Halo-femoral Traction Research Articles

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Severe and Neglected Spinal Deformities in Children and Adolescents without the Use of Radical Three-Column Osteotomies.

Background: Severe spinal deformity manifests as a pronounced deviation from the normal curvature of the spine in the frontal, sagittal, and horizontal planes, where the coronal plane curvature exceeds 90 degrees and may coincide with hyperkyphotic deformity. The most severe deformities exhibit rigidity, with flexibility below 30%. If left untreated or improperly treated, these deformities can result in serious complications associated with progression of the curvature. A combination of surgical techniques is frequently employed to attain optimal outcomes and minimize the risk of complications. The overall medical condition of the patient, their capacity to endure extensive procedures, the expertise of the surgeon, and the resources available all play significant roles in determining the course of management. A systematic and thorough review of the relevant literature was conducted utilizing a variety of electronic databases. The primary objective of this study was to scrutinize the surgical techniques commonly employed in complex spine surgeries for the management of severe scoliosis without resection vertebral body techniques, with higher potential risk of major complications, including permanent neurological deficit. Conclusions: Halo-gravity traction, halo femoral traction, and all techniques for releases of the spine (anterior, posterior, or combine), as well as thoracoplasty, have demonstrated significant effectiveness in managing severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. The combination of several of these methods can lead to optimal alignment correction without the need to perform high-risk techniques involving three-column osteotomies. Surgeons must customize the indications based on factors such as available resources, characteristics of the deformity, and the patient's individual profile. Surgical correction of severe scoliosis without vertebral body resection surgeries decreases the potential risks related to neurological and pulmonary complications while providing significant clinical improvement outcomes. The powerful Ponte osteotomy is indicated for severe scoliosis, curves with poor flexibility, for better restoration of hypokyphosis, and decrease of hyperkyphosis. These corrective techniques combined with HGT or temporary internal distraction rods are recommended as viable options for managing individuals with severe rigid spine deformity characteristics. Therefore, they also should be considered and performed by a proficient surgical team. The presence of neuromonitoring is crucial throughout these procedures.

Risk factors for neurophysiological events related to intraoperative halo-femoral traction in spinal deformity surgery

PurposeThis study identifies risk factors for neurophysiological events caused by intraoperative halo-femoral traction (IOHFT) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS).MethodsNeurophysiological integrity was monitored using motor evoked potentials (MEPs). IONM event was defined as a decreased MEP amplitude of more than 80% of baseline in, at least, one muscle. Time between application of IOHFT and event, affected muscles, surgical stage, and time between removal of IOHFT and recovery of MEPs were described. Characteristics (age, height, weight, diagnosis, Cobb angle, and flexibility of the curve) of patients with and without IOHFT-events were compared using analysis of variance. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors.ResultsThe study included 81 patients (age 15.6 ± 2.4 years, 53 females, AIS: n = 47, NMS n = 34). IOHFT-events occurred in 11 patients (13%; AIS n = 4, NMS n = 7). IOHFTevents affecting all limbs occurred pre-incision in NMS. Events affecting only the legs occurred during all stages of surgery. Patients with IOHFT-events were smaller (p = 0.009) and had stiffer curves (p = 0.046). Height was a predictor (odds ratio, 0.941; 95% confidence interval = 0.896–0.988). All MEPs recovered after removing IOHFT.ConclusionNeurophysiologic events due to IOHFT were common, with the majority in patients with NMS. A shorter stature was a risk factor, and larger Cobb angle and stiffer curve were associated with IOHFT-events. Events occurred at any stage of surgery and involved upper and lower limbs. With an adequate response on IOHFT events, none of the patients had postoperative neurological impairments due to IOHFT.

