Physician Global Assessment Research Articles

Phenotypic differences in clinical manifestations of generalized pustular psoriasis and severe plaque psoriasis in tropical Taiwan

Abstract Background: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is an uncommon variant of psoriasis. Clinical characteristics of GPP are limited due to its relatively low prevalence worldwide. Thus, the region-specific phenotypic differences between GPP and severe plaque psoriasis (SPP) remained not fully clarified. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the gender distribution, disease onset, clinical features, medical comorbidities, associated symptoms, laboratory findings, and potential precipitating factors of GPP and SPP in a single center in tropical Taiwan. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for GPP and SPP in a tertiary medical center from 2003 to 2023. The GPP Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) and GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) score were used to measure the severity of GPP. Results: A total of 26 patients with GPP (mean age: 48.2 years) and 50 patients with SPP (defined as psoriasis area and severity index over 20 and undergoing biological agents more than 1 year, mean age: 41.3 years) were included in this study. Forty-six percentage of the GPP patients had a preceding history of psoriasis. While there was no gender or age predominance, patients with GPP tended to develop fever, hypertension, upper respiratory tract infection, leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, scalp involvement, be hospitalized and for a long time, along with allergy history of medications (diclofenac, ampicillin, and ceftriaxone), as compared to those with SPP. Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections were less prevalent in GPP patients (with 15.4% and 3.8%, compared to 30.0% and 8.0% in SPP, respectively, although not statistically significant). The highest GPPASI and GPPGA scores occurred in young patients of GPP, but they are not associated with diseases of hypertension, hyperglycemia, or hyperlipidemia. Conclusion: Patients with GPP in Taiwan tended to have a higher hospitalization rate and longer mean hospitalization time along with increased occurrence of fever, leukocytosis, elevated CRP levels, and drug allergy. The younger patients of GPP tended to have higher GPPASI and GPPGA scores than the elder ones.

Pemphigus oral lesions area index (POLAI): A new scoring scale for assessing oral pemphigus vulgaris

AbstractObjectivesCurrent scales for Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) do not adequately represent the clinical variability of oral lesions. This study aimed to develop an independent scale, the Pemphigus Oral Lesions Area Index (POLAI), for assessment of oral PV exclusively, and compare POLAI, Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) and Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) regarding inter‐ and intra‐observer reliability and validity.Materials and MethodsRetrospective cohort included 209 sets of digital‐photographs. Additional clinical cohort included 32 PV patients. All visits were assessed by four clinicians using the PDAI, ABSIS, ODSS and POLAI, and were rated by three specialists using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA).ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient showed the inter‐observer reliability with 0.89 and 0.86 for PDAI, 0.87 for ABSIS, 0.93 for ODSS, 0.96 for POLAI, and 0.97 and 0.96 for PGA. Intra‐observer agreements showed excellent reliability for all 4 scores. Highest correlation was observed between PGA and POLAI (correlation coefficients were 0.96). The mean time taken to complete each scale was within 1.5 min.ConclusionPOLAI is valid for the assessment of oral PV with superior inter‐ and intra‐observer reliability to PDAI, ABSIS and ODSS, and is feasible in clinic.

Therapeutic efficiency and safety assessment of intradermal platelet-rich plasma combined with oral tranexamic acid in patients with facial melasma.

Melasma is a chronic, acquired hypermelanosis that primarily affects the face. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and tranexamic acid (TXA) are promising treatments for melasma. However, only a few randomized clinical trials have examined the efficacy and safety of combining these therapies for melasma. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combining PRP and oral TXA with those of PRP alone in the treatment of facial melasma. A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Walailak University Hospital, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand, between March and September 2023. Participants with mixed-type melasma were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either group A (PRP injection alone without placebo) or group B (PRP injection with oral TXA). Therapeutic efficacy and safety assessments were performed over a 12-week follow-up period. The study included 26 participants (mean age: 45.9 years, standard deviation (±SD): 5.0) who were predominantly female (84.6%). In group A, the modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) scores significantly decreased from a median of 4.30 interquartile range (IQR): 4.10) to 3.60 (IQR: 3.10) between week 0 and week 12, respectively. In group B, the median mMASI decreased from 6.40 (IQR: 7.80) to 3.60 (IQR: 3.70) over the same period. The median change in mMASI scores in group B (2.90, IQR: 2.40) was significantly larger than in group A (0.90, IQR: 0.60) (p < 0.001, U = 160.50). However, there were no significant differences in the physicians' global assessment (PGA), melasma quality of life scale (MelasQoL) or patient satisfaction during follow-up. Four patients (15.4%) experienced transient erythema and swelling. In group B, 1 participant (7.7%) experienced transient mild gastrointestinal discomfort after receiving oral TXA. The combination of intradermal PRP injection and oral TXA is effective for melasma, even in patients with poor prognostic treatment response factors. No serious adverse reactions were observed in either group.

