GT1a-infected Patients Research Articles

Linkage of resistance-associated substitutions in GT1 sofosbuvir + NS5A inhibitor failures treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir

Retreatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) resulted in a rate of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) of >90% in HCV genotype 1 (GT1) patients who previously failed a regimen of sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor (NS5Ai). This study investigated the prevalence and impact of baseline NS3 and NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) on the efficacy of G/P in prior GT1 sofosbuvir+NS5Ai failures and the persistence of treatment-emergent RASs. Longitudinal samples from 177 patients enrolled in a phase IIIb, randomized pragmatic clinical trial were analyzed. Patients without cirrhosis were randomized to 12 or 16 weeks of G/P, and patients with compensated cirrhosis were randomized to G/P and ribavirin for 12 weeks or G/P for 16 weeks. Linkage of RAS was identified using Primer-ID next-generation sequencing at a 15% cut-off. Of 177 patients, 169 (95.5%) were PI-naïve. All 33 GT1b-infected patients achieved SVR12. In GT1a-infected patients, baseline NS5A RASs were prevalent (74.5%, 105/141) but NS3 RASs were uncommon. Baseline NS3 RASs had no impact on G/P efficacy and patients with baseline NS5A RASs showed a numerically but not statistically significantly lower SVR12 rate compared to those without NS5A RASs (89% vs. 97%). SVR12 was achieved in 34 of 35 (97%) patients without NS5A baseline substitution, and 53 of 57 (93%), 35 of 40 (88%), 5 of 8 (63%) with single, double-linked, and triple-linked NS5A substitutions, respectively. Among 13 patients with virologic failure, 4 acquired treatment-emergent NS3 RASs and 10 acquired NS5A RASs. Baseline NS5A RASs were highly prevalent. The presence of an increasing number of linked NS5A RASs in GT1a showed a trend in decreasing SVR12 rates, although no specific NS5A RASs or their linkage pattern were associated with lower SVR12 rates. Direct-acting antivirals have revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection, but treatment failure occurs in some patients. Retreatment of patients who previously failed a regimen consisting of sofosbuvir and an NS5A inhibitor with a regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P) is >90% effective. Herein, we analyzed samples from these patients and showed that retreatment efficacy with G/P is lower in patients with double- or triple-linked NS5A resistance mutations than in patients with single or no NS5A resistance mutations. NCT03092375.

Failure on voxilaprevir, velpatasvir, sofosbuvir and efficacy of rescue therapy

There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients. Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients. Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n= 18, 45%) or GT1a (n= 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n= 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n= 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n= 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n= 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n= 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12. VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients. The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%).

Utilization and effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir and adoption of resistance-associated substitutions testing in real-world treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1A infection: results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry.

BackgroundFor treatment of genotype 1a (GT1a) infection with elbasvir/grazoprevir, the German guidelines recommend a differentiated approach depending on baseline viral load (BVL). For low BVL ≤800 000 IU/mL, treatment with 12 weeks elbasvir/grazoprevir should be considered, whereas for high BVL >800 000 IU/mL, this regimen is only recommended in nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) absence. With present NS5A RAS or when RAS-testing is not available, 16 weeks elbasvir/grazoprevir + ribavirin is preferred. Here, we investigated the adherence to these recommendations and the effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir in a large German Hepatitis C-Registry GT1a cohort.MethodsFrom September 2016 until July 2018, 195 GT1a-infected patients were treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir ± ribavirin for 12–16 weeks. The primary outcome was per protocol SVR12 or SVR24.ResultsMean age was 50 years, 89% were male, 19% had cirrhosis, 72% were treatment-naïve. Forty-five percent had low BVL ≤800 000 IU/mL, 55% high BVL >800 000 IU/mL, of whom 49 vs. 42% were baseline RAS-tested. Four patients with high (7.7%) and two with low BVL (5%) had NS5A RAS of whom 50% received elbasvir/grazoprevir+ribavirin, respectively. Ninety-four percent of patients with low and 65% with high BVL received elbasvir/grazoprevir without ribavirin. Thirty-five percent of patients with high BVL received ribavirin, mostly without prior RAS-testing. Per protocol sustained virologic response (SVR) by low vs. high BVL was 98.8 and 95.1%. All patients with NS5A RAS achieved SVR.ConclusionsIn German, real-world most patients received elbasvir/grazoprevir without ribavirin. Ribavirin was mainly added in GT1a patients >800 000 IU/mL, who were not NS5A RAS tested. SVR rates were consistently high and comparable to clinical trial results.

Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin for HCV in Brazilian Adults with Advanced Fibrosis

Introduction and aim. Approximately 650,000 people in Brazil have chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) plus dasabuvir (DSV) with/without ribavirin (RBV) in an open-label multicenter phase 3b trial in treatment-naive or interferon (IFN) treatment-experienced Brazilian patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis (METAVIR F3/4) and HCV genotype (GT) 1 infection.Material and methods. All patients received coformulated OBV/ PTV/r daily + DSV twice daily (3-DAA). GTIa-infected patients received 3-DAA plus RBV for 12 weeks, except for prior pegIFN/ RBV nonresponders with cirrhosis who were treated for 24 weeks. GTIb-infected patients received 3-DAA alone (F3) or in combination with RBV (F4) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL) at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12).Results. The study enrolled 222 patients, 214 achieved an SVR12 (96.4%; 95% CI, 93.1-98.2%), one GT1a-infected patient experienced virologic breakthrough, six (5 GT1a) relapsed, and one was lost to follow-up. SVR12 was achieved in 111/ 112 (99.1%) GT1b-infected patients, including 42/43 (97.7%) noncirrhotic, and 69/69 (100%) cirrhotic patients; and in 103/110 (93.6%) GT1a-infected patients, including 44/46 (95.7%) noncirrhotic and 59/64 (92.2%) cirrhotic patients. Overall there was a low rate of serious adverse events (n = 6, 2.7%). One patient experienced a treatment-related serious adverse event and one patient discontinued treatment because of an adverse event.Discussion. The results confirm that the 3-DAA regimen with/without RBV is well tolerated and had a favorable safety profile and is efficacious in GT1-infected patients with advanced fibrosis (METAVIR F3/4).

Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 or 4 Infection and Advanced Kidney Disease

IntroductionHepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in patients with end-stage renal disease. We investigated the safety and efficacy of ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) ± ribavirin (RBV) in 2 phase 3, open-label, multicenter studies in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD).MethodsRUBY-I, Cohort 2 enrolled treatment-naïve or -experienced patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1a or 1b infection, with or without cirrhosis. Patients received 12 weeks (24 weeks for GT1a patients with cirrhosis) of OBV/PTV/r + DSV; all GT1a patients received RBV. RUBY-II enrolled treatment-naïve patients with GT1a or GT4 infection without cirrhosis. All patients received 12 weeks of RBV-free treatment: OBV/PTV/r + DSV for GT1a-infected patients; OBV/PTV/r for GT4-infected patients. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12).ResultsRUBY-I, Cohort 2 and RUBY-II enrolled 66 patients, including 50 (76%) on dialysis; 15 (23%) had compensated cirrhosis. Overall, the SVR12 rate was 95% (63/66); 1 patient had virologic failure. There were 3 discontinuations due to adverse events. Seventy-three percent (27/37) of patients receiving RBV had adverse events leading to RBV dose modification. The RBV-free RUBY-II study had no hemoglobin-associated adverse events.ConclusionTreatment with OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV was well tolerated and patients with HCV GT1 or 4 infection and stage 4 or 5 CKD had high SVR12 rates, including patients with compensated cirrhosis and/or prior treatment experience.

Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin for HCV in Brazilian Adults with Advanced Fibrosis

Introduction and aim: Approximately 650,000 people in Brazil have chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) plus dasabuvir (DSV) with/without ribavirin (RBV) in an open-label multicenter phase 3b trial in treatment-naive or interferon (IFN) treatment-experienced Brazilian patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis (METAVIR F3/4) and HCV genotype (GT) 1 infection. Materials and methods: All patients received coformulated OBV/PTV/r daily + DSV twice daily (3-DAA). GT1a-infected patients received 3-DAA plus RBV for 12 weeks, except for prior pegIFN/RBV nonresponders with cirrhosis who were treated for 24 weeks. GT1b-infected patients received 3-DAA alone (F3) or in combination with RBV (F4) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (HCV RNA &lt;15 IU/mL) at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). Results: The study enrolled 222 patients, 214 achieved an SVR12 (96.4%; 95% CI, 93.1–98.2%), one GT1a-infected patient experienced virologic breakthrough, six (5 GT1a) relapsed, and one was lost to follow-up. SVR12 was achieved in 111/112 (99.1%) GT1b-infected patients, including 42/43 (97.7%) noncirrhotic, and 69/69 (100%) cirrhotic patients; and in 103/110 (93.6%) GT1a-infected patients, including 44/46 (95.7%) noncirrhotic and 59/64 (92.2%) cirrhotic patients. Overall there was a low rate of serious adverse events (n = 6, 2.7%). One patient experienced a treatment-related serious adverse event and one patient discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Conclusion: The results confirm that the 3-DAA regimen with/without RBV is well tolerated and had a favorable safety profile and is efficacious in GT1-infected patients with advanced fibrosis (METAVIR F3/4).