Multi-rod posterior correction only with halo-femoral traction for the management of adult neuromuscular scoliosis (> 100°) with severe pelvic obliquity: a minimum 5-year follow-up

BackgroundMany patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) experience a variety of difficult medical problems that aggravate the development effects of progressive scoliosis and pelvic obliquity (PO). The objective of the current study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of multi-rod posterior correction only (MRPCO) with halo-femoral traction (HFT) for the management of adult NMS (> 100°) with severe PO.MethodsFrom 2012 to 2017, 13 adult patients who suffered from NMS (> 100°) with severe PO underwent MRPCO with HFT. The radiography parameters in a sitting position, such as the coronal Cobb angle of the main curve, the PO and the trunk shift (TS), were measured at the preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up stages. The preoperative and final follow-up assessment of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was taken.ResultsThe average follow-up span was 68.15 ± 6.78 months. There was decreased postoperative coronal Cobb angle with an average mean of 125.24° ± 11.78° to 47.55° ± 12.10°, with a correction rate of 62.43%; the PO was reduced to 6.25° ± 1.63° from 36.93° ± 4.25° with a correction rate of 83.07%; the TS was reduced to 2.41 cm ± 1.40 cm from 9.19 cm ± 3.07 cm. There was significant improvement in all parameters compared to the preoperative data. The VAS score reduced from 4.77 ± 0.93 to 0.69 ± 0.75, and the ODI score reduced from 65.38 ± 16.80 to 28.62 ± 12.29 at the final follow-up.ConclusionsTreatment of adult NMS (> 100°) with severe PO could be safe and effective with MRPCO with HFT. In order to obtain the optimum sitting balance, this could reduce the prevalence of complications and rectify the curvature and the correction of PO.

AVALIAÇÃO RADIOGRÁFICA DE CORREÇÃO CIRÚRGICA DE ESCOLIOSE DEVIDO A PARALISIA CEREBRAL USANDO TRAÇÃO INTRAOPERATIVA E NOVA TÉCNICA DE CORREÇÃO COM TERCEIRA HASTE PROVISÓRIA

ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the radiographic results of patients with cerebral palsy and Lonstein and Akbarnia type II scoliosis who underwent intraoperative halofemoral traction (IFAT) and correction with a 3rd provisional nail. Methods: Retrospective case series study. Were evaluated preoperative (PRE), traction (TR), immediate (POI), and late (POT) total spine radiographs. Were verified the angular value of the main curve (COBB), pelvic obliquity (OP), trunk balance in the coronal plane (CSVA), vertical sagittal alignment (SVA), curve flexibility, and percentage of correction in the final PO. Friedam and Wilcoxon tests were performed (p<0.05). Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 16 (±4.13). There was a statistical difference when comparing COBB PRE with TRACTION to POI and POT (p=0.0001), OP in PRE with TRACTION, and between PRE and POT (p=0.0001). There was a statistical difference in coronal (CSVA) and sagittal (SVA) balance concerning PRE and POT. The percentage of correction for the main curve was 55.75% (± 11.11), and for the O P, 64.86% (± 18.04). Conclusion: The correction technique using the 3rd provisional nail technique and intraoperative traction presents a correction power of 55.75% of the proximal curve and 64% of the pelvic obliquity. In addition, it is easy to assemble, has a short surgical time, and causes little loss of correction during follow-up. Level of Evidence III B; I study a series of retrospective cases.

Preoperative Halo-Femoral Traction With Posterior Surgical Correction for the Treatment of Extremely Severe Rigid Congenital Scoliosis (Cobb Angle >120°).

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of preoperative halo-femoral traction (HFT) with posterior surgical correction for the treatment of extremely severe rigid congenital scoliosis (>120°). We reviewed the records of all patients with extremely severe rigid congenital scoliosis (>120°) treated with preoperative HFT from 2010 through 2018. Radiographic measurements were performed. The period of traction, blood loss, operation time, complications, and pulmonary function test results were recorded. A total of 11 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent preoperative HFT with posterior surgical correction. The mean preoperative main curve Cobb angle was 127.9° ± 4.4°, and the average correction rate was 33.5% posttraction, 54.8% postoperation, and 55.3% at the latest follow-up. Pulmonary function improved significantly after traction, and forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased from 34.7% and 33.4% to 48.1% and 48.5%, respectively. Only one patient experienced halo pin infection during HFT. No patients experienced permanent neurologic deficits or death. For extremely severe rigid congenital scoliosis with a Cobb angle greater than 120°, preoperative HFT with posterior surgical correction offers an effective and safe corrective option. The perioperative complication rate can be partially reduced. Retrospective study.

