Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy Research Articles

Ex Vivo Lenticule Customization for Stromal Lenticule Addition Keratoplasty.

The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal shape of customized lenticules for stromal lenticule addition keratoplasty (SLAK) for off-centered ectasia. Two different methods to create ex vivo models of eccentric-keratoconus were investigated. Twelve human corneas were used to create model 1 by a hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and model 2 by masked phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) on the anterior corneal surface, whereas both types received myopic ablation of the posterior surface. Keratoconus models underwent a modified femtosecond laser (FSL) flap-cut to create stromal pockets. Sixteen human corneas underwent FSL dissection to obtain four lenticule types: type I (planar) and type II (negative) lenticules were used without modifications, whereas type III (customized-planar), and type IV (customized-negative) lenticules underwent further masked-PRK to obtain an asymmetric bow-tie shape. Topographic, aberrometric analysis, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were performed in all recipient corneas before and after lenticule implantation. Keratoconus model was successfully reproduced. Tomographic analysis showed a significant inferiorly decentered corneal steepening with coherent stromal thinning. Model 2 reproduced better the curvature of real keratoconus. Lenticules type I implantation induced a homogeneous corneal thickening, type III produced higher thickening in the inferior half of the cornea. Type II determined a maximal peripheral pachymetric increase, with a gradual reduction toward the center, and type IV presented an asymmetric peripheral thickening. Topographic assessment showed a cone apex flattening in all cases, but it was significantly higher in types II and IV. Customized lenticules improved significantly corneal surface regularity regarding types I and II. The approach of customizing lenticules by increasing their asymmetry and tailoring the re-shaping effects, may improve SLAK outcomes in eccentric keratoconus.

Long-term results of hyperopic ablations using alcohol-assisted PRK and FS-LASIK: comparative study.

To evaluate the long-term visual and refractive outcomes of hyperopic excimer ablation using alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. Retrospective, matched comparative study. Eyes that underwent alcohol-assisted PRK were compared to matched eyes that underwent FS-LASIK. All patients were followed up for at least 3 years after surgery. The refractive and visual outcomes of each group were compared at different postoperative time points. The main outcome measures were spherical equivalent deviation from target (SEDT), manifest refraction, and visual acuity. 83 eyes underwent alcohol-assisted PRK and 83 matched eyes underwent FS-LASIK. Preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent was 2.44 ± 1.18 diopters (D) and 2.20 ± 0.87 D ( P = .133) in the PRK and FS-LASIK groups, respectively. Preoperative manifest cylinder was -0.77 ± 0.89 D and -0.61 ± 0.59 D ( P = .175) for the PRK and LASIK groups, respectively. 3 years postoperatively, SEDT was 0.28 ± 0.66 D and 0.40 ± 0.56 D for the PRK and LASIK groups, respectively ( P = .222), whereas manifest cylinder was -0.55 ± 0.49 D and -0.30 ± 0.34 D for PRK and LASIK, respectively ( P < .001). The mean difference vector was 0.59 ± 0.46 for PRK and 0.38 ± 0.32 for LASIK ( P < .001). 13.3% of PRK eyes and 0% of LASIK eyes had >1 D of manifest cylinder ( P = .003). Both alcohol-assisted PRK and FS-LASIK are safe and effective for the treatment of hyperopia. PRK induces slightly more postoperative astigmatism than LASIK. Larger optical zones and recently introduced ablation profiles that lead to a smoother ablation surface might improve the clinical results of hyperopic PRK.

Intraocular Lens Power Calculations in Eyes with Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery: Review and Expert Opinion

Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations are less accurate in eyes that have undergone corneal refractive surgery. A wide range of methods have been proposed. We reviewed the methods and outcomes of IOL power calculations in eyes with previous LASIK, excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or radial keratotomy (RK). The PubMed database was searched for articles that (1) discuss methods and outcomes of IOL power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery and (2) evaluate the outcomes of toric, multifocal, or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs in these eyes. We excluded review articles, case reports or case studies, and non-English reports. Seventy full-text articles were included in this review. Three categories of methods exist based on whether and how they use historical data acquired before the corneal refractive surgery. The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) postrefractive IOL calculator incorporates many commonly used methods. In eyes with previous myopic LASIK or PRK, hyperopic LASIK or PRK, and RK, 0% to 85%, 38.1% to 71.9%, and 29% to 87.5% of eyes, respectively, showed refractive prediction errors within ±0.5 diopter (D); in eyes with toric IOL implantation that met certain inclusion criteria, 80%, 84%, and 69% of eyes, respectively, achieved postoperative astigmatism of 0.50 D or less. Intraocular lenses with negative spherical aberration (SA) will reduce the positive corneal spherical aberration induced in eyes by myopic LASIK or PRK or by RK. Intraocular lenses with 0 SA on average best match corneal SA in eyes with prior hyperopic LASIK or PRK. Studies have reported excellent outcomes of postrefractive eyes implanted with multifocal or EDOF IOLs; however, corneal topographic enrollment criteria were not specified. Despite availability of new measurement technologies and development of new IOL calculation formulas, further advances are needed to improve outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes that have undergone corneal refractive surgery. Tools like the ASCRS postrefractive IOL calculator are useful for the clinician by incorporating a variety of formulas. Toric, EDOF, and multifocal IOLs may provideexcellent outcomes in selected cases that meet certain corneal topographic criteria.

Corneal Thickness Measurement after Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Corneal Thickness Measurement after Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy

To evaluate the accuracy of 7 intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in patients with previous hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Retrospective case series. Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and private practice, Mesa, Arizona, USA. The 7 formulas evaluated were the adjusted Atlas 0-3, Masket, Modified Masket, Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, Barrett True-K, and Barrett True-K No-History. The Masket and Modified Masket were calculated using the single-K version of Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q formulas; the adjusted Atlas 0-3 was calculated using the double-K version of Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q. The IOL power predicted by each formula was calculated by targeting the postoperative manifest refraction. The IOL prediction error was obtained by subtracting the predicted IOL power from the implanted IOL power. The mean IOL prediction error, median absolute refractive prediction error, and percentages of eyes within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.00 D of the predicted refraction were calculated. Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients were evaluated. There were no significant differences in the median absolute refractive prediction error or percentages of eyes within ±0.50 D or ±1.00 D of the predicted refraction between formulas or methods. The IOL mean prediction errors were comparable between the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q calculations for all formulas except for a greater error for the double-K version of the Hoffer Q of the adjusted Atlas 0-3. In eyes that had hyperopic LASIK or PRK, there were no significant differences in the accuracy between the 7 IOL calculation formulas.

Comparison between Pentacam HR and Orbscan II after Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Purpose:The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between Pentacam HR (Scheimpflug imaging, Oculus) and Orbscan II (scanning slit topography, Bausch and Lomb) in measuring corneal parameters after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for hyperopia.Methods:In this prospective cross-sectional study, 38 hyperopic eyes undergoing PRK were examined before refractive surgery and 8 to 10 months postoperatively using Pentacam HR and Orbscan II. Ultrasound (US) pachymetry was also used to measure central corneal thickness (CCT). The radius of anterior (A-) and posterior (P-) best-fit sphere size (BFS), central elevation (CE), and anterior maximum tangential power in 3 mm (TG3) and 3-5 mm (TG5) zones, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were collected and used in the analyses. To study the agreement between the measurements made by the two devices, the method described by Bland and Altman was used and the 95% limits of agreement were calculated.Results:The 95% limits of agreement show reasonable agreement between the measurements by Pentacam HR and Orbscan II for A-BFS, P-BFS, A-TG3, and CCT, but not for A-CE, P-CE, A-TG5, or ACD. CCT values obtained by both Pentacam HR and Orbscan II correlated well with the values determined by US pachymetry.Conclusion:Pentacam HR and Orbscan II after PRK for hyperopia show reasonable agreement for determining A-BFS, P-BFS, A-TG3, and CCT, but not for A-CE, P-CE, A-TG5, or ACD. CCT measurements with Pentacam HR have reasonable agreement with US pachymetry.

Outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy following laser in situ keratomileusis: a cohort study

ObjectiveTo analyze the outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on residual myopia and hyperopia post–laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to compare these results with PRK on eyes without previous laser refractive surgery. DesignRetrospective comparative cohort study. ParticipantsPatients undergoing PRK between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed. MethodsPatients were divided into 4 groups, myopic or hyperopic PRK post-LASIK (mPRK-PL and hPRK-PL, respectively) and myopic or hyperopic PRK on corneas without previous laser refractive surgery (mPRK and hPRK, respectively). Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), and mean keratometry and aberrations (total, higher order [HOA], coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration) were recorded at months 3 and 6 postoperatively, as were complications and attempted versus achieved MRSE. ResultsThirty-three eyes of 25 patients who underwent PRK post-LASIK (21 eyes of 14 patients for hPRK-PL and 12 eyes of 11 patients for mPRK-PL) and 35 eyes of 21 patients who underwent PRK on virgin eyes (11 eyes of 8 patients for hPRK and 24 eyes of 13 patients for mPRK) were included in the study. The only significant differences in outcomes were found to be HOA at 3 months for hPRK-PL as compared with both hPRK and mPRK. Achieved MRSE was significantly different from expected MRSE for hPRK-PL at 3 months postoperatively. No haze- or flap-related complications were observed. ConclusionOutcomes of PRK were not different in myopic and hyperopic corrections post-LASIK by 6 months or when compared with PRK in virgin eyes. HOA may render hPRK-PL results less predictable early in the postoperative period.

Efficacy of Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy Simultaneously Performed With Phototherapeutic Keratectomy for Decreasing Hyperopic Shift.

To investigate the efficacy of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (HPRK) that was performed simultaneously with phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) with regard to decreasing hyperopic shift. A total of 63 eyes of 47 consecutive patients with granular corneal dystrophy (GCD) or band-shaped keratopathy (BSK) underwent PTK or PTK + HPRK. PTK alone was performed in 40 eyes (20 GCD and 20 BSK), and PTK + HPRK was performed in 23 eyes (15 GCD and 8 BSK). All patients underwent examinations including uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, refractometry, and keratometry before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after PTK. Medical charts were reviewed retrospectively. Superficial corneal opacity was successfully removed from all eyes, and uneventful reepithelialization was completed within 7 days after PTK or PTK + HPRK. The average uncorrected distance visual acuity was significantly better in the PTK + HPRK group than in the PTK group preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The corrected distance visual acuities were similar in both groups preoperatively and postoperatively. The hyperopic change in the PTK group was approximately 1.5 diopters, and that in the PTK + HPRK group was almost zero. There were significant differences in the average changes of the spherical equivalent from preoperation between the PTK and PTK + HPRK groups at all postoperative time points. Simultaneous performance of PTK and HPRK can effectively reduce hyperopic shift after PTK and is as safe as PTK alone. It is recommended that HPRK be added to PTK to treat eyes in which hyperopic shift is undesirable.

Eighteen-year follow-up of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy

To investigate the long-term efficacy of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). University Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Prospective case series. Patients with a follow-up of 18 years ± 0.7 (SD) attended for examination. All had spherical corrections with a 6.5 mm optical zone and 1.5 mm blend zone. Twenty-five patients (45 eyes) were included. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error was +4.11 ± 1.8 diopters (D) (range +1.125 to +7.25 D). Between 1 year and 18 years, in eyes that had no cataract surgery (n = 34), there was a +1.14 ± 1.48 D increase in the mean SE (P < .0002). The increase between 7.5 years and 18.0 years did not reach clinical significance (P = .1). Uncorrected distance visual acuity improved at 18 years (P < .02). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was reduced (P < .001). The efficacy index was 0.47, and the safety index was 0.83. Six eyes (18%) lost 2 lines of CDVA, of which 4 eyes had preexisting cataract. Keratometry remained stable between 1 year and 18 years (P = .2). Forty percent still had traces of peripheral haze, and 4 (9%) had Salzmann-like changes. Eleven eyes (24%) had cataract surgery and 4 (9%) had laser iridotomy. There was no evidence of ectasia. Hyperopic PRK showed an increase in hyperopic SE between 1.0 year and 7.5 years but was generally stable thereafter. The efficacy was limited. Peripheral haze was evident in 40% of cases with Salzmann-like changes in some. Ocular comorbidity in relationship to cataract was common and reduced CDVA. Dr. Marshall was a consultant to Summit Technology, Inc. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Factors that Influence Intraocular Pressure Changes after Myopic and Hyperopic LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Large Population Study

