GP Training Research Articles

Determinants of polydoctoring among multimorbid older adults; a cross-sectional study in an urban area of Japan.

Multimorbidity increases with age, leading to various adverse outcomes, including higher mortality, care dependency, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs. Polydoctoring, managing a patient with multimorbidity by multiple healthcare providers, can be a risk of fragmented care and increased healthcare expenditures. This study aims to identify patient-related factors contributing to polydoctoring in older adults with multimorbidity. This study is a cross-sectional study using baseline data from the Kawasaki Aging and Wellbeing Project. Participants were residents of Kawasaki City aged 85-89 years, without disability in basic activities of daily living, and being able to visit study site. The regularly visited facilities (RVF) index was employed to quantify polydoctoring. Polydoctoring was defined as having two or more RVFs. Poisson regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between polydoctoring and patient demographics, including types of chronic conditions and socioeconomic factors. A total of, 968 participants with multimorbidity were analyzed. Increased RVF was significantly associated with eye diseases (rate ratio [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.44), osteoporosis (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.38), prostate diseases (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40), and osteoarthritis (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.27). No significant correlation was found with educational status or financial hardship. The study indicated that certain chronic conditions are linked to increased polydoctoring among multimorbid older adults in Japan. However, most of those conditions are considered to be within a scope of family medicine/general practice. Training general practitioners to manage these conditions could reduce healthcare costs and the treatment burden, indicating a direction for future healthcare policy and medical education.

Perception and knowledge of general practitioners on COPD management according to the GOLD23 document and reimbursement criteria for drugs prescription: an e-Delphi study

Background COPD management and therapy have been periodically revised to support a more patient-specific approach. Several concerns remain in primary care, such as the proper choice of initial treatment, medication adherence, and missing values for spirometry investigations. These concerns may be exacerbated by inconsistencies between the GOLD23 report and reimbursement criteria, as per the Italian NOTA99, especially for what concerns the assessment of disease severity and related treatment choice. We therefore examined the perception and knowledge of general practitioners (GPs) on COPD management and treatment. Methods We conducted an exploratory e-Delphi study among 600 GPs. The study examined the COPD-related GP's access to spirometry evaluations in primary care clinics; knowledge on early recognition of COPD and related clinical concerns; perception of the clinical application of the NOTA99; the place in therapy of the triple LABA/LAMA/ICS combination. Results Among 466 participating GPs (response rate: 70.3%; mean age 52, SD: 14.2; mean years of experience: 21.3, SD: 15) had a good level of knowledge about the GOLD 2023 document and the reimbursement criteria for COPD medications. Nevertheless, a low (34%) direct access to spirometry was reported, along with absence of consensus on the proper choice of initial treatment (especially of use of LABA/LAMA combination), and the re-evaluation of free-triple therapy LABA/LAMA/ICS through specialist’s referral. Conclusions This study captured the domains on which further training for GPs might be implemented to improve the management and treatment of COPD. An extension of this e-Delphi to a larger GPs’ panel might further confirm these findings.

COVID-19 pandemic impact on mental and professional cognition: A questionnaire survey on a sample of GP trainees and GPs.

Since the outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19), general practitioners (GPs) have been working in the frontline under psychological and physical pressure. This study aims to evaluate the psychological health, career prospective, attitudes toward educational mode changes, and knowledge about COVID-19. An online anonymous questionnaire survey was carried out on GP trainees and GPs from June 2022 to September 2022. The survey mainly consisted of four parts: 1) general information; 2) level of knowledge about COVID-19; 3) psychological and physical health impact; and 4) changes in professional perception. The total knowledge score of 43 GP trainees and 38 GPs was 334 and 283, respectively, without significant difference (z = -0.839, P = 0.402). There was no statistical difference between the scores of GP trainees and GPs for each subindicator of mental and physical disorders. Eleven GP trainees and four GPs had severe psychological disorder subindexes. Severe somatization disorder subindexes were found in eight GP trainees and five GPs. Also, 67.44% of GP trainees and 52.63% of GPs had a positive attitude toward GP career. Moreover, 62.79% of GP trainees and 52.63% of GPs considered the epidemic had no impact on their professional cognition. Among GP trainees, 62.8% and 32.6% considered the epidemic had no or slight impact on their academic activities, respectively. Also, 53.5% and 44.2% of GP trainees partially and fully approved online teaching, respectively. The most popular forms were live and recorded courses. COVID-19 pandemic had no noticeable impact on their physical and mental health and their attitude toward GP career.

