The article is devoted to understanding the nature of modern wars from the standpoint of geophilosophical methodology. Based on the research of O. Bazaluk, V. Mandragelya, N. Masciandaro, B. Woodard, T. Webb, K. Gulson, and others, it outlines the contours of the geophilosophical paradigm, where geographic space and psychospace are distinguished. War and peace are interpreted in geophilosophy as a continuous and non-linear interaction between psispaces, which on the surface of the Earth are manifested in the endless change of the boundaries of the loci of civilization. It is proven that in modern wars it is not enough to just capture the enemy's territory and resources. It is necessary to destroy his psyspace, which has an extraterritorial status. The world of spiritual values of the victim is sacralised, displaced into virtual space, where it is mobilized to resist the aggressor. Victory in the war of the 21st century is actually impossible because, in the information age, the war is primarily between ideas and values. The variant of partisan war is analyzed, which, according to K. Schmitt's "Partisan Theory", is a struggle not of elites, but of the people themselves for their existence. This figure of the "Ukrainian partisan" is well known to historians. For almost a decade after the end of the Second World War, OUN-UPA fighters waged their own war on their lands. They could not help but understand that they had very little chance of defeating the Soviet juggernaut, but they consciously sacrificed themselves, refusing to recognize other people's values. In the case of the modern Russian-Ukrainian war, not only the territory of Ukraine was under attack, but its valuable and meaningful core. The world of Ukrainian culture, the Ukrainian language, and Ukrainian history form the basis of the Ukrainian psyche. The role of Ukrainian studies as an ideological weapon in the modern war is emphasized. Ukrainian studies is a form of self-awareness of the nation, its awareness of its interests, and therefore an important step for the selfreproduction of Ukrainianness, through "Ukrainian love" and "Ukrainian creation".
Read full abstract