Frequency Of Adverse Reactions Research Articles

Selective opioid agonist Taphalgin® as a component of postoperative analgesia in various surgical areas: “NIKITA” observational multicenter study

Introduction. The role of peptides in antinociceptive system regulation has became a subject of interest for scientists worldwide. The first registered peptide analgesic tyrosyl-D-arginyl-phenylalanyl-glycinamide acetate which currently can be used in clinical practice was developed in Russia under the name Taphalgin® (PharmFirma “Sotex”, Russia). The effectiveness and safety of this pharmaceutical in postoperative pain management was evaluated in the all-Russia multicenter prospective observation program NICITA (Non-interventional Clinical Trial of Taphalgin ®).Aim. To analyze the effectiveness and safety of Taphalgin® in postoperative pain management in various surgical fields.Materials and methods. The observational program NICITA included 887 patients including patients with malignant tumors of various locations from 15 study centers in different Russian cities. All patients underwent surgical interventions in various anatomical areas under general, regional and combination anesthesia. The principal scheme of postoperative pain management was based on the multimodal approach which included peptide opioid agonist alongside acetaminophen, cyclooxygenase inhibitors in combination with regional anesthesia or without it. The study also included patients who underwent small-volume surgeries, and pain was managed through Taphalgin® monotherapy with subsequent switch to cyclooxygenase inhibitors. The primary endpoint of the NICITA observational program was response to therapy after the first Taphalgin® administration. Decreased pain syndrome per the numerical rating scale 15–60 min after subcutaneous injection and maintenance of analgesic effect 3 h later were considered treatment response. The secondary endpoints included mean time to analgesia start after administration of the 1st single drug dose (in min), duration of effect, types and frequency of adverse reactions including serious in the central nervous system, pulmonary system, gastrointestinal tract developed during the observational program, as well as patient and research physician satisfaction with pain management. To evaluate the significance of pain intensity change at rest and in motion in time, analysis of variance with repeat measurements was used; for pairwise comparison of two time periods, Student’s t-test for dependent samples was used. The differences were considered significant at p = 0.05.Results. Statistically significant decrease in pain intensity in the total patient group was observed 15 minutes after Taphalgin® administration; it reached its minimum 40 min after the injection (р <0.05). The percentage of patients responding to analgesic therapy with Taphalgin® was 96.5 %. During administration of the drug, insignificant decrease (10–15 mmHg) in arterial blood pressure (1.7 % of cases) and vertigo (1 % of cases) were observed. In some patients, several adverse reactions were observed. Satisfaction with analgesic effect of Taphalgin® was relatively high both in patients and research physicians.Conclusion. Taphalgin® has pronounced analgesic effect and is effective for pain management after surgical interventions of various volumes and injury level. The use of this drug is associated with low rate of adverse reactions and absence of pulmonary depression characterizing opioid agonists. Therefore, Taphalgin® can be recommended for clinical use for postoperative pain management after various types of surgical interventions.

Drug-Associated Acute Kidney Disease: Data From a World Pharmacovigilance Database.

Background Drugs are a frequent cause of nephrotoxicity, especially in the context of acute kidney disease (AKD), with a significant number of cases being drug-associated. The WHO's VigiBase is a powerful tool for identifying drugs described and associated with the development of AKD. Methods We retrieved data from the period 1968 to 2022 regarding notifications of adverse drug reactions (ADR). The extracted medications were evaluated for their nephrotoxicity based on the bibliographic score (BS)developed through pre-selected references. The main medications involved were classified as 'non-nephrotoxic', 'potentially nephrotoxic', and 'nephrotoxic'. We utilized the IC025 and reporting odds ratio (ROR) disproportionality indexes to study the relationship between medications and the odds of being included in an AKD notification. Results During the period, a total of 33,932,051 notifications were obtained, revealing 435,677 cases related to drug-associated AKD following MedDRA term filtering, predominantly affecting males aged 45-64. We identified 8,991 active ingredients or suspected combinations associated with AKD development, with the ATC class A - Alimentary Tract and Metabolism being the most frequently described. Among the medications most strongly associated with this phenotype, classes J and N stood out. Among the most notable medications collected, 8.3% were classified as "non-nephrotoxic," 16.7% as "potentially nephrotoxic," and 75% as "known nephrotoxic." Notable active ingredients included cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil (IC025 8.7; ROR 786.96), inotersen (IC025 7.7; ROR 604.57), emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil (IC025 7.9; ROR 432.36), esomeprazole (IC025 6.8; ROR 184.23), and pantoprazole (IC025 6.3; ROR 109.86), with proton pump inhibitors dominating the top four positions among the most frequently involved medications. Conclusion AKD is a frequent adverse reaction in VigiBase, with a significantly high reported mortality rate. Evaluation of the notifications revealed medications with a high disproportionality index and a strong association with AKD. We also highlight the potential nephrotoxic role of less suspected medications. This study emphasizes the need to consider AKD as a condition potentially associated with iatrogenic etiology, highlighting various medications and their respective involvement in the various possible manifestations of AKD.