To describe the factors that influence the measured intraocular pressure (IOP) change and to develop a predictive model after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in a large population. Retrospective, observational case series. Patients undergoing primary PRK or LASIK with a refractive target of emmetropia between January 1, 2008, and October 5, 2011. The Optical Express database was queried for all subjects. Data were extracted on procedure specifics, preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT), IOP (using noncontact tonometry), manifest refraction, average keratometry, age, gender, and postoperative IOP at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. A linear mixed methods model was used for data analysis. Change in IOP from preoperatively to 1 month postoperatively. A total of 174 666 eyes of 91 204 patients were analyzed. Hyperopic corrections experienced a smaller IOP decrease than myopic corrections for both PRK and LASIK (P<0.0001). Patients who underwent LASIK had a 0.94 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.98) greater IOP decrease than patients who underwent PRK (P<0.0001), reflecting the effect of the lamellar flap. The decrease in IOP was linearly related to preoperative manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) for myopic PRK and LASIK (P<0.0001), weakly correlated with preoperative MSE after hyperopic LASIK, and not related to preoperative MSE after hyperopic PRK. The single greatest predictor of IOP change was preoperative IOP across all corrections. By using the available data, a model was constructed to predict postoperative IOP change at 1 month; this was able to explain 42% of the IOP change after myopic LASIK, 34% of the change after myopic PRK, 25% of the change after hyperopic LASIK, and 16% of the change after hyperopic PRK. Myopic procedures lower measured IOP more than hyperopic procedures; this decrease was proportional to the amount of refractive error corrected. Independent of the refractive correction, the creation of the lamellar LASIK flap decreased measured IOP by 0.94 mmHg. A best-fit model for IOP change was developed that may allow better interpretation of post-laser vision correction IOP values.

Axial Eye Length Evaluation Before and After Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy

To test the accuracy of a new device (IOL Master; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) in detecting axial eye length changes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).Pre- and postoperative (1, 3, and 6 months) subjective refraction and axial eye length measurements were performed in 184 consecutive eyes that underwent PRK with the Nidek EC5000 excimer laser (Nidek Technologies, Gamagori, Japan) to treat refractive errors from +0.25 to -16.25 diopters (D) (mean: -5.12 +/- 3.01 D).The axial eye length measurements ranged from 22.51 to 31.32 mm (mean: 25.61 +/- 1.47 mm) before PRK; from 22.39 to 31.10 mm (mean: 25.48 +/- 1.43 mm) 1 month after PRK; from 23.17 to 31.14 mm (mean: 25.61 +/- 1.36 mm) 3 months after PRK; and from 23.36 to 29.68 mm (mean: 25.58 +/- 1.35 mm) 6 months after PRK. Preoperative and 1-month postoperative data showed a statistically significant difference (P<.001), whereas no significant difference was found between 1 and 3 months (P=.0137) or 3 and 6 months (P=.2422).The IOL Master showed a decrease in the axial eye length measurement larger than the theoretical ablation depth and the difference increased as the correction became higher.

Near Visual Acuity Following Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy in a Presbyopic Age Group

Purpose. To assess near visual acuity in a presbyopic age group following hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Setting. Private practice in Siena, Italy. Methods. In this retrospective single-surgeon comparative study, PRK with mitomycin C was performed to correct hyperopia using Bausch & Lomb 217z laser for 120 eyes of 60 patients in the presbyopic age group (mean spherical equivalent SE +2.38 D ± 0.71 D and mean age 52 ± 5.09). 120 eyes of 60 age-matched controls (mean age 54 ± 5.09) had their unaided near vision measured. Results. At 12 months mean SE was −0.10 D ± 0.27 D in the PRK group. Mean best corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.005 ± 0.022 log MAR; 2 eyes lost ≥0.1 log MAR. Mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.04 ± 0.077 log MAR. Mean distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) in the PRK group was J3.73 ± 1.06. This was statistically better (P < 0.05) than the mean unaided near visual acuity in the control group J4.07 ± 1.08. Conclusion. PRK was found to be safe, predictable, and an effective way of correcting hyperopia in this age group. It was also found to give better than expected near vision.

