Results: In our sample, about 13.8% (ages 18-64) and 7.9% (ages 65-79) reported moderate to severe levels of food insecurity, respectively; 32.1% (ages 18-64) and 19.2% (ages 65-79) reported moderate to severe levels of non-medical financial worries, respectively. In adjusted analyses, cancer survivors had increased mortality risk. After controlling for medical financial hardship, food insecurity was associated with higher mortality risk in both age groups, following a dose-response relationship (Table); Non-medical financial worry was associated with higher mortality risk in the 65-79 age group (Table). Conclusions: Standardized and comprehensive assessment of financial hardship and other social needs, such food insecurity, is essential to identify and mitigate adverse economic impacts of cancer. [Table: see text]

Longitudinal changes of health-related quality of life over 10years in breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery.

The study intended to (1) assess changes of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between early treatment-related time points and 10years post-treatment in a cohort of breast cancer (BC) patients who received radiotherapy (RT), (2) to evaluate differences in HRQoL between long-term BC survivors and unaffected women from the same geographical region and (3) to identify determinants of long-term HRQoL in the survivor cohort. 292 BC patients were recruited prior to RT after breast-conserving surgery between 1998 and 2001 in Germany and prospectively followed up for a median of 11.4years (range 10.3-12.8years). HRQoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 at pre-RT (baseline), during RT, 6weeks after RT, and at the 10-year follow-up. Changes in mean HRQoL scores over time were assessed using linear-mixed models. HRQoL in long-term survivors and controls was compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test, stratified by age groups. Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify determinants for HRQoL in long-term BC survivors. Compared to baseline level (mean summary score of 64.9), global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) declined during RT (62.4) and improved 6weeks after RT (69.9) before decreasing to baseline level at the 10-year follow-up (66.7). Most functional domains deteriorated or remained stable at 10years post-diagnosis compared to post-RT scores, except for role functioning which improved, while dyspnea and diarrhea significantly deteriorated between those two time points. There were no significant differences in long-term GHS/QoL between BC survivors 10years post-RT and controls for all age groups (p > 0.05). However, deficits in specific HRQoL domains such as emotional burden, sleep problems or fatigue were found to more strongly affect survivors, in particular those younger than 65years, compared to controls. In the determinant analysis, being overweight was associated with lower GHS/QoL and physical functioning, while living with others was found to be associated with better physical functioning, and decreased dyspnea and pain levels. Certain comorbidities such as depression had a strong association with multiple HRQoL domains, including lower GHS/QoL and functioning as well as a higher level of fatigue, pain, sleep/intestinal problems, and financial difficulties. Side effects such as lymphedema/pain and fibrosis were associated with worse physical and social functioning, respectively. The long-term GHS/QoL remained comparable when compared with the control population while restrictions in certain functional and symptoms domains in long-term BC survivors persisted over 10years, in particular among younger survivors. Targeted screening to identify cancer survivors at risk for psychosocial/other impairment accounting also for comorbidities and treatment side effects may be warranted in long-term aftercare to address unmet health needs.

Understanding the Post-Treatment Concerns of Cancer Survivors with Five Common Cancers: Exploring the Alberta Results from the Pan-Canadian Transitions Study.

As the rates of cancer incidence and survival increase in Canada, more patients are living in the post-treatment survivorship phase of their cancer journey. Identifying cancer survivors’ concerns and unmet needs is important so that health care teams can provide relevant information, supports, and resources. Secondary data analysis was carried out on the Alberta patient sample from the 2016 Pan-Canadian Transitions Study survey, designed by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The top concerns for patients treated for five different cancers were examined descriptively and compared. A question about information that patients received post-treatment was also descriptively analyzed. Binary logistic regressions were conducted for each tumour group, using the top three concerns for each group as outcomes and a variety of demographic factors as independent variables. There were 1833 valid respondents in the Alberta sample. Fatigue and anxiety were top concerns for multiple tumour groups. Most patients received more information about treatment side effects than about signs of recurrence and community resources. Within certain tumour groups, younger patients had higher odds of having concerns, particularly anxiety. Awareness of the common and unique concerns experienced by cancer survivors post-treatment enables health care providers to tailor care and resources to help patients manage their symptoms and concerns. These findings address gaps in knowledge around the cancer survivorship phase and may be applicable to cancer programs and primary care providers in Alberta and beyond.

Multilevel Factors for Adiposity Change in a Population-Based Prospective Study of Black Breast Cancer Survivors.

