An in-depth understanding of liquid water transport in fuel cell gas diffusion layers (GDLs) has the potential to inform the development of novel water management strategies that lead to improved fuel cell performance at high current densities. Several visualization (1-4) and modeling (5, 6) studies have shed light into some of these mechanisms of liquid water transport. However, due to the heterogenous nature of porous materials within the fuel cells, pore-scale modeling and simulations are required for in-depth analysis. Due to recent advancements in visualization techniques, particularly high-resolution synchrotron X-ray (1-4) and neutron (7) micro-computed tomography, the spatial distribution of liquid water within individual GDL pores during fuel cell operation can be resolved. In addition, pore network modeling (8) has been used to simulate and examine pore-to-pore water transport behavior within a wide range of GDL materials. However, we need to combine pore-network simulations with experimental data of realistic fuel cell conditions to study water transport in representative operating conditions in greater detail. In this study, we combined 3-D computed tomography and pore network modeling to expand on our understanding of liquid water transport within gas diffusion layers of operating fuel cells. First, we used synchrotron X-ray tomography to examine the micron-scale GDL porous structure and in-operando 3-D liquid water distribution using a custom fuel cell specialized for imaging. Then, we simulated water transport within the examined GDL structure using pore network modelling. We then compared the 3-D experimental results to our simulations to gain a deeper understanding of realistic inlet conditions for liquid water transport within the GDL. The study demonstrates a robust strategy to probe, understand, and predict liquid water transport within the complex porous structures in PEM fuel cells. References S. J. Normile, D. C. Sabarirajan, O. Calzada, V. De Andrade, X. Xiao, P. Mandal, D. Y. Parkinson, A. Serov, P. Atanassov and I. V. Zenyuk, Meter. Today Energy., 9 (2018).J. Eller, J. Roth, F. Marone, M. Stampanoni and F. N. Büchi, J. Electrochem. Soc., 164, 2 (2017).S. S. Alrwashdeh, I. Manke, H. Markötter, M. Klages, M. Göbel, J. Haußmann, J. Scholta and J. Banhart, ACS Nano., 11, 6 (2017).P. Krüger, H. Markötter, J. Haußmann, M. Klages, T. Arlt, J. Banhart, C. Hartnig, I. Manke and J. Scholta, J.Power Sources., 196, 12 (2011).C. Y. Wang, Chem. Rev., 104 (2004).P. P. Mukherjee, Q. J. Kang and C. Y. Wang, Energy Environ. Sci., 4, 2 (2011).J. M. LaManna, Y. Yue, T. A. Trabold, J. D. Fairweather, D. S. Hussey, E. Baltic and D. L. Jacobson, Meet. Abstr. - Electrochem.Soc., 32 (2017).J. Gostick, M. Aghighi, J. Hinebaugh, T. Tranter, M. A. Hoeh, H. Day, B. Spellacy, M. H. Sharqawy, A. Bazylak, A. Burns, W. Lehnert and A. Putz, Comput. Sci. Eng., 18, 4 (2016).
Read full abstract