Systemic isotretinoin in modern clinical guidelines on acne management

Objective — to analyze the medical and technological documents developed on the basis of evidence­based medicine (guidelines, recommendations, consensuses) regarding the treatment of patients with acne of various degrees of severity with systemic retinoids (systemic isotretinoin preparations) dating from 2013 to 2023, as also to focus attention on the pharmacokinetic features of the original systemic isotretinoin according to innovative Lidose technology. Materials and methods. An analysis was conducted of clinical European guidelines (French guideline and those of the European Dermatology Forum), guidelines of the American Academy of Dermatology, the National Institute for Health Protection and Improvement of Medical Care (NICE) of Great Britain in conjunction with the British Dermatology Association and the Canadian Dermatology Association, recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the French Society of Dermatology, the International Consensus of the Global Alliance for the Improvement of Acne Treatment Outcomes, and consensus­based practical and daily guideline for the management of acne patients. The key words for the search were «acne», «clinical guideline», «consensus», «systemic treatment», «isotretinoin», «isotretinoin­ Lidose». Results and discussion. Clinical guidelines (2013, 2015, 2016) for the management of acne recommend isotretinoin at a dose of 0.5—1 mg/kg/day for 16—24 weeks to a total (cumulative) dose of 120—150 mg/kg for severe acne (nodular/conglobate acne). Low-­dose regimens of isotretinoin (< 0.5 mg/kg/day) have been used with varying degrees of success in the treatment of severe papulopustular/moderate nodular acnе. The International Consensus of the Global Alliance to Improve Acne Treatment Outcomes (2017) supports standard isotretinoin dosing for severe acne until the cumulative dose is reached. At the same time, for patients that have severe papulopustular acne, poor tolerance, risk of serious side effects, or rash regression before the cumulative dose is achieved it is recommended to continue taking the drug until the skin is completely cleansed of acne­elements and for additional 1—2 months. Such provisions are set out in the guidelines developed jointly with the British Association of Dermatologists (2021). According to the American Academy of Dermatology (2023) guidelines, standard isotretinoin or isotretinoin ­Lidose® is recommended for patients for whom isotretinoin is indicated, which is supported by high­quality evidence. Due to the Lidose technology, the soluble fraction of isotretinoin increases, while the insoluble fraction responsible for side effects, on the contrary, decreases. The bioavailability of the drug increases, which allows lowering the daily and course doses of the drug. Conclusions. Systemic isotretinoin has a convincing evidence base as highly effective treatment for severe and moderate forms of acne, providing a sustained therapeutic effect at standard or low doses. In current US guidelines, isotretinoin and isotretinoin­ Lidose® are recommended for the treatment of severe acne, as well as acne that causes psychosocial burden or scarring, or acne that does not respond to treatment with oral or topical therapy. The use of isotretinoin ­Lidose® due to extrabioavailability, high solubility, independence from food intake allows to obtain better clinical results, has a favorable safety profile, characterized by a minimal frequency of adverse reactions.

Managing systemic reactions and venom immunotherapy in vespid-venom allergy: observations from a retrospective study of Portuguese patients.

