Genetic Toxicology Assays Research Articles

Genotoxic Aspects of Psychoactive Substances

Exposure to psychoactive substances is undoubtedly a serious public health issue that should be carefully analyzed from different perspectives. Regarding the types of toxic effects inflicted by these xenobiotics, it is already known that many of the common abused psychoactives have shown positive genotoxicity findings in complementary genetic toxicology assays. Nevertheless, while there are several experimental articles and reviews on this topic, it is also clear that additional information, particularly mechanistic studies, is still needed. This article addresses these issues, pointing out some aspects of the potential genotoxicity of psychoactive substances that should be further explored, and suggests some possible approaches that could be valuable in future toxicological studies.

An Updated Review on the Psychoactive, Toxic and Anticancer Properties of Kava.

Kava (Piper methysticum) has been widely consumed for many years in the South Pacific Islands and displays psychoactive properties, especially soothing and calming effects. This plant has been used in Western countries as a natural anxiolytic in recent decades. Kava has also been used to treat symptoms associated with depression, menopause, insomnia, and convulsions, among others. Along with its putative beneficial health effects, kava has been associated with liver injury and other toxic effects, including skin toxicity in heavy consumers, possibly related to its metabolic profile or interference in the metabolism of other xenobiotics. Kava extracts and kavalactones generally displayed negative results in genetic toxicology assays although there is sufficient evidence for carcinogenicity in experimental animals, most likely through a non-genotoxic mode of action. Nevertheless, the chemotherapeutic/chemopreventive potential of kava against cancer has also been suggested. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have evaluated the effects of flavokavains, kavalactones and/or kava extracts in different cancer models, showing the induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and other antiproliferative effects in several types of cancer, including breast, prostate, bladder, and lung. Overall, in this scoping review, several aspects of kava efficacy and safety are discussed and some pertinent issues related to kava consumption are identified.

Genome-wide detection of ultralow-frequency substitution mutations in cultures of mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells and Caenorhabditis elegans worms by PacBio sequencing.

Many conventional genetic toxicology assays require specialized cell cultures or animals and can only detect mutations that inactivate the function of a reporter gene. These limitations make such assays incompatible with many toxicological models but could be overcome by the development of techniques capable of directly detecting genome-wide somatic mutations through DNA sequencing. PacBio sequencing can generate almost error-free consensus reads by repeatedly inspecting both DNA strands from circularized molecules (a method known as PacBio HiFi). In this study, we show that PacBio HiFi can detect genome-wide ultralow-frequency substitution mutations in cultures of mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells and Caenorhabditis elegans worms. The mutation frequencies (MFs) of unexposed samples in both models were ~1 × 10-7 mutations per base pair. Compared to these controls, PacBio HiFi detected MF increases of 23-fold in cultures of L5178Y cells exposed to 5 mM ethyl methanosulfonate (EMS) for 4h, and 5-, 12-, and 29-fold in cultures of C. elegans worms exposed to 12.5, 25, and 50 mM EMS for 4h, respectively. In both models, the mutation spectra of controls were diverse, while those derived from EMS-exposed samples were dominated by C:G → T:A transitions. To validate these results, clone sequencing analyses were performed on the same cultures of L5178Y cells. The results obtained by clone sequencing and PacBio HiFi were almost identical. Our results suggest that PacBio sequencing could be used for the detection, quantitation, and characterization of mutations in any DNA-containing sample, including those that are not compatible with conventional mutation detection approaches.

Molecular analysis of GPI-anchor biosynthesis pathway genes in rat strains used for the Pig-a gene mutation assay

