Global Code Of Practice Research Articles

From humanitarian crisis to employment crisis: The lives and livelihoods of South Sudanese refugee health workers in Uganda.

Despite the many benefits of refugee health workers for health systems, they commonly face challenges integrating into host country workforces. The Global Code of Practice on International Recruitment of Health Personnel, which should monitor and protect migrant health workers, offers little guidance for refugees and research is needed to inform strategy. Based on interviews with 34 refugee health workers and 10 leaders across two settlements supporting populations fleeing the humanitarian crisis in South Sudan since 2013, we describe the governance and social dynamics affecting South Sudanese refugee health worker employment in Uganda. Refugees in Uganda legally have the right to work but face an employment crisis. Refugee health workers report that systemic discrimination, competition from underemployed domestic workers, unclear work permit rules and expensive credentialling processes exclude them from meaningful work in public health facilities and good jobs in the humanitarian response. This pushes them into unchallenging roles in private clinics, poorly remunerated positions on village health teams or out of the health sector altogether. Health system strengthening initiatives in Uganda to integrate humanitarian and government services and to deter the domestic workforce from emigration have overlooked the potential contributions of refugee health workers and the employment crisis they face. More effort is needed to increase fairness in public sector recruitment practices for refugee health workers, support credentialling, training opportunities for professional and non-professional cadres, job placements, and to draw attention to the public benefits of refugee health worker employment alongside higher spending on human resources for health.

Trends in foreign-educated nurse mobility beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

While the COVID-19 pandemic initially halted the mobility of health professionals, global migration has since returned to pre-pandemic levels and will likely explode in the years beyond the pandemic. Simultaneously, the situation surrounding global health workforce staffing and sustainability is dire; the current global shortage of nurses is estimated at seven million, while the WHO calls for 13 million new nurses by 2030. In response, countries, particularly in high-income regions, seek to fill workforce vacancies with foreign-educated health workers. To both meet the demands of high-income countries’ strained health systems and to ensure ethical and sustainable recruitment practices for equally strained low- to middle-income regions, governments, health systems, and other stakeholders should strive for workforce sustainability via effective and coordinated policy responses, both at the national and international level. If correctly endorsed and implemented, the WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel can be an effective tool in helping “destination” countries and regions meet the needs of their strained health workforces while also ensuring sustainability and ethical recruitment from “source” regions that are equally at risk.

The ethics of recruiting foreign-trained healthcare workers.

Canada’s active immigration policy includes thousands of internationally trained health workers arriving annually. The effective utilization of these workers represents an ethical issue relevant to the WHO’s Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel, to which Canada is a signatory. The ethical obligation for Canadian healthcare stakeholders is to continuously improve systems of credential evaluation and subsequent workplace integration to maximize immigrant health worker skills utilization and invest in better workforce data to meet Canada’s ethical obligations regarding health workforce sustainability.

South African physician emigration and return migration, 1991-2017: a trend analysis.

Although critical for understanding health labour market trends in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), longitudinal LMIC health worker emigration and return migration trends are not routinely documented. This article seeks to better understand SA's trends in physician emigration and return migration and whether economic growth and related policies affect migration patterns. This study used physician registry data to analyse patterns of emigration and return migration only among SA-trained physicians registered to practice in top destination countries such as Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the USA or the UK between 1991 and 2017, which represent the top five emigration destinations for this group. A linear regression model analysed the relationship between migration trends (as dependent variables) and SA's economic growth, health financing and HIV prevalence (as independent variables). There has been a 6-fold decline in emigration rates from SA between 1991 and 2017 (from 1.8% to 0.3%/year), with declines in emigration to all five destination countries. About one in three (31.8% or 5095) SA physicians returned from destination countries as of 2017. Annual physician emigration fell by 0.16% for every $100 rise in SA GDP per capita (2011 international dollars) (95% confidence interval -0.60% to -0.086%). As of 2017, 21.6% (11 224) of all SA physicians had active registration in destination nations, down from a peak of 33.5% (16 366) in 2005, a decline largely due to return migration. Changes to the UK's licensing regulations likely affected migration patterns while the Global Code of Practice on International Recruitment contributed little to changes. A country's economic growth might influence physician emigration, with significant contribution from health workforce policy interventions. Return migration monitoring should be incorporated into health workforce planning.