Predicting the impact of intraoperative halo-femoral traction from preoperative imaging in neuromuscular scoliosis.

Intraoperative traction (ITx) has been demonstrated to be a useful adjunct intervention at the time of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the treatment of severe neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) to improve the coronal spinal deformity and pelvic obliquity. The purpose of this study is to determine if preoperative flexibility radiographs can predict the amount of spinal deformity and pelvic obliquity correction at final follow-up. This was a retrospective analysis of a single-surgeon series who underwent PSF to the pelvis with adjunct ITx for NMS. Database query identified 76 NMS patients, of which 41 met inclusion criteria. Demographic, radiographic and operative data were analyzed. Of the 41 study patients, 56% (n = 23) were male and mean age at surgery was 13.6years. Mean follow-up of 4.1years (minimum follow-up 2years). 35 patients had cerebral palsy, 5 patients were syndromic, and 1 patient had myelomeningocele. The average preoperative weight was 35kg and all were wheelchair ambulators. Total traction applied on average was 49% of the preoperative body weight. Mean preoperative coronal deformity was 91° which improved to 43° at final follow-up (53% correction). Push-supine imaging had the strongest correlation to major coronal deformity outcome at final follow-up (r2 = 0.87, p ≤ 0.0001). Compared to push-supine imaging, there was a mean greater coronal deformity correction of 18 ± 10° (p ≤ 0.0001) at final follow-up. To predict the final coronal deformity, the regression equation was final Cobb angle = 1.13085 + preop push-supine Cobb angle × 0.68830. Mean preoperative pelvic obliquity was 34° which improved to 12° at final follow-up (65% correction). Push-supine imaging had the strongest correlation to pelvic obliquity outcome at final follow-up (r2 = 0.59, p = 0.0001). Compared to push-supine imaging, there was a mean greater pelvic obliquity correction of 3 ± 10° (p = 0.0857) at final follow-up. The regression equation was final POB = 6.42096 + preop push-supine POB × 0.36675. Mean preoperative kyphosis was 70° and 52° at final follow-up (26% correction). The results of this study demonstrated for preoperative planning that the push-supine flexibility radiograph is most predictive of the coronal deformity and of the pelvic obliquity correction. At final follow-up in this NMS population, there was a mean greater improvement of 18° for coronal deformity versus preoperative push-supine imaging and 3° for pelvic obliquity versus preoperative push-supine imaging. At the time of PSF, ITx is an effective adjunct technique to improve coronal deformity and POB for NMS producing 53% coronal correction, 65% POB correction, and 26% kyphosis correction. IV.

Successful Congenital Kyphoscoliosis (with Severe Truncal Shift) Correction Associated with Syrinx and Diastematomylia without Prior Neurosurgical Intervention: A Case Report and Brief Review of Literature

Introduction and Importance: The use of halo-femoral traction to ease correction in patients with scoliosis with multiple intraspinal pathologies is an evolving technique that is not yet fully understood. This report aimed to demonstrate the efficiency of using this technique to achieve maximum deformity correction along with decreasing complication rates. Case Presentation: Congenital scoliosis with two intraspinal pathologies was corrected in a 17-year-old male with severe truncal shift, who was easily fatigued due to respiratory symptoms, utilizing the traction method with no neurosurgical intervention. The patient had consulted many hospitals locally and internationally, and was told that surgery poses a great risk of neurological deficit. He needed neurosurgical release of the cord prior to any deformity correction. Management and Outcome: The patient did not undergo any neurosurgical intervention, but rather posterior spinal correction and instrumented fusion preceded by halo-femoral traction. He was followed up for 5 years and showed complete recovery without any short-term or long-term complications. The patient was able to return to full activity and resolution of respiratory symptoms, and a good alignment on follow-up radiography was observed. Discussion: Not all patients with scoliosis associated with intraspinal pathology need treatment before spinal correction. Perioperative halo-femoral traction seems to be safe and effective in maximizing deformity correction and decreasing the risk of complications.