Recent studies support the assumption that mutation of the X-linked Pig-a gene is most likely responsible for the mutant phenotype of the cells deficient in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins quantified in the rodent Pig-a gene mutation assay. In humans, however, mutations in both alleles of one of the 30 other genes involved in GPI-anchor synthesis, e.g., PIG-L and PIG-O, cause reduced expression of surface GPI-anchored proteins. Here, we investigated the possibility that the loss of the GPI-anchor detected by the rat Pig-a assay also could be caused by mutation in other GPI-biosynthesis genes. 31 samples were obtained from 8 inbred and outbred rat strains commonly used for genetic toxicology assays. In order to investigate possible sources of variation in the Pig-a assay, variant DNA sequences were evaluated in Cd59 and 24 GPI-biosynthesis genes. In some genes, such as Pig-n and Pig-u, homozygous variations occurred in all animals, suggesting that these variations are due to deviations in the reference genome. Heterozygous Pig-s, Pig-w, Pig-o, Pig-c, Pgap1, Pgap2, Pig-k and Pig-t variations were found, however, indicating that these genes could serve as targets for mutation in the assay. Protein alignment for these altered genes was conducted with possible human, mouse and rat phenotypic mutants from the literature; this analysis demonstrated that many of the variations that we detected were in non-conserved sequences and that no phenotypes for any of these variants could be inferred from known mutants from the literature. All heterozygous variants were in outbred rats. Overall, the findings of this study cannot totally rule out the possibility that mutations in GPI-biosynthesis genes other than Pig-a are detected in the Pig-a assay, but suggest that if it occurs, it must occur only rarely and therefore mutations in genes other than Pig-a have little impact on rat-based experiments.

Development of an integrated assay in human TK6 cells to permit comprehensive genotoxicity analysis in vitro

In vitro genetic toxicology assays are used to assess the genotoxic potential of chemicals or mixtures. They measure chromosome damage (e.g., micronucleus [MN] formation) or gene mutation, and different combinations of data generated from such assays are evaluated in concert in order to identify genotoxic hazards. Mode-of-action (MoA) information is also fundamental to understanding any apparent genotoxic response. In view of the importance of these types of data for full characterization of genotoxic potential, we leveraged relevant endpoints already established in the human TK6 cell line to develop a single integrated assay that measures MN formation, gene mutation (at the thymidine kinase locus), and MoA (DNA damage response biomarkers). Several prototypical direct-acting genotoxins (methyl methanesulfonate, mitomycin C, and 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide), pro-genotoxins (benzo[a]pyrene and cyclophosphamide monohydrate), and one non-DNA reactive genotoxin (vinblastine sulfate) were assessed in the approach and found to elicit genotoxic profiles that were generally consistent with their MoA. In contrast, the non-genotoxic agents D-mannitol and (2-chloroethyl) trimethyl-ammonium chloride induced negligible effects on all endpoints up to a top concentration of 10 mM. Sodium diclofenac, presumed to be non-genotoxic, provoked an induction in the phosphoserine10-H3-positive cell population within a small window of concentrations (0.157–0.314 mM), as well as increases in γH2AX, nuclear p53, and MN at higher concentrations, although it had no effect on the mutation frequency endpoint. G2M cell cycle arrest was also largely observed in cells that exhibited genotoxicity in the in vitro MN assay. The TK6 cell-based integrated assay represents an in vitro approach that permits comprehensive genotoxicity analysis in a human-relevant test system. Moreover, its vis-à-vis nature may facilitate further comprehension of the range of effects that can manifest in human cells in response to DNA-damaging agents.

Baseline effects of non-flavored e-liquids in the in vitro micronucleus assay

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs; e.g. e-cigarettes) are being developed as potentially reduced-risk alternatives to the continued use of conventional tobacco products. They typically comprise a device that heats an e-liquid to generate inhalable vapor. E-liquids and ENDS-derived vapor have been the focus of toxicological assessment; in particular, their DNA-damaging potential has been investigated with varying outcomes and conclusions. In vitro genetic toxicology assays have formed a part of these assessments. However, they are susceptible to producing misleading or false positive results, especially under extreme conditions. In the present study, we evaluated a series of six neat (non-vaporized) non-flavored e-liquids (NFEL-A to F) in a flow cytometry version of the in vitro micronucleus assay in order to characterize their baseline effects on Chinese hamster ovary cells under hazard identification conditions. The NFELs induced cytotoxicity universally despite differing in propylene glycol (PG), vegetable glycerin (VG), and nicotine content. In addition, significant genotoxic responses were also detected with the PG-predominant e-liquids NFEL-A, D, and F but not with NFEL-B, C, or E, which contained higher proportions of VG. All six NFELs induced extreme cell culture conditions (i.e. increases in pH and osmolality) at the concentrations assessed. They also exhibited nonbiologically relevant effects on the mechanistic endpoints (i.e. cell cycle and phosphorylated histones H2AX and H3). In conclusion, although the PG component of the NFELs drove micronucleus formation in the assay, data on the complementary mechanistic endpoints suggest that this apparent DNA damage is potentially misleading and of negligible biological relevance as a risk for DNA integrity. In future assessments, any adverse changes (such as signatures of micronuclei induction, G2M arrest, and increases in γH2AX) relative to this reference data set might indicate a possible genotoxic hazard and would prompt further investigations for exploring the extent of risk.

