High-volume Arthroplasty Surgeons Research Articles

The rate and management of prosthetic joint infection in the low-income setting: a cross-sectional study.

Using data from the ECAR, for over 10 years, and surveying six high-volume arthroplasty surgeons, we reviewed the infection rate, common organisms, antibiotics used, and how the revision surgeries were done. The total number of patients included in this study was 210 infection cases out of 5216 THA and TKA. Out of the 5216 joint replacement surgeries, the rate of all infections in THA and TKA was 4.03% (4.73 and 2.94%, respectively). The rate of infections requiring staged revision surgeries was 2.24 and 1.71% (2.03% in total) in the THA and TKA groups, respectively. The most encountered organism was Staphylococcus aureus. The common antibiotics used were vancomycin and a combination of cefoperazone and sulbactam. From this study, we conclude that THA was associated with a higher rate of PJI, surgeons' use of antibiotics for a relatively long period, and the rate of PJI in our setting is relatively higher than what is reported in developed countries but lower in other low-income settings. We believe that with improved operating theater design and infection control education, infection rates will decrease significantly. Finally, we acknowledge the need for a national arthroplasty registry that can help in documentation and improving patient outcomes.

Perception of Perioperative Risk for Arthroplasty Patients: A Poll of Australian Orthopedic Surgeons

BackgroundThere is growing interest in the perioperative management of patients who have indications for hip and knee arthroplasty in the setting of modifiable risk factors such as morbid obesity, poorly controlled diabetes, and smoking. A recent survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) found that 95% of respondents address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery. The aim of this study was to poll Australian arthroplasty surgeons regarding their approach to patients who have modifiable risk factors. MethodsThe survey tool used in the AAHKS study was adapted for use in the Australian context and distributed to the membership of the Arthroplasty Society of Australia via SurveyMonkey. There were 77 responses received, representing a response rate of 64%. ResultsThe majority of respondents were experienced, high volume arthroplasty surgeons. Overall, 91% of respondents restricted access to arthroplasty for patients who have modifiable risk factors. There were 72% restricting access for excessive body mass index, 85% for poor diabetic control, and 46% for smoking. Most respondents made decisions based on personal experience or literature review rather than hospital or departmental pressures. While 49% of surgeons believed that current payment systems did not impair their ability to achieve good outcomes, 58% believed that certain arthroplasty patients would benefit from additional intervention, based on their socioeconomic status. ConclusionOver 90% of surgeons who responded address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery. This finding aligns with the practice patterns of AAHKS members, despite differences in healthcare systems.

PERCEPTION OF PERIOPERATIVE RISK FOR ARTHROPLASTY PATIENTS: A POLL OF AUSTRALIAN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS

There is growing interest in the peri-operative management of patients with indications for hip and knee arthroplasty in the setting of modifiable risk factors such as morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and smoking. A recent survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) found that 95% of respondents address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery. The aim of this study was to poll Australian arthroplasty surgeons regarding their approach to patients with modifiable risk factors.The survey tool used in the AAHKS study was adapted for use in the Australian context and distributed to the membership of the Arthroplasty Society of Australia via Survey Monkey.Seventy-seven survey responses were received, representing a response rate of 64%. The majority of respondents were experienced, high volume arthroplasty surgeons. Overall, 91% of respondents restricted access to arthroplasty for patients with modifiable risk factors. Seventy-two percent of surgeons restricted access for excessive body mass index, 85% for poor diabetic control, and 46% for smoking. Most respondents made decisions based on personal experience or literature review rather than hospital or departmental pressures.Despite differences in healthcare systems, our findings were similar to those of the AAHKS survey, although their responses were more restrictive in all domains. Differences were noted in responses concerning financial considerations for potentially underprivileged populations. The survey is currently being administered by arthroplasty societies in six other countries, allowing comparison of orthopaedic practice across different healthcare systems around the world.In conclusion, over 90% of Australian arthroplasty surgeons who responded to the survey address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery.

Customized Individually-Made and Conventional Total Knee Implants are associated with Similar Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background Customized individually-made (CIM) implants aim to reproduce knee kinematics by restoring patient-specific anatomy. There is sparse data comparing outcomes of CIM implants with conventional implants. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with CIM versus off-the-shelf (OTS) implants. Methods We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes of 123 CIM TKAs with 282 concurrent, matched OTS TKAs performed at a single academic medical center by two high-volume arthroplasty surgeons. All CIM TKA were included. Perioperative outcomes evaluated included hospital length-of-stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year. Student’s t-tests were used for continuous variables, and chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables. Results Baseline demographics were statistically similar between groups. CIM Baseline WOMAC Pain and Physical Function scores were statistically, but not clinically, better. There were no differences in LOS (CIM 2.19d vs. OTS 2.35d; p=0.30) or proportion discharged home (78.7% vs. 83.5%, p=0.26). There were no differences in WOMAC subscores or the KSS Functional Score at 3-month and 1-year follow-up. The CIM cohort had a statistically significant, but not clinically significant, higher KSS-Function score at 1-year (79.4 vs. 72.6, p=0.02), but the change from preoperative baseline was not significant between groups. Conclusions Compared to traditional TKA implants, CIM implants offered similar improvements and patient-reported outcome scores through the first postoperative year. Longer-term outcomes as well as cost-effectiveness of CIM implants should be studied.

Stress and Strain During Total Joint Arthroplasty Are Not Impacted by Hand Dominance or Operative Laterality in Orthopedic Surgeons.

Orthopedic surgeons experience significant musculoskeletal pain and work-related injuries while performing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We sought to investigate the impact of operative extremity and surgeon limb dominance on surgeon physiologic stress and energy expenditure during TJA. This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary academic practice. Cardiorespiratory data was recorded continuously in 3 high-volume arthroplasty surgeons using a smart garment that measured heart rate (HR), HR variability, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and energy expenditure (calories) during conventional total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Surgeon 1 and 2 (right-handed) performed 21 right TKAs, 10 left TKAs, 13 right THAs, and 10 left THAs. Surgeon 3 (left-handed) performed 6 right TKAs, 9 left TKAs, 16 right THAs, and 10 left THAs. While performing TKA or THA, limb laterality had no significant impact on operative time and no significant differences existed in HR, HR variability, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, or energy expenditure for any right-handed or left-handed surgeons, regardless of the operative limb laterality. While performing TKA, consistently standing on the side of hand dominance was associated with decreased strain and stress, compared to always standing on the operative side. This study suggests that surgeon hand dominance and operative limb laterality do not impact energy expenditure or physiologic strain during TJA. However, consistently standing on the side of hand dominance in TKA may lead to decreased physiologic strain and stress during surgery. Further study utilizing wearable technology during TJA may provide orthopedic surgeons with information about modifiable factors that contribute to differences in physiological parameters during surgery.

The Impact of Changing Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants at a High-Volume Institution

BackgroundThe ability of a group of high-volume arthroplasty surgeons to simultaneously change their preferred primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant of choice to another, has not been explored in the literature to date. The main hypothesis was that such a change could be made with no significant impact on clinical outcomes. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study comparing the last 500 consecutive TKAs implanted of a routinely used TKA implant (NexGen; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) with the first 500 consecutive TKAs implanted of a newly adopted TKA implant (Triathlon; Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) at an institutional level. Primary outcomes of importance included all complications that occurred either intraoperatively or early postoperatively, early all-cause revision rate, and early reintervention rate. ResultsThere was a 1.2% (n = 6) complication rate in the NexGen cohort compared to 0.8% (n = 4) in the newly adopted Triathlon cohort (P = .75). The rate of intraoperative fracture was 1% in the NexGen cohort and 0.6% in the Triathlon cohort (P = .72). The early all-cause revision rate for the NexGen TKA was 1% (n = 5) compared to 0.8% (n = 4) in the Triathlon cohort (P = 1.0). The manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) rate in the NexGen cohort was 2.4% compared to 4.6% in the Triathlon cohort (P = .058). The only predictor variable associated with MUA rate was American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, where there was a significantly lower rate of MUA with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (P = .042). ConclusionIt is possible to implement the institution-wide adoption of an established, high-performing TKA implant without any negative implications in relation to early revision rates, perioperative complication rates, and reintervention rates. This study is the first of its kind to be reported in the literature.

Improved accuracy and fewer outliers with a novel CT-free robotic THA system in matched-pair analysis with manual THA

Accurate component orientation and restoration of hip biomechanics remains a continuing challenge in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The goal of this study was to analyze the accuracy/reproducibility of a novel CT-free and pin-less robotic-assisted THA (RA-THA) platform compared to manual THA (mTHA). This matched-pair cadaveric study compared this RA-THA system to mTHA (n = 33/arm), both using the assistance of fluoroscopic imaging, in a group of 14 high-volume arthroplasty surgeons. In both groups, surgeons were asked to aim for 40°/15° for cup inclination/version, and 0 mm of leg length discrepancy (LLD). A validated and accurate method using radio-opaque markers measured cup inclination/version and LLD. The accuracy and reproducibility (fewer outliers) of cup inclination was significantly improved in the robotic group (1.8° ± 1.3° vs 6.4° ± 4.9°, respectively, robotic vs manual; p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups for version. The reproducibility of LLD was significantly improved in the robotic group (p = 0.003). For all parameters studied, the robotic group had an improved accuracy and lower variance (fewer outliers). The percentage of cases within the more restrictive Callanan safe zone was 100% for RA-THA vs 73% for mTHA (p = 0.002). The CT-free RA-THA platform, using only fluoroscopic imaging, demonstrated more accurate acetabular cup positioning, when compared to the mTHA procedures performed by high-volume hip surgeons (naive to this RA-THA platform), with respect to cup inclination and placement within the Lewinnek/Callanan safe zones. Future study must incorporate economic factors, lower volume surgeons, clinical and patient-centric outcomes, and other radiographic parameters in controlled studies in large sample sizes.

Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 35 Years: A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BackgroundHip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are two treatment options for end-stage degenerative hip conditions. The objective of this single-center retrospective cohort study was to compare implant survival and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in young patients (≤35 years) who underwent HRA or THA.MethodsAll patients aged 35 years or younger who underwent HRA or THA with a single high-volume arthroplasty surgeon between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed. The sample included 33 THAs (26 patients) and 76 HRAs (65 patients). Five-year implant survival and minimum 2-year PROs were compared between patient cohorts.ResultsThree patients in the THA group (9%) were revised within 5 years for instability (n = 1), squeaking (n = 1), or squeaking with a ceramic liner fracture (n = 1). No patients who underwent HRA were revised. The University of California, Los Angeles, activity score, modified Harris Hip score, and Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement increased by 74%, 64%, and 49%, respectively, among all patients. Compared to the HRA cohort, patients who underwent THA had lower preoperative and postoperative University of California, Los Angeles, activity, modified Harris Hip score, and Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement scores, yet there were no differences in the absolute improvements in any of the three measures between the two groups.ConclusionsExcellent functional outcomes were seen in young patients undergoing either HRA or THA. Although young patients undergoing THA started at lower preoperative baseline and postoperative PROs than patients undergoing HRA, both groups improved by an equal amount after surgery, suggesting that both HRA and THA afford a similar degree of potential improvement in a young population.

Outcomes of simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty for 256 selected patients in a single surgeon's practice.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) is undertaken with the patient in the supine position, creating an opportunity to replace both hips under one anaesthetic. Few studies have reported simultaneous bilateral DAA-THA. The aim of this study was to characterize a cohort of patients selected for this technique by a single, high-volume arthroplasty surgeon and to investigate their early postoperative clinical outcomes. Using an institutional database, we reviewed 643 patients who underwent bilateral DAA-THA by a single surgeon between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018. The demographic characteristics of the 256 patients (39.8%) who underwent simultaneous bilateral DAA-THA were compared with the 387 patients (60.2%) who underwent staged THA during the same period of time. We then reviewed the length of stay, rate of discharge home, 90-day complications, and readmissions for the simultaneous bilateral group. Patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral DAA-THA had a 3.5% transfusion rate, a 1.8 day mean length of stay, a 98.1% rate of discharge home, and low rates of 90-day infection (0.39%), dislocation (0.39%), periprosthetic fracture (0.77%), venous thromboembolism (0%), haematoma (0.39%), further surgery (0.77%), and readmission (0.77%). These patients were significantly younger (mean 58.2 years vs 62.5 years; p < 0.001), more likely to be male (60.3% vs 46.5%; p < 0.001), and with a trend towards having a lower mean BMI (27.8 kg/m2 vs 28.4 kg/m2; p = 0.071) than patients who underwent staged bilateral DAA-THA. Patients selected for simultaneous bilateral DAA-THA in a single surgeon's practice had a 3% rate of postoperative transfusion and a low rate of complications, readmissions, and discharge to a rehabilitation facility. Simultaneous bilateral DAA-THA appears to be a reasonable and safe form of treatment for patients with bilateral symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip when undertaken by an experienced arthroplasty surgeon with appropriate selection criteria. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2021;103-B(7 Supple B):116-121.

Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Via the Direct Anterior vs Alternative Approaches for Acute Femoral Neck Fractures.

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is becoming a more frequent treatment in the active elderly population. The complication profiles associated with THA surgical approaches in the fracture setting are unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare a series of THA for FNF performed via the direct anterior (DA) approach vs alternative approaches (anterolateral and posterolateral).MethodsA retrospective review identified 52 patients who underwent primary THA for FNF between 2009 and 2018, including 20 via the DA approach and 32 by alternative approaches. All procedures were exclusively performed by high-volume arthroplasty surgeons. Perioperative results, complications, and clinical outcomes were compared with those of routine statistical methods. Mean follow-up duration was 3 years (range, 1-8).ResultsThe average age was 74 years (range, 57-92) with similar baseline characteristics between the 2 groups (P = .09). The DA cohort demonstrated significantly shorter length of stay (3 days vs 5 days, P < .01) and discharge to home vs skilled nursing facility (40.0% vs 9.4% P = .014). There was a trend toward decreased complications (0% vs 16%, P = .08). There were no dislocations or fractures in either cohort. Final Harris Hip Scores (94 vs 81, P = .07) and return to community ambulation (96%) were similar between DA and alternative approach groups.ConclusionThe DA approach to THA performed for FNF appears safe with improved outcomes compared with alternative approaches. Larger studies are needed to verify these results.

Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip Does Not Increase the Risk for Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundRecent studies suggest an increased risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) utilizing the direct anterior (DA) approach to the hip. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether such an increased risk does indeed exist on a large cohort of patients, operated by experienced surgeons and taking into account various confounders. MethodsThis was a single institutional study, including all patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty during the last decade, who were operated on by four high-volume arthroplasty surgeons utilizing a single surgical approach. Three of them utilized the direct lateral (DL) approach while one of them used the DA approach throughout the entire study. Patient characteristics, demographics, and comorbidities were assessed as well as operative and perioperative factors and their association with PJI. Association between surgical approach and PJI was evaluated in a univariate followed by a multivariate regression analysis. ResultsA total of 10,201 patients were included in the study. Of those, 4390 (43.0%) underwent total hip arthroplasty through the DA approach and 5811 (57.0%) through the DL approach. PJI rates were 0.9% (38/4390) in the DA group compared with 1.3% (73/5811) in the DL group (P = .068). Results from a regression analysis showed no significant association between PJI and DA approach (adjusted odds ratio 0.760, 95% confidence interval 0.428-1.348, P = .348). The risk remained nonsignificant in patients with higher body mass index. There were also no significant differences in the infecting organisms between the two groups. ConclusionThe DA approach to the hip does not increase the risk for subsequent PJI.

Trends of Prosthetic Joint Infection Organisms and Recurrence for a Single High-Volume Arthroplasty Surgeon Over 20 Years

BackgroundProsthetic joint infection (PJI) is a morbid complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PJI diagnosis and treatment has changed over time, and patient co-management with a high-volume musculoskeletal infectious disease (MSK ID) specialist has been implemented at our institution in the last decade. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated all consecutive TJA patients treated for PJI between 1995 and 2018 by a single high-volume revision TJA surgeon. Microbial identities, antibiotic resistance, prior PJI, and MSK ID consultation were investigated. ResultsIn total, 261 PJI patients (median age 66 years, interquartile range 57-75) were treated. One-year and 5-year reinfection rates were 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6-20.7) and 22.1% (95% CI 17.0-27.7), respectively. Microbial identities and antibiotic resistances did not change significantly over time. Despite seeing more prior PJI patients (53.3% vs 37.6%, P = .012), MSK ID-managed patients had similar infection rates as non-MSK ID-managed patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.6-1.75, P = .93). Prior PJI was associated with higher reinfection risk (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.39-4.12, P = .002) overall and in patients without MSK ID consultation, specifically (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.37-5.65, P = .005). This risk was somewhat lower and did not reach significance in prior PJI patients with MSK ID consultation (HR 1.97, 95% CI 0.87-4.48, P = .106). ConclusionWe noted minimal differences in microbial/antibiotic resistances for PJI over 20 years in a single institution, suggesting current standards of PJI treatment remain encouragingly valid in most cases. MSK ID involvement was not associated with lower reinfection risk overall; however, in patients with prior PJI, the risk of reinfection appeared to be somewhat lower with MSK ID involvement. Level of EvidenceLevel IV–Case Series.

Use of a Modified Rep Model in Primary Joint Arthroplasty: Lessons Learned.

Orthopedic implant device sales representatives ("reps") can provide intraoperative guidance based on their product knowledge, as part of their many responsibilities. However, for experienced high-volume arthroplasty surgeons, a representative may not be required in the room for most primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. The goal of this study was to describe the authors' experience with a modified rep model for primary TKA. Between January and December 2017, a total of 100 unilateral primary TKAs were performed with a modified rep model and compared with 100 primary TKAs that were performed before this protocol. The authors adopted 2 additional initiatives to institute this protocol safely: (1) improved education of operating room staff and allocation of responsibilities; and (2) reengineering of the existing surgical trays. No perioperative complications, including readmission, periprosthetic fracture, or infection, occurred in either group. In addition, no difference was found in mean length of stay between the modified rep and conventional cohorts (2.2 and 2.4 days, respectively; P=.49). Mean operating room time was less with the modified rep cohort (102.1 vs 117.8 minutes; P<.001), as was total instrument turnover time in the operating room (13.9 vs 29.7 minutes; P<.0001) and in central sterilization (59.4 vs 126.8 minutes; P<.001). No errors occurred with implant accuracy or trays, and there was no need to change the type of implant with the modified rep model, compared with 6% of trays requiring additional sterilization with the conventional model. The negotiated implant cost with the modified rep model was approximately $2000 less than that for the conventional group. This study found that the modified rep model for primary TKA is safe and has the potential for substantial cost savings. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e538-e542.].

High Prevalence of Radiographic Outliers and Revisions with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Alignment outcomes and their impact on implant survival following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the implant survival and radiographic outcomes after UKA as well as the impact of component alignment and overhang on implant survival. We performed a retrospective analysis of 253 primary fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing medial UKAs from a single academic center. All UKAs were performed by 2 high-volume fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. UKAs comprised <10% of their knee arthroplasty practices, with an average of 14.2 medial UKAs per surgeon per year. Implant survival was assessed. Femoral coronal (FCA), femoral sagittal (FSA), tibial coronal (TCA), and tibial sagittal (TSA) angles as well as implant overhang were radiographically measured. Outliers were defined for FCA (>±10° deviation from neutral), FSA (>15° of flexion), TCA (>±5° deviation from neutral), and TSA (>±5° deviation from 7°). "Far outliers" were an additional >±2° of deviation. Outliers for overhang were identified as >3 mm for anterior overhang, >2 mm for posterior overhang, and >2 mm for medial overhang. Among patients with a failed UKA, revision was performed at an average of 3.7 years (range, 0.03 to 8.7 years). The cumulative revision rate was 14.2%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated 5 and 10-year survival rates of 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 82.0% to 91.0%) and 70.0% (95% CI = 56.0% to 80.0%), respectively. Only 19.0% (48) of the UKAs met target alignment for all 4 alignment measures, and only 72.7% (184) met all 3 targets for overhang. Only 11.9% (30) fell within all alignment and overhang targets. The risk of implant failure was significantly impacted by outliers for FCA (failure rate = 15.4%, p = 0.036), FSA (16.2%, p = 0.028), TCA (17.9%, p = 0.020), and TSA (15.2%, p = 0.034) compared with implants with no alignment or overhang errors (0%); this was also true for far outliers (p < 0.05). Other risk factors for failure were posterior overhang (failure rate = 25.0%, p = 0.006) and medial overhang (38.2%, p < 0.001); anterior overhang was not a significant risk factor (10.0%, p = 0.090). The proportions of UKA revisions and alignment outliers were greater than expected, even among high-volume arthroplasty surgeons performing an average of 14.2 UKAs per year (just below the high-volume UKA threshold of 15). Alignment and overhang outliers were significant risk factors for implant failure. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Long-term performance of oxidized zirconium on conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.