Health workers on the move: the need for global policy

Abstract Issue WHO's Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel was adopted in 2010 by WHO Member States to 1: monitor and address unethical international recruitment practices; 2: to strengthen national health workforces. Unethical recruitment and lack of investments in resilient health workforces was leading to increased health inequalities worldwide. The WHO Code provided non-binding behavioral principles to address these. Description The WHO Code came with a monitoring and review mechanism. Member States were to report on Code implementation every three years and every five years the Code's relevance and effectiveness is reviewed. In the 2018/19 reporting round, non-state actors, too, submitted reports to WHO. Wemos carried out a qualitative analysis of these (14) reports and presented the findings to the Expert Advisory Group (EAG) tasked to review the Code in 2019/20. Results Non-state actor reports provide important additional information to Member States' reports on Code implementation. The 14 submissions included cases of unfair treatment of migrant health workers and indicated some improvement in health workforce planning and forecasting. Moreover, they pointed to a lack of efforts (or results thereof) by governments to invest in more resilient health workforces, fueling health worker mobility globally. Lessons These findings are consistent with observations from civil society, trade unions, health professional associations and employers' organizations, as evidenced during the roundtable discussions with the EAG in June 2019. They noted that increased global mobility, not just by health workers, is a given and actually further accelerated by a growing number of inter-country migration agreements, undermining equitable access to a health worker across the globe. They urged for supra-national policies and practices in order to achieve Universal Health Coverage for all by 2030. Key messages With increased global mobility of individuals, an equitable distribution of health workers worldwide surpasses the policy scope of national governments and requires supra-national measures. The involvement of civil society in the monitoring of mobility trends and equity effects of health workforce policies is essential for shared prosperity as envisioned in the SDG Agenda.

Health professional mobility and the Global Code of Practice: joint EUROSTAT/OECD/WHO survey data

Abstract Background This study assesses the impact and continuing relevance of the Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel in the WHO Europe region by analysing trends over time in intra- and inter-regional health worker mobility. Methods Data from the joint EUROSTAT/OECD/WHO questionnaire are analysed to determine 1) the proportion of foreign-born and foreign-trained doctors and nurses working in WHO Europe Member States, 2) trends in health workforce mobility over time by country of origin and destination, and 3) how the Global Code has impacted mobility patterns. Results The size of the foreign-trained health workforce in Europe varies widely, with foreign-trained doctors comprising over a quarter of the workforce in Norway, Switzerland and the UK, but below 2% in Estonia and Serbia. While annual in-flows across the region have been stable since 2009, the share of foreign-trained doctors and nurses have both increased by over 30%. Mobility between The Commonwealth of Independent States has remained steady, but an increase in East-West and South-North migration is observed, driven by European Union expansion in 2004 and the economic crisis. Migration of health workers into Europe from developing countries covered by the Code has fluctuated, with increased numbers seen from some origin countries (e.g. Nigeria, Pakistan). Some Western countries remain reliant on a foreign-trained health workforce. This contributes to a high outward flow of health professionals from other European countries and creates challenges for sustainable workforce development. Conclusions The Global Code remains highly relevant, but other factors have more impact on migration flows, such as free movement in the EU. Health workforce mobility data can be improved to support a 'whole of workforce' approach to policy and planning by including more professional groups, and by adding qualitative indicators, e.g. individual perceptions and intention to leave.

Panel: Care4Care: what is it about the migrant care workforce and how to improve inclusion?

Abstract A round table comprising three panelists will discuss the topic from different perspectives. Gabrielle Jacob, WHO: The WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel. How far have we come, where are we now and what’s next?Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat, EUPHA President: The role of public health in raising awareness on the contribution of migrant workers to health systemsScott L Greer, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies: Governance4Care of the migrant care workforce: what matters?