Evaluation of U. S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) mouse lymphoma assay data using International Workshop on Genotoxicity Tests (IWGT) and the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) criteria.

The forward gene mutation mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) is widely used, as part of a regulatory test battery, to identify the genotoxic potential of chemicals. It identifies mutagens capable of inducing a variety of genetic events. During the 1980s and early 1990s, the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) developed a publicly available database (https://tools.niehs.nih.gov/cebs3/ui/) of MLA results. This database is used to define the mutagenic potential of chemicals, to develop structure-activity relationships (SAR), and to draw correlations to animal carcinogenicity findings. New criteria for MLA conduct and data interpretation were subsequently developed by the International Workshop for Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) and the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). These recommendations are included in a new OECD Test Guideline (TG490). It is essential that early experimental data be re-examined and classified according to the current criteria to build a curated database to better inform chemical-specific evaluations and SAR models. We re-evaluated more than 1900 experiments representing 342 chemicals against the newly defined acceptance criteria for background mutant frequency (MF), cloning efficiency (CE), positive control values (modified for this evaluation due to lack of colony sizing), appropriate dose selection, and data consistency. Only 17% of the evaluated experiments met all acceptance criteria used in this re-evaluation. Results from 211 chemicals were determined to be uninterpretable, 92 were positive, and 39 equivocal. The authors could not classify any responses as negative because colony sizing was not performed for any of these experiments and it is clear, based on many experiment with unacceptably low background and positive control MFs, that mutant colony recovery was often suboptimal. This re-evaluation provides a curated database for the MLA. A similar curation should be done for other widely used genetic toxicology assays, but will be more difficult for certain assays (e.g., in vitro chromosomal aberrations) because important parameters such as level of cytotoxicity were often not evaluated/reported. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 59:829-841, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Genome-wide mutation detection by interclonal genetic variation

Genetic toxicology assays estimate mutation frequencies by phenotypically screening for the activation or inactivation of endogenous or exogenous reporter genes. These reporters can only detect mutations in narrow areas of the genome and their use is often restricted to certain in vitro and in vivo models. Here, we show that Interclonal Genetic Variation (ICGV) can directly identify mutations genome-wide by comparing sequencing data of single-cell clones derived from the same source or organism. Upon ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) exposure, ICGV detected greater levels of mutation in a dose- and time-dependent manner in E. coli. In addition, ICGV was also able to identify a ∼20-fold increase in somatic mutations in T-cell clones derived from an N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-treated rat vs. a vehicle-treated rat. These results demonstrate that the genetic differences of single-cell clones can be used for genome-wide mutation detection.

In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assessment of the dopamine receptor antagonist molindone hydrochloride.

Molindone hydrochloride is a dihydroindolone neuroleptic with dopamine D2 and D5 receptor antagonist activity. As an integral component of its preclinical safety evaluation, molindone hydrochloride was evaluated in a series of in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology assays. In the bacterial reverse gene mutation assays employing four Salmonella tester strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537) and the E. coli tester strain WP2uvrA, molindone hydrochloride was negative in all strains, except TA100, in which it induced a positive response (up to 3-fold) in the presence of rat liver S9. With human S9, a small (2-fold), but nonreproducible, increase in revertants was observed in TA100 at the highest concentration of molindone tested (5,000 µg/plate). The mutagenicity was completely abrogated by the addition of glutathione and UDP-glucuronic acid to rat liver S9, suggesting detoxification of the mutagenic metabolite(s) by Phase II conjugation reactions, pathways commonly operational in humans. Molindone hydrochloride did not induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocyte cultures, did not elicit a positive response in a rat bone marrow micronucleus test for clastogencity/aneugenicity, and did not give a positive response in the rat liver comet assay for DNA damage. Collectively, the weight of evidence from these studies, combined with a large margin of safety and efficient detoxification through Phase II conjugation supports the interpretation that molindone hydrochloride does not pose a genotoxic risk to humans at the anticipated clinical dose levels.