Intraoperative halo-femoral traction during posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70° and 100°: a randomized controlled trial.

Surgical management of scoliosis curves between 70° and 100° remains controversial. The authors designed this randomized controlled trial to validate the efficacy of intraoperative halo-femoral traction (IOHFT) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Cobb angles between 70° and 100°, and flexibility < 35%. The authors prospectively recruited and randomized 29 patients with severe AIS scheduled for posterior surgery into a traction group or control (nontraction) group. The primary outcome measures were operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included degree of spine deformity correction, traction-related complications, and health-related quality of life. In the traction group, the average preoperative Cobb angle was 83.2°, with an average 20.6% flexibility. The average postoperative Cobb angle was 16.1° and the major curve was 18.3° at the final follow-up. In the control group, the average preoperative major curve was 80.3° with 22.8% flexibility. The average postoperative Cobb angle was 16.1° and the major curve was 18.1° at the final follow-up. The operative duration was 325.7 minutes for the traction group and 385.4 minutes for the control group (p = 0.018). Compared with the control group, the traction group had a 29.5% reduction in intraoperative blood loss and a significantly lower rate of blood transfusion (13.3% vs 50.0%, p = 0.033). There were no neurological complications in either group. One patient in the traction group had a superficial infection at the traction site. Use of IOHFT contributed to significant reductions in operative time and blood transfusion requirements, with no added morbidity. It is an effective and safe method to assist correction of AIS curves between 70° and 100° and flexibility < 35%.

Posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction for the treatment of extremely severe and rigid adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (> 130°).

The treatment of extremely severe and rigid spinal deformities was a great surgical challenge. Pulmonary impairment often occurred, which increased the challenges to already daunting surgical approaches. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction (HFT) for the treatment of extremely severe and rigid adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) of more than 130°. From 2010 to 2017, 11 patients suffered from extremely severe and rigid AIS of more than 130° underwent posterior-only surgical correction with HFT. The preoperative mean coronal Cobb angle of major curve was 139.01° ± 5.83°, and the mean flexibility was 17.21% ± 3.33%; the mean angle of thoracic kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were 65.02° ± 7.21° and 39.05° ± 4.08°, respectively; the mean trunk shift (TS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were 3.3 ± 0.97cm and 3.97 ± 1.16cm, respectively; moreover, the percent forced vital capacity (FVC%) and percent forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1%) were 50.08% ± 6.07% and 53.46% ± 5.96%, respectively; the mean body height and weight were 140.09 ± 4.95cm and 37 ± 4.34kg, respectively. The mean duration of surgery was 335.91 ± 48.31min and blood loss was 1590 ± 520.1ml. The average period of follow-up was 32.18 ± 8.17months. After heavy HFT, the mean coronal Cobb angle of major curve was reduced to 82.98° ± 6.91° with correction rate of 40.39%. After posterior-only surgical correction, the mean coronal Cobb angle was further reduced to 51.17° ± 5.4° with correction rate of 63.27%. The postoperative mean TK, LL, TS and SVA were improved to 23.85° ± 5.14°, 44.95° ± 2.26°, 1.32 ± 0.72cm and 1.42 ± 0.83cm, respectively. At the final follow-up, the corrective loss rate of Cobb angle was only 0.72%; moreover, the mean FVC% and FEV1% were increased to 65.45% ± 5.29% and 69.08% ± 5.32% with improvement of 15.36% and 15.62%, respectively; the mean body height and weight were increased to 154.45 ± 5.32cm and 45 ± 4.02kg with improvement of 14.36cm and 8kg, respectively. The spinal cord function was stable, and there were no new neurological symptoms after correction. Posterior-only surgical correction with heavy HFT could be safe and effective for the treatment of extremely severe and rigid AIS of more than 130° in reducing the incidence of complications and greatly improving curve correction.