International migration of health labour: monitoring the two-way flow of physicians in South Africa

IntroductionAlthough health labour migration is a global phenomenon, studies have neglected the flow of health workers into low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In compliance with the data-monitoring recommendation of the...

Rosalinda Dimapilis-Baldoz: balancing domestic and international needs for health workers.

Rosalinda Dimapilis-Baldoz talks to Fiona Fleck about the health worker migration policy of the Philippines and discusses the challenges faced by the WHO Global code of practice on the international recruitment of health personnel.

Managing intra-EU mobility\u2014do WHO principles of ethical recruitment have relevance?

BackgroundThe WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel provides for guidance in health workforce management and cooperation in the international context. This article aims to examine whether the principles of the voluntary WHO Global Code of Practice can be applied to trigger health policy decisions within the EU zone of free movement of persons.MethodsIn the framework of the Joint Action on European Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting project (Grant Agreement: JA EUHWF 20122201 (see healthworkforce.eu)), focus group discussions were organised with over 30 experts representing ministries, universities and professional and international organisations. Ideas were collected about the applicability of the principles and with the aim to find EU law compatible, relevant solutions using a qualitative approach based on a standardised, semi-structured interview guide and pre-defined statements.ResultsBased on implementation practices summarised, focus group experts concluded that positive effects of adhering to the Code can be identified and useful ideas—compatible with EU law—exist to manage intra-EU mobility. The most relevant areas for intervention include bilateral cooperations, better use of EU financial resources, improved retention and integration policies and better data flow and monitoring.Improving retention is of key importance; however, ethical considerations should also apply within the EU. Compensation of source countries can be a solution to further elaborate on when developing EU financial mechanisms. Intra-EU circular mobility might be feasible and made more transparent if directed by tailor-made, institutional-level bilateral cooperations adjusted to different groups and profiles of health professionals. Integration policies should be improved as discrimination still exists when offering jobs despite the legal environment facilitating the recognition of professional qualifications. A system of feedback on registration/licencing data should be promoted providing for more evidence on intra-EU mobility and support its management.ConclusionsWorkforce planning in EU Member States can be supported, and more equitable distribution of the workforce can be provided by building policy decisions on the principles of the WHO Code. Political commitment has to be strengthened in EU countries to adopt implementation solutions for intra-EU problems. Long-term benefits of respecting global principles of the Code should be better demonstrated in order to incentivise all parties to follow such long-term objectives.

Empirically evaluating the WHO global code of practice on the international recruitment of health personnel's impact on four high-income countries four years after adoption.

BackgroundShortages of health workers in low-income countries are exacerbated by the international migration of health workers to more affluent countries. This problem is compounded by the active recruitment of health workers by destination countries, particularly Australia, Canada, UK and USA. The World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a voluntary Code of Practice in May 2010 to mitigate tensions between health workers’ right to migrate and the shortage of health workers in source countries. The first empirical impact evaluation of this Code was conducted 11-months after its adoption and demonstrated a lack of impact on health workforce recruitment policy and practice in the short-term. This second empirical impact evaluation was conducted 4-years post-adoption using the same methodology to determine whether there have been any changes in the perceived utility, applicability, and implementation of the Code in the medium-term.MethodsForty-four respondents representing government, civil society and the private sector from Australia, Canada, UK and USA completed an email-based survey evaluating their awareness of the Code, perceived impact, changes to policy or recruitment practices resulting from the Code, and the effectiveness of non-binding Codes generally. The same survey instrument from the original study was used to facilitate direct comparability of responses. Key lessons were identified through thematic analysis.ResultsThe main findings between the initial impact evaluation and the current one are unchanged. Both sets of key informants reported no significant policy or regulatory changes to health worker recruitment in their countries as a direct result of the Code due to its lack of incentives, institutional mechanisms and interest mobilizers. Participants emphasized the existence of previous bilateral and regional Codes, the WHO Code’s non-binding nature, and the primacy of competing domestic healthcare priorities in explaining this perceived lack of impact.ConclusionsThe Code has probably still not produced the tangible improvements in health worker flows it aspired to achieve. Several actions, including a focus on developing bilateral codes, linking the Code to topical global priorities, and reframing the Code’s purpose to emphasize health system sustainability, are proposed to improve the Code’s uptake and impact.