Evaluation of General Toxicity and Genotoxicity of the Silkworm Extract Powder

The silkworm extract powder contain 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ), a potent α-glycosidase inhibitor, has therapeutic potency against diabetes mellitus. Therefore, natural products containing DNJ from mulberry leaves and silkworm are consumed as health functional food. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety of the silkworm extract powder, a health food which containing the DNJ. The repeated toxicity studies and gentic toxicity studies of the silkworm extract powder were performed to obtain the data for new functional food approval in MFDS. The safety was evaluated by a single-dose oral toxicity study and a 90 day repeated-dose oral toxicity study in Sprague-Dawley rats. The silkworm extract powder was also evaluated for its mutagenic potential in a battery of genetic toxicity test: in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay, in vitro chromosomal aberration test, and in vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay. The results of the genetic toxicology assays were negative in all of the assays. The approximate lethal dose in single oral dose toxicity study was considered to be higher than 5000 mg/kg in rats. In the 90 day study, the dose levels were wet at 0, 500, 1000, 2000 mg/kg/day, and 10 animals/sex/dose were treated with oral gavage. The parameters that were monitored were clinical signs, body weights, food and water consumptions, ophthalmic examination, urinalysis, hematology, serum biochemistry, necropsy findings, organ weights, and histopathological examination. No adverse effects were observed after the 90 day administration of the silkworm extract powder. The No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) of silkworm extract powder in the 90 day study was 2000 mg/kg/day in both sexes, and no target organ was identified.

Phenolphthalein induces centrosome amplification and tubulin depolymerization in vitro

Aneuploidy is a major cause of human reproductive failure and plays a large role in cancer. Phenolphthalein (PHT) induces tumors in rodents but its primary mechanism does not seem to be DNA damage. In heterozygous TSG-p53(®) mice, PHT induces lymphomas and also micronuclei (MN), many containing kinetochores (K), implying chromosome loss (aneuploidy). The induction of aneuploidy would be compatible with the loss of the normal p53 gene seen in the lymphomas. In this study, we confirm PHT's aneugenicity and determine the aneugenic mechanism of PHT by combining traditional genetic toxicology assays with image and flow cytometry methods. The data revealed that PHT induces tubulin polymerization abnormalities and deregulates the centrosome duplication cycle causing centrosome amplification. We also show that one of the consequences of these events is apoptosis.

The fate of 4-hydroxycarbazole metabolite: metabolism and carcinogenicity assessment of a β-adrenergic receptor modulator containing carbazole structure

LY377604 has a potential to form 4-hydroxycarbazole, which was reported in the literature as a mutagen. This safety concern led to our investigation of the metabolism and carcinogenicity of LY377604.In in vitro studies with LY377604, 4-hydroxycarbazole was detected in the presence of liver microsomes prepared from different species. When incubated with liver slices, only the conjugate of 4-hydroxycarbazole was detected.Subsequent in vivo radio-labelled studies were conducted to characterise the formation of 4-hydroxycarbazole from LY377604. Free 4-hydroxycarbazole was not detected in vivo, but the O-glucuronide conjugate was identified as a minor metabolite in urine samples, representing 0.2% and 0.9% of the radioactive dose in rats and monkeys. The low level of circulating 4-hydroxycarbazole glucuronide conjugate was also detected in plasma.LY377604 was negative in all genetic toxicology assays and was not associated with tumour induction in a 6-month carcinogenicity study using RasH2+/− mouse model. The exposure to free 4-hydroxycarbazole was not measurable after one dose and was about 0.1%−0.2% of the parent exposure at the end of the 6-month study.These data suggested that 4-hydroxycarbazole was formed as a minor metabolite in vivo, but it was primarily conjugated and excreted in urine as the glucuronide conjugate. The absence of tumours in the carcinogenicity study combined with the exposure data suggested that the low level of free 4-hydroxycarbazole did not represent a carcinogenic risk.

What's in a name? The argument for changing the name of IAEMS and its affiliated societies

We identify trends over the past decades in membership in societies affiliated with the International Association of Environmental Mutagen Societies (IAEMS), and we also highlight findings in a recent review by Claxton et al. [Environ Health Perspect, in press] regarding the numbers of papers published per year using genetic toxicology assays. These analyses reveal a decline or at best a static level of membership in IAEMS-affiliated societies, as well as a decline in the number of papers published per year using genetic toxicology assays-with the exception of those using comet assays, which already have begun to plateau. In contrast, toxicogenomics and computational toxicology are becoming increasingly prominent relative to environmental mutagenesis research in most research institutes, reflecting the ascendancy of these areas of environmental toxicology. We conclude that changing the name of IAEMS and its affiliated societies to reflect these changes might enhance membership and publication by welcoming a broader range of scientists into these societies. Although various names are possible, we think that changing the name of these societies to "Environmental Genomics Society" may help to make our societies more attractive to a broader range of scientists, resulting in an increase in membership and an acceleration of the incorporation of genomic methods into environmental research.

Rationale of genotoxicity testing of nanomaterials: Regulatory requirements and appropriateness of available OECD test guidelines

The development of an environmental health and safety risk management system for nanoscale particle-types requires a base set of hazard data. Accurate determination of health and environmental risks of nanomaterials is a function of the integration of hazard and exposure datasets. Recently, a nanoparticle risk assessment strategy was promulgated and the components are described in a document entitled “Nanorisk framework” (www.nanoriskframework.com). A major component of the hazard evaluation includes a proposed minimum base set of toxicity studies. Included in the suggested studies were substantial particle characterization, a variety of acute hazard and environmental tests, concomitant with screening-type genotoxicity studies. The implementation of well-accepted genotoxicity assays for testing nanomaterials remains a controversial issue. This is because many of these genotoxicity tests were designed for screening general macroparticle chemicals and might not be suitable for the screening of nanomaterials (even of the same compositional material). Furthermore, no nanoparticle-type positive controls have been established or universally accepted for these tests. Although it is the comparative results of the test material vs. the negative or vehicle control that forms the basis for interpreting the results and potency of test materials in genetic toxicology assays, the lack of a nanoparticle-type positive control questions the suitability of the tests to identify nanomaterials with genotoxic properties. It is also not possible to establish historical positive control ranges that would confirm the sensitivity of the tests. Although several genetic toxicology tests have been validated for chemicals according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines, the relevance of these assays for nanoparticulate materials remains to be determined. In an attempt to remedy this issue, the OECD has established current projects designed to evaluate the relevance and reproducibility of safety hazard tests for representative nanomaterials, including genotoxicity assays (i.e., Steering Group 3 – Safety Testing of Representative Nanomaterials). In this article, we discuss our past approaches and experience in conducting genotoxicity assays (1) for a newly developed ultrafine TiO2 particle-type; and (2) in a recent inhalation study, evaluating micronucleus formation in rat erythrocytes following exposures to engineered amorphous nanosilica particles. It seems clear that the development of standardized approaches will be necessary in order to determine whether exposures to specific nanoparticle-types are associated with genotoxic events. The appropriateness of available genotoxicity test systems for nanomaterials requires confirmation and standardization. Accordingly, it seems reasonable to conclude that any specific regulatory testing requirements for nanoparticles would be premature at this time.

Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of three phenyltetrahydropyridinyl butylazole-derived sigma-receptor ligand drug candidates

Three structurally related phenyltetrahydropyridinyl butylazole (PTHPB)-derived drug candidates with sigma receptor-binding properties were evaluated for genotoxic potential in the ICH standard battery of genetic toxicology assays. These comprised an Ames test, a mouse-lymphoma assay, and a mouse bone-marrow micronucleus test. The maximum test concentrations in the in vitro assays were determined by the solubility and/or the cytotoxicity of the compounds. In the mouse micronucleus assay, the compounds were administered orally at three levels up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Negative results were obtained for all three drug candidates in the Ames test and in the mouse-lymphoma assay, both in the absence or presence of metabolic activation. In the mouse micronucleus test, there was no effect on the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE) in bone marrow after oral administration of any of the three test compounds, at any dose level or sampling time (24 and 48 h). Administration of all three compounds at the MTD induced a clear decrease in mouse body-temperature of 3.1–4.8 °C below normal; the temperature returned to normal within 8 h of dose administration. The produced mild hypothermia and absence of micronucleus induction was in contrast to the induction of MNPCE secondary to marked hypothermia reported for a structurally similar PTHPB-derived sigma-receptor ligand, the antipsychotic compound E-5842. The results obtained in the current series of studies suggest that exposure to the three tested PTHPB-derived drug candidates would not pose a genotoxic risk under clinical conditions.

Follow-up testing of rodent carcinogens not positive in the standard genotoxicity testing battery: IWGT workgroup report

At the Plymouth Third International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing in June 2002, a new expert group started a working process to provide guidance on a common strategy for genotoxicity testing beyond the current standard battery. The group identified amongst others “Follow-up testing of tumorigenic agents not positive in the standard genotoxicity test battery” as one subject for further consideration [L. Müller, D. Blakey, K.L. Dearfield, S. Galloway, P. Guzzie, M. Hayashi, P. Kasper, D. Kirkland, J.T. MacGregor, J.M. Parry, L. Schechtman, A. Smith, N. Tanaka, D. Tweats, H. Yamasaki, Strategy for genotoxicity testing and stratification of genotoxicity test results—report on initial activities of the IWGT Expert Group, Mutat. Res. 540 (2003) 177–181]. A workgroup devoted to this topic was formed and met on September 9–10, 2005, in San Francisco. This workgroup was devoted to the discussion of when it would be appropriate to conduct additional genetic toxicology studies, as well as what type of studies, if the initial standard battery of tests was negative, but tumor formation was observed in the rodent carcinogenicity assessment. The important role of the standard genetic toxicology testing to determine the mode of action (MOA) for carcinogenesis (genotoxic versus non-genotoxic) was discussed, but the limitations of the standard testing were also reviewed. The workgroup also acknowledged that the entire toxicological profile (e.g. structure–activity relationships, the nature of the tumor finding and metabolic profiles) of a compound needed to be taken into consideration before the conduct of any additional testing. As part of the meeting, case studies were discussed to understand the practical application of additional testing as well as to form a decision tree. Finally, suitable additional genetic toxicology assays to help determine the carcinogenic MOA or establish a weight of evidence (WOE) argument were discussed and formulated into a decision tree.

Assessing surface water quality of the Yangtze Estuary with genotoxicity data

The present study investigated the genotoxicity of the surface water samples from the Yangtze Estuary with the Ames test in three seasons. Several important chemical parameters, such as COD inorganic nitrogen, active phosphate and heavy metals, were also analyzed at the same time. According the results, surface water samples from the south branch and a few of samples at the seaward end of the Yangtze Estuary show positive genotoxicity in some seasons. Chemical analysis revealed that the Yangtze Estuary was seriously polluted by inorganic nitrogen and by active phosphate. However, chemical parameters could not demonstrate the spatial variation of water quality of the estuary, and they could not assess adverse effects of chemicals in mixtures as well. Therefore, it is recommended that genotoxicity data, mutation rate of the Salmonella typhimurium strain TA98 at the dose of 1 l per plate, be taken as a new parameter assessing surface water quality of the Yangtze Estuary. Our studies also suggested that genetic toxicology assays, such as the Ames test, could be applied as a routine measure to monitoring marine environment in China. The paper proposes a development of the National Seawater Quality Standard of China.

Genotoxicity studies with pure trans-capsaicin

Both positive and negative effects have been found in classical genetic toxicology assays with capsaicin. However, the capsaicin tested in most studies has been derived from pepper plant extracts, which is likely to display varying degrees of purity and possibly diverse impurity profiles. Therefore, the objective of the series of studies reported here was to test the genotoxic potential of pure, synthetic trans-capsaicin (the only naturally occurring geometric isomer of capsaicin), using four genotoxicity assays widely used to evaluate drug substances. These included the Ames, mouse lymphoma cell mutation, mouse in vivo bone marrow micronucleus and chromosomal aberration in human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) assays. In the Ames assay, pure trans-capsaicin was not mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli when dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide and tested at concentrations extending into the toxic range. trans-Capsaicin was weakly mutagenic in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells, in the presence of S9 mix, when dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide and tested at concentrations extending into the toxic range. Limited evidence for very weak activity was also obtained in the absence of S9 mix. trans-Capsaicin did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow cells when tested to the maximum tolerated dose of 800 mg/kg per day in male and 200 mg/kg per day in female CD-1 mice using a 0 h plus 24 h oral dosing and 48 h sampling regimen. Finally, trans-capsaicin did not induce structural or numerical chromosomal aberrations when evaluated for its ability to induce clastogenicity in blood lymphocytes. Taken together, these data suggest that the genotoxic potential of pure trans-capsaicin is very low, especially as the clinical significance of weak mutagenicity in the mouse lymphoma assay for catechol-moiety containing compounds is unclear. Moreover, the different genotoxicity profiles of pure trans-capsaicin and purified chili pepper extracts suggest that the purity and source of capsaicin should always be an important consideration for toxicological evaluations.

Genetic toxicology of remifentanil, an opiate analgesic.

Compounds that interact with opioid receptors are commonly used as analgesics. Opioid agonists vary in their potency and pharmacokinetic properties as well as in their affinity for distinct opioid receptors. The fentanyl opiate analogues are an important group of analgesics that interact with the mu opioid receptor. Remifentanil (GI87084) is a particularly interesting member of this group of opioids because its action is especially short in duration. This report examines the genetic toxicology of remifentanil. Remifentanil was not genotoxic in an Ames test, an in vitro chromosome aberration assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells, an in vivo micronucleus assay in rat erythrocytes, or an in vivo/in vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis assay in rat hepatocytes. In the in vitro L5178Y tk(+/-) mouse lymphoma assay, remifentanil produced a genotoxic response at dose levels >or=308 microg/mL only in the presence of rat liver S9 metabolic activation; primarily tiny and small mutant colonies were produced. This pattern of activity in a battery of genetic toxicology assays is not unique to remifentanil, but has also been observed for other pharmaceuticals, including the opioid fentanyl. A weight-of-evidence analysis, taking into consideration genotoxic mechanisms, in vivo results, and the conditions of clinical use, suggests remifentanil does not pose a genotoxic risk to patients.

Practical aspects of mutagenicity testing strategy: an industrial perspective

Genetic toxicology studies play a central role in the development and marketing of new chemicals for pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, and consumer use. During the discovery phase of product development, rapid screening tests that require minimal amounts of test materials are used to assist in the design and prioritization of new molecules. At this stage, a modified Salmonella reverse mutation assay and an in vitro micronucleus test with mammalian cell culture are frequently used for screening. Regulatory genetic toxicology studies are conducted with a short list of compounds using protocols that conform to various international guidelines. A set of four assays usually constitutes the minimum test battery that satisfies global requirements. This set includes a bacterial reverse mutation assay, an in vitro cytogenetic test with mammalian cell culture, an in vitro gene mutation assay in mammalian cell cultures, and an in vivo rodent bone marrow micronucleus test. Supplementary studies are conducted in certain instances either as a follow-up to the findings from this initial testing battery and/or to satisfy a regulatory requirement. Currently available genetic toxicology assays have helped the scientific and industrial community over the past several decades in evaluating the mutagenic potential of chemical agents. The emerging field of toxicogenomics has the potential to redefine our ability to study the response of cells to genetic damage and hence our ability to study threshold phenomenon.