Can a simple 0–10 RheuMetric physician estimate of inflammatory activity (DOCINF) depict a detailed swollen joint count (SJC) as accurately as a DAS28 or CDAI in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

ObjectiveTo compare a 0–10 physician subglobal estimate of inflammatory activity (DOCINF) on a RheuMetric checklist to a formal swollen joint count (SJC) and other rheumatoid arthritis (RA) Core data set measures in a disease activity score 28 (DAS28), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), and simplified disease activity index (SDAI) in patients with RA, recognizing that RA measures, index scores and physician global assessment (DOCGL) may be elevated by joint damage and patient distress, independent of inflamamtory activity, and that formal joint counts are not recorded at most routine care visits. MethodsA cross-sectional study at a routine care visit included a RheuMetric checklist completed by a rheumatologist, with four 0–10 visual numeric scales (VNS) for DOCGL, and three sub-global estimates for inflammatory activity (DOCINF), joint damage (DOCDAM), and patient distress (DOCDIS), e.g., anxiety, depression, and/or fibromyalgia, etc. Variation in SJC according to other individual measures in the DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI, and in the indices was analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficients and regressions with and without DOCINF as an independent variable. ResultsIn 173 patients with long disease duration, regressions which included individual DAS28, CDAI or SDAI measures and added DOCINF as an independent variable explained 46 % of variation in SJC, compared to 23 % if DOCINF was not included. DOCINF was more explanatory of SJC than even the DAS28 or CDAI indices themselves, although SJC is a component of these indices. ConclusionIn routine care RA patients with long disease duration, DOCINF depicts SJC as effectively as RA indices which require 90–100 seconds to record, and may provide a feasible, informative quantitative clinical measure without recording formal joint counts.

The Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus Clinician-Reported Outcome Predicts Damage in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Data From the Almenara Lupus Cohort.

To evaluate the predictive value of the LFA-REAL ClinRO (Lupus Foundation of America Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus clinician-reported outcome) on damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Data from a prevalent lupus cohort were used. The LFA-REAL ClinRO includes 9 domains: mucocutaneous (global and 3 subdomains), musculoskeletal (global and 2 subdomains), cardiorespiratory, neuropsychiatric, renal, hematological, constitutional, vasculitis, and other (it allows for other or rare manifestations). For each domain, a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale is used, and global domains are included except for the mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal domains where the subdomains are included; it allows for 3 manifestations under "other," so the score ranges from 0 to 1400 (sum of 14 in the visual analog scale). Damage was assessed with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index. Generalized estimating equations were performed, being the outcome the increase in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index; confounders from the previous visit were included; adjusted multivariable models were done. Incidence rate ratios per 10-unit increase in the LFA-REAL ClinRO were reported. Similar models were performed to evaluate the impact of the SLEDAI-2K (SLE Disease Activity Index) and physician global assessment on damage to determine which measure would better predict damage accrual. Three-hundred thirty-one patients and 1425 visits were included, 1.9 (SD 1.2) years of follow-up. Disease duration at baseline was 10.7 (7.4) years. The mean LFA-REAL ClinRO was 18.2 (SD 30.7). During the follow-up visits, 63 (17.9%) patients accrued damage once; 4 (1.1%) accrued damage twice. The LFA-REAL ClinRO was predictive of damage accrual even after adjustment for possible confounders (incidence rate ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.16; p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained using the SLEDAI-2K and the physician global assessment. The LFA-REAL ClinRO is predictive of damage accrual, even after adjusting for possible confounders.