63 General practitioners’ experience, attitudes and needs on providing advice on physical activity to people with chronic ischemic heart disease - A qualitative study (OptiCor study)

Abstract Purpose The German treatment guideline “chronic ischemic/coronary heart disease (IHD)” recommends that general practitioners (GPs) deliver advice on physical activity (PA) to IHD patients. However, the provision of PA advice is inadequately implemented in general practice in Germany. One reason is the lack of medical training in providing PA advice effectively and efficiently. International guidelines recommend such training for GPs. This study aims to explore needs, experiences, and attitudes including barriers and facilitators of GPs towards the routine delivery of PA advice to IHD patients, in order to adequately inform a customised development of such a training. Methods Over a period of four months (March – June 2023), 12 face-to-face problem centred interviews (n = 12; 5/12 females, age range: 35-73 years) and six focus group discussions (n = 37; 13/37 females, age range: 36-70 years) with GPs were conducted. Interview and discussion guides were developed and pilot tested by the multi-professional study team. Data were collected in an iterative process. Purposive sampling and techniques of maximal structural variation were applied (e.g., with regard to professional experience, interest in PA). Audio-recorded data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a content structuring procedure (deductive and inductive approach). GPs were involved throughout the entire research process, e.g., in multi-professional analysis groups. Results Whereas GPs are mostly aware of the health benefits of PA for IHD patients, PA advice is not routinely provided. Conversations on PA tend to be unstructured and advice is often addressed more generally than customised to the patients’ needs and preferences. Priority is given to other lifestyle issues, such as smoking. The effectiveness of PA advice is perceived as less effective but time consuming. GPs mention frustration in this context. They express a need for communication strategies (structure and tools) to motivate patients to PA that can be integrated into everyday GP care. Conclusion The results provide relevant insights into the everyday practice of GPs, information on GPs’ needs and requirements and can thus contribute to a target group-specific development of a GP training on PA advice for patients with IHD in the OptiCor study. Funding German Ministry of Education and Research (01GY2103).

Factors associated with early-career GPs' retention as independent specialists in former training practices.

Retention of general practice registrars in their training practices is important for addressing the GP workforce deficit and maldistribution of GPs. Given that rural and remote general practices are disproportionately affected by low retention, identifying the factors that promote retention may be as important as developing recruitment strategies in these areas. Quantifying the impact of relevant factors on registrar retention will enable a better understanding of how to incentivise retention and attenuate the loss of the rural workforce to other areas. We sought to establish the prevalence and associations of retention of general practice registrars in their training practices. This analysis was a component of the New alumni Experience of Training and independent Unsupervised Practice (NEXT-UP) study: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of early-career GPs in conjunction with evaluation of data contemporaneously recorded as part of vocational training. Participants were former registrars of three regional training organisations delivering general practice training in New South Wales, Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory and Eastern Victoria, who had attained Fellowship of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners or the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine between January 2016 and July 2018. The outcome measured was whether the registrar had previously worked at their current practice during vocational training. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between relevant explanatory variables and the outcome. A total of 354 alumni responded (response rate 28%), of whom 322 provided data regarding previous training practice retention, with 190 (59%) having previously worked at their current practice as registrars. Among respondents who reported currently working in a regional-rural practice location (n=100), 69% reported having previously worked at their current practice during training. GPs were more likely to be retained by a practice they had trained at if it was of lower socioeconomic status (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.91), p<0.001 for each decile of socioeconomic status) and if the practice provided two or more of home visits, nursing home visits or after-hours services (aOR 4.29 (95%CI 2.10-8.75), p<0.001). They were less likely to be retained by the practice if training was completed in a regional-rural area (aOR 0.35 (95%CI 0.17-0.72), p=0.004). Regional-rural training location is associated with reduced odds of subsequent retention of general practice registrars. This is occurring despite significant government investment in expansion of general practice training in regional and rural areas. The practice factor most strongly associated with GP retention was the provision of out-of-practice and after-hours care. There may be altruistic, rather than monetary, reasons that explain this finding. Such training opportunities, if provided to all trainees, especially in regional and rural areas, would be a learning opportunity, a way of promoting holistic community-based care and an incentive for subsequent retention within the practice and community as an established GP.