The Effect of Corneal Wavefront Aberrations on Corneal Pseudoaccommodation

To determine the effect on corneal pseudoaccommodation of anterior corneal wavefront aberrations in normal corneas and corneas with prior myopic or hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Theoretical study. In 220 normal eyes, 102 myopic-PRK eyes, and 106 hyperopic-LASIK/PRK eyes, anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs, third to sixth order, 6- and 4-mm pupils) were computed from the Atlas corneal elevation data using the VOL-CT program. Using the ZernikeTool, corneal optical image quality was evaluated by the polychromatic modulation transfer function with Stiles-Crawford effect. Defocus from -3.0 diopters (D) to +3.0 D was added to corneal HOAs, and depth of focus was defined as the ranges over which the polychromatic modulation transfer function maintains 80% of the peak value (DOF80) and 50% of the peak value (DOF50). The depth of focus values between groups were compared, stepwise multiple regression was used to assess if any Zernike terms significantly contributed to the depth of focus, and correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between depth of focus and corneal HOAs. The depth of focus varied widely between corneas, especially in corneas with prior hyperopic-LASIK/PRK. For 6-mm pupil, mean depth of focus values in myopic-PRK and hyperopic-LASIK/PRK corneas were significantly greater than those for normal corneas, and for 4-mm pupil, depth of focus values in hyperopic-LASIK/PRK corneas were greater than those in normal and myopic-PRK corneas. Zernike terms significantly contributing to both DOF80 and DOF50 were fourth- and sixth-order spherical aberration and fourth- and sixth-order astigmatism in normal corneas, third-order vertical coma and fourth-order tetrafoil in myopic-PRK corneas, and third-order vertical coma and fourth-order astigmatism in hyperopic-LASIK/PRK corneas. Depth of focus had weak to moderate positive correlation with HOAs (Pearson correlation coefficient r ranged from 0.300 to 0.583). These theoretical calculations suggest that certain corneal wavefront aberrations affect corneal pseudoaccommodation. To predict corneal pseudoaccommodation, the most important Zernike term is spherical aberration in normal eyes and coma in eyes with prior laser corneal surgery.

Aggressive Pterygium Growth and Corneal Scarring After Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy

To describe a patient who noticed a corneal growth and accompanying rapid decrease in visual acuity soon after undergoing hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Interventional case report. A healthy 47-year-old white woman presented with a corneal growth after undergoing PRK. Visual acuity became progressively worse over 2 years. The growth transected the visual axis, measuring 180 μm centrally and 310 μm nasally. She underwent excisional biopsy, application of mitomycin C on the limbus and adjacent corneal tissue, and grafting with cryopreserved multilayer amniotic membrane. The pathologist reported findings consistent with pterygium. The patient initially experienced improvement in uncorrected visual acuity but then became noncompliant with topical steroids. The central anterior stroma became opacified to the extent of obscuring iris details. Best-corrected visual acuity at the last follow-up was 20/30. Because ultraviolet exposure is a risk factor for development and growth of pterygium, 1 possible explanation for this patient's findings is the effect of the excimer laser (which has a wavelength in the ultraviolet spectrum) on a previously insignificant corneal growth and/or the corneal limbal stem cells. Patients with corneal lesions suggestive of pterygia may be at increased risk for rapid lesion growth and aggressive corneal scarring after photorefractive keratectomy with a large ablation zone.

Reliability of the IOLMaster in Measuring Corneal Power Changes After Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy

To test the accuracy of the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec) in detecting corneal power changes after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Forty-five consecutive eyes that underwent hyperopic PRK with the SCHWIND ESIRIS excimer laser, ranging from +0.75 to +7.00 diopters (D) (mean: +3.84±1.56 D), were analyzed. Data included pre- and postoperative (1, 3, and 6 months) fogging refraction and automated keratometry (K). Statistical analysis was performed to determine the correlation between the changes in refraction at the corneal plane and the changes in keratometry. The mean difference between the changes in refraction and the measured corneal changes was +0.27±1.19 D (range: -1.91 to +4.28 D) (P=.18) at 1 month; +0.56±0.97 D (range: -1.00 to +2.96 D) (P=.006) at 3 months; and +0.67±0.80 D (range: -0.73 to +2.31 D) (P=.00002) at 6 months. Based on these results, we suggest using the regression formula found at 6-month follow-up (y=0.8074 x + 0.092) to better calculate the effective corneal power. Comparison between the data obtained with IOLMaster measurements and equivalent K readings from the Holladay report obtained with the Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) shows good agreement (R(2)=0.9). Automated keratometry provided by the IOLMaster underestimates the effective refractive changes after hyperopic PRK, and a correcting factor is needed to calculate the corneal power in these cases.

Mitomycin-C in hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy

To evaluate the effects of topical mitomycin-C (MMC) after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Private practice, Siena, Italy. In this prospective study, a sponge with 0.2 mg/mL MMC or balanced salt solution (controls) was placed on the stroma for 45 seconds after PRK performed using a Technolas 217z laser. After epithelialization, fluorometholone 0.1% eyedrops were used for 4 months in both groups. The MMC group comprised 88 eyes (mean spherical equivalent [SE] +3.51 diopters [D] +/- 1.04) and the control group, 91 eyes (mean SE +3.50 +/- 1.03 D). At 18 months, the mean SE was -0.10 +/- 0.37 D and 0.22 +/- 0.70 D, respectively, and the mean defocus equivalent, 0.34 +/- 0.32 D and 0.69 +/- 0.74 D, respectively (both P<.05). The mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.06 +/- 0.08 logMAR in the MMC group and 0.08 +/- 0.10 logMAR in the control group; 2 eyes and 11 eyes, respectively, lost more than 0.1 logMAR of BSCVA. The mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.13 +/- 0.11 logMAR in the MMC group and 0.21 +/- 0.20 logMAR in the control group (P<.05). The UCVA was better than 20/40 in 94% of eyes and 80% of eyes, respectively. The efficacy index was 0.87 and 0.67, respectively. Haze at 18 months was 0.05 +/- 0.11 in the MMC group and 0.23 +/- 0.46 in the control group (P<.05). No endothelial damage was observed in either group. Mitomycin-C prevented haze formation and improved predictability and efficacy. No adverse effects occurred.

Multilayer amniotic membrane transplantation for bacterial keratitis with corneal perforation after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy: Case report and literature review

We report a case of corneal infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) that produced severe corneal melting, ulceration, and multiple perforations. Treatment included antibiogram-based antibiotic topical therapy and multilayer amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) performed to seal the perforations and restore the globe integrity. Clinical and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (Visante OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec) examinations documented progressive integration of the amniotic membrane tissues within the cornea, stromal and epithelial healing, and recovery of a stable and regular anterior chamber. The cornea healed with an avascular leucoma; the best corrected visual acuity was reduced to 20/200. Severe pneumococcal ulcerative perforation is a potential complication of PRK. Penetrating keratoplasty, at high risk for failure in the acute settings of an infected and inflamed eye, can be delayed until the cornea is healed. Amniotic membrane transplantation may be an alternative surgical option to achieve this goal.

