Full Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Research Articles

The delivery assessment for small targets on Halcyon radiotherapy system - Measured and calculated dose comparison.

With the ever-increasing requirements of accuracy and personalization of radiotherapy treatments, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on O-ring Halcyon radiotherapy system could potentially provide a fast, safe, and feasible treatmentoption. The purpose of this study was to assess the delivery of Halcyon VMAT plans for small targets. Well-defined VMAT-SRT plans were created on Halcyon radiotherapy system with the stacked and staggered dual-layer MLC design for the film measurement set-up and the target sizes and shapes designed to emulate the targets of the stereotactic treatments. The planar dose distributions were acquired with film measurements and compared to a current clinical reference dose calculation with AcurosXB (v18.0, Varian Medical Systems) and to Monte Carlo simulations. With the collapsed arc versions of the VMAT-SRT plans, the uncertainty in dose delivery due to the multileaf collimator (MLC) without the gantry rotation could be separated andanalyzed. The target size was mainly limited by the resolution originated from the design of the MLC leaves. The results of the collapsed arc versions of the plans show good consistency among measured, calculated, and simulated dose distributions. With the full VMAT plans, the agreement between calculated and simulated dose distributions was consistent with the collapsed arc versions. The measured dose distribution agreed with the calculated and simulated dose distributions within the target regions, but considerable local differences were observed in the margins of the target. The largest differences located in the steep gradient regions presumably originating from the deviation of the isocenter. The potential of the Halcyon radiotherapy system for VMAT-SRT delivery was evaluated and the study revealed valuable insights on the machine characteristics with thedelivery.

Dosimetric Impact of Voluntary Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) in Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Delivery Methods Using Voluntary DIBH and Free Breathing Techniques.

Hodgkin lymphomas are radiosensitive and curable tumors that often involve the mediastinum. However, the application of radiation therapy to the mediastinum is associated with late effects including cardiac and pulmonary toxicities and secondary cancers. The adoption of conformal IMRT and deep inspiration breath- hold (DIBH) can reduce the dose to healthy normal tissues (lungs, heart and breast). We compared the dosimetry of organs at risk (OARs) using different IMRT techniques for two breathing conditions, i.e., deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing. Twenty-three patients with early-stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphomas were accrued in the prospective study. The patients were given treatment plans which utilized full arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (F-VMAT), Butterfly VMAT (B-VMAT), and fixed field IMRT (FF-IMRT) techniques for both DIBH and free breathing methods, respectively. All the plans were optimized to deliver 95% of the prescription dose which was 25.2 Gy to 95% of the PTV volume. The mean dose and standard error of the mean for each OAR, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for the target using the three planning techniques were calculated and compared using Student's t-test for parametric data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-parametric data. The HI and CI of the target was not compromised using the DIBH technique for mediastinal lymphomas. The mean values of CI and HI for both DIBH and FB were comparable. The mean heart doses were reduced by 2.1 Gy, 2.54 Gy, and 2.38 Gy in DIBH compared to FB for the F-VMAT, B-VMAT, and IMRT techniques, respectively. There was a significant reduction in V5Gy, V10Gy, and V15Gy to the heart (p < 0.005) with DIBH. DIBH reduced the mean dose to the total lung by 1.19 Gy, 1.47 Gy, and 1.3 Gy, respectively. Among the 14 female patients, there was a reduction in the mean right breast dose with DIBH compared to FB (4.47 Gy vs. 3.63 Gy, p = 0.004). DIBH results in lower heart, lung, and breast doses than free breathing in mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma. Among the different IMRT techniques, FF-IMRT, B-VMAT, and F-VMAT showed similar PTV coverage, with similar conformity and homogeneity indices. However, the time taken for FF-IMRT was much longer than for the F-VMAT and B-VMAT techniques for both breathing methods. B-VMAT and F-VMAT emerged as the optimal planning techniques able to achieve the best target coverage and lower doses to the OARs, with less time required to deliver the prescribed dose.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Craniospinal Irradiation Utilizing a Vertebral Body Sparing Approach: An Alternative Approach to Improve Access and Minimize Toxicity