HSD29 Predicting Psoriasis Area and Severity Index From Physician Global Assessment and Body Surface Area in the Real-World Dermatology Setting

HSD29 Predicting Psoriasis Area and Severity Index From Physician Global Assessment and Body Surface Area in the Real-World Dermatology Setting

Clinical Validation of Digitally Acquired Clinical Data and Machine Learning Models for Remote Measurement of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Psoriatic disease remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. We developed and validated a suite of novel, sensor-based smartphone assessments (Psorcast app) that can be self-administered to measure cutaneous and musculoskeletal signs and symptoms of psoriatic disease. Participants with psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and healthy controls were recruited between June 5, 2019, and November 10, 2021, at 2 academic medical centers. Concordance and accuracy of digital measures and image-based machine learning models were compared to their analogous clinical measures from trained rheumatologists and dermatologists. Of 104 study participants, 51 (49%) were female and 53 (51%) were male, with a mean age of 42.3 years (SD 12.6). Seventy-nine (76%) participants had PsA, 16 (15.4%) had PsO, and 9 (8.7%) were healthy controls. Digital patient assessment of percent body surface area (BSA) affected with PsO demonstrated very strong concordance (Lin concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] 0.94 [95% CI 0.91-0.96]) with physician-assessed BSA. The in-clinic and remote target plaque physician global assessments showed fair-to-moderate concordance (CCCerythema 0.72 [0.59-0.85]; CCCinduration 0.72 [0.62-0.82]; CCCscaling 0.60 [0.48-0.72]). Machine learning models of hand photos taken by patients accurately identified clinically diagnosed nail PsO with an accuracy of 0.76. The Digital Jar Open assessment categorized physician-assessed upper extremity involvement, considering joint tenderness or enthesitis (AUROC 0.68 [0.47-0.85]). The Psorcast digital assessments achieved significant clinical validity, although they require further validation in larger cohorts before use in evidence-based medicine or clinical trial settings. The smartphone software and analysis pipelines from the Psorcast suite are open source and freely available.

The Typical Nail Lichen Planus Severity Index: An Outcome Instrument for Typical Nail Lichen Planus.

Despite numerous treatment options for nail lichen planus (NLP), a validated method for measuring the severity of NLP and therapeutic response in clinical trials is absent. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a measurement instrument, Typical Nail Lichen Planus Severity Index (tNLPSI), for typical NLP that could be used in clinical trials. A total of 48 patients pathologically confirmed with typical NLP were enrolled in this study. Five dermatologists were trained to use the tNLPSI activity scale and the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scale to score samples independently to estimate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability across two sessions. In addition, tNLPSI activity scores were compared with PGA scores to assess the construct validity. The tNLPSI activity scale had excellent internal consistency and inter-rater reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.990; ICC = 0.954; 95% CI = 0.930-0.971), and the correlations between the different graders' scores indicate good consistency (rp = 0.934-0.968). In addition, the tNLPSI activity scale demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.996; 95% CI = 0.993-0.998), showing good reproducibility. And tNLPSI activity scores and PGA scores showed good construct validity (Spearman's rho = 0.941 and Spearman's rho = 0.903-0.935, respectively; p &lt; 0.01). The tNLPSI activity scale was demonstrated to be consistent, reliable, reproducible, and feasible, making it a potential valuable tool for evaluating the treatment response in typical NLP clinical trials.

Combination of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors With Topical 4% Hydroquinone Compared With Topical 4% Hydroquinone Alone in the Treatment of Dermal Type of Melasma: A Single-Blinded Randomized Split-Face Study.

Response to the current available treatments of melasma, dermal type, in particular, is usually gradual and can result in possible side effects. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and topical 4% hydroquinone (HQ) in comparison with monotherapy using topical 4% HQ alone in the treatment of dermal type of melasma. This is a single-blinded, randomized, split-face clinical trial on twenty female patients with dermal type of melasma. Patients were asked to apply topical 4% HQ on both sides of their face at night for 6 months. In each participant, one side of the face was randomly chosen to receive monthly intradermal injections of PRGF for 3 sessions. Efficacy of the treatment was assessed using hemi melasma area and severity index (MASI) score, physician's global assessment (PGA), and patients' global assessment (PtGA). Both groups revealed significant improvement in hemi-MASI score during the treatment course. Mean percentage of improvement at the end of study was 40.38 ± 6.04% and 33.42 ± 3.23% in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.31). PGA demonstrated excellent-to-marked improvement in melasma in 25% and 5% of patients in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.31). PtGA showed high levels of satisfaction in 15% of patients in the combination therapy group (vs. 0% in the monotherapy group) (P = 0.05). Differences between the two treatment groups in terms of hemi-MASI and PGA scores were not statistically significant; however, patients demonstrated higher satisfaction with combination of PRGF and topical 4% HQ compared with topical HQ alone. Thereby, combination of PRGF and topical 4% HQ can be suggested as a safe alternative therapeutic approach and may hold promise in the development of future therapeutic options for dermal type of melasma.