Photorefractive keratectomy in the cat eye: Biological and optical outcomes

To quantify optical and biomechanical properties of the feline cornea before and after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and assess the relative contribution of different biological factors to refractive outcome. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA. Adult cats had 6.0 diopter (D) myopic or 4.0 D hyperopic PRK over 6.0 or 8.0 mm optical zones (OZ). Preoperative and postoperative wavefront aberrations were measured, as were intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal hysteresis, the corneal resistance factor, axial length, corneal thickness, and radii of curvature. Finally, postmortem immunohistochemistry for vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin was performed. Photorefractive keratectomy changed ocular defocus, increased higher-order aberrations, and induced myofibroblast differentiation in cats. However, the intended defocus corrections were only achieved with 8.0 mm OZs. Long-term flattening of the epithelial and stromal surfaces was noted after myopic, but not after hyperopic, PRK. The IOP was unaltered by PRK; however, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor decreased. Over the ensuing 6 months, ocular aberrations and the IOP remained stable, while central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, and the corneal resistance factor increased toward normal levels. Cat corneas exhibited optical, histological, and biomechanical reactions to PRK that resembled those previously described in humans, especially when the OZ size was normalized to the total corneal area. However, cats exhibited significant stromal regeneration, causing a return to preoperative corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor without significant regression of optical changes induced by the surgery. Thus, the principal effects of laser refractive surgery on ocular wavefront aberrations can be achieved despite clear interspecies differences in corneal biology.

Enhancement outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis using topographically guided excimer laser photoablation

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topographically guided excimer laser photoablation to retreat unsuccessful myopic and hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Eye Clinic, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy. At least 3 months after primary PRK (Group A) or primary LASIK (Group B), 48 eyes of 42 patients were submitted to PRK or LASIK enhancements. The eyes were treated with an excimer laser linked to a computerized videokeratography unit with a topographically supported customized ablation workstation. The mean follow-up was 27.8 months +/- 8.2 (SD). In Group A, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) changed from 0.5 +/- 0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range 20/600 to 20/200) to 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/60 to 20/20); the mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) changed from 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/50 to 20/20) to 0 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/50 to 20/20) after the enhancement. In Group B, the UCVA changed from 0.7 +/- 0.8 logMAR (range 20/600 to 20/40) to 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/40 to 20/20); the mean BSCVA improved from 0.2 +/- 0.8 logMAR (range 20/30 to 20/20) to 0 +/- 1.3 logMAR (range 20/25 to 20/20) after surgery. The enhancements using topographically guided excimer laser photoablation with a topographically supported customized ablation method resulted in satisfactory and stable visual outcome with good safety and efficacy after unsuccessful PRK and LASIK.

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia: 7.5-year follow-up

To report the results of a long-term prospective study to evaluate refractive stability and safety of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (H-PRK). Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Twenty-one patients (49%) (40 eyes) of cohort of 43 patients who participated in 1 of the first clinical trials of H-PRK were assessed at a mean follow-up of 90.7 months (range 62 to 106 months). The H-PRK was performed using a Summit Technology Apex Plus Excimer laser (Summit Technology, Inc.). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was +4.70 diopters (D) (range +2.00 to +7.50 D). Patients were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups based on their preoperative refraction and received 1 of the following spherical corrections: +1.50 D, +3.00 D, +4.50 D, or +6.00 D. At 7.5 years, the refractive correction remained stable with a mean difference in SEQ between 1 year and 7.5 years of +0.28 D. The mean manifest SEQ was +0.83 D (range +5.00 to -3.00 D). Sixty-seven percent of eyes having corrections of +1.50 D and +3.00 D were within +/-1.00 D of the predicted correction. Predictability was poorer with +4.50 D and +6.00 D corrections, with 40% of eyes within +/-1.00 D of that expected. An improvement in uncorrected near acuity was achieved in 35 eyes (87.5%), and 35 eyes (87.5%) showed an improvement in uncorrected distance acuity from preoperative levels. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was unchanged or improved from preoperative values in 25 eyes (62.5%). Three eyes (8%) lost 2 lines of Snellen BSCVA, which in 2 cases was attributable to cataract formation. A peripheral ring of haze, 6.5 mm in diameter, appeared in most eyes. Its intensity was greatest at 6 months and then diminished with time. In 10 eyes (25%), remnants of the haze ring were evident at 7.5 years and subepithelial iron rings, 6.5 mm in diameter were evident in 26 eyes (70%). No patient complained of night-vision problems and no eye developed ectasia. In H-PRK, refractive stability achieved at 1 year was maintained up to 7.5 years with no evidence of hyperopic shift, diurnal fluctuation, or late regression. Peripheral corneal haze decreased with time but was still evident in a number of eyes at the last follow-up visit.