General practice registrars' practice in outer metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional comparison with rural and inner metropolitan areas.

Background General practice training in outer metropolitan (OM) areas contributes to patients' access to care. Differences in clinical practice and training in rural versus urban areas have been established, but less is known about OM versus inner metropolitan (IM) differences - whether they offer a trainee learning experience of populations with distinct demographics and healthcare characteristics. This study sought to identify the characteristics and associations of general practice training in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory OM areas, compared to IM and rural areas. Methods Cross-sectional analyses of data (2016-2020) from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, an ongoing cohort study of Australian GP registrars' in-consultation clinical and educational experience and behaviours, were performed. Multinomial logistic regression assessed associations of rural/OM/IM practice location with registrar and practice factors, patient factors, consultation content factors and consultation action factors. Results Overall, 1308 registrars provided data from 177,026 consultations. For several variables, there was a pattern in the differences of associations across rural/OM/IM areas. Experience of care of older patients and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander health were more likely in OM than IM areas. Care of patients from non-English speaking background was more likely in OM than in rural areas. Possible markers of healthcare access (specialist referrals, and pathology and imaging requests) were less likely in OM than in both IM and rural areas. Conclusions OM areas are distinct (and educationally rich) clinical learning environments, with distinct demographic characteristics and seeming healthcare access limitations. This finding has implications for workforce support and health resource allocation.

Pathways of Care in the Hospital Visiting Patients Having Mental Health Problems in Central India

Background: There is a high community prevalence of mental health problems in India. Psychiatric patients often consult nonspecialist or unqualified health providers which results in significant treatment delays and poor mental health outcomes. Knowledge of existing treatment-seeking practices may be useful to design specific and effective awareness programs. Objectives: The objectives were to study the types of health-care providers contacted by patients suffering from different mental illnesses as well as assess the treatment delays and associated factors. Methodology: A cross-sectional observational descriptive study was done in a psychiatry clinic of a tertiary health care center and teaching hospital in Central India. The information was collected from consecutive newly visiting patients on two predefined weekdays through face-to-face interviews. A predesigned sociodemographic format and World Health Organization pathways interview schedule were used to assess pathways of care. Results: Data were collected from 157 participants. Majority of participants were males (58%). Mood disorders were the most common diagnostic category (28%), followed by substance-related disorders (23%) and anxiety disorders (21%). Eighty (51%) among the total participants consulted psychiatrist in the first visit. Allopathic practitioners were the second commonly consulted health provider category. The median delay in treatment was maximum in substance-related disorders (7 years). Conclusion: Significant delay in treatment was observed across all diagnostic categories. Training general practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses and a structured health-care referral system to enhance appropriate psychiatry consultations may be desirable to improve mental health outcomes in India.

45 Optimising the management of chronic ischemic heart disease by training general practitioners to deliver very brief advice on physical activity (OptiCor)

Abstract Purpose The German treatment guideline “chronic ischemic/coronary heart disease (IHD)” recommends that general practitioners (GPs) deliver advice on physical activity (PA) to IHD patients. This recommendation is inadequately implemented, often due to GP’s insufficient specific training. International guidelines recommend training GPs in how to deliver PA advice effectively and efficiently. Evidence is lacking on how such training should be designed to match the recipients’ needs, and whether it improves the frequency and quality of advice. With OptiCor we aim to systematically develop and evaluate such a training for GPs to optimise the routine care of IHD patients. Project OptiCor has started in 2022. It comprises three phases over five years. The methodology matches the Medical Research Council framework recommendations for complex interventions. GPs and patients are substantially involved throughout the entire project. OptiCor (funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research) will be presented internationally for the first time. Phase 1 (needs analysis/development)–completed: A nationwide, face-to-face household survey was used to collect data on the receipt of GP-delivered PA advice in people with IHD. Focus group discussions and problem-centred interviews were conducted with GPs and patients with IHD to explore attitudes and motivation towards, experiences with, and barriers and facilitators of PA advice implementation or reception, respectively. The findings are now being used to inform the theory-based training development. Phase 2 (pilot): A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) on the effectiveness of the GP training on delivered PA advice during routine care of IHD patients will be pilot tested in summer 2024. Phase 3 (evaluation): A full pragmatic cRCT will be conducted from 2025 onwards (primary endpoint: patient-reported proportions of GP-delivered PA advice). Health economic and process-related analyses will facilitate a potential future broad dissemination and health economic evaluation of the training. Conclusions If our training successfully enhances the proportions and quality of delivered PA advice to IHD patients, it represents a low-threshold strategy for a broad implementation in general practice. The training could extend existing projects on PA referral/prescription schemes, and it could be transferred to the management of other diseases or to other healthcare settings.