Effectiveness of generic tofacitinib in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM)-a retrospective analysis from Indian Myositis Registry (MyoIN).

Determine domain-based-outcomes and steroid-sparing efficacy of generic tofacitinib in IIM. This is a multicenter retrospective study wherein clinical phenotype, autoantibody profile, prior immunosuppressives, and outcomes at 3, 6, and 12months were retrieved for IIM patients prescribed tofacitinib. Overall clinical response was assessed as complete or partial remission as per physician judgment. Changes in cutaneous and calcinosis domain were recorded as per physician global assessment (PGA), lung domain as per medical research council (MRC) dyspnea scale, and muscle strength by Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8). Forty-two patients of IIM with mean age 38.7 ± 16years; (76.2% (N = 32) women), median duration of illness 48 (19;88) months were included. Commonest indication for initiating tofacitinib was either for refractory or as steroid sparing for cutaneous domain (N = 25/42, 59.5%) followed by calcinosis (N = 16/42, 38%). Overall complete and/or partial remission was achieved in 23/37 (64.8%), 30/35 (85.7%), and 29/30 (96.6%) patients at 3, 6, and 12months, respectively. At 12-month follow-up, there was a reduction in prednisolone dose, with absolute decrease from a daily dose of 17.5mg (IQR 5;50) to 2.5mg (IQR 0;5) (p < 0.001). Individual domain assessments revealed improvement in cutaneous domain [16/25 (64%)] and calcinosis [6/15 (40%)]. Adverse effects included herpes zoster (N = 2/42, 4.8%) and dyslipidemia (N = 4/42, 9.5%). Treatment with generic tofacitinib significantly reduces the daily dose of corticosteroids and is effective in cutaneous domain including calcinosis in IIM. • This multicenter retrospective study is the first real-world data from India, elucidatingsteroid sparing efficacyof generic tofacitinib in patients with inflammatory myositis. • Domain-based outcome assessment suggests good clinical improvement especially in cutaneous domain, even those with refractory disease. • Modest benefits were evident in calcinosis, but its effect on the muscle and pulmonary domain appears limited.

Comparative efficacy and safety of JAK/TYK2 inhibitors and other oral drugs for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background Janus kinase (JAK)/tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitors are novel treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Objective To perform a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of TYK2 inhibitors with other oral drugs in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods Eligible randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were identified from public databases (published before November 2, 2023). Random-effect frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with ranking based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of Physician's Global Assessment of "clear" or "almost clear" (PGA 0/1), 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75). Results Twenty RCTs containing 7,564 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were included. Deucravacitinib at all dose levels (except for 3 mg every other day) and tofacitinib (10 mg BID) ranked best in achieving PGA 0/1 and PASI-75 at 12- 16 weeks. Tofacitinib (10 mg BID) was considered the most unsafe. Analysis of Ranking according to efficacy and safety showed deucravacitinib (3 mg QD and 3 mg BID) was the best treatment. Analysis of Ranking according to efficacy and safety showed deucravacitinib (3 mg QD and 3 mg BID) was the best treatment. Limitation Insufficiency of eligible data and no long-term follow-up data. Conclusion Deucravacitinib showed superior efficacy and safety for treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis over other included drugs.

Evaluation of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score in Assessing Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity in Teleconsultation.

