Adeimantus, I said, you and i are not up moment; we're a community. Plato, Republic, Book II IN PLATO'S CAVE, as we know, representation was already a problem and troping of representation--art--even more so. The distortions produced by written words occasioned danger and potential a particular concern in establishment of a well-regulated where at least for general rank and file, obedience to those in authority and establishing one's authority over pleasures of drink, sex, and were paramount (Republic Book III). In Canada since R. v. Sharpe and R. v. Malmo-Levine we appear to be less concerned with drink and food and more with sex and drugs but concern with representation remains and I suspect that Plato would feel right home. In this paper I want to consider some of things that happen when Court thinks about up stories, especially when artistic merit of those is issue, and what happens when Court thinks about harm and public in context of art. I am going to suggest that in this hall of interpretive mirrors, art runs a great risk of going up in smoke just as individual freedom recently did in Malmo-Levine. Given that Court has maintained that in certain contexts perceiver, perceived and maker are all liable, I am also going to maintain that teachers have a vested interest in this debate and should prepare accordingly. But let's return to Plato briefly while bearing in mind that this inter-disciplinary approach situates law in context of theory ancient and modern rather than undertaking rigourous analysis of precedent and rigourous distinction between obscenity and child pornography which a longer paper and conventions of legal scholarship would require. Sex, Lies, Plato, Aristotle For Plato, rhapsode's gift was inseparable from underworld of Orphic cults, Dionysian frenzies, and, as we would say now, sex and drugs. The requirement that art depict and serve the was corollary of rejection of art produced by possessed or crazed hysterics disseminating their misleading and seductive messages so harmful to young and vulnerable. In Ion, rhapsode is mocked as an ignorant singer of Homeric verses, devoid of social responsibility and intellectual acumen, inciting equally ignorant and misguided to delusion and potential riot. The poet, as a well-known passage from Republic puts it, disseminates artistic lies which have no redeeming value and must be banned since if young men of our community hear this kind of thing and take it seriously, rather than regarding it as despicable and absurd, they're hardly going to regard such behavior as despicable in human beings like themselves and feel remorse when they also find themselves saying or doing these or similar things. (Republic Book III) Under these circumstances, making up stories becomes serious business indeed, fraught with anxiety and obsessed with production of good use of language, harmony, grace and rhythm [which] all depend on goodness of character (Republic Book III), Goodness becomes entry ticket for art into republic and only context in which making up stories can be justified. Where, as Luce Irigaray puts it, [r]e-semblance is she law, founding a re quires elimination of any further levels of distortion (149-50). Aristotle's response in Poetics is to undertake a redaction of rhetorical analysis, formalizing Plato's delusion as catharsis, embedding transformation center of his process theory of artistic production while developing an understanding of mimesis as fundamental to art. Poetry is invention, constructed of tropes and figures, governed by decorum, expressive of plot, theme, and emotion. From this point on into Middle Ages, Aristotelian rhetoric develops into a taxonomically complex but conceptually elegant hermeneutics well adapted to both theological and jurisprudential articulations. …
Read full abstract