Prevalence of relevant NS5A resistance-associated substitutions to elbasvir in genotype 1a hepatitis C virus patients in Spain

Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) to the new HCV NS5A inhibitor elbasvir may limit its efficacy and lead to virological failure in HCV-GT1a-infected patients. There are no data outside clinical trials evaluating their prevalence and impact in grazoprevir/elbasvir in GT1a-infected patients in Spain. A multicentre cross-sectional study of 632 initial patients was conducted. In 13 of these patients, the sample could not be amplified or a consensus sequence by Sanger sequencing could not be performed. Ultimately, 617 HCV-G1a-infected individuals treated at 84 Spanish hospitals from the 17 autonomous communities plus the 2 autonomous cities of Spain were analysed. HCV population sequencing was used to identify RAS to elbasvir and the mutational pattern and drug sensitivity were confirmed by geno2pheno[HCV]. Viruses bearing RASs to elbasvir were present in 6.2% of HCV-G1a infected patients. The most common RASs were the Y93C/H/N and Q30E/H/R (2.4% and 2.3%, respectively). Only 3.4% of the identified RASs to elbasvir conferred reduced susceptibility to elbasvir by geno2pheno[HCV], which exclusively identified the positions Q30H/R (n=7) and Y93C/H/N (n=8) as single mutations and Q30H+Y93H (n=4) and Q30R+Y93H (n=2) as double mutations as the major RASs to elbasvir. A lower prevalence of RASs to elbasvir was observed in our HCV-G1a Spanish cohort than reported previously in clinical trials evaluating patients from the USA. This information may be essential to guide the implementation of grazoprevir/elbasvir in Spain and to manage G1a-infected patients.

Natural NS5A inhibitor resistance associated substitutions in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infected patients from Italy

ObjectivesGenetic variability in NS5A is associated with different levels of resistance to the currently licensed NS5A inhibitors. The aim of this study was to detect NS5A inhibitor resistance associated substitutions (RASs) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (GT1) patients who are naive to direct-acting HCV antivirals. MethodsAmplification, Sanger sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the HCV NS5A region were performed on plasma obtained from 122 consecutive patients with HCV chronic infection attending four different clinics in Italy. ResultsNS5A inhibitor RASs were detected in 14/61 (23.0%) HCV GT1b and 3/61 (4.9%) HCV GT1a infected patients (p 0.007). The pan-genotypic RAS Y93H was detected in 1 (1.6%) GT1a and 4 (6.6%) GT1b patients. GT1a sequences clustered into two different clades with RASs detected in 1/34 (2.9%) clade I and 2/27 (7.4%) clade II sequences. ConclusionsAlthough the impact of naturally occurring NS5A RASs might be limited with upcoming pan-genotypic treatment regimens, this information is still useful to map naturally occurring HCV variants in different geographic areas in the context of current HCV therapy.

Low frequency of NS5A relevant resistance-associated substitutions to Elbasvir among hepatitis C virus genotype 1a in Spain: a cross-sectional study

Relevant resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) to elbasvir, the new HCV NS5A inhibitor, may limit its efficacy and lead to virological failure in HCV-GT1a-infected patients. There are few data outside clinical trials evaluating their prevalence and impact of elbasvir/grazoprevir. A multicenter cross-sectional study of 617 HCV-GT1a-infected individuals attended in 84 Spanish hospitals from the 17 Autonomous Communities and two Autonomous cities was performed. HCV population sequencing was used to identify RASs to elbasvir and the mutational pattern and drug sensitivity were confirmed by geno2pheno[HCV]. Viruses bearing RASs to elbasvir were present in 6.2% of HCV-GT1a infected patients. The most common RASs were the Y93C/H/N and Q30E/H/R (2.4% and 2.3%; respectively). Only 3.4% of patients had viruses with RASs that confer reduced susceptibility to elbasvir by geno2pheno[HCV] that identified exclusively the positions Q30H/R (n = 7) and Y93C/H/N (n = 8) as single mutations and Q30H + Y93H (n = 4) and Q30R + Y93H (n = 2) as double mutations considered as RASs to elbasvir. Lower prevalence of RASs to elbasvir in our HCV-GT1a-Spanish cohort was observed than reported previously in clinical trials. This information may be essential to guiding the implementation of elbasvir/grazoprevir in Spain, expected at the beginning of 2017 and the management of GT1a-infected patients.

Simeprevir with peginterferon \u03b1-2a/ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in treatment-experienced patients: an open-label, rollover study

BackgroundThis Phase 3, open-label, rollover study (NCT01323244) investigated the efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus peginterferon α-2a (PegIFNα-2a) and ribavirin (RBV) in a well-characterized population of HCV genotype 1 (GT1)-infected treatment-experienced patients.MethodsPatients who had failed PegIFNα/RBV treatment in the placebo arm of a previous Phase 2/3 simeprevir study (Phase 2/3 group, n = 125), or had been exposed to HCV direct-acting antivirals (simeprevir or other) for up to 14 days in a selected Phase 1 study (Phase 1 group, n = 16), were eligible. Phase 2/3 group patients were classified according to prior relapse, breakthrough, or non-response (null response, partial response, non-classifiable non-response) to PegIFNα/RBV. Eight patients in the Phase 1 group received short-term (≤14 days) simeprevir.Treatment comprised simeprevir 150 mg once daily (QD) plus PegIFNα-2a/RBV for 12 weeks followed by PegIFNα-2a/RBV for 12 or 36 weeks (using response-guided therapy [RGT] to determine total treatment duration in Phase 2/3 prior relapsers or breakthrough) or 36 weeks fixed (Phase 2/3 group non-responders and Phase 1 group). The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after planned end of treatment (SVR12).ResultsPhase 2/3 group: SVR12 rate was 69.6% (87/125) overall; 92.7% (51/55), 60.0% (6/10), 64.3% (18/28), and 36.7% (11/30) in patients with prior relapse, viral breakthrough, partial response, or null response, respectively. SVR12 rates were similar for patients with HCV GT1a (66.0% [33/50]) and GT1b infection (72.0% [54/75]) and among HCV GT1a-infected patients with/without a baseline Q80K polymorphism (66.7% [8/12] and 65.8% [25/38], respectively). The majority of RGT-eligible patients (prior viral relapse or breakthrough) met RGT criteria (89.2% [58/65]); of these, 89.7% (52/58) achieved SVR12. Overall, 16.0% (20/125) of patients experienced on-treatment failure and 14.4% (18/125) experienced post-treatment failure (15 relapses, 3 missing data). Phase 1 group (simeprevir-naïve and -experienced patients combined): SVR12 rate was 37.5% (6/16). Safety and tolerability findings were comparable to those of the feeder studies.ConclusionsThe majority of RGT-eligible patients met criteria for shortening treatment to 24 weeks in total. Simeprevir 150 mg QD with PegIFNα-2a/RBV led to a high SVR rate among prior relapsers with HCV GT1 infection. No new safety signals were noted.Trial registrationNCT01323244. (date of registration: March 24, 2011).

Frecuencia de sustituciones relevantes asociadas a resistencia en la región NS5A a elbasvir en el virus de la hepatitis C en pacientes con genotipo 1a en España

Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) to the new HCV NS5A inhibitor elbasvir may limit its efficacy and lead to virological failure in HCV-GT1a-infected patients. There are no data outside clinical trials evaluating their prevalence and impact in grazoprevir/elbasvir in GT1a-infected patients in Spain. A multicentre cross-sectional study of 632 initial patients was conducted. In 13 of these patients, the sample could not be amplified or a consensus sequence by Sanger sequencing could not be performed. Ultimately, 617 HCV-G1a-infected individuals treated at 84 Spanish hospitals from the 17 autonomous communities plus the 2 autonomous cities of Spain were analysed. HCV population sequencing was used to identify RAS to elbasvir and the mutational pattern and drug sensitivity were confirmed by geno2pheno[HCV]. Viruses bearing RASs to elbasvir were present in 6.2% of HCV-G1a infected patients. The most common RASs were the Y93C/H/N and Q30E/H/R (2.4% and 2.3%, respectively). Only 3.4% of the identified RASs to elbasvir conferred reduced susceptibility to elbasvir by geno2pheno[HCV], which exclusively identified the positions Q30H/R (n=7) and Y93C/H/N (n=8) as single mutations and Q30H+Y93H (n=4) and Q30R+Y93H (n=2) as double mutations as the major RASs to elbasvir. A lower prevalence of RASs to elbasvir was observed in our HCV-G1a Spanish cohort than reported previously in clinical trials evaluating patients from the USA. This information may be essential to guide the implementation of grazoprevir/elbasvir in Spain and to manage G1a-infected patients.

Unraveling the structural basis of grazoprevir potency against clinically relevant substitutions in hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease from genotype 1a

Grazoprevir is a potent pan-genotype and macrocyclic inhibitor of hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease and was developed for treating chronic HCV infection. In HCV genotype (GT) 1a, grazoprevir maintains potent activity against a majority of NS3 resistance-associated amino acid substitutions, including the highly prevalent and naturally occurring Q80K polymorphism that impacts simeprevir, another NS3/4A protease inhibitor. The basis for an unexpected difference in the clinical impact of some NS3 substitutions was investigated. Phenotypic analysis of resistance-associated substitutions identified in NS3 from GT1a-infected patients who failed therapy with grazoprevir (in combination with elbasvir, an inhibitor of HCV NS5A protein) showed that positions 56, 156, and 168 in NS3 were most impactful because they diminished protein-inhibitor interactions. Although an amino acid substitution from aspartic acid to alanine at position 168 (D168A) reduced the potency of grazoprevir, its combination with R155K unexpectedly nullified this effect. Molecular dynamics and free-energy surface studies indicated that Asp-168 is important in anchoring Arg-155 for ligand binding but is not critical for Lys-155 because of the inherent flexibility of its side chain. Moreover, modeling studies supported a strong direct cation-heterocycle interaction between the Lys-155 side chain of the double substitution, R155K/D168A, and the lone pair on the quinoxaline in grazoprevir. This unique interaction provides a structural basis for grazoprevir's higher potency than simeprevir, an inhibitor to which the double substitution confers a significant reduction in potency. Our findings are consistent with the detection of R155K/D168A in NS3 from virologic failures treated with simeprevir but not grazoprevir.

Sustained Virologic Response Rate of 96% in HCV Genotype 1a-Infected Patients Treated With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/r and Dasabuvir With Ribavirin

Introduction: The interferon-free 3 direct-acting antiviral (3D) regimen of ombitasvir (an NS5A inhibitor), paritaprevir (an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor identified by AbbVie and Enanta, boosted with ritonavir [r]) and dasabuvir (a non-nucleoside NS5B RNA polymerase inhibitor) is approved to treat patients infected with HCV genotype (GT) 1. Using pooled data from four phase 3 studies in treatmentnaïve and prior pegIFN/RBV-experienced patients with GT1a infection, with or without cirrhosis, we report the safety and efficacy in patients who received the label-recommended 3D regimen plus ribavirin (RBV). Methods: Genotype 1a-infected patients from the PEARL-IV, SAPPHIRE-I, SAPPHIRE-II, and TUR-QUOISE-II studies were included in this post-hoc analysis. Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response (HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL) 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12). Per the US Prescribing Information and European SmPC, the label-recommended regimen for GT1a infection is 3D+RBV for 12 weeks in non-cirrhotic patients, and 3D+RBV for 24 weeks in patients with cirrhosis. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory measures are reported for all patients receiving the label-recommended regimen. Results: Among 714 HCV GT1a-infected patients treated with the label-recommended 3D+RBV regimen, 64% were male, 33% were treatment-experienced, 17% had cirrhosis, and 85% had baseline viral loads ≥800,000 IU/mL. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 96% (95% CI, 94-97%) of patients (Table). Response rates were similar regardless of the presence or absence of cirrhosis (95 versus 96%, respectively). Virologic failure was observed in 18 (2.5%) patients, 5 (0.7%) with on-treatment breakthrough and 13 (1.8%) with post-treatment relapse. Seven patients (1.0%) discontinued treatment due to AEs, 4 of whom subsequently achieved SVR12. The most common AEs were fatigue (41%), headache (33%), nausea (23%), and insomnia (17%). Grade 3+ laboratory abnormalities were infrequent for ALT (0.9%), AST (0.6%), hemoglobin (0.3%), and total bilirubin (2.8%). Conclusion: In HCV GT1a-infected patients, the label-recommended 3D regimen with RBV achieved high SVR12 rates, including historically difficult-to-cure subgroups of patients with prior PR null response and/or cirrhosis.Table 1

Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir compared to IFN-containing regimens in genotype 1 HCV patients: The MALACHITE-I/II trials

Telaprevir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin (TPV+PegIFN/RBV) remains a therapeutic option for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 infection in many regions. We conducted two open-label, phase IIIb trials comparing safety and efficacy of all-oral ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir±ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r+DSV±RBV) and TPV+PegIFN/RBV. Treatment-naïve (MALACHITE-I) or PegIFN/RBV-experienced (MALACHITE-II) non-cirrhotic, chronic HCV GT1-infected patients were randomized to OBV/PTV/r+DSV+weight-based RBV, OBV/PTV/r+DSV (treatment-naïve, GT1b-infected patients only), or 12weeks of TPV+PegIFN+weight-based RBV and 12-36 additional weeks of PegIFN/RBV. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Patient-reported outcome questionnaires evaluated mental and physical health during the studies. Three hundred eleven treatment-naïve and 148 treatment-experienced patients were randomized and dosed. Among treatment-naïve patients, SVR12 rates were 97% (67/69) and 82% (28/34), respectively, in OBV/PTV/r+DSV+RBV and TPV+PegIFN/RBV-treated GT1a-infected patients; SVR12 rates were 99% (83/84), 98% (81/83), and 78% (32/41) in OBV/PTV/r+DSV+RBV, OBV/PTV/r+DSV, and TPV+PegIFN/RBV-treated GT1b-infected patients. Among treatment-experienced patients, SVR12 rates were 99% (100/101) and 66% (31/47) with OBV/PTV/r+DSV+RBV and TPV+PegIFN/RBV. Mental and physical health were generally better with OBV/PTV/r+DSV±RBV than TPV+PegIFN/RBV. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse events (0-1% and 8-11%, respectively, p<0.05) and rates of hemoglobin decline to <10g/dl (0-4% and 34-47%, respectively, p<0.05) were lower for OBV/PTV/r+DSV±RBV than TPV+PegIFN/RBV. Among non-cirrhotic, HCV GT1-infected patients, SVR12 rates were 97-99% with 12week, multi-targeted OBV/PTV/r+DSV±RBV regimens and 66-82% with 24-48 total weeks of TPV+PegIFN/RBV. OBV/PTV/r+DSV±RBV was associated with a generally better mental and physical health, more favorable tolerability, and lower rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events.

Resistance analysis of baseline and treatment-emergent variants in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in the AVIATOR study with paritaprevir-ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir.

AVIATOR, a phase 2 clinical trial, evaluated ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir (a protease inhibitor), ombitasvir (an NS5A inhibitor), and dasabuvir (a nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitor) (the three-drug [3D] regimen) with or without ribavirin (RBV) for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in 406 HCV genotype 1 (GT1)-infected patients. The rate of sustained virologic response 24 weeks after treatment ranged from 88% to 100% across the arms of the 3D regimen with or without RBV; 20 GT1a-infected patients and 1 GT1b-infected patient experienced virologic failure (5.2%). Baseline resistance-conferring variants in NS3 were rare. M28V in GT1a and Y93H in GT1b were the most prevalent preexisting variants in NS5A, and C316N in GT1b and S556G in both GT1a and GT1b were the most prevalent variants in NS5B. Interestingly, all the GT1a sequences encoding M28V in NS5A were from the United States, while GT1b sequences encoding C316N and S556G in NS5B were predominant in the European Union. Variants preexisting at baseline had no significant impact on treatment outcome. The most prevalent treatment-emergent resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in GT1a were R155K and D168V in NS3, M28T and Q30R in NS5A, and S556G in NS5B. The single GT1b-infected patient experiencing virologic failure had no RAVs in any target. A paritaprevir-ritonavir dose of 150/100 mg was more efficacious in suppressing R155K in NS3 than a 100/100-mg dose. In patients who failed after receiving 12 or more weeks of treatment, RAVs were selected in all 3 targets, while most patients who relapsed after 8 weeks of treatment did so without any detectable RAVs. Results from this study guided the selection of the optimal treatment regimen, treatment duration, and paritaprevir dose for further development of the 3D regimen. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT01464827.)