To evaluate the relevance of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score as a disease activity marker of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a teleconsultation setting. A prospective, observational, 24-month, single-center study involving patients with RA who underwent teleconsultations was performed. The RAID score was sent to all patients by email and completed the day before the scheduled session. The RAID questionnaire was also completed just prior to the next scheduled face-to-face consultation. The same physician performed teleconsultation/in-person consultations and was unaware of the RAID results. We included 70 patients (mean age 50 [SD 14] yrs, mean disease duration 10 [SD 9] yrs). The RAID score correlated with the following items: patient global assessment (r 0.55, P < 0.001), patient-reported swollen joint count (r 0.50, P < 0.001), and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) calculated with patient self-reported tender/swollen joints (r 0.74, P < 0.001). The RAID score completed during the next face-to-face consultation for 45 patients also correlated with the DAS28-CRP performed by the clinician (r 0.65, P < 0.001). A RAID score > 2 was associated with the best combination of sensitivity (94%) and specificity (43%) for the indication of rapid in-person consultation because of insufficiently controlled disease activity, with an area under the curve of 0.74. All 23 patients with RAID < 2 had no intercurrent flares; overall physician global assessment was 1.6 of 10 (SD 1.4), DAS28-CRP 1.5 (SD 0.2), and CRP 1.8 (SD 1.4) mg/L. Our findings reinforce the RAID score as a valuable tool in teleconsultation, exhibiting a good correlation with disease activity variables. Using a RAID score threshold of 2 during teleconsultations could distinguish patients with good disease control and those with the potential need for an in-person visit.

Consistent Efficacy of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis Regardless of Baseline Disease Severity or Special Area Involvement: Subgroup Analysis from PROMINENT.

Psoriasis involvement in special areas (e.g., scalp or nails) is associated with a great disease burden yet it is often inadequately treated with topical treatments. The efficacy and tolerability of apremilast plus existing topical therapy in Japanese patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis were demonstrated in PROMINENT, a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. We evaluated the efficacy of apremilast across disease severities and special areas involved in these patients. In PROMINENT, patients received apremilast 30mg twice daily for 16weeks in addition to their existing topical therapy, with the option of topical therapy reduction at the discretion of their physician while continuing apremilast treatment from Weeks 16 to 32. We performed a post hoc analysis, assessing apremilast efficacy and safety in Japanese patients stratified by baseline static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score (2 [mild] or 3 [moderate]) and special area involvement. Of patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3, 62.7% and 30.7%, respectively, achieved sPGA score 0 or 1 at Week 32. At Week 32, improvements in skin, nail, scalp, and quality of life assessments were observed regardless of baseline sPGA score. Improvements in these endpoints at Week 32 were also observed in patients with special area (scalp or nail) involvement (n = 134). Incidence of adverse events was similar between patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3. Apremilast in combination with topical therapy may be a beneficial treatment for Japanese patients, who have limited systemic treatment options for mild to moderate psoriasis or psoriasis in special areas. NCT03930186.

Combined Biologic and Surgical Interventions for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review

Introduction. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent painful or suppurative lesions due to follicular occlusion. Biologics and other treatment modalities such as surgical excision are commonly used in the treatment of severe HS. However, despite the frequent use of biologics and surgical interventions in the treatment of patients with HS, an assessment of their combined effects is lacking. This systematic review aims to qualitatively analyze the efficacy of combined biologic and surgical treatment for HS. Methods. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The databases PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, MedRxiv.org, and the International Clinical Trial Registry were searched from inception until May 1, 2023. Results. A total of 1,145 studies were screened, with eight studies included for data extraction. Patients receiving combined biologic and surgical treatment showed greater improvement in the severity measurements of HS, including HS Impact Assessment, HS Physician Global Assessment, HS Sartorius Score, International Hidradenitis Suppurative Severity Score, HS recurrence rate, and Dermatology Life Quality Index. However, three studies reported a prolongation of wound healing with combined biologic and surgical treatment. Conclusion. Our systematic review highlights the additive effects of using biologics and surgery together to treat HS compared to either treatment alone. However, when both treatment modalities are used simultaneously, the potential risk of prolonged wound healing must be considered. Due to the limited number and heterogeneity of the included studies, more clinical trials are needed to establish diagnostic conclusions.

Safety and effectiveness of apremilast in Japanese patients with psoriatic disease: Results of a post-marketing surveillance study.