Difficulties experienced by migrant physicians working in German hospitals: a qualitative interview study

BackgroundWith Germany facing a shortage of doctors, hospitals have been increasingly recruiting physicians from abroad. Studies in other countries have shown that migrant physicians experience various difficulties in their work, which might impact the quality of patient care, physician job satisfaction, and, accordingly, retention. The experiences of migrant doctors in Germany have not been systematically studied so far and will likely differ from experiences migrant physicians make in other contexts. A thorough understanding of challenges faced by this group, however, is needed to develop adequate support structures—as required by the WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted to give an overview of the multifaceted difficulties migrant physicians might face in German hospitals. Twenty semi-structured interviews with foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians were conducted in German. Participants were recruited via the State Chambers of Physicians and snowballing based on a maximum variation sampling strategy varying purposefully by source country and medical specialty. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using qualitative content analysis.ResultsParticipants described difficulties relating to healthcare institutions, own competencies, and interpersonal interactions. Participants experienced certain legal norms, the regulation of licensure and application for work, and the organization of the hospital environment as inadequate. Most struggled with their lack of setting-specific (language, cultural, clinical, and system) knowledge. Furthermore, behaviour of patients and co-workers was perceived as discriminating or inadequate for other reasons.ConclusionsThis is the first study to describe the broad range of issues migrant physicians experience in Germany. Based on this information, institutional actors should devise support structures to ensure quality of care, physician wellbeing, and retention. For example, training opportunities should be offered where needed to support acquisition of setting-specific knowledge. Discrimination experienced by participants calls for better diversity management as a leadership task in healthcare institutions. Misinformation practices in recruitment could be managed by a voluntary code of ethical conduct. Further research is necessary to identify strategies that adequately address diverging normative positions between migrant health personnel and their patients and colleagues.

Knowledge and potential impact of the WHO Global code of practice on the international recruitment of health personnel: Does it matter for source and destination country stakeholders?

The WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel was implemented in May 2010. The present commentary offers some insights into what is known about the Code five years on, as well as its potential impact, drawing from interviews with health care and policy stakeholders from a number of ‘source’ and ‘destination’ countries.

Challenges to implementation of the WHO Global Code of Practice on International Recruitment of Health Personnel: the case of Sudan.

BackgroundThe WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel (hereafter the WHO Code) was adopted by the World Health Assembly in 2010 as a voluntary instrument to address challenges of health worker migration worldwide. To ascertain its relevance and effectiveness, the implementation of the WHO Code needs to be assessed based on country experience; hence, this case study on Sudan.MethodsThis qualitative study depended mainly on documentary sources in addition to key informant interviews. Experiences of the authors has informed the analysis.ResultsMigration of Sudanese health workers represents a major health system challenge. Over half of Sudanese physicians practice abroad and new trends are showing involvement of other professions and increased feminization. Traditional destinations include Gulf States, especially Saudi Arabia and Libya, as well as the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Low salaries, poor work environment, and a lack of adequate professional development are the leading push factors. Massive emigration of skilled health workers has jeopardized coverage and quality of healthcare and health professional education. Poor evidence, lack of a national policy, and active recruitment in addition to labour market problems were barriers for effective migration management in Sudan. Response of destination countries in relation to cooperative arrangements with Sudan as a source country has always been suboptimal, demonstrating less attention to solidarity and ethical dimensions.The WHO Code boosted Sudan’s efforts to address health worker migration and health workforce development in general. Improving migration evidence, fostering a national dialogue, and promoting bilateral agreements in addition to catalysing health worker retention strategies are some of the benefits accrued. There are, however, limitations in publicity of the WHO Code and its incorporation into national laws and regulatory frameworks for ethical recruitment. The outlook is bleak for Sudan unless the country designs and implements a robust national policy for migration management and unless prospects for source–destination country collaboration improve within a more sound version of the WHO Code.ConclusionsThe WHO Code catalysed some vital steps in managing migration and strengthening the national health workforce in Sudan. Nevertheless, the country has not utilized the full potential of this instrument. Revisions of the WHO Code would benefit much from lessons of its application in the context of developing countries such as Sudan.

Implementing the Code of Practice on International Recruitment in Romania - exploring the current state of implementation and what Romania is doing to retain its domestic health workforce.

BackgroundThe Romanian health system is struggling to retain its health workers, who are currently facing strong incentives for migration to Western European health systems. Retention issues, coupled with high levels of migration, complicate Romania’s efforts in providing basic health services for rural, underserved, and marginalized populations, as well as in achieving equitable health access for all. The WHO Global Code of Practice on International Recruitment of Health Personnel (the Code) aims to promote ethical international recruitment and health systems strengthening. We explore Romania’s implementation of the Code’s principles and recommendations.MethodsWe analysed peer-reviewed and grey literature, in English and Romanian, and sought secondary data from the websites of Romania’s largest medical universities. The analysis was guided by the following themes and recommendations in the Code: health personnel development and health systems sustainability, international cooperation, data gathering, information exchange, and implementation and monitoring of the Code.ResultsRomania’s implementation of the Code was observed to be limited. Gaps were identified with regards to several aspects of the Romanian health system, including the lack of support to health personnel training, recruitment, and retention in order to increase the appeal for health providers to practice in Romania and in underserved areas. In terms of international cooperation, the Code recommends various policy instruments to guide recruitment, including bilateral agreements. However, we could not determine which of these instruments were used as a result of the Code and whether or not they were effective. We identified little evidence of initiatives for health workers’ professional and personal support. Insufficient data and few information exchange platforms exist on health workforce issues, hindering active sharing of data on migration with European Union and WHO audiences. We could not identify any evidence of monitoring of the Code’s implementation to date.ConclusionsIn the absence of major system reforms, health workers will continue to migrate to urban areas and abroad. Romanian policymakers should address more of the Code’s recommendations by developing a national policy for human resources for health, a central database to aid health workforce planning and management, stronger platforms for information exchange and civil society engagement, and updated and transparent bilateral agreements.

The surgical workforce shortage and successes in retaining surgical trainees in Ethiopia: a professional survey.

BackgroundMedical workforce shortages represent a major challenge in low- and middle-income countries, including those in Africa. Despite this, there is a dearth of information regarding the location and practice of African surgeons following completion of their training. In response to the call by the WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel for a sound evidence base regarding patterns of practice and migration of the health workforce, this study describes the current place of residence, practice and setting of Ethiopian surgical residency graduates since commencement of their surgical training in Ethiopia or in Cuba.MethodsThis study presents data from a survey of all Ethiopian surgical residency training graduates since the programme’s inception in 1985.ResultsA total of 348 Ethiopians had undergone surgical training in Ethiopia or Cuba since 1985; data for 327 (94.0 %) of these surgeons were collected and included in the study. The findings indicated that 75.8 % of graduates continued to practice in Ethiopia, with 80.9 % of these practicing in the public sector. Additionally, recent graduates were more likely to remain in Ethiopia and work within the public sector. The average total number of surgeons per million inhabitants in Ethiopia was approximately three and 48.0 % of Ethiopian surgeons practiced in Addis Ababa.ConclusionsEthiopian surgeons are increasingly likely to remain in Ethiopia and to practice in the public sector. Nevertheless, Ethiopia continues to suffer from a drastic surgical workforce shortage that must be addressed through increased training capacity and strategies to combat emigration and attrition.

Code for ethical international recruitment practices: the CGFNS alliance case study.

