T HE concept of the typical section is a two-dimensional idealization that allows for the synthesis and design of aeroelastic dynamic and control systems. It is usually modeled as an airfoil suspended by a plunging and by a pitching spring representing the structural dynamics of a typical wing section. Conventional airfoil sections are fitted with ailerons and trailing edge flaps which are generally hinged to the main section. In this study, we employ a continuouslyflexibleflap. Themechanization and actuation of such a flap, a model of which is currently being built and tested at Queen Mary, University of London, is accomplished by employing structurally embedded, multilayered, shape memory alloy actuators and active composites that are programmed to flex the flap into the desired shape. The structure is thus considered to be smart because it uses the sensor information to make decisions about how to modify its shape or other properties to improve the performance of the overall system. In this paper we consider the problem of active flutter suppression by employing such smart flaps. Could one expect that by introducing such a flexible flap, flutter can be more easily eliminated than by a rigid flap?To answer this question and to analyze the effectiveness of such a “smart” flap it is first intended to employ the flap as a feedback controller with an active feedback control law that is designed to actively regulate the structural vibrational amplitudes of the airfoil and thus suppress the occurrence of the flutter-type instabilities. To be able to actually establish the complete dynamics of a flexible flap airfoil, including significant but minimal aerodynamic vortex, wake, and interaction effects, we establish the idealized, incompressible potential flow based on unsteady aerodynamic generalized force coefficients for such flexible flaps by reconsidering the original work of Theodorsen and Garrick [1], in relation to hinged flaps. It is assumed that the continuous deflection of such flaps may be affected by means of a distribution of control effectors. It is further assumed thatmodal set point commands can be translated into a set of individual set point commands to these distributed actuators which would in turn deform the flap as in the desired mode. Such an assumption is now known to be valid for structures actuated by shape memory alloy (SMA)wire bundle actuators, which tend to behave as force-control integrators in the open loop. The methodology of optimal control is employed to obtain the relevantmulti-input–multioutput optimal regulation control laws and the relevant command signals that are needed to drive the actuators. Although it is always possible to model a flexible flap by a hinged rigid flap and tab combination, which has been thoroughly and completely studied by Nissim [2], there is sometimes a need to focus on the essential differences between a flexible and a rigid articulated flap. As pointed out by Theodorsen and Garrick [1] themselves, the latter suffers from a singularity in the pressure distribution at the leading edge of the flap. Although this does not significantly affect the hinge moment acting on the flap (or tab), it is important to ensure that its absence does not cause any detrimental effects in a flexibly actuated flap. This study shows that, while a flexible flap mode may not be as effective as a rigid hinged flap, the ability to deploy several control modes more than compensates the shortcomings. In fact, the multimode feature is an important aspect that is absent in a rigid flap. In a sense, the flexible flap is a natural generalization of the flap–tab combination.
Read full abstract