Background. Vespula spp. and Polistes spp. are relevant species in South Europe, with Vespa velutina nigrithorax (VVN) being considered a public health problem. We aimed to characterize a cohort of Portuguese patients referred for large local reaction (LLR) and/or systemic reaction (SR) to vespids. In patients treated with venom immunotherapy (VIT), induction protocol and frequency of adverse reactions were evaluated. Methods. Retrospective study including patients with LLR and SR to vespids referred to our Immunoallergology Department (2008-2022). Results. A total of 129 patients were evaluated, the majority were male adults (n = 77, 59.7%), from rural areas. From these, 51 patients had SR (Mueller classification: 7.8% grade I, 19.6% grade II, 37.3% grade III, 35.3% grade IV). We found no differences regarding the levels of total serum IgE, basal serum tryptase value, sIgE levels to the eliciting venom or their molecular components, regarding the severity of the SR that motivated the referral to our clinic. In the SR group, previous LLR Hymenoptera sting were reported in 15.7%. Thirty-eight patients (74.5%) initiated VIT: 22 with wasp venom, 14 with paper wasp venom and 2 with Vespa velutina venom. There was one mild systemic reaction, not requiring adrenaline and 4 LLR. Re-stings after VIT occurred in 16 patients, without any systemic or local reactions. Currently, eleven patients remain under VIT. Conclusions. Most vespid-venom allergic patients are male adults from rural areas. Sensitization to wasp venom was present in 52.9%, paper wasp in 33.3% and Vespa velutina in 13.7%. The frequency of adverse reactions during both induction and maintenance phases appears to be low. Despite a reduced sample size, our experience with VVN VIT, suggests its safety.

A phase II, non-comparative randomised trial of two treatments involving liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in India and Bangladesh.

In Southeast Asia, treatment is recommended for all patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). Adherence to the first-line regimen, twelve weeks of miltefosine (MF), is low and ocular toxicity has been observed with this exposure period. We assessed the safety and efficacy of two shorter-course treatments: liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) alone and combined with MF. An open-label, phase II, randomized, parallel-arm, non-comparative trial was conducted in patients with parasitologically confirmed PKDL, 6 to ≤60 years. Patients were assigned to 20 mg/kg LAmB (total dose, in five injections over 15 days) alone or combined with allometric MF (3 weeks). The primary endpoint was definitive cure at 12 months, defined as complete resolution of papular and nodular lesions and >80% re-pigmentation of macular lesions. Definitive cure at 24 months was a secondary efficacy endpoint. 118/126 patients completed the trial. Definitive cure at 12 months was observed in 29% (18/63) patients receiving LAmB and 30% (19/63) receiving LAmB/MF (mITT), increasing to 58% and 66%, respectively, at 24 months. Most lesions had resolved/improved at 12 and 24 months for patients receiving LAmB (90%, 83%) and LAmB/MF (85%, 88%) by qualitative assessment. One death, unrelated to study drugs, was reported; no study drug-related serious adverse events were observed. The most frequent adverse drug reactions were MF-related vomiting and nausea, and LAmB-related hypokalaemia and infusion reactions. Most adverse events were mild; no ocular adverse events occurred. Both regimens are suitably safe and efficacious alternatives to long-course MF for PKDL in South Asia. CTRI/2017/04/008421.

Real-life use of delamanid: results from the European post-authorisation safety study.

A post-authorisation safety study (PASS) on delamanid (DLM) was conducted as part of a post-approval commitment to the European Medicines Agency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of DLM in a real-life setting, its safety, and treatment outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). This was a prospective, multicentric, non-interventional study conducted in the European Union. MDR-TB Regimen selection and patient monitoring were conducted in accordance with existing medical practices. Data on the use of DLM, related adverse events, and treatment outcomes were collected for up to 30 months after the first DLM dose. Descriptive summary statistics were used for continuous and categorical variables. Out of 86 patients, one had extrapulmonary TB. Two-thirds of the patients were treated with DLM for more than 24 weeks. The most frequent adverse drug reaction to DLM was QT interval prolongation. Resistance to DLM was detected in one patient during treatment. The treatment success rate was 77%. No new safety concerns were revealed, including in patients treated with DLM for more than 24 weeks. QT interval prolongations were well managed and did not lead to any clinically significant cardiac effects. The treatment outcomes were in line with the WHO target for Europe.