Projections indicate a global workforce shortage of approximately 4.3 million across the health professions. The need to ensure an adequate supply of health workers worldwide has created a context for the increased global migration of these professionals. The global trend in the migration of health professionals has given rise to the international recruitment industry to facilitate the passage of health workers from source to destination countries. This is particularly the case in the United States, where the majority of immigrant health professionals have come by way of the recruiting industry. This industry is largely unregulated in the United States as well as in many other countries, for which voluntary codes have been used as a means to increase transparency of the recruitment process, shape professional conduct, and mitigate harm to foreign-educated health workers. The CGFNS Alliance case study presented herein describes a multi-stakeholder effort in the United States to promote ethical recruitment practices. Such codes not only complement the WHO Global Code of Practice but are necessary to maximize the impact of these global standards on local settings. This case study offers both a historical perspective and a conceptual framework for examining the multiplicity of factors affecting the migration of human resources for health. The lessons learned provide critical insights into the factors pertaining to the relevancy and effectiveness of the WHO Code from the perspectives of both source and destination countries. This study provides a conceptual model for examining the usefulness of the WHO Code as well as how best to ensure its viability, sustainability, relevancy, and effectiveness in the global environment. This case study concludes with recommendations for evolving business models that need to be in place to strengthen the effectiveness of the WHO Code in the marketplace and to ensure its impact on the international recruitment industry in advancing ethical practices. These recommendations include using effective screening mechanisms to determine health professionals’ readiness for migration as well as implementing certification processes to raise the practice standards for those directly involved in recruiting skilled workers and managing the migration flow.

The Code of Practice and its enduring relevance in Europe and Eastern and Southern Africa.

BackgroundThe relevance and effectiveness of the WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Personnel will be reviewed by the World Health Assembly in 2015. The origins of the Code of Practice and the global health diplomacy process before and after its adoption are analyzed herein.Methods and ResultsCase studies from the European and eastern and southern African regions describe in detail successes and failures of the policy implementation of the Code. In Europe, the Code is effective and even more relevant than before, but might require some tweaking. In Eastern and Southern Africa, the code is relevant but far from efficient in mitigating the negative effects of health workforce migration.ConclusionsSolutions to strengthen the Code include clarification of some of its definitions and articles, inclusion of a governance structure and asustainable and binding financing system to reimburse countries for health workforce losses due to migration, and featuring of health worker migration on global policy agendas across a range of institutional policy domains.

Diaspora engagement of African migrant health workers – examples from five destination countries

BackgroundMigrant health workers fill care gaps in their destination countries, but they also actively engage in improving living conditions for people of their countries of origin through expatriate professional networks. This paper aims to explore the professional links that migrant health workers from sub-Saharan African countries living in five African and European destinations (Botswana, South Africa, Belgium, Austria, and the United Kingdom) have to their countries of origin.DesignQualitative interviews were conducted with migrant doctors, nurses, and midwives from sub-Saharan Africa (N=66). A qualitative content analysis of the material was performed using the software ATLAS.ti.ResultsAlmost all migrant health workers have professional ties with their countries of origin supporting health, education, and social structures. They work with non-governmental organizations, universities, or hospitals and travel back and forth between their destination country and country of origin. For a few respondents, professional engagement or even maintaining private contacts in their country of origin is difficult due to the political situation at home.ConclusionsThe results show that African migrant health workers are actively engaged in improving living conditions not only for their family members but also for the population in general in their countries of origin. Our respondents are mediators and active networkers in a globalized and transnationally connected world. The research suggests that the governments of these countries of origin could strategically use their migrant health workforce for improving education and population health in sub-Saharan Africa. Destination countries should be reminded of their need to comply with the WHO Global Code of Practice for the international recruitment of health professionals.

The WHO Code and US Nursing

In 2010, all member states of the World Health Assembly, including the United States, adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel (the WHO Code). 1 The development and unanimous adoption of the Code by all WHO affiliate countries marked a watershed in policy focus on the issue of health worker migration.