Abstract 4402 BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation is a widely used therapeutic modality especially in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). However, mobilization failure rates following first attempt are estimated to be between 5% and 30% and remobilization is required in those patients. Although plerixafor, a selective CXCR4 antagonist, is a promising agent for these purpose, mobilization with chemotherapeutic agents would be a hands-on option.°° Therefore we investigated the feasibility of high dose methotrexate and cytarabine with G-CSF as a remobilization regimen in those who failed a prior mobilization and collection with chemotherapy and G-CSF. Patients and methodsMobilization failure was defined as a collection of less than 5 × 106 CD34+ cells after 3–5 apheresis procedures. Methotrexate (3,500 mg/m2 in a 120 min infusion) on day 1 and cytarabine (3,000 mg/m2 infusion for 120 min) on day 4 and day 5 were followed by G-CSF. Supportive care and leucovorine rescue were done as standard protocol. Peripheral blood (PB) hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) were counted with the Sysmex SE9000. PB progenitor cell harvest was initiated when HPC levels reached at least 5 per mm3. ResultsTotal 8 patients (6 NHL and 2 MM, median age: 55 years) who have failed in previous mobilization with conventional chemotherapy and G-CSF were tried again with high dose methotrexate, cytarabine and G-CSF. (table 1) Successful collection of CD34+ cells (> 5 × 106/kg) was achieved in six patients (75%). The total yield of CD34+ cells per kg of body weight harvested by 3 to 5 apheresis procedures was 6.28 × 106/kg (median; range, 1.53– 10.09 × 106/kg). (table 2) ConclusionHigh dose-MTX and cytarabine plus G-CSF may be a feasible chemotherapeutic regimen for stem cell mobilization in NHL and MM patients who have failed in previous mobilization with other type of chemotherapy and G-CSF.Table 1Patients characteristics and mobilization outcome (1st & 2nd °°mobilization)NAgeDiagnosisPrevious Treatmentprevious Mobilization regimen(1st)No. Of apheresis in 1st mobilizationTotal CD34+ yield (x106/kg ) in 1st mobilizationNo. Of apheresis in 2nd mobilizationTotal CD34+ yield (x106/kg ) in 2nd mobilizationCumulative CD34+ yield (x106/kg ) in 1st & 2nd mobilization148PTCLCHOP SMILESMILE44.0333.77.73257MZLRCVP ESHAPESHAP41.8845.337.21359MCLCHOP ESHAPESHAPHD Ara-C3,40.67, 1.5331.533.73454MMVAD PADCYC44.73410.0914.82564PTCLCHOP ESHAPESHAP20.647.017.61645DLBCLRCHOP ESHAPESHAP31.1257.738.85762MMVAD PADCYC43.7639.2112.97842EN NK/T cell lymphomaVIPDCYC53.1645.558.71Abbreviations: PTCL=Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma; MZL=Marginal Zone Lymphoma; MCL=Mantle Cell Lymphoma; MM=Multiple Myeloma; EN=extra nodal; DLBCL=Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma; CHOP=cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone; SMILE=dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, L-asparaginase, etoposide; RCVP=rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone; ESHAP=etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine, cisplatin; VAD=vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone; PAD=bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone; RCHOP=rituximab+CHOP; VIPD=etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, dexamethasone; HD Ara-C=high dose cytarabine; CYC=cyclophosphamide; No.=number;Table 2Remobilization of CD34+ cells after HD-MTX and cytarabine plus G-CSFNApheresis 1Apheresis 2Apheresis 3Apheresis 4Apheresis 5Cumulative CD34+ yield (x106/kg)10.121.542.043.720.671.890.891.885.3330.290.760.481.5341.831.293.693.1810.0950.410.953.262.397.0160.390.471.871.543.467.7371.353.094.779.2181.121.272.021.145.55Median (range)0.54 (0.12−0.83)1.28 (0.47−3.09)2.03 (0.48−4.77)1.88 (1.14−3.18)3.46 (3.46)6.28 (1.53 – 10.09) Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Read full abstract