Introduction: Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is indicated for adult patients diagnosed with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Proton-based vertebral-body-sparing (VBS) CSI has been explored with pediatric patients to minimize hematologic toxicity; however, utilization of VBS in an adult population is limited. A recent phase II trial has shown efficacy of proton-based CSI to treat non-small cell lung and breast cancer with LMD. We hypothesize that VBS-CSI utilizing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) could also effectively reduce dose to vertebral bodies and surrounding organs-at-risk (OARs), minimizing toxicity for adult patients with LMD and comparing favorably to proton-based CSI.Methods: Consecutive patients with leptomeningeal disease received VMAT VBS-CSI, 30 Gy in 10 fractions, as a part of a prospective registry. Full VMAT arcs for the brain fields matched to two spine isocenters for the upper and lower spine were created utilizing limited posterior arcs. To further decrease the vertebral body dose, an avoid entry and exit contour was created. Acute toxicity data were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.Results: Ten adult patients were treated in this cohort. One patient experienced Grade 2 neutropenia with the remaining nine experiencing Grade 1 hematologic toxicity. Three patients experienced Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity with the remaining seven experiencing Grade 1 nausea. No patient experienced Grade 3+ toxicities in this cohort. One patient experienced a 5-day delay in systemic therapy initiation due to neutropenia; otherwise, all patients planned for systemic therapy started without delay.Conclusions: In this study, VMAT VBS-CSI led to acceptable toxicity compared to patients treated with proton CSI on a phase 2 clinical trial. Given its promising early results, future prospective evaluation of the technique is warranted.

A novel lung SBRT treatment planning: Inverse VMAT plan with leaf motion limitation to ensure the irradiation reproducibility of a moving target

This study exposed the implementation of a novel technique (VMATLSL) for the planning of moving targets in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This new technique has been compared to static conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and dynamic conformal arc (DCA). The rationale of this study was to lower geometric complexity (54.9% lower than full VMAT) and hence ensure the reproducibility of the treatment delivery by reducing the risk for interplay errors induced by respiratory motion. Dosimetry metrics were studied with a cohort of 30 patients. Our results showed that leaf speed limitation provided conformal number (CN) close to the VMAT (median CN of VMATLSL is 0.78 vs 0.82 for full VMAT) and was a significant improvement on 3D-CRT and DCA with segment-weight optimized (respectively 0.55 and 0.57). This novel technique is an alternative to VMAT or DCA for lung SBRT treatments, combining independence from the patient's breathing pattern, from the size and amplitude of the lesion, free from interplay effect, and with dosimetry metrics close to the best that could be achieved with full VMAT.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Craniospinal Irradiation Utilizing a Vertebral Body Sparing Approach: A Toxicity Analysis

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is indicated for adult patients diagnosed with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Proton-based vertebral-body-sparing (VBS) CSI has been explored with pediatric patients to minimize hematologic toxicity; however, utilization of VBS in an adult population is limited. A recent phase II trial (Yang et al, JCO 2022) has shown efficacy of proton-based CSI to treat non-small cell lung and breast cancer with LMD. We hypothesize that VBS-CSI utilizing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) could also effectively reduce dose to vertebral bodies and surrounding organs-at-risk (OARs), minimizing toxicity for adult patients with LMD and comparing favorably to proton-based CSI. Consecutive patients with leptomeningeal disease received VMAT VBS-CSI, 30 Gy in 10 fractions, as a part of a prospective registry. Full VMAT arcs for the brain fields matched to two spine isocenters for the upper and lower spine were created utilizing limited posterior arcs. The PTV was created with margins of 3mm uniformly around the brain contour and 7mm around the spinal canal. To further decrease the vertebral body dose, an avoid entry and exit contour was created. This structure was a margin on the PTV anteriorly designed to carve dose out of the vertebral bodies while still maintaining coverage to the PTV. Acute toxicity data were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5 and was defined as toxicity occurring within 30 days of treatment conclusion. Ten adult patients were treated in this cohort. All patients completed radiation treatment. One patient experienced Grade 2 neutropenia with the remaining nine experiencing Grade 1 hematologic toxicity (three Grade 1 pancytopenia, six Grade 1 thrombocytopenia). Three patients experienced Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity (Grade 2 nausea, Grade 2 esophagitis, Grade 2 esophagitis/Grade 2 diverticulitis) with the remaining seven experiencing Grade 1 nausea. No patient experienced Grade 3+ toxicities in this cohort. One patient experienced a 5-day delay in systemic therapy initiation due to neutropenia; otherwise, all patients planned for systemic therapy started without delay. VMAT VBS-CSI is an effective technique to reduce dose to surrounding OARs and vertebral bodies. In this study, VMAT VBS-CSI led to acceptable toxicity compared to patients treated with proton CSI on a phase 2 clinical trial. An NRG phase 3 clinical trial may be developed to evaluate the efficacy of proton-based CSI for patients with LMD. However, these data show how VMAT VBS-CSI may be an acceptable alternative for centers without proton therapy capabilities. Given its promising early results, future prospective evaluation of the technique is warranted.

