In August 1971, US President Richard Nixon must decide how to respond to a growing “run” on the US dollar. Declining confidence in the dollar has led some national trading partners to redeem dollars for gold at the US Treasury's gold window. Nixon has convened an urgent conference with his economic advisers at Camp David to consider a response. The two dominant policy alternatives are (a) gradual intervention proposed by central banker, Arthur Burns; and (b) “shock treatment” (devaluation of the dollar by abandoning the commitment under the Bretton Woods Agreement to convert dollars into gold at the rate of $35/ounce) proposed by Treasury Secretary John Connally. The task for the student is to assess the situation and recommend a course of action.The A case describes the Bretton Woods system, the run on the dollar, and Nixon's policy dilemma. The B case gives the text of Nixon's 1971 address outlining his New Economic Policy. This A and B abridged case, which has been taught successfully in Darden in-person and online classes, shortens the total presentation by eliminating some of the quoted material; the student task in this case is to analyze Nixon's decision and decide on next steps. The C case presents a brief epilogue. Excerpt UVA-F-1837 Rev. Jul. 21, 2020 Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged) This could be the most important weekend in the history of economics since March 4, 1933. —Herbert Stein, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, August 13, 1971 On August 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon addressed the nation to introduce a New Economic Policy that would dramatically change the stance of the United States in international monetary affairs. This policy—reached after a dramatic debate among advisers—would impose a special import tax surcharge and suspend the convertibility of dollars for gold. These actions would abandon the Bretton Woods agreement that had underpinned global finance since 1945. Before his speech, Nixon reflected upon why a new policy was necessary and what had changed in the world to warrant a new policy. How would US voters and foreign trading partners respond to this new policy? . . .
Read full abstract