Clinical Results of Asymmetric Blepharoplasty Plastic Repair.

To investigate plastic surgery repair's effects and adverse reactions in the clinical therapy of asymmetric double eyelids. All 126 sufferers who came to the hospital for asymmetric double eyelid plastic repair from January 2022 to October 2022 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into a control group and an observation group using the random number method, with 63 cases in each group, in which sufferers in the control group underwent full incision blepharoplasty and sufferers in the observation group underwent small incision liposuction with submerged sutures. The general data, treatment results, treatment satisfaction, related surgical indicators, and frequency of adverse reactions of the 2 groups of sufferers with asymmetric double eyelid plastic repair were compared. It had no statistically obvious distinction between the control group and the observation group of sufferers in terms of general data such as sex, age, weight, and height (P>0.05); the total therapy efficiency of the sufferers in the observation group (95.24%) was greater than the control group (74.60%), with P value <0.05; the total treatment satisfaction of the patients in the observation group (96.83%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (76.19%), with P value <0.05; compared with the control group, patients in the observation group had shorter operative time and healing time and less intraoperative bleeding, with P value <0.05; the total frequency of adverse reactions of sufferers in the observation group (4.76%) was less than the control group (17.46%), with P value <0.05. Small incision liposuction with submerged sutures for plastic repair has significant efficacy, relatively high patient satisfaction, and low incidence of adverse reactions, in line with patient esthetic review, which has a broad clinical application prospect.

One-Year Safety Evaluation of New Hyaluronic Acid Fillers (YYS Series): A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.

With the continuous increasing availability of new filler products, each hyaluronic acid filler brand has distinctive pharmacokinetics, which may be associated with different complications. Therefore, the long-term safety of new generations of fillers should be evaluated. This prospective, multicenter, observational, postmarketing study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04738019) aimed to investigate the incidence of delayed-onset nodules and adverse reactions after the injection of new hyaluronic acid fillers (YYS series) into the facial skin. Subjects scheduled to receive an injection YYS series filler were followed up for 52 weeks. The authors aimed to determine the incidence of a self-reported delayed-onset nodule-a visible or palpable nodule or mass at the injection site that was detected beyond the 14th day following the injection-during the 1-year follow-up period. Among the 1,022 subjects who received an injection of the YYS series, the incidences of delayed-onset nodules were 0% for YYS 360, YYS 540, and YYS 720. A 0.21% incidence (1 delayed hypersensitivity reaction) of a delayed-onset adverse reaction was noted for YYS 720, although none were reported for YYS 360 and YYS 540. In this study, a notably low frequency of adverse reactions associated with the YYS series was observed.

Ultrasensitive upconverting nanoprobes for in situ imaging of drug-induced liver injury using miR-122 as the biomarker