Analysis of the corrective contribution of strong halo-femoral traction in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis

IntroductionStrong halo-femoral traction has been widely used in the field of severe rigid scoliosis correction. The objective of this study was to analyze the corrective contribution of strong halo-femoral traction in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis and discuss its meaning.Material and methodsA retrospective review was performed for patients with severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis who were treated with halo-femoral traction in our center from December 2008 to December 2015. All cases underwent halo-femoral traction for 2 to 4 weeks before a one-stage posterior operation, and the absolute and relative contribution rates of each orthopedic factor (bending, fulcrum, traction, surgery) were analyzed.ResultsA total of 38 patients were included (15 males and 23 females), with a mean age of 16.4 ± 3.73 years (10–22 years) and follow-up of 55.05 ± 6.63 months (range 40–68 months). The etiology was congenital in 17 patients, neuromuscular in 14 patients, neurofibromatosis-1 in 3 patients, and Marfan syndrome in 2 patients. Congenital high scapular disease with scoliosis was found in 2 patients. The mean coronal Cobb angle of the major curve was 97.99° ± 11.47° (range 78°–124°), with a mean flexibility of 15.68% ± 6.65%. The absolute contribution rate (ACR) of bending was 27.26% ± 10.16%, the ACR of the fulcrum was 10.91% ± 2.50%, the ACR of traction was 32.32% ± 11.41%, and the ACR of surgery was 29.50% ± 9.70%. A significant difference in correction was noted between the ACRs of traction and the fulcrum (P < 0.05).DiscussionStrong halo-femoral traction plays a relatively significant role in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis while decreasing the risk of operation, and it is a safe and effective method for the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis.

Canadian Spine SocietyPresentation CPSS1: Spinal insufficiency fracture in the geriatric pediatric spinePresentation CPSS2: The clinical significance of tether breakages in anterior vertebral body growth modulation: a 2-year postoperative analysisPresentation CPSS3: Anterior vertebral body growth modulation for idiopathic scoliosis: early, mid-term and late complicationsPresentation CPSS4: Ovine model of congenital chest wall and spine deformity with alterations of respiratory mechanics: follow-up from

Canadian Spine SocietyPresentation CPSS1: Spinal insufficiency fracture in the geriatric pediatric spinePresentation CPSS2: The clinical significance of tether breakages in anterior vertebral body growth modulation: a 2-year postoperative analysisPresentation CPSS3: Anterior vertebral body growth modulation for idiopathic scoliosis: early, mid-term and late complicationsPresentation CPSS4: Ovine model of congenital chest wall and spine deformity with alterations of respiratory mechanics: follow-up from

Halo Femoral Traction for 1 Week Between Staged Anterior and Posterior Fusion Surgeries for Severe Adolescent Scoliosis Is Effective and Safe

To report the outcomes of halo femoral traction (HFT) used for 1 week between anterior release and definitive posterior fusion in adolescents with severe rigid scoliosis. A retrospective single-center review of 22 consecutive patients (mean age at surgery, 14.1 years; range, 10.5-18.2 years; 17 girls) with severe, rigid scoliosis treated with anterior release, followed by HFT for 7 days prior to posterior instrumented fusion. Cobb angles were measured preoperatively, 1 week after anterior release and traction, after posterior fusion, and at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Complications were recorded. Mean preoperative Cobb angle was 97° (range, 80°-118°), correcting to 52° with anterior release and HFT and 31° after posterior fusion. This equated to a 68% deformity correction and was maintained at final follow-up. Three traction-related complications were experienced, including 1 case of neck pain and 2 cases of brachial plexopathy that resolved with traction weight reduction. Three-staged deformity correction using HFT for 1 week only offers gradual correction of the spine over sufficient time to optimize deformity correction yet minimizes neurologic dysfunction.

Preoperative Halo Traction for Severe Scoliosis.

Retrospective case control study. The aim of this study was to analyze the appropriate traction period and preoperative halo traction (HT)-related factors in severe scoliosis SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: HT can reduce risks involved in severe scoliosis treatment, and its safety and efficacy are well known. However, a lack of evidence exists in guiding the appropriate traction period and other factors involved in HT. We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients who underwent preoperative HT, analyzed correction rate changes over time using HT, and assessed other factors by dividing the patients into two groups according to differences between the post-bending correction angle (PBC) and post-halo traction correction angle (PTC): group A (PBC ≒ PTC) and group B (PBC < PTC). The grouping was determined by whether the difference between PBC and PTC was >8°, the maximum measurement error when measuring the Cobb angle. The mean Cobb angle improved from 96.9° preoperatively to 72.9° post-bending to 63.3° post-traction and 32.5° postoperatively. The coronal correction of the major curve (change in curve from the start to each week/total change in curve after traction) was 28.2% at 1 week (n = 59), 34.0% at 2 weeks (n = 58), 33.8% at 3 weeks (n = 41), and 32.2% at 4 weeks (n = 13); a difference was noted between the first and second weeks (P < 0.001, <0.001, 0.244, and 0.082, respectively). Compared with group A, group B had a lower height (154.9 vs. 144.4 cm, P = 0.029), lower body weight (49.1 vs. 39.4 kg, P = 0.017), higher traction/body weight ratio (0.41 vs. 0.47, P = 0.025), and more halo-femoral traction (0 vs. 6, P = 0.018). Traction for ≥3 weeks was unnecessary for optimal traction. In patients with low height and weight, halo-femoral traction with a heavy traction weight was effective. 4.

Posterior-Only Surgical Correction with Heavy Halo-Femoral Traction for the Treatment of Severe and Rigid Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Tethered Spinal Cord and Type II Split Cord Malformation

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction for the treatment of severe and rigid congenital scoliosis (SRCS) associated with tethered spinal cord (TSC) and type II split cord malformation (SCM). Thirteen patients with SRCS associated with TSC and type II SCM underwent posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction. The preoperative mean coronal Cobb angle was 88.87° ± 12.15°; the mean flexibility was 15.28% ± 3.88%; and the mean angle of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis was 39.63° ± 18.47° and 56.99° ± 10.02°, respectively. The mean duration of surgery was 320 ± 43.64 minutes and the mean blood loss was 1422.31 ± 457.59 mL. The mean follow-up period was 24.46 ± 7.53 months. After heavy halo-femoral traction, the mean coronal Cobb angle was reduced to 59.14° ± 8.75°. After posterior-only surgical correction, postoperative mean coronal Cobb angle was further reduced to 33.85° ± 8.77°. The postoperative mean correction rate was 62.46% ± 5.04%. The postoperative mean angle of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis was 29.31° ± 6.75° and 47.79° ± 3.68°, respectively. At the final follow-up, the corrective loss rate of Cobb angle was only 0.69%. There were no significant differences between final follow-up and preoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association total scores. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 total score improved at the final follow-up evaluation compared with the preoperative total score. Without prophylactic neurosurgical intervention and spine-shortening osteotomy, posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction could be safe and effective for the treatment of SRCS associated with TSC and type II SCM.

Posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction for the treatment of rigid congenital scoliosis associated with split cord malformation

BackgroundWhether or not, prophylactic neurosurgical interventions of split cord malformation (SCM) before undertaking corrective surgery was the focus of debate. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction for the treatment of rigid congenital scoliosis (RCS) associated with SCM.MethodsFrom 2011 to 2017, 24 patients suffered from RCS associated with SCM underwent posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction. The apex of the deformity was lumbar (n = 9), thoracic (n = 11), and thoracolumbar (n = 4). There were 13 cases of failure of segmentation; 4 cases of failure of formation and 7 cases of mixed defects. Based on SCM classification, there were 14 patients with SCM type 1 and 10 patients with SCM type 2. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow up.ResultsThe mean duration of surgery was 327.08 ± 43.99 min and the mean blood loss was 1303.33 ± 526.86 ml. The mean follow-up period was 20.75 ± 8.29 months. The preoperative mean coronal Cobb angle was 80.38° ± 13.55°; on the bending radiograph of the convex side, the mean Cobb angle was 68.91° ± 15.48°; the mean flexibility was 15.04% ± 7.11%. After heavy halo-femoral traction, the mean coronal Cobb angle was reduced to 56.89° ± 13.39°. After posterior-only surgical correction, postoperative mean coronal Cobb angle was further reduced to 32.54° ±11.33°. The postoperative mean correction rate was 60.51% ± 7.79%. At the final follow up, the corrective loss rate of Cobb angle was only 3.17%. The SRS-22 total score improved at the final follow-up evaluation compared with the preoperative SRS-22 total score. The spinal cord function was stable and there were no new neurological symptoms after correction. There were no significant differences between final follow-up and preoperative mJOA total scores.ConclusionsWithout prophylactic neurosurgical intervention and spine-shortening osteotomy, posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction could be safe and effective for the treatment of RCS associated with SCM.

