There is a generally held perception that roads have neg-ative environmental impacts (Clevenger et al. 2003;For-man 2003; Roedenbeck et al. 2007). Ironically, thisparadigm stems from regions where fences and regulationsrestrict vehicles to paved roads. The situation is different insparsely populated rural areas in the developing world,where the scarcity of paved roads forces drivers to createtheir own tracks, often with considerable environmentaldegradation as a result. Arid and semi-arid regions, espe-cially those with communal land ownership and easilymotorable terrain, are particularly prone to this practice andthe consequent degradation is widespread—plaguingregions in Central Asia, the Middle East (Batanouny 1985),South America (Pe´rez 1991), and Africa (Rickard et al.1994). In such circumstances, the paradigm contradicts itsown purpose—paved roads here would in fact have apositive environmental impact, as they reduce the need for‘‘off-road driving’’.The land degradation that could have been avoided bythe construction of paved roads can be seen clearly insatellite imagery. We illustrate the destructive potentialthat this practice is having in Mongolia.Mongolia is a sparsely populated, landlocked countrywhich has seen an economic growth spurt since the 1990s.This growth has given rise to an increased need for trans-port by road, not just internally, but also internationally, toand from Russia and China. Yet, almost all vehicularmobility in this vast country relies on dirt-tracks—in 2008only about 2,600 km of the 49,500 km of the nationalintercity roads were paved (National Statistical Office ofMongolia 2008).The land degradation typically begins when repeatedusage renders an original track unsuitable for driving due tothe formation of washboard, ruts, potholes, and corruga-tions in the soil—a process facilitated by snowmelt, rain-fall, and sub-soil permafrost-thawing. Consequently, asystem of quasi-parallel trails is generated, denuding largeswathes of land (Fig. 1a). The communal land tenure tra-dition in Mongolia (a predominantly nomadic pastoralistcountry) and usage of rugged 4-wheel drive vehicles fur-ther compounds the problem, as there is practically norestriction to either vehicular movement or vehicle speeds.In addition to generating dust, which affects drivingsafety, the compulsory use of dirt-tracks considerablyincreases the costs of goods and public transport due toincreased fuel consumption and vehicle maintenancerequirements. However, for the low traffic densities foundon many routes here, these costs are small in comparison tothe environmental costs. The passing of vehicle-tires deci-mates native flora and fauna, and also degrades habitat(Brown and Schoknecht 2001). Moreover, vehicles compactthe ground, damaging its ability to absorb and retainmoisture and nutrients (Belnap 2002). In doing so, surfacewater flows are concentrated and speeded up, thus leadingto soil erosion, increased sediment loads in water coursesand consequently, damage to aquatic habitats and waterquality as well (Misak et al. 2002). Full re-vegetation ofdamaged swaths takes between 10 and 15 years after thetrack has ceased to be in use. However, the pioneeringplants are mostly invasive weed species, such as Tumble-weed (Salsola collina), Fringed sagebrush (Artemisia frig-ida), and Chinese wild-ryegrass (Leymus chinensis), and notthe native grasses such as Needle-leaf sedge (Carex duri-uscula) and Feather-grass (Stipa krylovii), that are socio-economically important to the indigenous pastoralists,
Read full abstract