1200 ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY OF EP-NI266, A POTENT NUCLEOTIDE HCV POLYMERASE INHIBITOR

1198 HCV NS3/4A PROTEASE RESISTANCE-ASSOCIATED VARIANTS (RAVS) IDENTIFIED IN GENOTYPE 1A PATIENTS EXHIBIT DIFFERENCES IN PHENOTYPIC RESISTANCE TO BOCEPREVIR AND TELAPREVIR IN GENOTYPE 1A REPLICON CELLS S. Black, P. McMonagle, R. Chase, S. Curry, R.J.O. Barnard, D.J. Hazuda, A.Y. Howe, J.A. Howe, R.A. Ogert. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA E-mail: robert.ogert@merck.com Background: The HCV NS3 protease inhibitors boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TPV) in combination with pegylated interferon alpha-2 plus ribavirin (PR) have been approved for treatment of HCV genotype 1 (GT 1) infection. The major RAVs identified in nonsustained virologic response (SVR) GT 1a infected patients were similar for BOC and TPV. These RAVs were analyzed for phenotypic resistance to BOC and TPV using an in-vitro GT 1a replicon assay. Methods: RAVs were detected by population sequencing in samples from SPRINT-2 (treatment naive) and RESPOND-2 (prior nonresponder/relapser) patients. RAVs were engineered into a GT 1a replicon derived from the H77 1a strain. Replicon cell lines were treated with BOC or TPV for 3 days, and HCVRNA was quantified by Taqman real time PCR analysis. Results: For patients treated with BOC, RAVs were detected in 53% of non-SVR patients with NS3 sequences available. In BOC treated, non-SVR HCV GT 1a infected patients; the most common RAVs were V36M, T54S and R155K. T54A and A156S/T were also identified in HCV GT 1a non-SVR treated patients but were observed more frequently in HCV GT 1b. A similar pattern of HCV GT 1a RAVs was identified in TPV treated patients (Bartels DJ, et al. Hepatology. 2011;54(S1):1328). These RAVs were analyzed for resistance to BOC and TPV in a GT 1a replicon assay. T54A and T54S produced similar fold-shifts in EC50 with BOC and TPV. However, V36M, R155K and A156S each produced a larger fold-shift in resistance to TPV than BOC. The fold shift in EC50 for each RAV was 2to 6-fold for BOC and 5to 16-fold for TPV. Also, the V36M + R155K double variant resulted in a >20-fold increase in EC50 for TPV but <10-fold for BOC.

Development of a Chimeric Replicon System for Phenotypic Analysis of Ns3 Protease Sequences from HCV Clinical Isolates

To support clinical development of HCV non-structural protein (NS) 3 protease inhibitors (PIs), phenotypic monitoring of patient isolates is a prerequisite for understanding the emergence of resistance. HCV isolates typically fail to replicate in cell culture, necessitating the use of alternative phenotyping methods. An NS3 protease chimeric replicon system was developed to monitor the phenotype of clinical isolates. The transfer of NS3 protease domain sequences from HCV-infected patients to the background of genotype (Gt) 1a-H77c, 1b-Con1 and 2a-JFH-1 lab strain replicons adapted to high-level cell culture replication was investigated. NS3 protease sequences derived from HCV Gt 1a or Gt 1b infected patients were transferred into Gt 1a and 1b replicons, respectively. Replication was detected for 20% of Gt 1a and 75% of Gt 1b sequences. Incorporation of known cell culture adaptive change NS3-E176G improved replication of Gt 1b but not of Gt 1a sequences. Transfer of Gt 1a clinical sequences into the Gt 1b background enhanced replication and allowed phenotypic analysis of all sequences. A correlation was observed between clinical isolate sequence polymorphisms and reduced susceptibility to NS3 PI. In mixed populations containing known NS3 PI resistance changes NS3-R155K or D168E/V, sensitivity of resistance detection was ≥ 10%. An HCV replicon capable of supporting phenotypic characterization of patient-derived HCV NS3 protease sequences was developed. Pre-existence of amino acid changes associated with NS3 PI resistance highlights the need for combination therapies in the treatment of HCV.