Wildfires are complex phenomena with harmful consequences, ranging from environmental and property destruction to loss of human lives. In this sense, predicting wildfire behaviour is essential to mitigate its impacts and consequences. The Rothermel model is the most used fire rate of spread prediction model. However, input parameter uncertainty is a significant source of prediction error. In this paper, we propose the calibration of the input parameters of the fire propagation model by metaheuristic algorithms under a two-stage framework. The fire spread model consists on the Rothermel model in a two-dimensional approach for surface fires. The proposed calibration is performed in two stages iteratively repeated over time: (i) the calibration of the fire spread model’s input parameters and (ii) the wildfire spread prediction using the calibrated input parameters. The calibration was performed by the genetic algorithm, differential evolution, and simulated annealing, which calibrates the surface-area-to-volume ratio, fuel bed depth, live fuel moisture and dead fuel moisture. The symmetric difference between the real and predicted fire map shapes was defined as the fitness function of all three metaheuristic algorithms. For validation, simulations were done on two prescribed fires. The results for the real and estimated fire behaviour were then compared and revealed that all the tested metaheuristic algorithms produce a better fit to the real fire’s perimeter when compared to the uncalibrated Rothermel model. From the results, differential evolution provided the majority of best results when compared to genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithms in each scenario.
Read full abstract