ABSTRACT Western armed forces have increasingly adopted “force protection” measures to avoid casualties during irregular warfare and peace-support operations. When similar protection measures were introduced in the humanitarian sector to safeguard aid workers, humanitarian action researchers criticised the broader implications of these security measures. Using their findings, it is possible to reflect critically on force protection in a military context. First, force protection may shift risks to vulnerable others, such as less-protected allies, or the local population. Second, force protection may directly upset power relations within the mission’s specific context. Third, force protection results in a deterioration of security intelligence. Fourth, force protection inhibits the development of empathy for allies, local populations, and victims. Fifth, force protection harms soldiers’ morale by exacerbating boredom. This paper concludes that armed forces would do well to assess the various adverse effects of force protection measures.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
932 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Related Topics
Articles published on Guerrilla Warfare
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
998 Search results
Sort by Recency