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a frequent adverse drug reaction. The current clinical diagnostic methods are inadequate for accurate and early detection of DILI due to the lack of effective diagnostic biomarkers. Hepatocyte-specific miR-122 is released from injured hepatocytes promptly and its efflux is significantly correlated with the progression of DILI. Therefore, achieving precise in situ detection of miR-122 with high sensitivity is vital for early visualization of DILI. Herein, a new nanoprobe, consisting of miR-122 aptamer, upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) and Prussian blue nanoparticles (PBNPs) was introduced for the early and sensitive detection of DILI in situ. As the nanoprobes reached in the liver, miR-122 aptamer-based entropy-driven strand displacement (ESDR) signal amplification reaction was triggered and luminescence resonance energy transfer (LRET) between UCNPs and PBNPs was responded to achieve the high-fidelity detection of DILI. A negative correlation was observed between the intensity of upconversion luminescence (UCL) and the concentration of miR-122. UCL imaging conducted both in vivo and ex vivo indicated that a reduction in miR-122 concentration led to an increase in UCL intensity, revealing a precise state of DILI. The detection technique demonstrated a positive correlation between signal intensity and severity, offering a more straightforward and intuitive method of visualizing DILI.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Intranasal Midazolam Administration for Antiseizure Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal midazolam (in-MDZ) administration for antiseizure treatment in adults. Embase and Medline literature databases were searched. We included randomized trials and cohort studies (excluding case series) of adult patients (≥18 years of age) examining in-MDZ administration for epilepsy, epileptic seizures, or status epilepticus published in English between 1985 and 2022. Studies were screened for eligibility based on predefined criteria. The primary outcome was the efficacy of in-MDZ administration, and the secondary outcome was its tolerability. Extracted data included study design, patient characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. A total of 12 studies with 929 individuals treated with in-MDZ were included. Most studies were retrospective, with their number increasing over time. Administered in-MDZ doses ranged from 2.5 to 20mg per single dose. The mean proportion of successful seizure termination after first in-MDZ administration was 72.7% (standard deviation [SD] 18%), and the proportion of seizure recurrence or persistent seizures ranged from 61 to 75%. Most frequent adverse reactions to in-MDZ were dizziness (mean 23.5% [SD 38.6%]), confusion (one study; 17.4%), local irritation (mean 16.6% [SD 9.6%]), and sedation (mean 12.7% [SD 9.7%]). Administration of in-MDZ seems promising for the treatment of prolonged epileptic seizures and seizure clusters in adults. Limited evidence suggests that intranasal administration is safe. Further research is warranted because of the heterogeneity of cohorts, the variation in dosages, and the lack of uniformity in defining successful seizure termination.

The Frequency and Structure of Adverse Drug Reactions in the Pharmacotherapy of Epilepsy

The problem of the safety of antiepileptic therapy due to the duration of treatment and the need for regular intake of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is extremely significant. Adverse reactions (ADRs) may outweigh any positive effect of therapy associated with seizure reduction. The purpose of the study: to analyze the frequency and structure of ADRs of AEDs. Materials and Methods: The work was carried out within the framework of comprehensive research on the topic No. 210-16 "Epidemiological, genetic and neurophysiological aspects of diseases of the nervous system (central, peripheral and vegetative) and preventive medicine" (registration number 0120.0807480). Results: The frequency of ADRs against the background of third-generation AEDs was not inferior to that against the background of receiving second-generation AEDs, while the structure of ADRs was different: third-generation AEDs had a higher incidence of ADRs from the central nervous system, including a worsening of the course of epilepsy. The ratio of the chances of valproic acid accumulation with the achievement of toxic concentration in the blood and the development of un-desirable side effects in poor metabolizers (carriers of the polymorphism of CYP2C9*2 or CYP2C9*3) the gene encoding the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 2C9 of the liver is 5.94 and 4.27, respectively. Conclusion: A personalized approach to ensuring the safety of valproic acid preparations based on taking into account the carriage of polymorphisms of the CYP2C9 gene allows to reduce the incidence of ADRs in patients receiving valproic acid preparations from 59.28% to 10.78%. The introduction of a personalized approach to the administration of valproates to patients suffering from epilepsy in the Krasnoyarsk Territory did not lead to an increase in direct costs.

Safety assessment of cenobamate: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.

This study aims to analyze adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with cenobamate from the FAERS database, covering the third quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2023. Data related to cenobamate-associated ADEs from the third quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2023 were collected. After standardizing the data, various signal quantification techniques, including ROR, MHRA, BCPNN, and MGPS, were employed for analysis. Among 2535 ADE reports where cenobamate was the primary suspected drug, 94 adverse reactions involving 11 different System Organ Class (SOC) categories were identified through the application of four signal quantification techniques. More specifically, neurological disorders and injuries resultant from complications are frequent adverse reactions associated with cenobamate. Our research findings align with established results, affirming the favorable safety profile of cenobamate. Effective prevention of adverse reactions induced by cenobamate can be achieved through the establishment of efficient blood concentration monitoring and dose adjustments.

FDA Approval Summary: Enfortumab Vedotin plus Pembrolizumab for Cisplatin-Ineligible Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

On April 3, 2023, the FDA granted accelerated approval to enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (EV) plus pembrolizumab for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Substantial evidence of effectiveness was obtained from EV-103/KEYNOTE-869 (NCT03288545), a multicohort study. Across cohorts, a total of 121 patients received EV 1.25 mg/kg (maximum of 125 mg) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The major efficacy outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR), determined by blinded independent central review using RECIST v1.1. The confirmed ORR in 121 patients was 68% (95% confidence interval, 59-76), including 12% with complete responses. The median DoR for the 82 responders was 22 months (range: 1+ to 46+). The safety profile of the combination comprised adverse reactions expected to occur with the corresponding monotherapies, but with overall increased frequency of adverse reactions, including skin toxicity, pneumonitis, and peripheral neuropathy. The article summarizes the data and the FDA thought process supporting accelerated approval of EV + pembrolizumab, as well as additional exploratory analyses conducted by the FDA.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib in 12 Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis and transcriptome analysis with peripheral blood.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent, pruritic, and localized eczema. Various types of new drugs have been recently investigated for treating AD. The efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in treating AD has been reported in clinical trials, but the real-world data from Japan has not been reported. Herein, we analyzed 12 Japanese patients with AD treated with 100 mg of abrocitinib using our real-world data. We also performed transcriptome analysis with peripheral blood to investigate the effects of abrocitinib on cytokine expressions and inflammatory pathways in AD from three patients. This study included patients with moderate to severe AD treated with abrocitinib at Gunma University Hospital, Japan. All patients were systemic treatment-naïve. All patients received a 100-mg dose of abrocitinib daily, and used strong or very strong topical steroids and moisturizers. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) response analysis revealed that after 4 weeks, 25% (three of 12) of the cases reached a 75% reduction in the EASI score (EASI-75) and a 90% reduction in the EASI score (EASI-90). After 12 weeks, 83.3.% (10 of 12), 41.6% (five of 12), and 16.7% (two of 12) of the patients reached EASI-50, a 75% reduction in the EASI score (EASI-75), and EASI-90. Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale was achieved in nine patients (75%) at week 12. The most frequent adverse reaction was acne (six cases [50%]). Gene Ontology pathway analysis using Differentially expressed genes from RNA sequencing analysis revealed attenuation of defense responses to biotic stimulus, virus, and cytokines. Th2 cytokine expression was not suppressed, but several chemokines, especially CXCL1, were suppressed by abrocitinib treatment. Our results indicate abrocitinib as a fast-acting and highly antipruritic agent that is effective for moderate skin eruptions.

The Dosing Strategy to Improve Adherence to Roflumilast in Treatment for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The clinical efficacy of roflumilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has been demonstrated in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, roflumilast has shown frequent adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study was performed to investigate the dosing strategy that will improve adherence to roflumilast in COPD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register. The dosing strategy for roflumilast was classified into a dose-escalation group and a low-dose group. We investigated clinical outcomes according to dosing strategy. Five clinical trials involving 2424 patients were included. Both the dose-escalation and the low-dose groups showed a decrease in discontinuation rate compared to the standard dosing group for roflumilast (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.97; P = 0.02 and RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80; P < 0.01, respectively). In the two strategies, the pooled proportions of discontinuation were 27.9% and 11.7%, respectively. Although the pooled proportion of any ADR was not statistically decreased in the two strategies, diarrhea was significantly reduced in the low-dose group compared to the standard group (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.82; P < 0.01). The pooled incidence of acute exacerbations was similar between the low-dose and the standard groups (22.9% and 20.1%, respectively; P = 0.27). Our findings show that the two alternative dosing strategies might have the benefit of improving adherence to roflumilast in COPD. Further large-scale trials are required to support our findings.

Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccines in Persons with Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A European Multi-Country Study.

In all pivotal trials of COVID-19 vaccines, the history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was mentioned as one of the main exclusion criteria. In the absence of clinical trials, observational studies are the primary source for evidence generation. This study aims to describe the patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following the first COVID-19 vaccination cycle, as well as the administration of booster doses of different vaccine brands, in people with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, as compared to prior infection-free matched cohorts of vaccinees. A web-based prospective study was conducted collecting vaccinee-reported outcomes through electronic questionnaires from eleven European countries in the period February 2021-February 2023. A baseline questionnaire and up to six follow-up questionnaires collected data on the vaccinee's characteristics, as well as solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions. Overall, 3886 and 902 vaccinees with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and having received the first dose or a booster dose, respectively, were included in the analysis. After the first dose or booster dose, vaccinees with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection reported at least one ADR at a higher frequency than those matched without prior infection (3470 [89.6%] vs. 2916 [75.3%], and 614 [68.2%] vs. 546 [60.6%], respectively). On the contrary side, after the second dose, vaccinees with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection reported at least one ADR at a lower frequency, compared to matched controls (1443 [85.0%] vs. 1543 [90.9%]). The median time to onset and the median time to recovery were similar across all doses and cohorts. The frequency of adverse reactions was higher in individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection who received Vaxzevria as the first dose and Spikevax as the second and booster doses. The frequency of serious ADRs was low for all doses and cohorts. Data from this large-scale prospective study of COVID-19 vaccinees could be used to inform people as to the likelihood of adverse effects based on their history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, age, sex, and the type of vaccine administered. In line with pivotal trials, the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines was also confirmed in people with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The effect of physical interventions on pain control after orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Pain is a frequent adverse reaction during orthodontic treatment, which can significantly reduce treatment compliance and compromise the expected treatment effect. Physical interventions have been used to alleviate pain after orthodontic treatment, but their effectiveness is controversial. This study used a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of various physical interventions typically used in managing pain after orthodontic treatment, with a view to provide evidence-based recommendations for representative interventions for orthodontic pain relief during peak pain intensity. A systematic search of six electronic databases, from their respective inception dates, was conducted to identify relevant literature on the efficacy of various typical physical interventions for managing pain after orthodontic treatment. Literature screening was performed according to the Cochrane System Evaluator's Manual. Stata 16.0 was used to assess heterogeneity, inconsistency, publication bias, and sensitivity to generate an evidence network diagram and conduct a network meta-analysis. In total, 771 articles were reviewed to collect literature on interventions, including low-level laser therapy (LLLT), vibration, acupuncture, and chewing. Of these, 28 studies using a visual analog scale (VAS) as an outcome indicator were included. The results showed that LLLT, vibration, acupuncture, and chewing effectively relieved the pain symptoms in patients after orthodontic treatment. At 24 h post-treatment, LLLT (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 80.8) and vibration (SUCRA = 71.1) were the most effective interventions. After 48 h of treatment, acupuncture (SUCRA = 89.6) showed a definite advantage as the best intervention. LLLT, vibration, acupuncture, and chewing can alleviate pain associated with orthodontic treatment. Among these interventions, acupuncture was found to be the most effective at 48 h after orthodontic treatment. In addition, acupuncture demonstrated long-lasting and stable pain-relieving effects. However, further studies are needed to determine the most suitable equipment-specific parameters for acupuncture in relieving pain associated with orthodontic treatment.

A Prospective Observational Study on the Prescription Pattern of Anticancer Drugs and Adverse Reactions of Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer

Background: Every hospital should conduct a periodic study of prescription patterns as a potential tool for determining the function of pharmaceuticals in society. Objective: The study’s primary goals were to evaluate prescription patterns and frequent adverse reactions in individuals undergoing breast cancer chemotherapy. Materials and methods: At the American Oncology Institute in Guntur, a prospective observational study was carried out. The breast cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent a six-month period of purposive sampling in a daycare centre. Information about the patient’s demographics, recommended medications, and adverse responses was gathered using a standard data collection form. Results: The study included 230 patients with breast cancer who, according to the study, were found to be in the 50–60year age range. Of the 230 patients, 117 had left breast cancer and 113 had right breast cancer; 226 of the patients were female and 4 were male. The most frequently used chemotherapeutic agent was cyclophosphamide (26%), which was followed by docetaxel (19%) and Adriamycin (14%). Adriamycin + Cyclophosphamide was the most frequently suggested regimen, followed by Docetaxel + Carboplatin + Trastuzumab. The most often reported ADR was nausea, which was followed by alopecia, fatigue, vomiting, and skin rashes. Conclusion: The medication most frequently prescribed was cyclophosphamide. ADR incidence was highest when cyclophosphamide and Adriamycin were used. Despite receiving prophylactic antiemetic medication, the majority of patients experienced nausea and vomiting. This suggests that more steps should be taken to prevent emesis, as these adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with antineoplastic medicines are typically avoidable. Keywords: breast cancer, prescription medications, anti-cancer drugs, breast cancer therapy, adverse effects.

An artificial intelligence algorithm for co‐clustering to help in pharmacovigilance before and during the COVID‐19 pandemic

AbstractAimsMonitoring drug safety in real‐world settings is the primary aim of pharmacovigilance. Frequent adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are usually identified during drug development. Rare ones are mostly characterized through post‐marketing scrutiny, increasingly with the use of data mining and disproportionality approaches, which lead to new drug safety signals. Nonetheless, waves of excessive numbers of reports, often stirred up by social media, may overwhelm and distort this process, as observed recently with levothyroxine or COVID‐19 vaccines. As human resources become rarer in the field of pharmacovigilance, we aimed to evaluate the performance of an unsupervised co‐clustering method to help the monitoring of drug safety.MethodsA dynamic latent block model (dLBM), based on a time‐dependent co‐clustering generative method, was used to summarize all regional ADR reports (n = 45 269) issued between 1 January 2012 and 28 February 2022. After analysis of their intra and extra interrelationships, all reports were grouped into different cluster types (time, drug, ADR).ResultsOur model clustered all reports in 10 time, 10 ADR and 9 drug collections. Based on such clustering, three prominent societal problems were detected, subsequent to public health concerns about drug safety, including a prominent media hype about the perceived safety of COVID‐19 vaccines. The dLBM also highlighted some specific drug–ADR relationships, such as the association between antiplatelets, anticoagulants and bleeding.ConclusionsCo‐clustering and dLBM appear as promising tools to explore large pharmacovigilance databases. They allow, ‘unsupervisedly’, the detection, exploration and strengthening of safety signals, facilitating the analysis of massive upsurges of reports.

Australian health care workers experience of PPE related side-effects. A cross-sectional survey.

Protection of health care workers (HCWs) is a fundamental aspect of an effective pandemic response. During the COVID-19 pandemic, frequency, and duration of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use increased. The experience of PPE-related side-effects has potential to contribute to decreased compliance resulting in breaches in infection prevention and increasing risk of HCW exposure. This study aims were to measure the frequency of PPE-related side-effects amongst HCW in Australia, and to establish if an increased frequency of adverse reactions was related to the significant increase in use and extended duration of time spent in PPE. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was used. Of the 559 respondents the majority were female (83.7%), aged 31-45 years old (33.6%). A pre-existing skin condition was reported by 266 (47.6%). Frequency of PPE related side-effects were: pressure-related 401 (71.7%), skin 321 (57.4%) and respiratory 20 (3.6%). Surgical mask use was significantly associated with pre-exiting skin conditions (β = 1.494 (SE 0.186), df (1), p < 0.001). Side effects to N95 respirator use was more commonly reported by staff working in COVID-19 high-risk areas (β = 0.572 (SE 0.211), df (1), p = 0.007) independent of work duration (β = -0.056 (SE 0.075), df (1), p = 0.456), and pre-existing skin conditions (β = 1.272, (SE.198), df (1), p < 0.001). The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a significant increase in the use of PPE. While the preventative benefits of PPE are significant, adverse events related to PPE use are frequently reported by HCW. Findings in this study highlight the need for innovation in PPE design to maximize protection while decreasing adverse effects and maintaining adhere to use.