Dear Madam: We thank Drs. Samaras and Campbell for their comments regarding our paper ((1)). We appreciate the opportunity to further discuss this interesting and important area of biomedical investigation. In our paper, we focused discussion on the measurements of both whole body and selected regional quantities of fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM). We analyzed DXA measurements, including % FM, whole body FM, trunk FM, whole body LM, and appendicular LM. BMI was considered as an easily measured phenotype for comparison. We recognize that DXA can be used to estimate central abdominal fat, but central abdominal fat was not the focus of this paper. Rather, we chose to focus on body composition per se (i.e., absolute and relative quantities of adipose tissue and lean mass). Drs. Samaras and Campbell have published a series of papers using a twin study to study the genetic epidemiology of total and central obesity and metabolic syndrome. The Diabetes Heart Study (DHS), on the other hand, is a study of siblings concordant for type 2 diabetics and unaffected family members. It is interesting to note that the twin study provides heritability estimates of similar magnitude to those in our study. This similarity may suggest relatively little effect of non-additivity or gene-gene interaction on the variation in these adiposity phenotypes after adjusting for the covariates. The two study designs (twin and family) have their own advantages and disadvantages. Sampling on multiplex families (e.g., affected sibling pairs) reduces the likelihood of including non-genetic sources of variation. Thus, the sibling pair study design can be used to define the role of genetic factors in disease and, with inclusion of genetic markers, provide gene localization. One potential limitation of the family study is that the heritability estimates may not delineate shared genes from shared environment. The twin study, when including monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, provides an elegant way to delineate genetic from environmental factors; however, in the absence of twins reared apart, the twin design may overestimate heritability due to the inability to separate the effects of shared environment. Even in the absence of any genetic factor, the greater environmental similarity in MZ twins can result in a higher concordance rate in MZ twins than in DZ twins ((2)). The ability to generalize results of twin studies to the non-twin population remains controversial, as twins share environmental factors uniquely, and selection bias may minimize the environmental variation and, hence, inflate the role of genetic factors ((3)). The DHS has extensive data on cardiovascular phenotypes, bone mineral density, and body composition. While our paper focuses on DXA measures, quantitative computed tomography measures exist that further delineate components of body composition. Taking advantage of the family study design, a genome scan is being performed to identify quantitative trait loci that contribute to the observed variation in these phenotypes. The combination of genome scan, candidate gene, and family-based association studies should permit the identification of genes that may contribute to the expression of FM and LM.
Read full abstract