NET G1 Research Articles

Liver metastases in high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comparative study of hepatic tumor volume and biochemical findings in NET G3 versus NEC.

Abnormal liver blood tests and liver tumor burden are known prognostic factors in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). However, the relationship between biochemical liver parameters and hepatic tumor load is largely unknown in NEN and in high-grade NEN (G3) specifically. The primary objective of this study was to correlate the biochemical parameters and liver tumor volume of patients with neuroendocrine tumors grade 3 (NET G3) or neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). We wanted to investigate whether patients with NET G3 with extensive liver involvement had less severely elevated laboratory liver parameters than NEC patients. In total, 46 patients with NEN were included, 31 had NEC and 15 NET G3. All patients had distant metastatic disease, with liver metastases being the most common (n = 39). Both laboratory results and semiautomatic volumetric measurements of liver tumor burden were obtainable for 34 patients at baseline and 26 patients at follow-up. Alkaline phosphatase (AP), gamma-GT (gGT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increased significantly between the two time periods (p < .01). In a regression model, liver tumor burden significantly affected several blood parameters, for example, increasing AP, gGT, LDH, and aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) by a factor of 1.02-1.04 per unit increase (1% tumor burden; all p < .001). AP, gGT, and LDH were significantly lower in NET G3 (factor of 0.43-0.68) than in NEC. Here, we found that liver chemistries changed over the NEN disease course, correlated with hepatic tumor burden, and differed by histologic subtype. The current data can potentially guide treatment decisions, for example, with regard to integration of liver-directed therapies.

The prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors according to the WHO 2017 classification: The multi-center experience in Taiwan.

87 Background: The occurrence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) remains infrequent, there is an upward trend in their diagnosis. Our retrospective study, conducted in Taiwan, focuses on exploring the interplay between clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and prognosis in PanNET cases. Particularly, we aim to assess the implications of the updated WHO classification system on prognosis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 176 PanNET cases from Chang Gung Medical Foundation, encompassing Linkou, Taoyuan, and Tucheng Hospitals, spanning the years 2009 to 2022. Pathology reports for all cases were reevaluated by pathologists according to the WHO 2017 classifications. Clinical features and overall survival outcomes were documented. Additionally, we examined the prognosis of distinct subgroups categorized by the WHO 2017 classification and their respective treatments. Results: The 5-year survival rate for all patients in the cohort stood at 58.7%. Among these, individuals diagnosed with NET G1 exhibited the highest survival rate (n = 78, 83.1%), followed by those with NET G2 (n = 57, 55.0%), NET G3 (n = 25, 14.6%), and NEC (n = 16, 9.4%). Univariate analysis highlighted several significant prognostic factors, including age, absence of symptoms at diagnosis, tumor size, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, higher Ki-67 index, and cellular morphology. Comparative analysis between the WHO 2017 and WHO 2010 classifications revealed both systems as significant independent predictors of overall survival in PanNET cases. Notably, the 95% confidence interval for the WHO 2017 classification (2.892–9.703) showed a slight improvement in prognostic precision compared to the WHO 2010 classification (3.696–10.067). Under the WHO 2010 classification, NET G3 and NEC were combined, with NEC presenting higher rates of distant metastases, lymph node involvement, and Ki-67 index. Further investigation revealed that patients receiving somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, or targeted therapy exhibited improved survival rates, particularly notable in NET G3 and NEC subgroups. Furthermore, NEC patients displayed extended treatment durations and higher objective response rates to first-line chemotherapy compared to the NET G3 group. Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis has illuminated the interrelation between prognostic factors and the overall survival rate. Furthermore, the updated WHO 2017 classification elucidates the distinctions between G3 and NEC, thus influencing the selection of clinical interventions.

Insulinoma: case report

The present study aims to depict a case of insulinoma in a 31-year-old woman, a patient of a private hospital in Maceió, state of Alagoas, presenting informative data regarding the medical follow-up performed during her treatment. She presented signs of mental confusion, behavioral changes, weakness, blurred vision, hypoglycemia, and loss of consciousness. Subsequently, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdominal region revealed a suggestive lesion of insulinoma. An endoscopic pancreatic ultrasound was then performed to evaluate the situation of the lesion. A partial pancreatectomy was performed, with enucleation of the pancreatic tumor by videolaparoscopy. The patient was diagnosed with a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, grade 1 (NET G1), and is currently undergoing oncological follow-up every six months, with laboratory and imaging exams, without presenting any pathological or clinical alterations to date.

NETest in advanced high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Molecular blood biomarkers are lacking for high-grade (HG) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). To histologically distinguish between neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), neuroendocrine tumors G3 (NET G3), adenocarcinoma and MINEN is often challenging. The mRNA-based NETest has diagnostic, prognostic and predictive value in neuroendocrine tumors G1-2 but has not been studied in HG GEP-NEN. Patients with advanced HG GEP-NEN were prospectively included in an observational study. A blood sample was collected before the start of chemotherapy and pseudonymised before NETest was performed. NETest results are expressed as an activity index (NETest score) from 0 to 100. The normal score cut-off is 20. Histological sections were pseudonymised before centralized pathological re-evaluation. Samples from 60 patients were evaluable with the NETest. Main primary tumor sites were colon (14), rectum (12), pancreas (11) and esophagus (7). Re-classification: 30 NEC, 12 NET G3, 3 HG-NEN ambiguous morphology, 8 MiNEN, 3 adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation (ADNE), 3 adenocarcinomas and 1 NET G2. Elevated NETest (>20) was seen in 38/45 (84%) HG GEP-NEN, all 17 large-cell NEC (100%), 11/13 (85%) small-cell NEC, all ambiguous cases and 7/12 (64%) NET G3. NETest was elevated in 5/8 (63%) MiNEN, 2/3 ADNE, however not in 3 adenocarcinomas. Median survival was 10.2 months (9.6-10.8 95%CI) for evaluable HG GEP-NEN treated with palliative chemotherapy (n = 39), and survival was significantly shorter in patients with NETest >60 with an OS of only 6.5 months. This is the first study to evaluate use of the NETest in advanced HG GEP-NEN. The NETest was almost always elevated in GEP-NEC and in all large-cell NEC. The NETest was also frequently elevated in NET G3 and MiNEN, however cases were limited. Baseline NETest was not predictive for benefit of chemotherapy, however a NETest >60 was prognostic with a shorter survival for patients receiving chemotherapy.

Clinical Evaluation of Response to Octreotide and Chemotherapy in High-Grade Malignant Neuroendocrine Tumors and Promising In Vitro Preclinical Results with Pasireotide.

Background and Objectives: High-grade malignant neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are characterized by rapid proliferation, high metastatic capacity, and strong expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). We aimed to analyze the presence of SSTRs in NET G3 and NEC, and to correlate their expression with the use of octreotide and pasireotide. Materials and Methods: For this purpose, we first performed a retrospective study of G3 NET and NEC patients, which included the determination of SSTR expression and response to octreotide treatment. Second, we selected the H69 small cell lung cancer cell line to determine the effect of octreotide and pasireotide. Results: Our results showed the traditional somatostatin analog (SSA) octreotide was ineffective in patients with NET G3 and NEC. On the other hand, RT-qPCR showed a high expression of SSTR2 and SSTR5 in H69 cells. Interestingly, while octreotide did not modify H69 cell proliferation, a strong inhibition of proliferation was detected with the use of pasireotide. Conclusions: In view of these results, a clinical trial in NET G3 and NEC patients using pasireotide is necessary to determine the usefulness of this drug in improving patient treatment.

Treatment outcome according to genetic tumour alterations and clinical characteristics in digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms

BackgroundChemotherapy has limited efficacy in advanced digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NEN) and prognosis is dismal. Predictive markers for palliative chemotherapy are lacking, and prognostic markers are limited.MethodsDigestive HG-NEN patients (n = 229) were prospectively included 2013–2017. Pathological re-assessment revealed 188 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and 41 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3). Tumour-DNA was sequenced across 360 cancer-related genes, assessing mutations (mut) and copy number alterations. We linked sequencing results to clinical information and explored potential markers for first-line chemotherapy efficacy and survival.ResultsIn NEC given cis/carboplatin and etoposide (PE), TP53mut predicted inferior response rate in multivariate analyses (p = 0.009) and no BRAFmut NEC showed response. In overall assessment of PE-treated NEC, no genetic alterations were prognostic for OS. For small-cell NEC, TP53mut were associated with longer OS (p = 0.011) and RB1 deletions predicted lack of immediate-progression (p = 0.003). In non-small cell NEC, APC mut were associated with immediate-progression and shorter PFS (p = 0.008/p = 0.004). For NET G3, ATRXmut, ARID1A- and ERS1 deletions were associated with shorter PFS.ConclusionCorrelations between genetic alterations and response/immediate-progression to PE were frequent in NEC but affected PFS or OS only when subdividing for cell-type. The classification of digestive NEC into large- and small-cell seems therefore molecularly and clinically relevant.

Efficacy and Toxicity Analysis of mFOLFIRINOX in High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise both well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) nearly always include poorly differentiated NEC as the neuroendocrine component. The efficacy and safety of frontline mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy has never been investigated in patients with high-grade NENs. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with advanced high-grade NEN of the gastroenteropancreatic tract or of unknown origin seen between February 2016 and April 2023 who received treatment with frontline mFOLFIRINOX. A total of 35 patients were included (G3 NETs: n=2; NECs: n=25; MiNENs: n=8; stage III: n=5; stage IV: n=30). The objective response rate was 77% (complete response: 3%; partial response: 74%). Median progression-free survival was 12 months (95% CI, 9.2-16.2 months) and median overall survival was 20.6 months (95% CI, 17.2-30.6 months). No significant differences in efficacy were seen according to primary site, histopathology, and Ki-67 proliferative index. All 5 patients with stage III disease who received mFOLFIRINOX obtained an objective response and underwent radical surgery or definitive radiotherapy with curative intent, with a recurrence rate of 40%. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 43% of patients (mainly neutropenia and diarrhea). Females were at significantly increased risk of developing severe toxicities. mFOLFIRINOX shows antitumor activity against high-grade NENs. Well-designed, prospective clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX in both the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings.

Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic characterization of high-grade gastro-entero-pancreatic neoplasms

BackgroundHigh-grade gastro-entero-pancreatic neoplasms (HG GEP-NENs) can be stratified according to their morphology and Ki-67 values into three prognostic classes: neuroendocrine tumors grade 3 (NETs G3), neuroendocrine carcinomas with Ki-67 < 55% (NECs <55) and NECs with Ki-67 ≥ 55% (NECs ≥55).MethodsWe analyzed a cohort of 49 HG GEP-NENs by targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (TrueSight Oncology 500), RNA-seq, and immunohistochemistry for p53, Rb1, SSTR-2A, and PD-L1.ResultsFrequent genomic alterations affected TP53 (26%), APC (20%), KRAS and MEN1 (both 11%) genes. NET G3 were enriched in MEN1 (p = 0.02) mutations, while both NECs groups were enriched in TP53 (p = 0.001), APC (p = 0.002) and KRAS (p = 0.02) mutations and tumors with TMB ≥ 10 muts/Mb (p = 0.01). No differentially expressed (DE) gene was found between NECs <55% and NECs ≥55%, while 1129 DE genes were identified between NET G3 and NECs. A slight enrichment of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in NECs and of cancer-associated fibroblasts and macrophages (M2-like) in NET G3. Multivariate analysis identified histologic type and Rb1 loss as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.ConclusionsThis study showed that GEP-NET G3 and GEP-NECs exhibit clear genomic and transcriptomic differences, differently from GEP-NECs <55% and GEP-NECs ≥55%, and provided molecular findings with prognostic and potentially predictive value.

Surgical resection of double advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with multiple renal cell carcinoma associated with von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, an autosomal dominant genetic disorder caused by a germline mutation, is associated with non-functional and slow-growing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) and kidney cancer. We describe the case of a 46year-old man with a 35mm mass in the pancreatic head causing stricture of the bile duct and main pancreatic duct, a 55mm mass in the pancreatic tail causing obstruction of the splenic vein (SV), and multiple masses of > 36mm on both kidneys. We performed a two-stage resection. First, a total pancreatectomy with superior mesenteric vein (SMV) resection and reconstruction and retroperitoneoscopic right partial nephrectomy (NP) for five lesions was performed, followed by retroperitoneoscopic left partial NP of the five lesions 6months later. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed NET G2 in the pancreatic head with SMV invasion and somatostatin receptor type 2A (SSTR2A) positivity, NET G2 in the pancreatic tail showed SV invasion and negative SSTR2A, and multiple clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC) were also noted. Multiple liver recurrences occurred 22months after primary surgery. The patient remains alive 41months after primary surgery. Kidney cancer generally determines VHL prognosis; however, we experienced dual-advanced PNETs with a more defined prognosis than multiple RCC associated with VHL.

NEC versus NET G3—is there a grey zone? Case report of pancreatic NET G3 with rapid disease progression

Summary Introduction Patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of grade 3 (NET G3) exhibit a significantly better survival than patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). However, some cases of NET G3 with high Ki-67 index present with highly aggressive clinical behavior, prompting the question whether there are selected tumors representing a biological continuum between NET G3 and NEC. Case presentation Here we report the case of a 49-year-old man with pancreatic NET G3 metastasized to the liver. Surgery was not indicated, and the patient was initially treated with cisplatin/etoposide on account of the high proliferation rate (Ki-67 index of 50%). Restaging showed immediate disease progression with new liver metastases, so therapy with capecitabine/temozolomide was initiated and continued until progressive disease after 7 cycles. Comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, including functional imaging and genetic analyses, revealed no potential therapeutic targets, and further treatment options were limited. The patient died shortly after a therapeutic attempt with streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil. Conclusion This case exemplifies the unfortunate course of a rapidly progressive NET G3 and highlights the limited number of effective therapies for some tumors within the relatively new cohort of NET G3 with a yet unsatisfactory understanding of its underlying tumor biology and behavioral spectrum.

Current WHO classification (2022) of neuroendocrine neoplasms

After the first description of the "carcinoid tumors" by the pathologist Siegfried Oberndorfer in Munich, the classification system of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is still achallenge and an evolving concept. The new WHO classification system proposed aframework for universal classification. The new WHO classification system recognizes two distinct families distinguished by genetic, morphology and clinical behaviour: Well differentiated NENs are defined as neuroendocrine tumor (NET G1, G2, G3), while poorly differentiated ones are defined as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC, G3) and further subdivided into small and large cell carcinoma. All NENs are characterized by the expression of synaptophysin and chromograninA, Ki-67 and morphology. The morphological NEN dichotomy is supported by genetic alterations. NECs show TP53 and RB1 alterations that are absent in NETs and are therefore useful for differentiating between NETs and NECs. All NENs are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET G1, G2, G3) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC, G3). They are categorized by morphology, mitotic count and immunohistochemistry with synaptophysin, chromogranin and Ki-67.

Prediction of disease recurrence in patients after complete pancreatic NET (PanNET) G2 resection.

The number of detected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) has been increasing over the last decades. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment, but the management is still controversial. This study aimed to compare patients after radical PanNET G2 resection to determine the most important predictive factors for relapse. All patients with histologically confirmed PanNET G2 who underwent successful surgery between 2006 and 2020 with the intention of radical treatment were enrolled. In total, 44 patients were eligible for the analysis. The average follow-up was 8.39 ± 4.5 years. Disease recurrence was observed in 16 (36.36%) patients. The dominant location of the primary tumour was the tail of the pancreas (43.18%), especially in the subgroup with disease recurrence (56.25%). The smallest tumour diameter associated with the PanNET G2 recurrence was 22 mm. The relationship between the largest dimension of the tumour with a division of < 4 cm vs. > 4 cm and the relapse was close to statistical significance. Recurrence was associated with a larger tumour size (p = 0.018). There was a statistically significant relationship and a weak correlation between Ki-67 (p = 0.036, V Cramer = 0.371) and disease relapse. For the group of PanNET G2 patients after radical surgery, the overall risk of recurrence was 36.36%, with the highest rate in the first 5 years after surgery, but in individual cases it occurred significantly later, even 10 years after surgery. The most important predictive factors of the PanNET G2 recurrence was Ki-67 over 5.75% and size of tumour > 4 cm.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor after bilateral breast cancer with type 1 neurofibromatosis: a case report

BackgroundYoung women with NF1 are at a high risk of developing breast cancer. Although they are at risk for abdominal tumors, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors and neuroendocrine tumors, follow-up strategies for other tumors after breast cancer have not yet been established. Here, we present a case of duodenal neuroendocrine tumor found during follow-up after bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer with type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1), for which pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and lymphadenectomy were performed.Case presentationA 46-year-old woman with NF1 was referred to our hospital for treatment of a duodenal submucosal tumor. Her previous operative history included bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer: right total mastectomy and left partial mastectomy performed 9 and 5 years ago, respectively. Her daughter was confirmed to have NF1, but her parents were unclear. Although she had no recurrence or symptoms during the follow-up for her breast cancer, she wished to undergo 18-fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography (FDG–PET) for systemic screening. FDG–PET demonstrated FDG accumulation in the duodenal tumor with a maximum standardized uptake value of 5.78. Endoscopy revealed a 20-mm-diameter tumor in the second duodenal portion, and endoscopic biopsy suggested a NET G1. We performed PD and lymphadenectomy for complete. She was doing well without recurrence and was followed up with PET tomography–computed tomography.ConclusionsEarly detection of gastrointestinal tumors is difficult, because most of them are asymptomatic. Gastrointestinal screening is important for patients with NF1, and PD with lymphadenectomy is feasible for managing duodenal neuroendocrine tumors, depending on their size.

Recurrence-Free Survival and Disease-Specific Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 413 Patients.

The prognosis and impact of different prognostic factors in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) remain controversial. To investigate prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival in patients with pNEN, divided into three groups: patients undergoing surveillance (tumor size < 2 cm, group 1), patients followed after curative-intended surgery (group 2), and patients with unresectable disease or residual tumors after resection (group 3). A single-center retrospective study including consecutive patients over a 20-year period. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors. 413 patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 62 ± 14 years. In group 1 (n = 51), median (IQR) follow-up was 29 (21-34) months, and tumor size was 1.0 (0.8-1.4) cm. One progressed and had a tumor resection. In group 2 (n = 165), follow-up 59 (31-102) months, median tumor size 2 (1.2-3.4) cm, median Ki-67 index 5 (3-10)%, the 5-year recurrence rate was 21%. Tumor size (p < 0.001), Ki-67 index (p = 0.02), and location in the pancreatic head (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors. In group 3 (n = 197), follow-up 19 (6-46) months, median tumor size 4.2 (2.6-7.0) cm, Ki-67 index 17 (9-64)%, the median disease-specific survival was 22 (6-75) months-99 in NET G1; 54 in NET G2; 14 in NET G3; and 6 months in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). Age (p = 0.029), plasma chromogranin A (p = 0.014), and proliferation, expressed by grade (p = 0.001) and Ki-67 index (p < 0.001), were risk factors. Growth in pNET < 2 cm requiring surgery was observed in 1/51. Tumor size, Ki-67 index, and location in the head were prognostic factors for disease recurrence, while age, plasma chromogranin A, and proliferation predicted mortality in patients with unresectable disease or residual tumors after resection.