LMAP-06 VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION UTILIZING A VERTEBRAL BODY SPARING APPROACH: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO IMPROVE ACCESS AND MINIMIZE TOXICITY

Abstract Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is indicated for adult patients diagnosed with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Proton-based vertebral-body-sparing (VBS) CSI has been explored with pediatric patients to minimize hematologic toxicity; however, utilization of VBS in an adult population is limited. A recent phase II trial has shown efficacy of proton-based CSI to treat non-small cell lung and breast cancer with LMD. We hypothesize that VBS-CSI utilizing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) could also effectively reduce dose to vertebral bodies and surrounding organs-at-risk (OARs), minimizing toxicity for adult patients with LMD and comparing favorably to proton-based CSI. Consecutive patients with leptomeningeal disease received VMAT VBS-CSI, 30 Gy in 10 fractions, as a part of a prospective registry. Full VMAT arcs for the brain fields matched to two spine isocenters for the upper and lower spine were created utilizing limited posterior arcs. To further decrease the vertebral body dose, an avoid entry and exit contour was created. Acute toxicity data were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5. Ten adult patients were treated in this cohort. One patient experienced Grade 2 neutropenia with the remaining nine experiencing Grade 1 hematologic toxicity. Three patients experienced Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. with the remaining seven experiencing Grade 1 nausea. No patient experienced Grade 3+ toxicities in this cohort. One patient experienced a 5-day delay in systemic therapy initiation due to neutropenia; otherwise, all patients planned for systemic therapy started without delay. VMAT VBS-CSI is an effective technique to reduce dose to surrounding OARs and vertebral bodies. In this study, VMAT VBS-CSI led to acceptable toxicity compared to patients treated with proton CSI on a phase 2 clinical trial. Given its promising early results, future prospective evaluation of the technique is warranted.

Sub-second photon dose prediction via transformer neural networks.

Fast dose calculation is critical for online and real-time adaptive therapy workflows. While modern physics-based dose algorithms must compromise accuracy to achieve low computation times, deep learning models can potentially perform dose prediction tasks with both high fidelity andspeed. We present a deep learning algorithm that, exploiting synergies between transformer and convolutional layers, accurately predicts broad photon beam dose distributions in few milliseconds. The proposed improved Dose Transformer Algorithm (iDoTA) maps arbitrary patient geometries and beam information (in the form of a 3D projected shape resulting from a simple ray tracing calculation) to their corresponding 3D dose distribution. Treating the 3D CT input and dose output volumes as a sequence of 2D slices along the direction of the photon beam, iDoTA solves the dose prediction task as sequence modeling. The proposed model combines a Transformer backbone routing long-range information between all elements in the sequence, with a series of 3D convolutions extracting local features of the data. We train iDoTA on a dataset of 1700 beam dose distributions, using 11 clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (from prostate, lung, and head and neck cancer patients with 194-354 beams per plan) to assess its accuracy andspeed. iDoTA predicts individual photon beams in ≈50 ms with a high gamma pass rate of (2 mm, 2%). Furthermore, estimating full VMAT dose distributions in 6-12 s, iDoTA achieves state-of-the-art performance with a (2 mm, 2%) pass rate and an average relative dose error of 0.75 ± 0.36%. Offering the millisecond speed prediction per beam angle needed in online and real-time adaptive treatments, iDoTA represents a new state of the art in data-driven photon dose calculation. The proposed model can massively speed-up current photon workflows, reducing calculation times from few minutes to just a fewseconds.