Improving Type 2 Diabetes Care with Extended-Release Metformin: Real-Life Insights from a Physician Educational Program.

Compared to Immediate-Release (IR) metformin, Extended-Release (ER) metformin reduces side effects and pill burden while improving adherence; however, there is little real-life data on patient satisfaction with this innovative formulation to guide physicians toward a more holistic approach. Our goal is to train general practitioners on holistic patient management, with the aim of increasing patient satisfaction and treatment adherence, reducing side effects, and improving quality of life in patients with poor tolerance to metformin-IR. We designed an educational program for physicians called SlowDiab, aimed at establishing a holistic patient approach. In this context, adult patients with T2DM who experienced gastrointestinal discomfort with metformin-IR were enrolled and switched to metformin- ER. Data on glycemic control were collected at baseline and 2 months after switching. A survey was carried out on patients to assess their level of satisfaction. In 69 enrolled patients (mean (min-max) age, 68.2 (41-90)), side effects decreased after switching from 61.8% to 16.2% (p < 0.01), and the mean perceived burden of adverse events on a scale of 1 to 10 also decreased (6.17 vs. 3.82; p < 0.05). Among patients previously intolerant to metformin-IR, 74.3% reported no longer experiencing any side effects after the switch. The mean number of tablets taken daily (2.28 vs. 1.66; p < 0.01) and mean plasma glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values (7.0% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.05) decreased, while 93.8% of patients were satisfied with the treatment change. Moreover, 84.2% reported an improvement in glycemic control after the switch. In a real-life setting, an educational program for general practitioners confirmed that metformin ER reduces side effects and improves pill burden, therapeutic adherence, and patient satisfaction compared to metformin IR.

Integrating academic medical education into vocational general practitioner training: how do these combined training posts impact on subsequent career paths?

ABSTRACT Background In the UK, to encourage academic careers, extended education posts (EEPs) exist, where standard three-year, general practice vocational training is extended, offering trainees dedicated time to spend in another specialty such as medical education (Med Ed). Little is known about whether this impacts positively on their subsequent careers. Aims To explore general practitioners’ (GPs’) experiences and career trajectories after undertaking Med Ed EEPs. Method Twenty-eight GPs who completed a Med Ed EEP between 2013 and 2021 were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews were held virtually. Transcripts were coded with NVivo software and underwent thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework to ensure a reiterative process of internal validation. Results Eight GPs took part. All were working as NHS GPs, alongside other roles. Four themes emerged: ‘growing as an academic educator’, ‘research can be interesting’, ‘the academic environment’ and ‘juggling multiple roles is stressful’. Most were still teaching, involved in research and had undertaken formal Med Ed training. Role models and immersion in academic teams were influential. Significant tensions and stresses were experienced when balancing multiple roles. The absence of ongoing academic training tracks contributed to this. Conclusion EEPs impact positively on academic career development and the acquisition of appropriate skills. However, managing multiple roles is challenging and stressful. Short-term university contracts, difficulties obtaining flexible working and resultant lack of partnership or salaried clinical work highlight an urgent need to explore fixed academic training pathways after vocational training, if sustainable recruitment into primary care academia is to be achieved.

Exploring learning characteristics and progression ofGPtrainees based in regional, rural and remote settings:Aqualitative study.