The use of halo-femoral traction without anterior spinal release for treating severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background Treatment of severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis is challenging because of severity of the deformity. With the introduction of several correction techniques, decision making became more complex.Patients and methods In this study, a trial was conducted comparing halo-femoral traction under anesthesia without anterior spinal release with the traditional technique involving anterior release. A single-center, open-label, two-group prospective randomized controlled trial was implemented. A total of eight patients was recruited in each group and allocated using a simple randomization method.Results Recent follow-up after surgery radiogram showed that the average primary curve Cobb’s angle was 53° (51.2%) in group 1 and 48.6° (54.2%) in group 2. The average shoulder and pelvic balance in group 1 was 0.3° (range, 0–2) and 0°, respectively, and in group 2 was 0.3° (range, 0–2) and 0°, respectively. Postoperative thoracic kyphosis was 38.6° (range, 18–51°) in group 1 (45.3%) and 39° (range, 23–47°) in group 2 (36%). Postoperative lumbar lordosis was 44.2° (range, 30–53°) in group 1 (12.4%) and 49.8° (range, 40–58°) in group 2 (25.6%). Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between correction of primary curve Cobb’s angle, postoperative thoracic kyphosis, and postoperative lumber lordosis in both groups. This indicates that patients in both groups had almost the same outcomes, and there is no difference between both surgical techniques in terms of clinical results. Patients undergoing the new technique could overcome several complication and comorbidities that may result from excessive blood loss.Conclusion The use of halo-femoral traction without anterior spinal release for treating severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is an effective, safe, and efficient procedure with low comorbidity.

Surgical treatment of advanced congenital kyphoscoliosis: A case report

Clinical case of surgical treatment of advanced congenital kyphoscoliosis in 12 years old child is reported. Radiographs and CT at presentation failed to reveal the entire anomaly. By analysis of priorly made radiographs hemivertebra L1 was recognized. At genitourinary assessment L-shaped kidney was detected. A full-size 3D-printed model was used for surgical planning. Vertebral column resection as treatment option was discussed, but due to high neurologic complication rate this approach was refused. After preoperative 35 days halo-femoral traction anterior instrumented fusion was performed. Right ureter was stented for intraoperative urologic injury prevention. Scoliosis correction of 32% and kyphosis of 14% was achieved. 5 months later definitive posterior uninstrumented fusion was performed. Spinal deformities caused by vertebral malformations progress dramatically unless they are treated early. An advanced case is a clinical challenge because of technical difficulties and poor result. Vertebral column resection is a treatment option for severe kyphoscoliosis, but it’s indications should be strictly individualized. Preoperative halo-femoral traction is the most safe correction method in spinal deformity due to prolonged and gradual action. 3d-printed models are practical for surgical planning. The model may be used intraoperatively as a 3D-reference. In congenital scoliosis genitourinary system should be assessed meticulously, and urologist advice in relevant case is necessary.

Intraoperative Halo-Femoral Traction in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves between 70° and 90°: Is It Effective?

Study DesignA retrospective clinical study.PurposeTo analyze the surgical outcomes of intraoperative halo-femoral traction (HFT) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with Cobb angles between 70° and 90° and flexibility <35%. Overview of LiteratureNumerous methods have been described to achieve adequate correction and successful results in the surgical treatment of AIS patients with a Cobb angle >70°. However, few studies have evaluated the results of HFT in AIS patients with Cobb angles between 70° and 90° and flexibility <35%.MethodsThe study comprised 24 AIS patients (18 females, six males; mean age, 17.4 years; mean preoperative Cobb angle, 80.1°; range, 70°–90°) who underwent surgery using intraoperative HFT. Neurological status was constantly assessed during the surgery using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 33.5 months. Radiographic outcomes demonstrated 85.7% correction of the major Cobb angle. Coronal and sagittal balance was achieved in all the patients, and shoulder levels were equalized. The traction was discontinued when a decrease in spinal cord potentials was observed during the surgery.ConclusionsIntraoperative HFT is an effective and reliable method for the management of scoliosis curves between 70° and 90°. The most significant advantages of the method are avoidance of the morbidities related to anterior surgery, osteotomy, or vertebral column resection; its contribution in helping achieve adequate reduction and optimum balance by the gradually increased corrective force, lack of any need for extreme correction force during instrumentation; and the high correction rates achieved.

Anterior release may not be necessary for idiopathic scoliosis with a large curve of more than 75° and a flexibility of less than 25%

Background ContextTo improve correction and fusion rates, an anterior release is often needed for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with a curve of more than 75° before posterior correction, instrumentation, and fusion. However, there are disadvantages to anterior release, and we are concerned about whether it is necessary for anterior-posterior spinal fusion in these patients. PurposeThe objective of this study was to compare the surgical results for idiopathic scoliosis with a curve of more than 75° and a flexibility of less than 25% between using posterior-only approach and combined anterior release followed by posterior correction with a hybrid construct (hooks and pedicle screws) and spinal fusion. Study Design/SettingThis was a retrospective cohort study. Patient SampleFrom 2000 to 2014, 388 consecutive patients with idiopathic scoliosis were treated surgically at our hospital. Of these patients, 53 whose primary curves were more than 75° with a flexibility of less than 25%, at an incidence of 13.6%, were included and divided into two groups. Thirty-one patients (mean age: 16.3 years old) who underwent anterior release followed by posterior correction, instrumentation, and fusion were included in the A+P group, and the remaining 22 patients (mean age: 17.3 years old) were designated as the P group for posterior procedure alone. Outcome MeasuresThe clinical outcomes were analyzed in terms of correction and loss of correction and by the Scoliosis Patient Questionnaire: Version 30 functional questionnaire. Materials and MethodsIn the A+P group, halo-femoral traction was applied for 1 week between the anterior release and the posterior procedure. Posterior instrumentation with a hybrid construct with hooks and pedicle screws was used for both groups. The radiological and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe average preoperative Cobb angle was 85.3° for the A+P group, with an average 17.4% flexibility, and 80° for the P group, with 15.3% flexibility. The postoperative Cobb angle was 53.1° for the A+P group and 45.6° for the P group. The Cobb angle at the final follow-up for the A+P group was 55.2° and that for the P group was 48°. The average correction rates of the A+P and P groups were 37% and 43.4%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in gender, age, number of levels fused, and flexibility of coronal curve. With a minimum 2-year follow-up, similar results were found between these two groups in terms of correction rate, loss of correction, and functional outcome. ConclusionsIn this study, we found that a posterior-only approach with hybrid construct (hooks and pedicle screws) could provide a correction similar to that of an anterior-posterior approach. Also, the disadvantages of anterior release could be avoided by the posterior-only approach.

Strategies for Surgical Management of Large, Stiff Spinal Deformities in Children.

Management of large, severe, stiff spinal deformities in children can be challenging. Adjunctive treatments used in conjunction with spinal osteotomy, instrumentation, and fusion can improve the ultimate degree of deformity correction. These adjunctive treatments include preoperative halo-gravity traction, intraoperative halo-femoral traction, temporary internal spinal distraction, and anterior spinal release. Each of these techniques has unique indications and individual risks. When the appropriate protocols are followed, these techniques can be safe and efficacious.