Introduction: Polyethylene wear and subsequent osteolysis remain obstacles to the long-term survivorship of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) with radical quenching represents a massive leap forward with dramatically improved wear rates compared to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). In this study we evaluate the wear of UHMWPE and XLPE coupled with oxidized zirconium (OxZr) femoral heads. Methods: A longitudinal, retrospective analysis was performed identifying consecutive patients who received a 28-mm OxZr-on-polyethylene primary THA from 2003 to 2004 by a single, high-volume arthroplasty surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups: those that received (1) UHMWPE liner and (2) a highly XLPE liner. Patients were included if clinical follow-up was complete to 2014 or later. Radiographic analysis was performed by two blinded observers. Measures included cup position, annual linear wear rate, and presence of osteolysis. Pairwise comparisons, correlations, and inter-rater reliability were calculated. Results: Eighty patients were in the UHMWPE group with an average follow-up of 10 ± 1.23 years and 88 patients in the XLPE group with an average of 10 ± 1.03-year follow-up. Average age (68) was similar between groups (p = 0.288). Observer reliability was excellent for cup abduction (ICC = 0.940), anteversion (ICC = 0.942), and detection of osteolysis (ICC = 0.811). Annual linear wear rates were significantly higher (p = 1 × 10−19) with UHMWPE (0.21 ± 0.12 mm/year) compared to XLPE (0.05 ± 0.03 mm/year). Linear wear rate was significantly correlated to decreasing acetabular abduction (p = 0.035). Osteolysis was noted only in the UHMWPE group, with 17 patients (21.2%) exhibiting acetabular osteolysis and 37 (46.3%) patients exhibiting femoral osteolysis. Conclusions: OxZr coupled with XLPE showed minimal wear and no osteolysis at 10-year follow up. The yearly linear penetration rate is similar to that seen in other studies of XLPE THA. A careful longitudinal follow-up will be required to determine if advanced bearings such as OxZr or ceramic can show improved performance in the second decade of implantation.

Perioperative Complications Following One-Stage Bilateral and Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach

Background A single stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty utilizing the direct anterior approach has been reported to have a similar incidence of perioperative complications as unilateral total hip arthroplasty. However, previous studies have included various surgeons with differences in contraindications, protocol, technique and/or experience. Questions/Purposes The purpose of this retrospective review was to compare perioperative outcomes in single-stage bilateral and unilateral total hip arthroplasties via the direct anterior approach performed by a single, fellowship trained, high volume arthroplasty surgeon. Methods A retrospective review was completed on consecutive single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasties performed between 2009 and 2017 and compared to consecutive unilateral total hip arthroplasties performed between 2014 and 2016. Perioperative data and complications occurring within 90 days were collected for all included patients. Student t-tests were performed to detect differences between bilateral and unilateral surgical variables. Results A total of 349 patients (531 hips) were included, consisting of 182 BTHA patients (364 hips) and 167 unilateral THA patients. Patients undergoing unilateral THA had significantly lower operating time, shorter length of stay, lower estimated blood loss, lower rate of transfusions and higher rate of home discharge compared to BTHA (p&lt;0.001). Complications were present in four unilateral THA patients, three requiring revision, and nine BTHA patients, three requiring revision. Conclusions There was no difference in complications, as well as no perioperative mortalities or systemic complications, within 90 days following surgery between unilateral and bilateral patients. Based on these results, single-stage DAA BTHA is a safe procedure to perform, and did not appear to result in higher rates of complications when compared to patients receiving a DAA unilateral THA.

Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.

Although tibial component loosening has been considered a concern after total knee arthroplasty without cement, such implants have been used in younger patients because of the potential for ingrowth and preservation of bone stock. However, mid-term and long-term studies of modern uncemented implants are lacking. We previously reported promising prospective 5-year outcomes after using an uncemented porous tantalum tibial component in patients who underwent surgery before the age of 60 years. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical and radiographic implant survivorship at 10 years in this large series of young patients. The original cohort included 79 patients (96 knees) who were <60 years old at the time of surgery. All procedures were performed with an uncemented, posterior-stabilized femoral component and a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component by 1 high-volume arthroplasty surgeon at a single institution. Patients were followed prospectively. The Knee Society Score (KSS), radiographic findings, and any complications or revisions were recorded. At the latest follow-up, 76% (60) of the 79 patients (74% [71] of the 96 knees) were available for evaluation or had undergone revision (n = 6); 7 patients had died with the implants in place, and 12 patients were lost to follow-up. The average follow-up for the available implants was 10 years (range, 8 to 12 years). There were no progressive radiolucencies on radiographic review. The mean functional KSS was 68 points (range, 0 to 100 points). All revisions were for reasons unrelated to tibial fixation: femoral component loosening (1), stiffness (1), pain and swelling (2), and instability (2). The all-cause revision rate was 6% (6 of 96 knees). Uncemented porous tantalum monoblock tibial components provided reliable fixation, excellent radiographic findings, and satisfactory functional outcomes at a mean of 10 years postoperatively. We identified no cases of tibial component loosening. These promising clinical and radiographic results support the use of uncemented tibial components. Such implants may produce well-integrated, durable long-term constructs in young patients. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Safe Selection of Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty Patients With Medical Risk Stratification: the “Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment Score”

BackgroundCurrent patient selection criteria and medical risk stratification methods for outpatient primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) surgery are unproven. This study assessed the predictive ability of a medically based risk assessment score in selecting patients for outpatient and short stay surgery. MethodsA retrospective review of 1120 consecutive primary TJAs in an early discharge program was performed. An Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (“OARA”) score was developed by a high-volume arthroplasty surgeon and perioperative internal medicine specialist to stratify patients as “low-moderate risk (≤59)” and “not appropriate” (≥60) for early discharge. OARA, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA-PS), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores were analyzed with respect to length of stay. ResultsThe positive predictive value of the OARA score was 81.6% for the same or the next day discharge, compared with that of 56.4% for ASA-PS (P < .001) and 70.3% for CCI (P = .002) scores. Patients with OARA scores ≤59 were 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.8) times more likely to be discharged early than those with scores ≥60 (P < .001), while a low ASA-PS score was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2-2.3) times more likely to be discharged early (P = .001). CCI did not predict early discharge (P ≥ .301). With deliberate patient education and expectations for outpatient discharge, the odds of early discharge predicted by the OARA score, but not the ASA-PS score, increased to 2.7 (95% CI, 1.7-4.2). ConclusionThe OARA score for primary TJA has more precise predictive ability than the ASA-PS and CCI scores for the same or next day discharge and is enhanced with a robust patient education program to establish appropriate expectations for early discharge. Early results suggest that the OARA score can successfully facilitate appropriate patient selection for outpatient TJA, although consideration of clinical program maturity before adoption of the score is advised.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes with a Hydroxyapatite and Porous Coated Cup Design

Press-fit, hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cup designs may offer a lower incidence of loosening and migration than older designs. Our study evaluated the initial clinical and radiographic success of a cementless acetabular shell in a large cohort of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. We queried our institution’s prospectively collected registry for a series of 771 primary THAs (695 patients) implanted with this cup by 4 high-volume arthroplasty surgeons. Of the 613 hips with minimum 2-year followup, average HHS (Harris Hip Score) was 93.6, WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) was 87.6, and VAS (Visual Analog Scale) pain score was 1.2. While there was a 2% reoperation rate (12 hips), none of the cups were revised for aseptic loosening. No radiolucencies were found and there was no evidence of acetabular loosening. At early followup, this newer cementless acetabular cup implant design exhibits high survivorship and clinical success.

The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of hip resurfacing patients and compare them to standard primary total hip arthroplasty procedures performed during the same period of time.MethodsOne hundred and fourteen consecutive men who had a mean age of 50 years (range, 20 to 85 years) and who had undergone 120 hip resurfacing arthroplasties between 2007 and 2009 were compared to 117 consecutive men (120 hips) who had undergone a standard total hip arthroplasty during the same time period. The mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 24 to 55 months) for both groups. Outcomes evaluated included implant survivorship, hip scores, activity levels, and complication rates.ResultsIn the resurfacing hip arthroplasty cohort, implant survivorship was 98% with two patients requiring a revision surgery one for femoral neck fracture and another for femoral head loosening. In comparison, implant survivorship was 99% in the standard total hip arthroplasty cohort, with 1 revision due to peri-prosthetic fracture which was successfully treated with a femoral component revision. In the resurfacing and standard hip arthroplasty cohorts, the mean post-operative Harris hip scores had improved to 96 and 94 points, respectively and were statistically similar. The resurfacing cohort had achieved a significantly higher mean post-operative University of California Activity Score (6.7 versus 5 points). There were no differences in the complication rates between the two cohorts.ConclusionWhen patients meet the appropriate selection criteria in the hands of experienced and high-volume arthroplasty surgeons, hip resurfacing provides excellent results at short- to mid-term follow-up.