PURPOSEUnfavorable weight change after breast cancer diagnosis increases the risk of mortality, but individual and neighborhood risk factors affecting postdiagnosis weight and body fat changes are unclear among Black women, who have higher rates of obesity and mortality than any other racial/ethnic group.METHODSAdiposity changes during the period approximately 10 months-24 months after diagnosis were evaluated among 785 women diagnosed between 2012 and 2018 and enrolled in the Women's Circle of Health Follow-Up Study, a population-based prospective cohort of Black breast cancer survivors in New Jersey. Multilevel factors for weight and fat mass change (with gain or loss defined as a relative difference of 3% or more, and considering whether changes were intentional or unintentional) were estimated using multivariable polytomous logistic regressions and multilevel models.RESULTSAdiposity gain was prevalent: 28% and 47% gained weight and body fat, respectively, despite a high baseline prevalence of overweight or obesity (86%). Risk factors for fat mass gain included receiving chemotherapy (relative risk ratio: 1.59, 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.33) and residing in neighborhoods with a greater density of fast-food restaurants (relative risk ratio comparing highest with lowest tertile: 2.18, 95% CI, 1.38 to 3.46); findings were similar for weight gain. Only 9% of women had intentional weight loss, and multilevel risk factors differed vastly from unintentional loss.CONCLUSIONBoth individual and neighborhood factors were associated with adiposity change among Black breast cancer survivors. Residential environment characteristics may offer clinically meaningful information to identify cancer survivors at higher risk for unfavorable weight change and to address barriers to postdiagnosis weight management.

Trajectories of cognitive symptoms and associated factors in cancer survivors after return to work: an 18-month longitudinal cohort study

PurposeCognitive symptoms affect cancer survivors’ functioning at work. To date, cognitive symptoms trajectories in working cancer survivors and the factors associated with these trajectories have not been examined.MethodsData from a heterogeneous group of working cancer survivors (n = 379) of the longitudinal “Work-Life-after-Cancer” study, linked with Netherlands Cancer Registry data, were used. The Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work was administered at baseline (within the first 3 months after return to work), 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up to measure self-perceived memory and executive function symptoms. Data were analyzed using group-based trajectory modeling.ResultsFour trajectories of memory and executive function symptoms were identified. All memory symptoms trajectories were stable and labeled as “stable-high” (15.3% of the sample), “stable-moderately high” (39.6%), “stable-moderately low” (32.0%), and “stable-low” (13.0%). Executive function symptoms trajectories changed over time and were labeled as “increasing-high” (10.1%), “stable-moderately high” (32.0%), “decreasing-moderately low” (35.5%), and “stable-low” (22.4%). Higher symptoms trajectories were associated with older age, longer time from diagnosis to return to work, more quantitative work demands, and higher levels of depressive symptoms at baseline.ConclusionsIn cancer survivors who returned to work, four cognitive symptoms trajectory subgroups were identified, representing different but relatively stable severity levels of cognitive symptoms.Implications for Cancer SurvivorsTo identify cancer survivors with higher symptoms trajectories, health care providers should assess cognitive symptoms at baseline after return to work. In case of cognitive symptoms, it is important to also screen for psychological factors to provide appropriate guidance.

Effect of Exercise on Sarcopenia among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Simple SummarySarcopenia is a condition characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass and low muscle strength or physical performance. Cancer survivors are likely to be impacted by sarcopenia and suffer from a worse prognosis. Exercise has been suggested to be a promising tool to attenuate sarcopenia, but its effect among cancer survivors has not been systematically tested yet. We conducted a systematic review of seven interventional studies examining the effects of exercise on sarcopenia among cancer survivors. Results suggested that exercise improved muscle quantity and potentially reversed sarcopenia among breast, gastric, prostate and liver cancer survivors. If the relationship is further supported by larger trials, we could potentially identify cancer survivors at higher risk of adverse health outcomes by screening for sarcopenia and improve their prognosis and quality of life through exercise interventions.Sarcopenia is related to adverse health outcomes in cancer survivors. Previous reviews reported exercise improved muscle mass or function in cancer survivors, but thus far a systematic review examining the effect of exercise on sarcopenia in this population has not been conducted. Therefore, we systematically searched PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and ClinicalTrials.gov for publications and ongoing trials (through November 2021) that reported exercise interventions and diagnosed sarcopenia among cancer survivors. Seven exercise trials were eligible for this review. Six of seven studies showed exercise increased skeletal muscle post intervention (1.6% to 5.4% increase within intervention groups compared to baseline, p ≤ 0.07; 2.1% to 12.8% greater increase for intervention than control groups, p ≤ 0.02) and in the three studies that reported sarcopenia reversal, an improvement (18.2% to 42.9% decrease in sarcopenia in exercise groups, 5.2% increase to 16.7% decrease in sarcopenia in control groups, p = 0.04) was observed. Existing research indicates the potential for exercise to improve health outcomes for cancer survivors through building muscle and attenuating sarcopenia. More high-quality, long-term, large randomized controlled trials examining effects of different exercise types and doses to improve sarcopenia should be conducted to further explore this important topic.

Informing the delivery of cancer survivorship care in rural primary care practice

PurposeThe cancer survivor population is projected to increase to 22.2 million by 2030, requiring improved collaboration between oncology and primary care practices (PCP). PCPs may feel ill-equipped to provide cancer survivorship care to patients without input from cancer specialists. Compared with nonrural cancer survivors, rural cancer survivors report experiencing worse treatment-related symptoms. The goal of this study was to gain a better understanding of the perspectives of PCP teams towards survivorship care and to develop and test an interdisciplinary training program to improve cancer survivorship care in rural practice.MethodsThis study was conducted in two phases. First, focus groups were conducted with rural PCP teams to gather information regarding beliefs, practices, and barriers related to cancer survivorship care delivery. A thematic analysis was completed using an iterative process of reviewing transcripts. Results from phase 1 were used to inform the development of a pilot intervention tested within seven rural PCPs (phase 2). Pre- and post-intervention knowledge changes were compared, and post-session interviews assessed planned or sustained practice changes.ResultsSeven PCPs participated in focus groups (phase 1). Cross-cutting themes identified included (1) organizational barriers affecting the delivery of cancer survivorship care, (2) challenges of role delineation with specialists and patients, (3) difficulty accessing survivorship care and resources, and (4) providers’ lack of knowledge of cancer survivorship care. For phase 2, seven practices participated in four case-based educational sessions. Within and between practice changes were identified.ConclusionThis project explored cancer survivorship perspectives among PCP teams. Lack of familiarity with evidence-based guidelines and the inability to identify cancer survivors was apparent during discussions and led to the implementation of the phase 2 intervention, iSurvive. As a result, PCPs either changed or planned changes to improve the identification and evidence-based care of cancer survivors.Implications for Cancer SurvivorsAddress barriers to access cancer survivorship care in rural primary care practices.

Assessing the fear of recurrence using the Cancer Worry Scale in a sample of Italian breast cancer survivors.

The fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most reported problems by cancer survivors. A valid instrument to detect this issue could be useful to identify cancer survivors who are more vulnerable to developing FCR and related adverse outcomes (e.g., anxiety). The present study aimed to evaluate FCR in a sample of Italian breast cancer survivors using an Italian version of the 8-item Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) in order to establish a cut-off for the use in clinical settings. The participants were 119 breast cancer survivors (mean age 47.7years) at least 1year after their primary treatment. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of CWS, internal reliability of CWS, concurrent and divergent validity using a bivariate correlation between the key measures of the study (i.e., FCR, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and self-efficacy), and ROC analysis of CWS were performed. Fit indices for the EFA were considered acceptable and showed a two-factor structure-labeled cancer worries and worries impact. The reliability of the two factors showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient greater than 0.90. The CWS was positively related to anxiety, depression, fatigue, and negatively related to perceived self-efficacy. The best cut-off score was 24 versus 25, with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 85%. The CWS is a valid questionnaire to assess FCR among breast cancer survivors. The present study provides an overview of the relationship between CWS and the adverse outcomes related to FCR and coping strategies adopted to face it.

Using Patient-Generated Health Data From Twitter to Identify, Engage, and Recruit Cancer Survivors in Clinical Trials in Los Angeles County: Evaluation of a Feasibility Study.

BackgroundFailure to find and attract clinical trial participants remains a persistent barrier to clinical research. Researchers increasingly complement recruitment methods with social media–based methods. We hypothesized that user-generated data from cancer survivors and their family members and friends on the social network Twitter could be used to identify, engage, and recruit cancer survivors for cancer trials.ObjectiveThis pilot study aims to examine the feasibility of using user-reported health data from cancer survivors and family members and friends on Twitter in Los Angeles (LA) County to enhance clinical trial recruitment. We focus on 6 cancer conditions (breast cancer, colon cancer, kidney cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, and prostate cancer).MethodsThe social media intervention involved monitoring cancer-specific posts about the 6 cancer conditions by Twitter users in LA County to identify cancer survivors and their family members and friends and contacting eligible Twitter users with information about open cancer trials at the University of Southern California (USC) Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. We reviewed both retrospective and prospective data published by Twitter users in LA County between July 28, 2017, and November 29, 2018. The study enrolled 124 open clinical trials at USC Norris. We used descriptive statistics to report the proportion of Twitter users who were identified, engaged, and enrolled.ResultsWe analyzed 107,424 Twitter posts in English by 25,032 unique Twitter users in LA County for the 6 cancer conditions. We identified and contacted 1.73% (434/25,032) of eligible Twitter users (127/434, 29.3% cancer survivors; 305/434, 70.3% family members and friends; and 2/434, 0.5% Twitter users were excluded). Of them, 51.4% (223/434) were female and approximately one-third were male. About one-fifth were people of color, whereas most of them were White. Approximately one-fifth (85/434, 19.6%) engaged with the outreach messages (cancer survivors: 33/85, 38% and family members and friends: 52/85, 61%). Of those who engaged with the messages, one-fourth were male, the majority were female, and approximately one-fifth were people of color, whereas the majority were White. Approximately 12% (10/85) of the contacted users requested more information and 40% (4/10) set up a prescreening. Two eligible candidates were transferred to USC Norris for further screening, but neither was enrolled.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate the potential of identifying and engaging cancer survivors and their family members and friends on Twitter. Optimization of downstream recruitment efforts such as screening for digital populations on social media may be required. Future research could test the feasibility of the approach for other diseases, locations, languages, social media platforms, and types of research involvement (eg, survey research). Computer science methods could help to scale up the analysis of larger data sets to support more rigorous testing of the intervention.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03408561; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03408561