Cabozantinib as salvage therapy for well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs)

Cabozantinib as salvage therapy for well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs)

Phase II study of everolimus and temozolomide as first-line treatment in metastatic high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BackgroundThe optimal treatment for metastatic high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms when Ki-67 ≤55% is unknown. A prospective multi-centre phase 2 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus and temozolomide as first-line treatment for these patients.MethodsPatients received everolimus 10 mg daily continuously and temozolomide 150 mg/m2 for 7 days every 2 weeks. Endpoints included response, survival, safety and quality of life (QoL). Histopathological re-evaluation according to the 2019 WHO classification was performed.ResultsFor 37 eligible patients, the primary endpoint with 65% disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months (m) was reached. The response rate was 30%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) 10.2 months and the median overall survival (OS) 26.4 months. Considering 26 NET G3 patients, 6 months DCR was 77% vs. 22% among nine NEC patients (p = 0.006). PFS was superior for NET G3 vs. NEC (12.6 months vs. 3.4 months, Log-rank-test: p = 0.133, Breslow-test: p < 0.001). OS was significantly better for NET G3 (31.4 months vs. 7.8 months, p = 0.003). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported in 43% and 38%. QoL remained stable during treatment.ConclusionEverolimus and temozolomide may be a treatment option for selected GEP-NET G3 patients including careful monitoring. Toxicity did not compromise QoL.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NTC02248012).

Systemic Therapy for Tumor Control in Well-Differentiated Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: ASCO Guideline Q and A.

ASCO recently published new guidance on systemic therapy for tumor control in well-differentiated metastatic gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. A companion Q and A article in the JCO-OP addresses some of the questions that clinicians may face as they implement these recommendations into clinical practice, including the role of somatostatin receptors and observation, definition of terms used within the guideline, considerations related to therapy options for G3 NETs, and future direction in research and treatment. ASCO also plans to address recommendations on the topic of symptom control of GEP-NETs in a forthcoming guideline

HepPar1 and GATA-3 Expression in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Potential Trap for Pathologic Diagnosis.

To investigate the expression and clinical significance of HepPar1 and GATA-3 in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The expression of HepPar1 and GATA-3 in 144 cases of NENs was detected using immunohistochemistry, and the relevant literature was reviewed. HepPar1 was localized in the cytoplasm, and the positive rate of HepPar1 was 6.25% (9/144) in 144 NENs, 9 of which were derived from gastrointestinal and pancreatic NENs, including 4 cases of neuroendocrine tumor, grade 1 (NET G1), 4 cases of NET G2, and 1 case of NET G3. GATA-3 was localized in the nucleus; the positive rate of GATA-3 was 7.62% (11/144), which was derived from 5 cases of gastrointestinal and pancreatic NENs, 2 cases of the lung, 2 cases of the liver, 1 case of the testis, and 1 case of the mediastinum. HepPar1 and GATA-3 were coexpressed in 4 cases: 2 cases of gastric NET G1, 1 case of gastric NET G2, and 1 case of pancreatic NET G3 with liver metastasis. HepPar1 and GATA-3 can be expressed in NENs, which are potential traps for the pathologic and differential diagnosis of tumors.

High efficacy of chlorfenapyr-based net Interceptor® G2 against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors from Cameroon

BackgroundThe increasing reports of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides associated with reduced efficacy of pyrethroid-only interventions highlight the urgency of introducing new non-pyrethroid-only control tools. Here, we investigated the performance of piperonyl-butoxide (PBO)-pyrethroid [Permanet 3.0 (P3.0)] and dual active ingredients (AI) nets [Interceptor G2 (IG2): containing pyrethroids and chlorfenapyr and Royal Guard (RG): containing pyrethroids and pyriproxyfen] compared to pyrethroid-only net Royal Sentry (RS) against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors in Cameroon.MethodsThe efficacy of these tools was firstly evaluated on Anopheles gambiae s.l. and Anopheles funestus s.l. from Gounougou, Mibellon, Mangoum, Nkolondom, and Elende using cone/tunnel assays. In addition, experimental hut trials (EHT) were performed to evaluate the performance of unwashed and 20 times washed nets in semi-field conditions. Furthermore, pyrethroid-resistant markers were genotyped in dead vs alive, blood-fed vs unfed mosquitoes after exposure to the nets to evaluate the impact of these markers on net performance. The XLSTAT software was used to calculate the various entomological outcomes and the Chi-square test was used to compare the efficacy of various nets. The odds ratio and Fisher exact test were then used to establish the statistical significance of any association between insecticide resistance markers and bed net efficacy.ResultsInterceptor G2 was the most effective net against wild pyrethroid-resistant An. funestus followed by Permanet 3.0. In EHT, this net induced up to 87.8% mortality [95% confidence interval (CI): 83.5–92.1%) and 55.6% (95% CI: 48.5–62.7%) after 20 washes whilst unwashed pyrethroid-only net (Royal Sentry) killed just 18.2% (95% CI: 13.4–22.9%) of host-seeking An. funestus. The unwashed Permanet 3.0 killed up to 53.8% (95% CI: 44.3–63.4%) of field-resistant mosquitoes and 47.2% (95% CI: 37.7–56.7%) when washed 20 times, and the Royal Guard 13.2% (95% CI: 9.0–17.3%) for unwashed net and 8.5% (95% CI: 5.7–11.4%) for the 20 washed net. Interceptor G2, Permanet 3.0, and Royal Guard provided better personal protection (blood-feeding inhibition 66.2%, 77.8%, and 92.8%, respectively) compared to pyrethroid-only net Royal Sentry (8.4%). Interestingly, a negative association was found between kdrw and the chlorfenapyr-based net Interceptor G2 (χ2 = 138; P < 0.0001) with homozygote-resistant mosquitoes predominantly found in the dead ones.ConclusionsThe high mortality recorded with Interceptor G2 against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors in this study provides first semi-field evidence of high efficacy against these major malaria vectors in Cameroon encouraging the implementation of this novel net for malaria control in the country. However, the performance of this net should be established in other locations and on other major malaria vectors before implementation at a large scale.Graphical

Germline pathogenic variants in patients with high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

High-grade gastroenteropancreatic (HG-GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are highly aggressive cancers. The molecular etiology of these tumors remains unclear, and the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in patients with HG-GEP NENs is unknown. We assessed sequencing data of 360 cancer genes in normal tissue from 240 patients with HG-GEP NENs; 198 patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and 42 with grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3). Applying strict criteria, we identified pathogenic germline variants and compared the frequency with previously reported data from 33 different cancer types. We found a recurrent MYOC variant in three patients and a recurrent MUTYH variant in two patients, indicating that these genes may be important underlying risk factors for HG-GEP NENs when mutated. Further, germline variants were found in canonical tumor-suppressor genes, such as TP53, RB1, BRIP1 and BAP1. Overall, we found that 4.5% of patients with NEC and 9.5% of patients with NET G3 carry germline pathogenic or highly likely pathogenic variants. Applying identical criteria for variant classification in silico to mined data from 33 other cancer types, the median percentage of patients carrying pathogenic or highly likely pathogenic variants was 3.4% (range: 0-17%). The patients with NEC and pathogenic germline variants had a median overall survival of 9 months, similar to what is generally expected for metastatic GEP NECs. A patient with NET G3 and pathogenic MUTYH variant had much shorter overall survival than expected. The fraction of HG-GEP NENs with germline pathogenic variants is relatively high, but still <10%, meaning that that germline mutations cannot be the major underlying cause of HG-GEP NENs.