The safety and efficacy of apremilast in psoriatic disease has been demonstrated in clinical trials, including in Japanese patients. This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted after approval of apremalast in Japan in 2016 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the drug in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in routine clinical practice. Patients (enrolled between September 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019), were observed for 12 months after apremilast treatment initiation or until discontinuation or withdrawal. Safety was assessed by evaluating adverse reactions (ARs) and serious ARs. Effectiveness measures in PsO included the proportion of patients who achieved global improvement and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scores of 0/1 and the change from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) after 6 and 12 months treatment. The safety analysis set included 1063 patients (PsO, n = 992; PsA, n = 127). ARs and serious ARs were reported in 29.4% and 0.7% of patients, respectively; most occurred <1 month after apremilast initiation. There were no reports of fatal ARs, serious infections, hypersensitivity, or vasculitis. No new safety signals were identified. Among the key survey items, gastrointestinal disorders were the most common ARs (21.3%). In patients with PsO, after 6 and 12 months of treatment, effectiveness rates of achieving highly effective or effective global improvement of were 90.9% and 93.8%; PGA 0/1 was achieved by 42.7% and 58.1% of patients; mean decrease from baseline in total DLQI score was 4.2 (p < 0.0001) and 5.7 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Effectiveness was evaluated in a small number of patients with PsA for some measures; after 6 and 12 months of treatment, improvements were observed in global improvement effectiveness rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints score, Visual Analog Scale score, and DLQI score. We conclude that orally administered apremilast was well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with PsO and/or PsA enrolled in this post-marketing surveillance study.

Spesolimab: A Review of the First IL-36 Blocker Approved for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis.

This article reviews clinical trial data that assesses the safety, efficacy, and clinical application of spesolimab, an interleukin-36 (IL-36) blocker, for the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). A review of the literature was conducted using the search terms: "spesolimab," "BI 655130," and "spevigo" in MEDLINE (PubMed) and Clinicaltrials.gov from January 1, 1950 to October 31, 2023. Relevant articles in English relating to the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of spesolimab were included. In one phase 2 clinical trial evaluating single dose IV spesolimab for GPP flares at day 8, 54% of patients receiving spesolimab had a GPP physician global assessment (GPPGA) pustulation subscore of 0, and 43% had a GPPGA total score of 0 compared with 6% and 11% for the placebo group, respectively. Another phase 2 clinical trial assessing subcutaneous spesolimab found 23% of patients in low-dose, 29% in medium-dose, and 10% of high-dose spesolimab had flares by week 48 compared with 52% of the placebo group. Hazard ratios for time to GPP flare compared with placebo were 0.16 (P = 0.0005), 0.35 (P = 0.0057), and 0.47 (P = 0.027) for the spesolimab groups, respectively. Infection rates were similar across treatment and placebo groups, and severe adverse events such as drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS), cholelithiasis, and breast cancer occurred with spesolimab. Spesolimab is a first-in-class IL-36 monoclonal antibody receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of acute GPP flares. It is a safe and effective therapeutic agent in preventing future GPP flares, with no current comparator trials with other GPP agents. Spesolimab is a safe and effective treatment for acute GPP flares in adults. Future clinical trials can establish safety and efficacy compared with other agents.

Clinical Disease Measures in Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Scoping Review

Background Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a rare, relapsing, disease characterized by pustules, pain, and fissuring. PPP is often combined with psoriasis, most commonly palmar plantar psoriasis, in clinical trials which further complicates our understanding of treatment response. Objective The objective of this scoping review is to describe all outcome measures (clinician-reported &amp; patient-reported) used in previous PPP clinical trials. Methods A search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for clinical trials and prospective cohort studies performed in adults with PPP, with an intervention and pre-determined outcomes collected at pre specified time points. Results The initial search identified 1839 records, of which 69 met our inclusion criteria. The studies were published between 1970–2023 and included a total of 3301 patients. The most common primary study outcome was the clinician-reported Palmoplantar Pustulosis Psoriasis Area Severity Index (ppPASI) ( n = 39, 56.5%) and an endpoint of 12 weeks ( n = 23, 33.3%). Other common clinician reported outcomes identified were pustule count ( n = 26, 37.7%) and the Physician Global Assessment ( n = 16, 23.2%) The majority of studies ( n = 43, 62.3%) did not include any patient reported outcome measures. Of those that did include patient reported outcome measures, the Dermatology Life Quality Index was most utilized ( n = 17, 24.6%), followed by symptoms-specific instruments measuring pain ( n = 11, 15.9%) and itch ( n = 6, 8.7%). Conclusions While the clinician-reported ppPASI has become the standard primary outcome in PPP clinical trials, there is still considerable heterogeneity and lack of specificity in the patient reported outcomes used.

Rapid and sustained improvement of psoriasis with Bimekizumab: A real‐world case series

AbstractThis retrospective case series examines the efficacy and safety of Bimekizumab in 22 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in a real‐world clinical setting. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants, including a mean age of 43.7 years and a gender distribution of 60% male and 40% female, are summarised. Notably, 70% of the patients had previously received systemic therapy, and 50% had concurrent psoriatic arthritis. The evaluation over a 12‐week treatment period revealed a significant reduction in psoriasis area and severity index scores from a baseline mean of 11.5−1.0 at Week 4 and further down to 0.3 by Week 12. Similar improvements were observed in body surface area, physician's global assessment and dermatology life quality index scores. Bimekizumab was well‐tolerated with no reported adverse events, leading to no treatment discontinuations. These findings highlight the potential of Bimekizumab to provide rapid and sustained improvements in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, underlining its value in clinical practice.

Assessment of the Impact of RNase in Patients With Severe Fatigue Related to Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of RSLV-132.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA and RNA debris persist in viral reservoirs for weeks to months following infection, potentially triggering interferon production and chronic inflammation. RSLV-132 is a biologic drug composed of catalytically active human RNase1 fused to human IgG1 Fc and is designed to remain in circulation and digest extracellular RNA. We hypothesized that removal of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA from latent reservoirs may improve inflammation, neuroinflammation, and fatigue associated with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). This was a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial in participants with a 24-week history of PASC and severe fatigue. The primary endpoint of the trial assessed the impact of 6 intravenous doses of RSLV-132 on the mean change from baseline at day 71 in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 7a (PROMIS Fatigue SF 7a). A statistically significant difference on day 71 was not observed with respect to the primary or secondary endpoints. This was likely due to a placebo response that increased during the trial. Statistically significant improvement in fatigue as measured by the PROMIS Fatigue SF 7a, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), and Physicians Global Assessment (PGA) instruments were observed earlier in the trial, with women demonstrating greater responses to RSLV-132 than men. While fatigue was not statistically significantly improved at Day 71, earlier timepoints revealed statistically significant improvement in fatigue and physician global assessment. The data suggest eliminating latent viral RNA by increasing serum RNase activity may improve fatigue in PASC patients. Women may respond better to this approach than men. Future studies will aim to confirm these findings.

Fecal calprotectin and platelet count predict histologic disease activity in pediatric ulcerative colitis: results from a projection-predictive feature selection

Especially for pediatric patients, proxies of mucosal inflammation are needed. The Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) has been established to predict clinical and endoscopic disease activity. However, histologic inflammation might persist. We applied a special variable selection technique to predict histologic healing in pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) as parsimoniously (but still as precisely) as possible. The retrospective analysis included data from two study cohorts, comprising 91 visits from 59 pediatric patients with UC. A Bayesian ordinal regression model was used in combination with a projection-predictive feature selection (PPFS) to identify a minimal subset of clinical and laboratory parameters sufficient for the prediction of histologic disease activity. Following the PPFS, CEDATA-GPGE patient registry data were analyzed to investigate the relevance of the selected predictors in relation to PUCAI and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) in up to 6697 patient visits. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and platelet count were identified as the minimal subset of predictors sufficient for prediction of histologic disease activity in pediatric UC. FC and platelet count also appeared to be associated with increasing disease activity as measured by PUCAI and PGA in the CEDATA-GPGE registry. Based on the selected model, predictions can be performed with a Shiny web app. Conclusion: Our statistical approach constitutes a reproducible and objective tool to select a minimal subset of the most informative parameters to predict histologic inflammation in pediatric UC. A Shiny app shows how physicians may predict the histologic activity in a user-friendly way using FC and platelet count. To generalize the findings, further prospective studies will be needed.What is Known:• Histologic healing is a major endpoint in the therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC).• The PUCAI score has been established to predict disease activity in pediatric UC but is not suitable for the prediction of histologic healing.What is New:• Our Bayesian ordinal regression model in combination with a projection-predictive feature selection is a reproducible and objective tool to select the minimal subset of clinical and laboratory parameters to predict histologic inflammation in pediatric UC.• Histologic inflammation in pediatric UC can be non-invasively predicted based on the combination of fecal calprotectin levels and platelet count.