RADT-05. VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION UTILIZING A VERTEBRAL BODY SPARING APPROACH: A DOSIMETRIC ANALYSIS

Abstract BACKGROUND Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is indicated for adult patients diagnosed with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Proton-based vertebral-body-sparing (VBS) CSI has been explored with pediatric patients to minimize hematologic toxicity; however, utilization of VBS in an adult population is limited. We hypothesize that VBS-CSI utilizing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) will effectively reduce vertebral body dose while minimizing dose to surrounding organs-at-risk (OAR) for adult patients with LMD. METHODS Ten adult patients with LMD received CSI, 30 Gy in 10 fractions. These patients were initially treated with a variety of VMAT and IMRT treatment techniques. These patients were then retrospectively replanned using VMAT VBS-CSI. For their VBS-CSI replan, full VMAT arcs for the brain fields matched to two spine isocenters for the upper and lower spine were created utilizing limited posterior arcs. The PTV was created with margins of 3mm uniformly around the brain contour and 7mm around the spinal canal. To further decrease the vertebral body dose, an avoid entry and exit contour was created. This structure was a margin on the PTV anteriorly designed to carve dose out of the vertebral bodies while still maintaining coverage to the PTV. RESULTS All 10 patients had a reduction in vertebral body dose with VMAT VBS-CSI when compared to their initial plan. The mean vertebral dose for the VBS-CSI plans had an average reduction of 33% compared to the initial plans. The mean dose to the small bowel and esophagus were reduced by 46% and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS VBS-CSI may be utilized to minimize dose to surrounding OARs and vertebral bodies. In this study, VMAT VBS-CSI led to significant reductions in vertebral body dose while also minimizing dose to other OARs. VMAT VBS-CSI may be an acceptable alternative to proton-based VBS-CSI in an adult population with LMD. Prospective evaluation is warranted.

Full Body Surface Coverage with Water-Equivalent Bolus as Novel Technique for Total Body Irradiation before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Acute Lymphoid Leukemia.

Total body irradiation (TBI) 2 × 2 Gy for 3 consecutive days followed by chemotherapy for conditioning pediatric patients with acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) before bone marrow transplantation is superior to chemo-conditioning alone. The globally used anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior (AP/PA) technique is the most referable method, but volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with modern linear accelerators is more precise in terms of ensuring better dose distribution, especially for skin, and higher protection of organs at risk, resulting in less side effects. For TBI, a modern VMAT technique was used. Whole-body immobilization in the supine position was performed using a vacuum mattress with a full body coverage, with a water-equivalent bolus of 1 cm thickness. The design goal was to achieve dose inhomogeneity of less than ±10%. From 2020 to 2022, we performed TBI for five pediatric patients with ALL, with full body bolus and VMAT, who later received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. No acute complications related to TBI were observed during the treatment period with a median follow-up of 1.27 (0.43-2.11) years. Using full body water-equivalent bolus with VMAT for TBI provides a safe method for children with a better organ sparing in the short term follow-up.

Double-vertebral segment SBRT via novel ring-mounted Halcyon Linac: Plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy.

To evaluate the plan quality, treatment delivery efficiency, and accuracy of single-isocenter/multi-target (SIMT) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of double-vertebral segments stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on Halcyon ring delivery system (RDS). In-house multi-target end-to-end phantom testing and independent dose verification using the MD Anderson's single-isocenter/multi-target (lung/spine targets) thorax phantom were completed. Six previously treated patients with 2-vertebral segments on thoracic and/or lumber spine were replanned on Halcyon RDS with 6MV-FFF beam using a single-isocenter placed between the vertebral segments. Three full VMAT arcs with 0° and ±10° collimator angles and advanced Acuros-based dose engine for heterogeneity corrections were used. Prescription was 35 Gy in 5 fractions to each vertebral-segment, simultaneously. For comparison, Halcyon VMAT-SBRT plans were retrospectively created on SBRT-dedicated Truebeam with a 6MV-FFF beam using identical planning geometry and optimization objectives. Target coverage, conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), dose to 2-cm away from each target (D2-cm), and dose to adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) were evaluated per NRG-BR002 protocol. Treatment delivery parameters were evaluated for both plans. In-house phantom measurements showed acceptable spatial accuracy (< 1mm within 5-cm from the isocenter) of conebeam CT-guided Halcyon SBRT treatments. The MD Anderson phantom irradiation credentialing results met IROC requirements for protocol patients. Mean isocenter-to-tumor center distance was 3.3 ± 0.6-cm (range 2.4 to 4.3-cm). Mean combined PTV was 57.3 ± 31.3 cc (range 20.1 to 99.9 cc). Both Halcyon and Truebeam SIMT-VMAT plans met NRG-BR002 compliance criteria and show similar CI, HI, GI, D2-cm. Maximal and volumetric doses to adjacent OAR including dose to partial spinal cord were lower with Halcyon RDS. Average total monitor units, modulation, and overall treatment time were lower with Halcyon plans by 130 MU, 0.2, 3.8 min, respectively, with similar beam-on time. Average pre-treatment patient-specific portal-dosimetry QA results on Halcyon showed a high pass rate of 99.6%, compared to SBRT-dedicated Truebeam pass rate of 96.8%, for 2%/2 mm clinical gamma passing criteria, suggesting more accurate treatment delivery on Halcyon RDS. SBRT treatment of double-vertebral segments via SIMT-VMAT plans on Halcyon for selected patients is feasible and dosimetrically superior to Truebeam Linac. Faster treatment delivery (<10 min) of double-vertebral segment SBRT on Halcyon could reduce patient intolerance due to severe back pain, potentially reduce intra-fraction motion errors, and improve patient throughput, and clinic workflow.

The robustness of prostate radiotherapy for patients with hip prosthesis

The aim of this study was to investigate prostate radiotherapy techniques for the patients with hip prosthesis in 4 different field setups. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique was used in 4 different cases: (1) using full VMAT arcs (VMAT_F); (2) same arcs as in case 1 but with avoidance sectors (VMAT_ASEC); (3) as case 2 but with the addition of a lateral static field through the prosthesis (VMAT_ASEC+STAT); (4) as in case 1 but with an automated structure avoidance option to avoid irradiation through the prosthesis (VMAT_ASTR). Fifteen previously treated prostate patients were retrospectively selected to this study. Treatment plans were created for all patients using all 4 techniques. The potential prosthesis misalignment in the treatment setup was modeled by moving the prosthesis 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 cm ventrally and dorsally and recalculating the plans in each case. For VMAT_ASEC, the dose parameters for organs at risk were the highest and the dose coverage of the target volume was the poorest when compared to the other techniques. For VMAT_ASEC+STAT, the movement of the prosthesis changed the target dose distribution the most. VMAT_F and VMAT_ASTR fulfilled the planning criteria the best, even when the prosthesis was misaligned. VMAT_F radiated through the prosthesis more than VMAT_ASTR and increased the dose near the prosthesis surface when compared to VMAT_ASTR. VMAT_ASTR and VMAT_F were the most robust techniques for the patients with the hip prosthesis considering plan quality and the effect of positioning errors. The increased prosthesis surface dose with VMAT_F and possible dose calculation uncertainties favors the use of VMAT_ASTR.

The impact of the field width on VMAT plan quality and the assessment of half field method.

PurposeThe goal of this work is to investigate the field width dependence of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan quality and to propose a half field method to irradiate large volumes effectively with VMAT.Materials and methodsWe compared four different VMAT methods; namely three full field (3ff), four full field (4ff), three half field (3hf), four half field (4hf). To evaluate the impact of the field width on VMAT plan quality, 12 different size PTVs were created in the virtual phantom and treatment plans generated for each PTV were compared. The effectiveness of our half field method was tested using computed tomography (CT) data of 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.ResultsIn the virtual phantom study, organs at risk (OAR) mean dose, the maximum point dose, and Homogeneity Index (HI) were found to be field width dependent. Conformation Number (CN) was not significantly affected. In the clinical study, 4hf plans obtained statistically significant dose reduction at brainstem (P < 0.001), right parotid (P = 0.034), oral cavity (P < 0.001), larynx (P = 0.003), cochlea (P = 0.017), lips (P = 0.024), and Body‐PTV (P = 0.04) compared to 4ff plans.ConclusionOur results indicate that VMAT plan quality is dependent on the field width. Half field VMAT method, with the help of reduced field width, shows a clear advantage for the irradiation of large size targets compared to traditionally used full field VMAT plans.

Dosimetric Comparison of Different Planning Techniques in Left-sided Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Planning Study.

Purpose:This planning study compared the various dosimetric parameters of different types of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.Materials and Methods:Treatment of 22 left-sided breast cases was planned using two IMRT and VMAT techniques for the prescription of 40 Gy in 15 fractions. For tangential IMRT (Tan_IMRT), five beams were placed as conventional tangential beams. For equally spaced IMRT (Equi_IMRT), six beams were placed equidistantly at 40° interval from 300° to 140°. For tangential VMAT (Tan_VMAT), two arcs were used with the avoidance sector in such a way that the beam covered like tangential fields. For full-arc VMAT (Full_VMAT), similar arcs as Tan_VMAT were used, without avoidance sector. All treatment plans were generated using Eclipse planning system for TrueBeam STx linear accelerator. For planning target volume (PTV), dose parameters including D95%, D99%, V105% homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) were analyzed. Different dose parameters for the left lung, heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), right lung, and right breast were also analyzed. In addition, low-dose spillage in the normal tissues and the number of monitor units (MUs) required for the treatment were compared.Results:IMRT technique exhibited superior D95% and D99% for PTV compared with VMAT techniques. VMAT plans provided more V105% (6%) compared with that of IMRT plans (approximately 1%). HI was better in IMRT plans (Tan_IMRT, 0.085 ± 0.015; Equi_IMRT, 0.094 ± 0.011) than in VMAT plans. CI was better in VMAT plans. The mean lung dose (7.7 Gy ± 1.788 Gy) and V5Gy (34.99% ± 6.799%) were better achieved in Tan_IMRT plan than other plans. Right lung, heart, and right breast sparing were better achieved in Tan_IMRT plan. Moreover, low-dose spillage was very less in the Tan_IMRT compared with all other techniques.Conclusion:Dosimetric comparison in this study showed that tangential IMRT technique is superior in terms of target coverage, sparing of lung, heart, and right breast, and low-dose spillage control in the left-sided breast-only radiotherapy.

Comparison of patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance for the prostate across multiple institutions.

To evaluate the success of a patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) practice for prostate cancer patients across multiple institutions using a questionnaire survey. The IMRT QA practice involves different methods of dose distribution verification and analysis at different institutions. Two full-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan and 7 fixed-gantry IMRT plan with DMLC were used for patient specific QA across 22 institutions. The same computed tomography image and structure set were used for all plans. Each institution recalculated the dose distribution with fixed monitor units and without any modification. Single-point dose measurement with a cylindrical ionization chamber and dose distribution verification with a multi-detector or radiochromic film were performed, according to the QA process at each institution. Twenty-two institutions performed the patient-specific IMRT QA verifications. With a single-point dose measurement at the isocenter, the average difference between the calculated and measured doses was 0.5 ± 1.9%. For the comparison of dose distributions, 18 institutions used a two or three-dimensional array detector, while the others used Gafchromic film. In the γ test with dose difference/distance-to-agreement criteria of 3%-3 mm and 2%-2 mm with a 30% dose threshold, the median gamma pass rates were 99.3% (range: 41.7%-100.0%) and 96.4% (range: 29.4%-100.0%), respectively. This survey was an informative trial to understand the verification status of patient-specific IMRT QA measurements for prostate cancer. In most institutions, the point dose measurement and dose distribution differences met the desired criteria.

Variation in accumulated dose of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for pancreatic cancer due to different beam starting phases.

PurposeTo assess the effects of different beam starting phases on dosimetric variations in the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs), and to identify the relationship between plan complexity and the dosimetric impact of interplay effects in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for pancreatic cancer.MethodsSingle and double full‐arc VMAT plans were generated for 11 patients. A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was prescribed to cover 50% of the planning target volume. Patient‐specific Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine–Radiation Therapy plan files were divided into 10 files based on the respiratory phases in four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) simulations. The phase‐divided VMAT plans were calculated in consideration of the beam starting phase for each arc and were then combined in the mid‐ventilation phase of 4DCT (4D plans). The dose‐volumetric parameters were compared with the calculated dose distributions without consideration of the interplay effects (3D plans). Additionally, relationships among plan parameters such as modulation complexity scores, monitor units (MUs), and dose‐volumetric parameters were evaluated.ResultsDosimetric differences in the median values associated with different beam starting phases were within ± 1.0% and ± 0.2% for the CTV and ± 0.5% and ± 0.9% for the OARs during single and double full‐arc VMAT, respectively. Significant differences caused by variations in the beam starting phases were observed only for the dose‐volumetric parameters of the CTV during single full‐arc VMAT (P < 0.05), associated with moderate or strong correlations between the MUs and the dosimetric differences between the 4D and 3D plans.ConclusionsThe beam starting phase affected CTV dosimetric variations of single full‐arc VMAT. The use of double full‐arc VMAT mitigated this problem. However, variation in the dose delivered to OARs was not dependent on the beam starting phase, even for single full‐arc VMAT.

Inclusion of heart substructures in the optimization process of volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques may reduce the risk of heart disease in Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients

Background and purposeRadiotherapy is an effective treatment for Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), but increases the risk of long term complications as cardiac events and second cancers. This study aimed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events through an optimization of the dose distribution on heart substructures in mediastinal HL patients with the adoption of different volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques, while maintaining the same risk of second cancer induction on lungs and breasts. Materials and methodsThirty patients (15 males and 15 females, 15 bulky lesions) treated between 2012 and 2017 at our institution were selected. Disease extent was mediastinum plus neck (n = 10), mediastinum plus unilateral axilla (n = 10) and mediastinum alone (n = 10). Lungs, breasts, whole heart and sub-structures (coronary arteries, valves and chambers) were contoured as organs at risk and included in the optimization process. A “first-generation” multi-arc butterfly VMAT (B-VMAT) planning solution was compared to a full-arc butterfly VMAT (FaB-VMAT) approach, consisting of a full arc plus a non-coplanar arc. Lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of second breast and lung cancer and relative risk (RR) of coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) were estimated. ResultsFaB-VMAT resulted in lower mean dose to whole heart (7.6 vs 6.9 Gy, p = 0.003), all coronary arteries (16.1 vs 13.5 Gy, p < 0.001), left ventricle (4.2 vs 3.4 Gy, p = 0.007) and in lower V20Gy to the lungs (15% vs 14%, p = 0.008). A significant lower RR for CAD and CHF was observed for FaB-VMAT. The risk of second breast and lung cancer was comparable between the two solutions, with the exception of female patients with mediastinal bulky involvement, where B-VMAT resulted in lower mean dose (2.8 vs 3.5 Gy, p = 0.03) and V4Gy (22% vs 16%, 0.04) to breasts, with a significant reduction in LAR (p = 0.03). ConclusionsFaB-VMAT significantly decreased the RR for CAD and CHF compared to B-VMAT, with almost the same overall risk of lung and breast cancer induction. These results are influenced by the different anatomical presentations, supporting the need for an individualized approach.

Secondary monitor unit calculations for VMAT using parallelized Monte Carlo simulations

We have developed a fast and accurate in‐house Monte Carlo (MC) secondary monitor unit (MU) check method, based on the EGSnrc system, for independent verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning system dose calculations, in accordance with TG‐114 recommendations. For a VMAT treatment plan created for a Varian Trilogy linac, DICOM information was exported from Eclipse. An open‐source platform was used to generate input files for dose calculations using the EGSnrc framework. The full VMAT plan simulation employed 107 histories, and was parallelized to run on a computer cluster. The resulting 3ddose matrices were converted to the DICOM format using CERR and imported into Eclipse. The method was evaluated using 35 clinical VMAT plans of various treatment sites. For each plan, the doses calculated with the MC approach at four three‐dimensional reference points were compared to the corresponding Eclipse calculations, as well as calculations performed using the clinical software package, MUCheck. Each MC arc simulation of 107 particles required 13–25 min of total time, including processing and calculation. The average discrepancies in calculated dose values between the MC method and Eclipse were 2.03% (compared to 3.43% for MUCheck) for prostate cases, 2.45% (3.22% for MUCheck) for head and neck cases, 1.7% (5.51% for MUCheck) for brain cases, and 2.84% (5.64% for MUCheck) for miscellaneous cases. Of 276 comparisons, 201 showed greater agreement between the treatment planning system and MC vs MUCheck. The largest discrepancies between MC and MUCheck were found in regions of high dose gradients and heterogeneous densities. By parallelizing the calculations, point‐dose accuracies of 2‐7%, sufficient for clinical secondary checks, can be achieved in a reasonable amount of time. As computer clusters and/or cloud computing become more widespread, this method will be useful in most clinical setups.

A GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit for surface dose calculation in VMAT breast cancer radiotherapy

The accuracy of superficial dose calculations for breast cancer treatments with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is of major importance. For target volumes close to the surface, the inverse dosimetric planning can lead to very high fluences in the build-up region to properly cover the volume to be treated. Various radiotherapy modalities are currently used in parallel with additional protocols to enable a better control on the dose delivery (bolus, target volume margins). One of the difficulties currently facing medical physicists is the lack of available tools to test the impact of these different solutions on the superficial dose distribution. We present a new open source toolkit to assist medical physicists in evaluating the 3D distributions of superficial dose in VMAT breast cancer treatments. This tool is based on the GATE Monte Carlo software, a Geant4 application dedicated to medical physics. A set of macros has been developed to simulate in an easy way a full VMAT plan from the information available in the DICOM-RT files (image, plan, structure and dose). The toolkit has been tested on a 6 MV Varian NovalisTx™ accelerator. The paper presents a precise comparison of 3D surface dose distributions from experimental measurements (EBT3 films), TPS (Varian Eclipse) and Monte Carlo simulation (GATE). The comparison made it possible to highlight both the TPS biases for the surface dose calculation and the good performances of the developed toolkit. The simulation of surface dose distributions on a real patient has also been performed to illustrate the potential clinical applications.

Dosimetric comparison of short and full arc in spinal PTV in volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based craniospinal irradiation

Since 2011 when it was first described, the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has always seen the use of large arc lengths for the spine fields ranging from 200° to 360°. This study was aimed to do a dosimetric comparison between the large and shorter spinal arc for CSI. For a cohort of 10 patients, 2 VMAT CSI plans were created for each patient, one using the conventional full 360° arc (VMAT_FA) for the spine and the other using 100° posterior arc (VMAT_PA) for 23.4 Gy and 35 Gy prescriptions. In both the plans, 360° arc fields were employed for treating cranial volume. Spillage dose (DBody-PTV) to Body-PTV (DBody-PTV: dose to body excluding planning target volume) was compared with VMAT_FA and VMAT_PA plans. In addition to these VMAT plans, a 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan was also created for all these patients to compare the DBody-PTV and target volume related dose constraints. Mean D95% difference between the two VMAT plans did not exceed 1.3% for cranial and spinal targets for both prescription levels. The conformity index (CI) was averaged over both prescription doses. Average CI shows a similar value for VMAT_FA (0.84 ± 0.04) and VMAT_PA (0.82 ± 0.05) plans. D95%, V110% and CI did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between partial and full-arc VMAT plans. However, the VMAT_PA plan exhibited a lower DBody-PTV compared to VMAT_FA plans (0.007 ≤ p < 0.05) in the 1 to 5 Gy range. Nevertheless, partial arc plans could not offer a statistically significant dose reduction for delineated organs compared to full arc plans, except for bilateral kidneys.

VMAT Optimization and Dose Calculation in the Presence of Metallic Hip Prostheses.

Introduction:This research quantifies and compares the effect of hip prostheses on dose distributions calculated using collapsed cone convolution superposition and Monte Carlo (with and without correcting for the density of the implant and surrounding tissues). The use of full volumetric modulated arc therapy arcs versus volumetric modulated arc therapy arcs avoiding the hip implants (skip arcs) was also studied.Materials and Methods:Six prostate patients with hip prostheses were included in this study. The hip prostheses and the streaking artifacts on the computed tomography images were contoured by a single physician, and full volumetric modulated arc therapy arcs were created in the Pinnacle3 TPS. Copies of each plan were made, and the doses were recalculated with the densities of the prostheses and surrounding tissues overridden. The plans were then exported to Monaco and recalculated using a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm, with and without densities of the prosthesis and surrounding tissues overridden.Results:With density overrides, Pinnacle3 had a 4.4% error for ion chamber measurements. Monaco was within 0.2% of ion chamber measurement when density overrides were used. On average, when density overrides were used in Pinnacle3 for patient dose calculations, the planning target volume D95 value dropped from 99.3% to 82.7%. Monaco also showed decreased planning target volume coverage when plans were recalculated with correct density information. Full arc plans (with density overrides) for the patient with a bilateral prosthesis provided significant bladder sparing and some rectal sparing compared to skip arc plans.Conclusion:When planning for prostate patients with hip prostheses, correct density information for implants and surrounding tissues should be used to optimize the plan and ensure optimal accuracy. If available, a Monte Carlo algorithm should be used as a second check. Full arcs could be used to spare dose to organs at risk, while maintaining adequate planning target volume coverage, when using a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm.