You have accessJournal of UrologyMale Voiding Dysfunction (BPH & Incontinence), Oncology & Prostate Cancer1 Apr 2011V371 INTRAOPERATIVE URODYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS IN BULBOURETHRAL SLING SURGERY FOR POST PROSTATECTOMY INCONTINENCE Marcus Horstmann, Christian Padevit, Christoph Schwab, Christian Vollmer, Isabelle Rauter, Kevin Horton, and Hubert John Marcus HorstmannMarcus Horstmann Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author , Christian PadevitChristian Padevit Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author , Christoph SchwabChristoph Schwab Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author , Christian VollmerChristian Vollmer Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author , Isabelle RauterIsabelle Rauter Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author , Kevin HortonKevin Horton Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author , and Hubert JohnHubert John Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.458AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Incontinence after prostatectomy remains a frustrating problem with a significant negative impact on quality of life. One possible option for moderate to severe incontinence is the implantation of a retropubic implant system, the bulbourethral suspension (J. Urology 171: 1866-70, 2004 and UROLOGY 71: 1191-5, 2008). This video demonstrates the improved technique with focus on intraoperative urodynamic measurements for optimal sling tension adjustment. METHODS The patient is first placed in a modified lithotomy position. A vertical perineal midline incision is performed to expose the bulbar urethra in a lithotomy position. The implant is positioned around the bulbar urethra and both ends of the sling are brought up strictly retropubically, lateral to the bladder neck to suprapubic skin incisions through two curved hollow needles. Bladder perforation is further excluded by 70° cystoscopy. Under general anaesthesia without relaxation sling tension is stepwise increased until an antegrade opening pressure of 60–65 cmH20 is reached. These measurements are repeated at least three times. Once a stable antegrade urethral opening pressure measurement is reached the polypropylene ends are tied off. Finally urethral pressure profile is repeatedly measured before and after sling implantation for further evaluation. The perineal and suprapubic incision lines are closed by interrupted sutures. A Foley bladder catheter is placed for 3 days. Antibiotics are stopped after bladder catheter removal. RESULTS With the use of intraoperative urodynamics the antegrade opening pressure was successfully increased to 65 cmH20. The urethral pressure profile revealed an increased functional length without an increase of the maximal urethral pressure. CONCLUSIONS The use of intraoperative urodynamics allows us to precisely determine the antegrade opening pressure and consequently reach urinary continence in most patients. Postoperative manipulations to adjust the sling tension can be avoided. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e151 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Marcus Horstmann Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author Christian Padevit Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author Christoph Schwab Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author Christian Vollmer Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author Isabelle Rauter Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author Kevin Horton Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author Hubert John Winterthur, Switzerland More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract