In a first reading, the two articles comprising the Special Section “Qualitative Research to Inform Therapeutic Practice” seem to have little in common. The first, Vulvar Pain: A Phenomenological Study of Couples in Search of Effective Diagnosis and Treatment by Jennifer Connor, Bean Robinson, and Elizabeth Wieling (2008), examines a little known medical condition that may be affecting as many as 15% of women. The second, Shared Ancestry, Evolving Stories: Similar and Contrasting Life Experiences Described by Foreign Born and U.S. Born Latino Parents by Jose Ruben Parra-Cardona, David Cordova, Kendal Holtrop, Francisco Villarruel, and Elizabeth Wieling (2008), looks at the commitment to be good parents in two Latino populations. As I dwelled with these papers that I found so compelling, I realized that each utilized the research arena to challenge stereotypes and misguided beliefs. In so doing, each study has the power to bring new ideas and potential practices to the clinical arena. Both studies illuminate the ways that being a minority and experiencing discrimination shapes critical life experiences—sexuality and sexual relationships for women with vulvodynia and their husbands, and raising children for Latino parents. Both populations in these studies face troubling interactions with the very larger systems whose intended purpose is to help and to enable better lives—the medical system for women and their partners, and schools, social service and the workplace for Latino parents. The challenges for family therapists providing clinical services to couples struggling with the impact of vulvodynia on their relationship or Latino parents striving to be the best parents for their children include providing a safe place to acknowledge the impact of prejudice, erase blame toward self and partners, explore ways to persevere and flourish, and help to locate their dilemmas in a frame larger than the boundaries of their own relationships. The two studies are qualitative. As such, they offer us local knowledge and the voices of participants. Parra-Cardona and his colleagues suggest that their research process, focus groups, is itself an intervention, one that somersaults the usual power hierarchy of researcher and subjects. Citing work on focus groups with Latinos (Umana-Taylor & Bamaca, 2004), they tell us “focus groups can be empowering for people who hold less power in society and for those who have experienced discrimination, particularly because participants realize the role of researchers is to learn from their experiences rather than the researchers themselves being experts on the topic of conversation” (Parra-Cardona, Cordova, Holtrop, Villarruel, & Wieling, 2008). Connor and her colleagues reverse the usual research trajectory of small qualitative studies followed by larger quantitative investigations. After citing the few quantitative examinations of vulvodynia and its impact on women (none of the studies looked at the impact on partners or relationships), they proceed to utilize the qualitative method of transcendental phenomenology to “investigate the processes behind some of these quantitative findings” (Connor, Robinson, & Wieling, 2008). As one for whom numbers in quantitative studies always make me yearn for the voices of participants and their lived experiences, I am especially appreciative of this position and urge more of it. I am especially interested in the journal reviewing paired studies, which would give us both quantitative data on significant matters impacting family relationships coupled with qualitative and systemic investigations of the same circumstances, and leading us to speculate soundly and deeply on therapeutic implications and directions. Each of these studies call to our attention the myriad ways humans facing adversities—whether illness, migration, poverty, difference—develop resilient responses. For some, this includes a commitment to activism and to helping others facing similar circumstances. What are the ingredients that lead some to turn outward, serve as advocates and seek community, while others turn inward, guarding privacy, but potentially building a fence of greater silence and shame? I want to call for more studies examining this phenomenon in a variety of adverse situations for couples and families. Many found ways to develop a shared sense of meaning in their most important relationship. Since Family Therapy, regardless of specific model, should enable families to express and hold difference, leading to a larger context of shared meanings, we need more qualitative studies such as these two to point the way.
Read full abstract