Human U6 snRNA Genes Research Articles

Regulation of Human RNA Polymerase III Transcription by DNMT1 and DNMT3a DNA Methyltransferases

The human small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and small cytoplasmic RNA (scRNA) gene families encode diverse non-coding RNAs that influence cellular growth and division. Many snRNA and scRNA genes are related via their compact and yet powerful promoters that support RNA polymerase III transcription. We have utilized the human U6 snRNA gene family to examine the mechanism for regulated transcription of these potent transcription units. Analysis of nine U6 family members showed enriched CpG density within the promoters of actively transcribed loci relative to inert genes, implying a relationship between gene potency and DNA methylation. Indeed, both pharmacological inhibition of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity and the forced diminution of DNMT-1, DNMT-3a, and DNMT-3b by siRNA targeting resulted in increased U6 levels in asynchronously growing MCF7 adenocarcinoma cells. In vitro transcription assays further showed that template methylation impedes U6 transcription by RNA polymerase III. Both DNMT-1 and DNMT-3a were detected at the U6-1 locus by chromatin immunoprecipitation directly linking these factors to RNA polymerase III regulation. Despite this association, the endogenous U6-1 locus was not substantially methylated in actively growing cells. However, both DNMT occupancy and low frequency methylation were correlated with increased Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) expression, suggesting that the RB status can influence specific epigenetic marks.

Cooperation between Small Nuclear RNA-activating Protein Complex (SNAPC) and TATA-box-binding Protein Antagonizes Protein Kinase CK2 Inhibition of DNA Binding by SNAPC

Protein kinase CK2 regulates RNA polymerase III transcription of human U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes both negatively and positively depending upon whether the general transcription machinery or RNA polymerase III is preferentially phosphorylated. Human U1 snRNA genes share similar promoter architectures as that of U6 genes but are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. Herein, we report that CK2 inhibits U1 snRNA gene transcription by RNA polymerase II. Decreased levels of endogenous CK2 correlates with increased U1 expression, whereas CK2 associates with U1 gene promoters, indicating that it plays a direct role in U1 gene regulation. CK2 phosphorylates the general transcription factor small nuclear RNA-activating protein complex (SNAP(C)) that is required for both RNA polymerase II and III transcription, and SNAP(C) phosphorylation inhibits binding to snRNA gene promoters. However, restricted promoter access by phosphorylated SNAP(C) can be overcome by cooperative interactions with TATA-box-binding protein at a U6 promoter but not at a U1 promoter. Thus, CK2 may have the capacity to differentially regulate U1 and U6 transcription even though SNAP(C) is universally utilized for human snRNA gene transcription.

Usage of Putative Chicken U6 Promoters for Vector-Based RNA Interference

Gene silencing with short interfering RNA (siRNA) expression vectors is a powerful method for the analysis of gene functions. For the expression of siRNA in mammalian cells, mammalian U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) promoters are widely used. However, the mammalian U6 promoter might not function well in other species. In this study, we cloned four putative chicken U6 promoters by PCR and analyzed their functions. First, we screened the chicken genomic database using the human U6 snRNA gene and identified four candidate sequences. The sequences contained some control elements in their promoter regions, but as we could not rule out that they were pseudogenes, we amplified these sequences and used them as promoters for short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression. Using the firefly luciferase (Luc) gene as a target, transient expression assays were performed with chicken ovary-derived cells. All four putative chicken U6 promoters exhibited suppressive activity toward Luc, and so could act as a promoter for expression of the snRNA gene in the chicken genome. The promoter activity was not as strong as that of a commercially available siRNA expression vector. This probably reflects artificial sequences between the promoters and synthetic DNA encoding shRNA.

Distinct mechanisms for repression of RNA polymerase III transcription by the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein.

The retinoblastoma (RB) protein represses global RNA polymerase III transcription of genes that encode nontranslated RNAs, potentially to control cell growth. However, RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes exhibit diverse promoter structures and factor requirements for transcription, and a universal mechanism explaining global repression is uncertain. We show that RB represses different classes of RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes via distinct mechanisms. Repression of human U6 snRNA (class 3) gene transcription occurs through stable promoter occupancy by RB, whereas repression of adenovirus VAI (class 2) gene transcription occurs in the absence of detectable RB-promoter association. Endogenous RB binds to a human U6 snRNA gene in both normal and cancer cells that maintain functional RB but not in HeLa cells whose RB function is disrupted by the papillomavirus E7 protein. Both U6 promoter association and transcriptional repression require the A/B pocket domain and C region of RB. These regions of RB contribute to U6 promoter targeting through numerous interactions with components of the U6 general transcription machinery, including SNAP(C) and TFIIIB. Importantly, RB also concurrently occupies a U6 promoter with RNA polymerase III during repression. These observations suggest a novel mechanism for RB function wherein RB can repress U6 transcription at critical steps subsequent to RNA polymerase III recruitment.

The Small Nuclear RNA-activating Protein 190 Myb DNA Binding Domain Stimulates TATA Box-binding Protein-TATA Box Recognition

Human U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) gene transcription by RNA polymerase III requires cooperative promoter binding involving the snRNA-activating protein complex (SNAP(c)) and the TATA-box binding protein (TBP). To investigate the role of SNAP(c) for TBP function at U6 promoters, TBP recruitment assays were performed using full-length TBP and a mini-SNAP(c) containing SNAP43, SNAP50, and a truncated SNAP190. Mini-SNAP(c) efficiently recruits TBP to the U6 TATA box, and two SNAP(c) subunits, SNAP43 and SNAP190, directly interact with the TBP DNA binding domain. Truncated SNAP190 containing only the Myb DNA binding domain is sufficient for TBP recruitment to the TATA box. Therefore, the SNAP190 Myb domain functions both to specifically recognize the proximal sequence element present in the core promoters of human snRNA genes and to stimulate TBP recognition of the neighboring TATA box present in human U6 snRNA promoters. The SNAP190 Myb domain also stimulates complex assembly with TBP and Brf2, a subunit of a snRNA-specific TFIIIB complex. Thus, interactions between the DNA binding domains of SNAP190 and TBP at juxtaposed promoter elements define the assembly of a RNA polymerase III-specific preinitiation complex.

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein targets distinct general transcription factors to regulate RNA polymerase III gene expression.

The retinoblastoma protein (RB) represses RNA polymerase III transcription effectively both in vivo and in vitro. Here we demonstrate that the general transcription factors snRNA-activating protein complex (SNAP(c)) and TATA binding protein (TBP) are important for RB repression of human U6 snRNA gene transcription by RNA polymerase III. RB is associated with SNAP(c) as detected by both coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous RB with SNAP(c) and cofractionation of RB and SNAP(c) during chromatographic purification. RB also interacts with two SNAP(c) subunits, SNAP43 and SNAP50. TBP or a combination of TBP and SNAP(c) restores efficient U6 transcription from RB-treated extracts, indicating that TBP is also involved in RB regulation. In contrast, the TBP-containing complex TFIIIB restores adenovirus VAI but not human U6 transcription in RB-treated extracts, suggesting that TFIIIB is important for RB regulation of tRNA-like genes. These results suggest that different classes of RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes have distinct general transcription factor requirements for repression by RB.

Maximization of Selenocysteine tRNA and U6 Small Nuclear RNA Transcriptional Activation Achieved by Flexible Utilization of a Staf Zinc Finger

Transcriptional activators Staf and Oct-1 play critical roles in the activation of small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and snRNA-type gene transcription. Recently, we established that Staf binding to the human U6 snRNA (hU6) and Xenopus selenocysteine tRNA (xtRNA(Sec)) genes requires different sets of the seven C2-H2 zinc fingers. In this work, using a combination of oocyte microinjection, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and missing nucleoside experiments with wild-type and mutant promoters, we demonstrate that the hU6 gene requires zinc fingers 2-7 for Staf binding and Oct-1 for maximal transcriptional activity. In contrast, the xtRNA(Sec) gene needs the binding of the seven Staf zinc fingers, but not Oct-1, for optimal transcriptional capacity. Mutation in the binding site for Staf zinc finger 1 in the tRNA(Sec) promoter reduced both Staf binding and transcriptional activity. Conversely, introduction of a zinc finger 1 binding site in the hU6 promoter increased Staf binding but interfered with the simultaneous Staf and Oct-1 binding, thus reducing transcriptional activity. Collectively, these results show that the differential utilization of Staf zinc finger 1 represents a new, critical determinant of the transcriptional activation mechanism for the Xenopus tRNA(Sec) and human U6 snRNA genes.

The distal elements, OCT and SPH, stimulate the formation of preinitiation complexes on a human U6 snRNA gene promoter in vitro.

The distal control region of a human U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) gene promoter contains two separable elements, octamer (OCT) and SPH, found in many vertebrate snRNA genes. Complete distal regions generally account for a 4- to 100-fold stimulation of snRNA gene promoters. We examined the mechanism of transcriptional stimulation by each element when linked to the proximal U6 promoter. Multimers of either OCT or SPH did not increase transcriptional levels above that with a single copy, either in transfected human cells or after in vitro transcription in a HeLa S100 extract. The orientation of a single SPH element differentially stimulated transcription in transfected cells, whereas the orientation of an octamer element was not important. Using Sarkosyl to limit transcription to a single-round, we concluded that promoters containing either OCT or SPH elements supported an increased number of preinitiation complexes in vitro. Furthermore, the rate of formation of U6 promoter preinitiation complexes resistant to low (0.015%) concentrations of Sarkosyl was accelerated on templates containing either OCT or SPH. However, neither element had a significant effect on the number of rounds of reinitiation in the S100 extract.

TFIID is required for in vitro transcription of the human U6 gene by RNA polymerase III.

We present evidence that transcription factor TFIID, known for its central role in transcription by RNA polymerase II, is also involved in RNA polymerase III transcription of the human U6 snRNA gene. Recombinant human TFIID, expressed either via a vaccinia virus vector in HeLa cells or in Escherichia coli, affects U6 transcription in three different in vitro assays. First, TFIID-containing fractions stimulate U6 transcription in reactions containing rate-limiting amounts of HeLa nuclear extract. Second, TFIID addition relieves transcriptional exclusion between two competing U6 templates. Third, TFIID can replace one of two heat labile fractions essential for U6 transcription. Thus, at least one basal transcription factor is involved in transcription by two different RNA polymerases.