Globally, most doctors train and work in metropolitan areas but a key strategy for developing the rural health workforce is expanding rural training. The aim of this study was to describe the scope and quality of learning along with skill acquisition of GP trainees based in regional, rural, and remote settings. Regional, rural and remote settings in Queensland Australia excluding Brisbane. Thirty-seven general practice trainees who had undertaken their first community placement were recruited from regional, rural and remote learning settings within Queensland. Qualitative descriptive methodology based on constructionist epistemology was employed which allowed for the exploration of current GP trainees' experiences. Trainees were interviewed and data were thematically analysed as to the scope and quality of learning by the setting of training. Learning experiences were then mapped against the Dreyfus and Dreyfus model to explore skill acquisition. In terms of the scope and quality of learning, rural and remote trainees mainly focused on the diverse and unique (sometimes challenging) experiences their setting offered compared with regionally based trainees. Mapping of the trainee comments to the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition demonstrated that regardless of setting, equivalent learning occurred by GP trainees. This exploratory study provides evidence that rural and remote learning may provide a more diverse and challenging experience. It suggests an equivalence of quality of education and skill acquisition across settings rural, regional and remote. This suggests that the training distribution policies may not disadvantage GP trainees and the scope and quality of more remote learning may increase uptake of remote placements.

The digital Balint: using AI in reflective practice

ABSTRACT Reflective practice is fundamental to postgraduate general practitioner (GP) training and ongoing professional development. However, real-world challenges like time constraints and professional isolation often limit meaningful engagement with this critical skill. This article proposes that large language models (LLMs), sophisticated artificial intelligence systems, may have potential for enhancing reflective practice. We present three case studies, in which we explore the ability of LLMs to generate thought-provoking questions, which could prompt GPs to consider new angles, address underlying factors, and bridge the gap between theory and practice. Our findings suggest that LLMs could help reframe experiences and foster deeper self reflection, particularly for isolated practitioners. While ethical concerns regarding privacy, over reliance, and potential biases exist, we consider the possibility of responsibly integrating LLMs into reflective practice. For trainees, AI-generated questions might complement personal reflection under guidance. For GPs working in isolation, LLMs present an opportunity to enhance reflective practice, challenging us to consider a place for this technological innovation without diminishing the human aspects essential to medical practice.

An investigation into General Practitioners' experience with Long Covid.

Long Covid (LC) is the continuation or development of new symptoms after initial COVID-19 infection. Little is known about General Practitioners' (GP) experience of managing patients with LC. The aim of this study is to establish GP experiences with LC. A survey was designed and piloted in three training practices prior to distribution. The survey was completed by doctors working in GP training scheme practices in Cork, Ireland. Fifty-three of one hundred and sixty invited GPs completed the survey, indicating a 33% response rate. 8% (4/53) of participants agreed and 0% (0/53) strongly agreed with the statement they were "confident in diagnosing Long Covid". 81% (43/53) were not confident in treating patients with LC. 70% (37/53) were unaware of indications for referral to secondary care. 38% (20/53) were aware of the referral pathways to local LC clinics. 93% (49/53) agreed there were educational deficits regarding LC. There was a lack of confidence in the diagnosis and management of LC, and in the interface with secondary care. There is demand for educational interventions to assist GPs with their care of patients with this emerging condition.

Missing topics for a newly established general practice curriculum for medical students in Hesse – a qualitative study

BackgroundTo address the declining numbers of general practitioners (GPs) in rural areas and a lack of medical students pursuing a career in primary care, a general practice-based curriculum coupled with additional university admissions for students has been established at three universities in Hesse, Germany. This study aims to analyze potential topics which students striving to become a GP will benefit from. Teaching such topics will prepare them for their chosen career and working in rural areas. We aimed to explore the views of both specialists and GPs on chief topics and necessary skills in primary care.MethodsIn our study we used semi-structured interviews with outpatient specialists and specialists in clinical practice and semi-structured group interviews with GPs in training. The topic guide addressed contents of the curriculum for medical students with an extracurricular focus (addressing additional topics) on primary care. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.ResultsGPs in training and specialists agreed on the importance of knowledge in the fields of medical history, physical examination, communication as well as common diseases in primary care. Essential competences mentioned were: inducing medical treatment, decision-making and triage, conducting structured conversations, having patient knowledge (hard skills) as well as an interest in continuous learning, empathy, personal commitment, listening and down-to-earthness (soft skills). Case reports, symptom-based learning, practical training, lessons with simulated patients and the integration of role models were regarded as useful teaching methods.ConclusionsGeneral practice-based curriculums should not only focus on the transfer of knowledge. Equally important is the training of soft and hard skills to prepare future GPs for their work in primary care. Special teaching methods as well as practical training should be the heart of a newly established curriculum.

