Hypertension is associated with several physiological dysfunctions, including changes in the neurohumoral control of heart and vessels. Different classes of antihypertensive drugs may have distinct effects on the autonomic system and body homeostasis, but their individual effects on the complexity of cardiovascular regulation are still not established. We investigated the effect of five different classes of antihypertensive on the complexity of pulse interval (PI) and arterial pressure (AP) variability in an experimental model of renal hypertension (2 kidney 1 clip, 2K1C) in the rat. Hypertensive rats were treated (by gavage) during 15 days with: water (N=12), ramipril (2 mg/kg/day; N=7), losartan (10 mg/kg/day; N=8), atenolol (90 mg/kg/day; N=9), amlodipine (10 mg/kg/day; N=7) or hydrochlorothiazide (20 mg/kg/day; N=8). A normotensive (sham‐operated) control group (N=10) received water for the same period. After the treatment, rats had their raw AP recorded and beat‐by‐beat series of systolic AP and PI were created. The complexity of AP and PI was assessed by multiscale entropy (MSE) and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). For PI series, hypertensive rats treated with water showed decreased MSE and increased DFA in the middle range of scales. For AP series, hypertensive rats untreated or treated with amlodipine have lower MSE at short and middle time scales. Hypertensive rats treated with amlodipine also showed altered DFA in comparison to the other groups. All antihypertensive drugs were efficient to restore AP to normal levels. Moreover, 2K1C untreated (water) rats presented the lowest cardiovascular complexity and all antihypertensive drugs, except for amlodipine, were capable to restore the cardiovascular complexity to normal levels. Therefore, amlodipine seems to have a deleterious effect on the cardiovascular integrative control, probably due to the increased sympathetic activity induced by amlodipine.Support or Funding InformationThis study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ‐ Brasil (CAPES) ‐ Finance Code 001, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Proc. 2013/20549‐7) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Proc. 402076/2016‐8).This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.
Read full abstract