A qualitative evaluation of trainee and educator experiences of Integrated Training Posts in one Vocational Training Scheme

ABSTRACT Integrated Training Posts (ITPs) were conceived in the 1990s and have recently increased in the Southwest of England. Most ITP evaluations have been small and undertaken over 13 years ago, so do not reflect the current training landscape. This qualitative study aimed to explore the views and experiences of ITPs amongst general practice trainees and educators. The location has increasing numbers of general practice trainees, International Medical Graduates (IMGs) and less-than-full-time trainees. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with six trainees and two educators; all had experienced at least one ITP. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Three themes were identified: ‘The role: expectations versus reality’, ‘Relevance of ITPs to future GP role’ and ‘Educational Challenges’. Most trainees valued the additional clinical experiences ITPs offered, as well as being able to trial ‘portfolio’ working. Trainee and educator expectations varied considerably, particularly whether the role was primarily service or observational. Working across multiple settings could limit contact between educator and trainee and make it difficult to identify a struggling trainee. There is a need to clarify the roles of trainees and educators involved in ITPs and whether and how this might vary between posts. Further studies could explore whether choice of ITP influences retention of general practitioners, and whether all trainees including those working less-than-full-time or IMGs benefit from ITPs.

Perceptions and experiences of trainers and trainees of UK workplace-based assessment for general practice licensing: a mixed methods survey

ABSTRACT Background Workplace-Based Assessment (WPBA) forms a major component of the UK General Practitioner (GP) licensing, together with knowledge and clinical skills examination. WPBA includes Case-based Discussion, Consultation Observation Tool, Mini-Consultation Exercise, Multisource Feedback, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, Clinical Examination and Procedural Skills, Clinical Supervisor’s Report, and Educational Supervisor Review. We aimed to investigate GP trainees’ and trainers’ perceptions and experiences of WPBA regarding validity and fairness. Methods We used a national online survey, with Likert-scaled and free-text responses, to a convenience sample of GP trainees and trainers, on perceptions and experiences of WPBA. Analysis included descriptive statistics, scale development, and regression models to investigate factors associated with attitudes towards WPBA, with thematic analysis of free text responses supported by NVivo 12. Results There were 2,088 responses from 1,176 trainees and 912 trainers. Both groups were generally positive towards WPBA, with trainers more positive or similar to trainees towards individual assessments. In a multivariable regression model, accounting for sex, ethnicity and country of primary medical qualification, trainees were significantly less positive (p < 0.001) while international medical graduates (IMGs) trained outside the European Economic Area (EEA) were significantly more (p < 0.001) positive towards WPBA. Qualitative analysis revealed varying concerns about validity and relevance, assessment burden, potential for bias, fairness to protected characteristics groups, gaps in assessment, and perceptions of individual assessments. Discussion Trainers’ greater positivity towards elements of WPBA accords with their role as assessors. Despite concerns about bias, IMGs from outside the EEA were significantly more positive towards WPBA.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Challenges: Irish General practitioners’ preparedness for publicly funded Assisted reproductive technologies

ObjectivesGlobal access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) remains highly inequitable. Until recently, access to ART in Ireland was solely available through private fertility clinics. Publicly funded ART was introduced in September 2023 but eligibility requires patients to meet strict access criteria that include referral by their primary care general practitioner (GP) to the local fertility service. Previous studies report that fertility training amongst doctors, including GPs, is variable and an obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) rotation is not mandatory for GP trainees in Ireland. This study aimed to investigate GPs’ knowledge of fertility investigations and management, as well as attitudes towards publicly funded ART access criteria. Study DesignA cross-sectional online survey was distributed to GPs working in Ireland between September 2023 and January 2024. The survey questionnaire explored attitudes to, and knowledge of, ART including the publicly funded access criteria. Responses to free-text questions were qualitatively analysed using content analysis. ResultsThe study had 154 respondents, representing approximately 4 % of GPs in Ireland. Three quarters (n = 120, 78 %) of respondents were female, 68 % (n = 105) had completed an O&G training rotation and 72 % (n = 111) had further O&G qualifications. However, 69 % (n = 107) reported that they had no training in subfertility investigation and management, and 34 % (n = 53) were not aware of the access criteria for publicly funded ART prior to completing the survey. Almost all GPs (97 %, n = 149) felt that they would benefit from more education on fertility. Qualitative content analysis generated two themes regarding publicly funded ART: (i) the access criteria are too restrictive and (ii) the workload for GPs will increase. ConclusionsGPs in Ireland are now being tasked with managing infertility and fertility treatment referrals, but most have not been provided with sufficient training. Our study shows that GPs in Ireland desire broader access criteria for publicly funded ART and better fertility training and education for their own clinical practice.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Early Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease in General Practice: The Endorse Study.

The underdiagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a significant public health concern. The Early chroNic kiDney disease pOint of caRe Screening (ENDORSE) project aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic implications of a targeted training intervention for general practitioners (GPs) to enhance CKD awareness and early diagnosis. Data on estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Urinary Albumin-Creatinine Ratio (uACR) were collected by 53 Italian GPs from 112,178 patients at baseline and after six months. The intervention involved six months of hybrid training provided by 11 nephrologists, which included formal lectures, instant messaging support, and joint visits for complex cases. The results demonstrated a substantial increase in the use of eGFR (+44.7%) and uACR (+95.2%) tests. This led to a 128.9% rise in the number of individuals screened for CKD using the KDIGO classification, resulting in a 62% increase in CKD diagnoses. The intervention's impact was particularly notable in high-risk groups, including patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure. A budget impact analysis projected cumulative five-year savings of €1.7 million for the study cohort. When these findings were extrapolated to the entire Italian CKD population, potential savings were estimated at €106.6 million, highlighting significant cost savings for the national health service. The clinical simulation assumed that early diagnosed CKD patients would be treated according to current indications for dapagliflozin, which slows disease progression. The ENDORSE model demonstrated that targeted training for GPs can significantly improve early CKD detection, leading to better patient outcomes and considerable economic benefits. This approach shows promise for broader implementation to address the underdiagnosis of CKD on a national and potentially international scale.

The perceived relevance, utility and retention of basic sciences in general practice

BackgroundBasic sciences are crucial for clinical medicine, yet studies focusing on their perceived utility among general practitioners (GPs) are sparse. Considering the broad scope of GPs’ practice, an in-depth understanding of basic sciences is fundamental for making informed clinical decisions. This study evaluated GP registrars’ retention and perceptions of the utility of basic sciences in clinical practice.MethodsUsing sequential explanatory mixed methods study design, knowledge retention was assessed by a multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination followed by interviews on the perception of the relevance and utility of basic sciences among GP registrars at James Cook University's (JCU) General Practice Training (GPT) program. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted on the MCQ exam data, while thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative interview data.ResultsSixty-one GP registrars participated in the MCQ exam, while 11 of them were involved in the interviews. The highest mean score was obtained in biochemistry (75.1 ± 2.23) while the lowest mean score was in anatomy (56.07 ± 3.16). Key performance predictors included the formative clinical examination scores (β = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.2, p < 0.001) and gender (β = -9.7, 95% CI: -17 to -2.3, p = 0.011). The qualitative data analysis revealed five themes, including the backbone of clinical medicine, varying utility over time and by specialty, clinical synthesis integrates encapsulated knowledge, professional pressures hinder revisitation of knowledge and knowledge renewal enhances updates.ConclusionBasic sciences were considered relevant in clinical practice. Development of continuing professional development (CPDs) sessions and clinically relevant online resources were measures proposed to enhance the retention of knowledge. Future research could focus on innovative educational strategies for GPs.

Application of Mini-CEX combined with DOPS in standardized training of community outpatient residents

ObjectiveTo explore the application effect of mini clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) combined with direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) in the standardized training of general practitioners in community clinics.MethodsFrom June 2022 to June 2023,20 general practitioners who received standardized training for residents in the general outpatient department of Changqing Community Health Service Center of Wuhan Fourth Hospital were collected as the research objects. Mini-CEX combined with DOPS was used to evaluate the general practitioners at the time of admission, 2 weeks of training and 4 weeks of training, and the results were fed back.ResultsThe scores of 20 general practitioners at 2 weeks and 4 weeks of training were compared with the scores at the time of admission, and the difference was statistically significant, p < 0.05.ConclusionMini-CEX combined with DOPS can improve the teaching effect of standardized training of residents in community general clinics.